[O'Reilly Factor] Bell Is Tolling for Far Left
Ubiquitous
Congress. On Monday, just 15 senators opposed bringing the compromise up for a
vote. Five of those are Republicans: Coburn, Sessions, DeMint, Ensign and
Voinovich. The other 10 are liberal Democrats, the usual suspects like Bernie
Sanders and Patrick Leahy of Vermont.
But the signature opposition to the Obama tax compromise comes, of course,
from the far left. And with yet another crushing defeat, the question is: Can
George Soros, Arianna Huffington, The New York Times and MSNBC even survive
much longer as credible enterprises?
It's clear the country has turned against the radical left. Even Obama has
figured that out. So guys like Howard Dean are in trouble, and when you're in
trouble, you often spin. Dean's current take on the tax compromise illustrates
that.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
HOWARD DEAN, FORMER DNC CHAIR: This is an inside Washington deal. Washington
politicians like it, but they're not really telling the whole story to the
American people. In order to get out of this deficit, which is really bad and
has been accumulating over 10 years, we're going to have to limit the growth
of Social Security, limit the growth of Medicare, cut defense and raise taxes
on people who make $1 million a year. You got to do all of those.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
Well, Dean is now speaking the truth. But wasn't it Dean and his crazy
far-left crew that encouraged the huge spending in the first place? I believe
so. Now the former governor of Vermont is moaning about it.
Is there anyone on Earth who thinks Howard Dean has suddenly changed into a
responsible fiscal policy person?
So, not only is President Obama now constrained in his social justice
spending, but the entire far-left movement in America has been marginalized by
the tax deal.
Americans see what's happening in Europe. They see countries like Greece and
Ireland collapsing under the weight of entitlement spending. They see what's
occurred in California, where there's a state of emergency because Sacramento
cannot pay the lavish union benefits and pensions that Democratic politicians
have championed for years. Americans see all that, and they know that far-left
governance does not work.
That is not good news for Barack Obama. Now his own political survival depends
on throwing away the social justice-income redistribution playbook and
actually looking out for all the folks.
Can the president do that? You make the call.
And that's "The Memo."
Pinheads & Patriots
As you know, Sarah Palin has a reality program where she runs around Alaska
doing outdoor stuff. For some reason, she invited Kate Gosselin to come along
on a camping trip. It didn't quite work out.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
KATE GOSSELIN, REALITY TV STAR: I don't see a table. I don't see utensils. I
don't see hand cleansing materials. This is not ideal conditions. I am
freezing to the bone. I have 19 layers on. My hands are frigid. I held it
together as long as I could, and I'm done now. I'm hungry!
(END VIDEO CLIP)
Now, we know -- we know -- you'll say Ms. Gosselin is a pinhead. We know that.
But we want to find out, just like with Al Sharpton last week, the margin of
pinheadedness. You can vote on BillOReilly.com.
--
It's now time for healing, and for fixing the damage the Democrats did
to America.
David Johnston
wolfagain
> Obama was never even remotely "far left"
Seriously, I never knew you were that stupid 'til now. I knew you
still lived with your mother and watched network TV as if it was
important, but...this post outs you as a moron. Obama is a closet
socialist...most liberal...far left president ever! Better stick to
your network TV shows.
David Johnston
> On Dec 20, 11:18 am, David Johnston <davidjohnsto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Obama was never even remotely "far left"
>
> Seriously, I never knew you were that stupid 'til now. I knew you
> still lived with your mother and watched network TV as if it was
> important, but...this post outs you as a moron. Obama is a closet
> socialist..
Meaning he's never actually done much of anything which indicates he's
a socialist but you know in your heart he is one, even as he props up
bankers and manufacturers and generally continues Bush's economic
policies..
Eddie Haskell
"David Johnston" <davidjo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f9a19d1e-6676-4541...@h17g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
> Obama was never even remotely "far left"
Hahahahahahaha!!!
Just say it. That will make it so.
