--
Hi. I'm a fan of the 1950s Perry Mason tv show. I'd like some
information on the props used in the show, particularly Perry's
office. So, if you're familiar with the program, could you identify,
say, the horse-head bas-relief behind the sofa, the abstract fish
painting behind the desk, the sofa and desk inself, the eagle and urn
on the credenza behind the desk, the curious tripod like
objects on the bookcase to Perry's right as he sits at his desk, ditto
the pig like figures, and so on and so forth.
I suspect some of these items are Eames inspired. What are good
sources for information about 1950s decorative arts that might help me
in tracking down information about these items - if any is to be got?
Thanks for any information you may be able to provide!
The show is currently being broadcast on The Hallmark Channel although that
may be coming to a close.
http://www.hallmarkchannel.com/framework.jsp?BODY=program.jsp&CONTENT=DAM_FAM_910146
It is also available from www.columbiahouse.com.
[I'm not affiliated with either.]
wd
In case you are not already aware of it, there is a fine Perry Mason
website <http://www.oz.net/~daveb/perry.htm> that will most certainly
identify Perry Mason discussion fora in which you might productively
ask your questions.
--
Marc Dashevsky -- Remove '_' from address if replying by e-mail.
Thanks for the pointer to the fan site. I've always loved the original
series.
The website does answer one of the original poster's questions, viz:
"Who is that bust in Perry's office? This question was first asked by Paul
in May 2002. In the Perry Mason novels, its Sir William Blackstone, the
famous 18th century British jurist. But, the bust in the TV show is not
Blackstone! On 11/1/02, Donna Bruce posted her answer on Howard Berlin's
Perry Mason Message Board. Its Voltaire! Some pictorial evidence can be
found here."
The set decorator must have had a very slim budget. I've always thought the
sets -- including Perry's office -- the least creditable thing about the
show. That incredibly ugly and cheap-looking paneling! The empty bookcases
in the outer office! The painting behind Perry is not much of a treat
either, as far as that goes.
I do find a lot of entertainment, however, in spotting the same elements in
episode after episode: the same paneling, the same curio stand, the same
lamps, etc.
--
Frank in Seattle
___________
Frank Richard Aloysius Jude Maloney
"I leave you now in radiant contentment"
-- "Whistling in the Dark"
When the show was being produced people only saw it on old 17" or 20"
tops B&W sets.
Even the best current non-HDTV 32" set with 3D comb filter is light
years ahead of TVs from the early 60s (or high-quality photos from that
era).
At the time it's unlikely viewers realized how tacky the set was.
C.
Most of the budget went toward Raymond's food.
>Thanks for the pointer to the fan site. I've always loved the original
>series.
Raymond Burr was once on Bob Costas' old late-night interview show on
NBC. I thought it was interesting how Costas handled the interview.
He divided the time asking only about three topics: Godzilla, Perry
Mason, and Rear Window. My favorite part, though, was when Burr laid
out the case that Perry Mason could have easily gotten the Rear Window
villain off. Burr had clearly given the matter some thought.
Bob Roman
My dad's home movies? You're kidding, of course?
(takes bow)
M S G
"Rich Ardini" <rea0...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Zblob.122686$a16.65078@lakeread01...
> In case you are not already aware of it, there is a fine Perry Mason
> website <http://www.oz.net/~daveb/perry.htm> that will most certainly
> identify Perry Mason discussion fora in which you might productively
> ask your questions.
Been there, done that. I was hoping against hope that a shotgun approach
might lead to some other sources of information.
(It is a good website, though. There's also a sorta private newsgroup,
too, which I think is referenced at oz.)
wd
Are you aware that you are crossposting to six different newsgroups,
five of which probably have no idea what you are talking about? :)
Dalin
> > In case you are not already aware of it, there is a fine Perry Mason
> > website <http://www.oz.net/~daveb/perry.htm> that will most certainly
> > identify Perry Mason discussion fora in which you might productively
> > ask your questions.
>
> Thanks for the pointer to the fan site. I've always loved the original
> series.
I think it's very entertaining.
> The website does answer one of the original poster's questions, viz:
>
> "Who is that bust in Perry's office? This question was first asked by Paul
> in May 2002. In the Perry Mason novels, its Sir William Blackstone, the
> famous 18th century British jurist. But, the bust in the TV show is not
> Blackstone! On 11/1/02, Donna Bruce posted her answer on Howard Berlin's
> Perry Mason Message Board. Its Voltaire! Some pictorial evidence can be
> found here."
