>Why did NBC, in late 1992/early 1993 decide to take the 1991 - 1992 series
>"The Torkelsons" and create a 'sequel' to it in the form of "Almost Home"?
In fall 1992 _TV Guide_ said NBC was reworking "The Torkelsons" to appeal
more to urban viewers.
They did this by trying to convert it into a conventional sitcom. They
adopted a standard premise -- those were the years where it seemed like
half the shows on TV were based on some sort of combined or unusual
family situation -- and added some generic sitcom plots. They knew they
were going over well travelled ground (I recall a "Brady Bunch" reference
in one episode), but I guess the network said "conform or be cancelled".
A quote from Michael Jacobs: "By turning it inside out and showing the
loyal opposition to the Torkelsons' conservative upbringing, we hope to
get our old audience back and develop a new one."
As I recall, the ratings didn't improve.
> Also, while I have the floor, why is there no NG on the net just for this
>show/these shows?
There has never been enough discussion to merit a newsgroup. There really
isn't much to say these days about either show.
--
John Carr j...@tiac.net
I rather liked "The Torkelsons", in fact I saw the pilot episode on
the Disney channel yesterday. John S.
>It's too bad, because "The Torkelsons" was probably my favorite show when
>it was on, and has endured as one of my favorite "one season wonders". I
>think "The Torkelsons" succeeded where a show like "Ready or Not" tends to
>fail.
>
>"Almost Home", on the other hand, was an abomination to me when I heard
>about it, and I have actively avoided watching that bastardized
>incarnation of "The Torkelsons" ever since.
Well I wasn't so upset by the impurifying of Torkelsons. As much as I lved
the show I had some major gripes, one was there were way too many
children, most of the kids weren't very good actors (the ones that were
they kept) and I really was tired of Dorothy Jane being tormented, I lived
that kind of childhood, I didn't want to see another child go through it.
Why did I like Almost Home more? Well becuase it was supposed to be comedy
and it was. Torkelsons was very, very slow at times. It was an excellent
show and I really loved some episodes (not to mention the theme song) but
with so many characters it still seemed the writers couldn't think to do
with have of the cast.
Almost Home's real bright spot was the addition of Jason Marsden and
Brittany Murphy. Those two are really talented actors that I have enjoyed
for a long time, their antics were terrific, especially Jason's. One more
thing, it was more upbeat and funny. I could have cared less for the Perry
King and Connie (Rae I think?) relationship though. But I did like that
we learned more about her.
Neither show was bad, but I think that as to which is the better comedy,
Almost Home wins.
Pamela-Marie
*** Thank you The Disney Channel for putting "The Torkelsons" and "Almost
Home" on 7 times a week (6:30 pm California time), with a bonus 2:00 pm
episode each Saturday and Sunday).... please keep this schedule alive for a
very long time! ***
Pamela-Marie <pamel...@juno.com> wrote in article
<5mvmbd$166$3...@news4.snfc21.pacbell.net>...
Lisa or Jeff <hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote in article
<5mvlfo$h...@netaxs.com>...
On "Full House" he played a rich, caring, sensitive guy. I don't know what
show you were watching. Rich Halke, his character on "Step by Step" has
many more redeeming qualities than Gregory. I certainly think if you are
going to point fingers to an actor who consistently plays a wise guy, talk
about Tom Cruise.
Pamela-Marie
Pamela-Marie <pamel...@juno.com> wrote in article
<5n19fg$s56$1...@news3.snfc21.pacbell.net>...
>Well I wasn't so upset by the impurifying of Torkelsons. As much as I lved
>the show I had some major gripes, one was there were way too many
>children, most of the kids weren't very good actors (the ones that were
>they kept)
I thought if they wanted to drop two children they should have kept the
older ones. The characters were more interesting, and I don't think
they were worse actors. If the producers were determined to rework the
show and reduce the cast, they should have made Olivia Burnette's character
an only child. The parts of the younger children were not well written.
>Torkelsons was very, very slow at times. It was an excellent
>show and I really loved some episodes (not to mention the theme song)
I agree about the theme: good theme songs are rare in TV, and it was
one of the best. Slow isn't a problem for me if the show is good (for
example, _2001_ is one of my favorite movies).
--
John Carr j...@tiac.net
John F. Carr <j...@tiac.net> wrote in article
<5n3sn9$j...@news-central.tiac.net>...
>
> I thought if they wanted to drop two children they should have kept the
> older ones. The characters were more interesting, and I don't think
> they were worse actors. If the producers were determined to rework the
> show and reduce the cast, they should have made Olivia Burnette's
character
> an only child. The parts of the younger children were not well written.
>
The Torklesons was a classy show that really made an impact. Almost Home
looses that underlying feeling that made the Torklesons so effective.
As I remeber a reviewer writing. . ."I WANT MY OLD TOKLESONS
BACK!!!!!!!!!"
JonathanF2 <jonat...@aol.com> wrote in article
<19970624030...@ladder02.news.aol.com>...
>I wish I knew how Jeff Jarvis (the TV Guide critic) felt about either "The
>Torkelsons" or "Almost Home". He is always very opinionated I find!
I can't remember anything from Jarvis in particular, but I still remember
one line from the TV Guide 1991 fall preview section about "The Torkelsons".
The reviewer thought it was too sweet, like "maple syrup on marshmallows".
Some day I'll give that food combination a try...
--
John Carr j...@tiac.net