The lies emanating from you dumbfucks have become even more shameless. Who
could have it possible?
Bah hahahahaha!!!
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
"wolfagain" <wo...@provide.net> wrote in message
news:e0080e27-fd48-45c3...@n2g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
You say he's stupid. I say he's lying.
But then, that's always the question with these leftist maggots.
Lying or stupid..
Lying or stupid..
-Eddie Haskell
Occidental
"In Barack Obama's book "Dreams from my Father" he tells about his
only job in the private sector and how he felt like he was "behind
enemy lines.""
Tom
From whom did you steal this article?
Tom
Barb May
Oh lookie. Another Obama quote taken out of context. How original.
Obama was only 22 years old and had been trying to find a job as a
community organizer because he wanted to help poor people. He couldn't
find one, so he had to take a corporate job because he had student loans
to pay. At the time, it seemed to him that he was working for a company
that exploited the very people he most wanted to help.
The idea that one can draw inferences about a 49 year old man based on
something he said he thought when he was 22 is ludicrous.
--
Barb
Tom
People like Ubi, wolfdung-gin, Idiot Mike, Eddie Haskel, et.al., are
so far to the extreme right, center and slightly left of center seem
like the far left to them.
Moreover, Charles Krauthammer would disagree with them and whomever
Ubi stole the article from...
From the Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/16/AR2010121604846.html
Righty Krauthammer seems to be hearing another bell tolling.
Tom
Eddie Haskell
"Tom" <drs...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:577418f6-fd00-4cdb...@29g2000yqq.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 20, 12:26 pm, David Johnston <davidjohnsto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 20, 10:56 am, wolfagain <w...@provide.net> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 20, 11:18 am, David Johnston <davidjohnsto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Obama was never even remotely "far left"
>
> > Seriously, I never knew you were that stupid 'til now. I knew you
> > still lived with your mother and watched network TV as if it was
> > important, but...this post outs you as a moron. Obama is a closet
> > socialist..
>
> Meaning he's never actually done much of anything which indicates he's
> a socialist but you know in your heart he is one, even as he props up
> bankers and manufacturers and generally continues Bush's economic
> policies..
> People like Ubi, wolfdung-gin, Idiot Mike, Eddie Haskel, et.al., are
> so far to the extreme right, center and slightly left of center seem
> like the far left to them.
The beliefs of the founders are "extreme right" to you.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
"Barb May" <bar...@nonofyourbusinessx.tv> wrote in message
news:4d0fc087$1...@news.x-privat.org...
I heard that he was a witch.
-Eddie Haskell
Tom
> "Tom" <drso...@aol.com> wrote in message
Yet, like the coward you are, you completely ignored the Krauthammer
column...
FTR, I've forgotten more about the intent of our Founding Fathers than
you'll ever know.
Tom
Eddie Haskell
No retort.
> FTR, I've forgotten more about the intent of our Founding Fathers than
> you'll ever know.
Still no retort.
Confirmation received.
Now, tell us again how the philosophy committed to the ideal of limited
government and liberty of individuals including freedom of religion, speech,
press, assembly, and free markets that founded this country are "extreme
right."
Moreover, tell us why you hate America, because that's really what you are
all about. You just can't say it out loud so you have to lie, smear and
character assassinate. That's the state of the modern liberal. You have no
choice because uttering the truth about your beliefs would be your death
knell.
-Eddie Haskell
Tom
> "Barb May" <barb...@nonofyourbusinessx.tv> wrote in message
Did Christine O'Donnell tell you that?
Tom
Tom
Yawn...
Tom
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never
reasoned into."
--Swift
Eddie Haskell
> Yawn...
No retort.
I win again.
> Tom
> "It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never
> reasoned into."
Thanks for the heads up. I'll not try to reason with you again.
-Eddie Haskell
trotsky
Krauthammer is a good writer--I can actually smell dog feces when I read
his columns.
Tom
What did you win? Can I see a picture of it?
