>>>> inconceivableI
>>>> that he knows North Korea and China better than Yeonmi Park does,
>>>> although it seems pretty unlikely. But hey, "I read in a book that
>>>> China
>>>> and North Korea are wonderful places" always trumps "I lived there and
>>>> know better", right?
>>>>
>>>> Park has clearly enunciated her concerns that the US, her new homeland,
>>>> is going the way of North Korea and China but I've watched several
>>>> dozen
>>>> of her videos over the past couple of years and I could not tell you
>>>> which specific ones contained those concerns.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's not so much that we're going the way of socialism, but
>>> authoritarianism. And I think we are unless sanity prevails.
>>
>> Socialism requires authoritarianism to work.
>
> No, not in a socialist democracy.
>
The problem is in how socialists define democracy. At the end of WWII,
with Eastern Europe very heavily damaged by both the Germans and the
Soviets, the Red Army "liberated" these countries and immediately set
about building new (Soviet-friendly) "democracies". Their immediate
priorities were to take over the radio stations and putting their people
at the top of the country's police, especially the secret police. Then
they created alternatives to the existing or re-emerging institutions of
that country that were Soviet-friendly. Initially, they assumed that
people would flock to the new versions of the institutions but were
shocked and dismayed to find very little interest in their institutions
so they set about making it impossible for the old versions of the
institutions to work. One of the first targets, surprisingly, was the
Boy Scouts. The new Soviet-sponsored heads of the local communist
parties feared ANY institution that they didn't control and dominate,
including the Boy Scouts - and many, many more, including charities,
anything affiliated with the church, etc. etc. They gradually demolished
all competition to their new institutions by arresting, torturing and
imprisoning - or executing - leaders of the old institutions.
In terms of politics, they initially tolerated opposition parties and
then had elections that were more-or-less democratic, fully expecting to
have the communist party elected by a majority. That didn't come close
to happening since many people were already distrustful of the
communists due to the pre-war and war years, so the opposition parties
were similarly crushed in very short order.
The communist leaders continue to blather about "democracy" but offered
nothing of the kind.
I strongly recommend Anne Applebaum's book Iron Curtain to get a good
look at what the communists SAID and what they actually DID. It will
shatter a lot of your illusions.
--
Rhino