I already knew about the web site and Voltaire.
> The set decorator must have had a very slim budget. I've always thought the
> sets -- including Perry's office -- the least creditable thing about the
> show. That incredibly ugly and cheap-looking paneling! The empty bookcases
> in the outer office! The painting behind Perry is not much of a treat
> either, as far as that goes.
The show generally had a very large budget although I don't know how it
was divvyed up. I do know Raymond Burr was paid fairly well. I don't
think the furnishings in the office are ugly per se although the african
(?) mask wall decoration isn't to my taste etc. From what I've seen
and learned of 1950s fashions, the office was probably considered fairly
trendy and modern.
I've read the paneling was cypress (pecky?) and I've seen color pictures
from the show that indicate it had a strong yellowish/gold color. I'm not
a wood expert, but if it is Cypress I think it's fairly desireable paneling
and not cheap.
I suspect that the coloration was useful for photographic (b/w) purposes.
The painting you refer to is abstract and in the 50s fashion. It's
some kind of a fish, I think. It's also in yellows, browns, and blues
as far as I can tell. There's actually a sort of joke about this painting.
Gail Patrick Jackson and others would periodically alter (overpaint) the
painting between epidodes or so I'm led to understand. SO it's always in
the state of transition.
> I do find a lot of entertainment, however, in spotting the same elements in
> episode after episode: the same paneling, the same curio stand, the same
> lamps, etc.
True. In early episodes a certain 18th century style secretary turns up
a people's apartments and homes with fair frequency and so on.
But back then I doubt people would have noticed (no VCRs, no repeats etc.)
wd
> > The set decorator must have had a very slim budget.
> Most of the budget went toward Raymond's food.
More likely it went to his salary.
wd
I don't have any idea, but based on your description of the horse
head wall ornament, I wonder if it might have been a Bosson head?
http://www.pricelook.co.uk/auction-bosson_head.html
Dink
--
N 30.21, W 97.81
"Women and cats will do as they please; and men and dogs should relax
and get used to the idea." ~~ Robert A. Heinlein
Good for Bob Costas! Exactly the three things he SHOULD have asked
about. I'm sorry I missed it.
> Are you aware that you are crossposting to six different newsgroups,
> five of which probably have no idea what you are talking about? :)
For one, plainly some people are aware since they've responded with
information - albeit already known by me.
Secondly, since Perry Mason was on TV in the late 1950s, it plainly
would be something that "fiftyplus" (assuming that's age) would be
aware of.
Thirdly, similar comments could be made for all the other groups
excepting, perhaps, "screenwriting".
wd
Cross posting is not considered newsgroup etiquette unless you inform
within your post that you are crossposting. Not everyone's newsgroup
client informs them when they answer a post that they are crossposting
and some would not wish to do that. It's just a matter of courtesy to
let people know your reply or original post is crossposted.
Dalin
Your posts are even more off-topic than the original in this thread.
Let it go. It has been a minor diversion, well-intentioned, and
hardly an egregious breach of netiquette.
You are still crossposting and not informing anyone. That IS a breach
of netiquette. Do you have a testosterone problem?
Dalin
You are the aggressor here. Lighten up.
Rec.arts.tv is the only appropriate group for the original post. The
fact that people in the music group know about Perry Mason doesn't mean
they want to read a lot of off-topic posts. Cross-posting seems always
to lead to unpleasantness sooner or later. Simple etiquette suggests
you avoid it.
--
--md
Remove xx to respond
> Cross posting is not considered newsgroup etiquette unless you inform
> within your post that you are crossposting. Not everyone's newsgroup
> client informs them when they answer a post that they are crossposting
> and some would not wish to do that. It's just a matter of courtesy to
> let people know your reply or original post is crossposted.
Consider yourself informed. ;-)
wd
> Rec.arts.tv is the only appropriate group for the original post. The
> fact that people in the music group know about Perry Mason doesn't mean
> they want to read a lot of off-topic posts. Cross-posting seems always
> to lead to unpleasantness sooner or later. Simple etiquette suggests
> you avoid it.
It's probably the most appropriate, but I wouldn't say that other
aren't. For instance, all of the principals and most of the people who
appeared in the show were in the movies as well. And so on.
Anyway, this wasn't a posting about penis enlargement, girls in
Thailand or what have you.
On the other hand, it seems to me that some people, well, I'll leave it
at that. ;-)
wd