>
> > Tom
> > "It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never
> > reasoned into."
>
> Thanks for the heads up. I'll not try to reason with you again.
You're implying you tried to reason with me in the first place. Saying
I hate America because I disagree with you isn't even close to a
reasonable statement.
Don't bother to reply, I'm out.
Tom
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
34> Newsgroups:
rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa
34> Oh lookie. Another Obama quote taken out of context. How original.
Oh lookie. Another off-topic posting in comp.os.os2.advocacy. How
original.
34> Obama was only 22 years old and had been trying to find a job as
a
34> community organizer because he wanted to help poor people. He
couldn't
34> find one, so he had to take a corporate job because he had student
loans
34> to pay. At the time, it seemed to him that he was working for a
company
34> that exploited the very people he most wanted to help.
What does that have to do with OS/2, May?
34> The idea that one can draw inferences about a 49 year old man
based on
34> something he said he thought when he was 22 is ludicrous.
What does that have to do with OS/2, May?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
2> Newsgroups:
rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa
2> I heard that he was a witch.
What does your gender mismatch have to do with OS/2, Haskell?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
22> Newsgroups:
rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa
22> Did Christine O'Donnell tell you that?
What does your question have to do with OS/2, Tom?
De Lurker
snip
I see that there continues to be a significant flux of off-topic traffic
into rec.arts.tv.
Tsk, tsk, tsk!
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
6> Newsgroups:
rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa
6> I see that there continues to be a significant flux of off-topic
traffic
6> into rec.arts.tv.
How ironic that you just added to it, Lurker.
6> Tsk, tsk, tsk!
"I see that torrents of off-topic posts continue to pour into
comp.os.os2.advocacy, half of them on the topic of politics and
half part of the big Seamus flamefest.
trotsky
> Obama was never even remotely "far left"
Exactly.
Eddie Haskell
I'll go you one better:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxAKFlpdcfc
> > Tom
> > "It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never
> > reasoned into."
>
> Thanks for the heads up. I'll not try to reason with you again.
> You're implying you tried to reason with me in the first place. Saying
> I hate America because I disagree with you isn't even close to a
> reasonable statement.
You hate America because you hate the principals of the founding.
Means you might have to get a job.
> Don't bother to reply, I'm out.
Yes, out of your fucking mind.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
"trotsky" <gms...@email.com> wrote in message
news:UvGdnaghWcpNNI3Q...@mchsi.com...
> On 12/20/10 11:18 AM, David Johnston wrote:
>> Obama was never even remotely "far left"
>
>
> Exactly.
And Karl Marx was right-wing.
-Eddie Haskell
Miles Evans
> "trotsky" <gmsi...@email.com> wrote in message
>
> news:UvGdnaghWcpNNI3Q...@mchsi.com...
>
> > On 12/20/10 11:18 AM, David Johnston wrote:
> >> Obama was never even remotely "far left"
>
> > Exactly.
>
> And Karl Marx was right-wing.
Another clueless rigthard.
For fuck's sake, don't you idiots have any pride?
Do you realize that the entire planet can see what a bunch of
ignorants you are?
Why do you enjoy it so much to look like a complete idiot?
To call Obama "far left" makes a much sense as calling Bush "nazi".
Miles Evans
Means you have nothing relevant or intelligent to answer.
Typical rightard.
Insults. That's all you have since you don't have the intelligence to
argue like a grown-up.
Eddie Haskell
"Miles Evans" <miles....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:57525657-ed09-48b3...@k13g2000vbq.googlegroups.com...
No retort.
> Typical rightard.
Insults, but still no retort.
> Insults.
Projection, but still no retort.
> That's all you have since you don't have the intelligence to
> argue like a grown-up.
More projection, but still no retort.
I win again.
Now, say it with me again. The principals of the founding are limited
government and liberty of individuals including freedom of religion, speech,
press, assembly, and free markets.
Every tenet being an anathema to liberals.
Verdict: Liberals are anti-American.
Now, STFU about it.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
That's because Lenin was a moderate, middle of the roader to you.
When your perspective is the far left, then the mainstream is radical
right-wing to you. The principals of the founding are radical right-wing to
you.
Mason Barge
<davidjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Obama was never even remotely "far left"
Of course he isn't. But why bother posting this? You're just going to
stir up the idiots from both extremes.
Eddie Haskell
"Mason Barge" <mason...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:36r1h61qltkdqm8fl...@4ax.com...
Thanks for the demonstration.
-Eddie Haskell
Tom
The founding what, idiot?
I don't hate America. Prove me wrong, douche.
>
> Means you might have to get a job.
I have a job, thank you.
>
> > Don't bother to reply, I'm out.
>
> Yes, out of your fucking mind.
Yawn... is that all you've got?
Tom
Eddie Haskell
> The founding what, idiot?
You're too stupid to know and then compound your stupidity by calling me the
idiot?
Nicely done.
> I don't hate America. Prove me wrong, douche.
Already did. You hate the principals of the founding so you hate America.
Now, that's your queue to bail from what you know is true by playing stupid
again. Why don't you just say "you're right" and get it over with? It would
be the same thing.
> Means you might have to get a job.
> I have a job, thank you.
Posting shit in UseNet for the DNC doesn't count. I'm talking about a real
job.
> > Don't bother to reply, I'm out.
>
> Yes, out of your fucking mind.
> Yawn... is that all you've got?
It's all I need.
-Eddie Haskell
Tom
Of the founding WHAT, you moron? If you mean Founding Fathers, then
say so.
Where in this thread did I say I hate the principals of the founding
whatever-you-think-they-are?
>so you hate America.
Again, prove it.
> Now, that's your queue to bail from what you know is true by playing stupid
> again. Why don't you just say "you're right" and get it over with? It would
> be the same thing.
You're not right. You're a righty and moron, but you're not right.
>
> > Means you might have to get a job.
> > I have a job, thank you.
>
> Posting shit in UseNet for the DNC doesn't count. I'm talking about a real
> job.
Yawn.
>
> > > Don't bother to reply, I'm out.
>
> > Yes, out of your fucking mind.
> > Yawn... is that all you've got?
>
> It's all I need.
Wanna bet?
Tom
Eddie Haskell
Look at 'em. Playing stupid again as a way out.
> Where in this thread did I say I hate the principals of the founding
> whatever-you-think-they-are?
You called me "extreme right" for believing in the principles of the
founding. That means you don't agree with those principles. So you hate
America.
>so you hate America.
> Again, prove it.
Again, just did.
> Now, that's your queue to bail from what you know is true by playing
> stupid
> again. Why don't you just say "you're right" and get it over with? It
> would
> be the same thing.
> You're not right. You're a righty and moron, but you're not right.
Oh, look. He's calling me a righty and a moron for believing in the
principles of the founding, thereby admitting that he hates America again.
Jolly good show..
> > Means you might have to get a job.
> > I have a job, thank you.
>
> Posting shit in UseNet for the DNC doesn't count. I'm talking about a real
> job.
> Yawn.
Got up early this morning at 2 pm, huh?
> > > Don't bother to reply, I'm out.
>
> > Yes, out of your fucking mind.
> > Yawn... is that all you've got?
>
> It's all I need.
> Wanna bet?
Sure. How about $100.00? Post the router number on your bank account and
I'll deposit it there as an act of good faith until this is settled.
-Eddie Haskell
Tom
The founding WHAT, you moron?
And you're also a liar. I didn't say that. Here's an exact quote of my
second post in this thread:
"People like Ubi, wolfdung-gin, Idiot Mike, Eddie Haskel, et.al., are
so far to the extreme right, center and slightly left of center seem
like the far left to them.
Moreover, Charles Krauthammer would disagree with them and whomever
Ubi stole the article from...
From the Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/16/AR201...
Righty Krauthammer seems to be hearing another bell tolling.
Tom "
And here's an exact quote of your reply:
"The beliefs of the founders are "extreme right" to you.
-Eddie Haskell"
I didn't say any thing about our Founding FATHERS until I replied to
your post above. Here's an exact quote:
"Yet, like the coward you are, you completely ignored the Krauthammer
column...
FTR, I've forgotten more about the intent of our Founding Fathers than
you'll ever know.
Tom"
So, now I've proven you're not only a moron, but a liar.
>That means you don't agree with those principles. So you hate
> America.
> >so you hate America.
> > Again, prove it.
>
> Again, just did.
No, you didn't. You lied.
>
> > Now, that's your queue to bail from what you know is true by playing
> > stupid
> > again. Why don't you just say "you're right" and get it over with? It
> > would
> > be the same thing.
> > You're not right. You're a righty and moron, but you're not right.
>
> Oh, look. He's calling me a righty and a moron for believing in the
> principles of the founding,
Founding WHAT, moron?
I'm calling you a righty because your political views are right of
center.
I'm calling you a moron because you seem incapable of typing the
phrase Founding Fathers.
>thereby admitting that he hates America again.
>
> Jolly good show..
>
> > > Means you might have to get a job.
> > > I have a job, thank you.
>
> > Posting shit in UseNet for the DNC doesn't count. I'm talking about a real
> > job.
> > Yawn.
>
> Got up early this morning at 2 pm, huh?
2PM is in the afternoon, not the morning, moron.
>
> > > > Don't bother to reply, I'm out.
>
> > > Yes, out of your fucking mind.
> > > Yawn... is that all you've got?
>
> > It's all I need.
> > Wanna bet?
>
> Sure. How about $100.00? Post the router number on your bank account and
> I'll deposit it there as an act of good faith until this is settled.
>
> -Eddie Haskell
You don't have $100.
Tom
Miles Evans
> "Miles Evans" <miles.evan...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Can't read?
>
> > Typical rightard.
>
> Insults, but still no retort.
Can't read?
> > Insults.
>
> Projection, but still no retort.
Can't read?
>
> > That's all you have since you don't have the intelligence to
> > argue like a grown-up.
>
> More projection, but still no retort.
>
> I win again.
Sure you wine : the biggest moron of the day.
Congratulations, yankee moron.
Eddie Haskell
There he goes again. Playing stupid as a way out.
> And you're also a liar. I didn't say that. Here's an exact quote of my
> second post in this thread:
> "People like Ubi, wolfdung-gin, Idiot Mike, Eddie Haskel, et.al., are
> so far to the extreme right, center and slightly left of center seem
> like the far left to them.
Why did you post proof that you said I was "extreme right" and then claim
that I lied?
> And here's an exact quote of your reply:
> "The beliefs of the founders are "extreme right" to you.
> -Eddie Haskell"
> I didn't say any thing about our Founding FATHERS until I replied to
> your post above. Here's an exact quote:
I know you didn't say anything about the founders. I did. I believe in the
principals that founded the country and you call that extreme. That means
you hate America.
> So, now I've proven you're not only a moron, but a liar.
No, you've proven what I said - that I am "extreme right." Yet you seem to
be too stupid to understand that.
>That means you don't agree with those principles. So you hate
> America.
> >so you hate America.
> > Again, prove it.
>
> Again, just did.
> No, you didn't. You lied.
You're lying.
> > Now, that's your queue to bail from what you know is true by playing
> > stupid
> > again. Why don't you just say "you're right" and get it over with? It
> > would
> > be the same thing.
> > You're not right. You're a righty and moron, but you're not right.
>
> Oh, look. He's calling me a righty and a moron for believing in the
> principles of the founding,
> Founding WHAT, moron?
Damn, can't stop playing stupid.
> I'm calling you a righty because your political views are right of
> center.
And my political views mirror those of the founders and you called me
"extreme right." That means you don't believe in the beliefs of the founders
and obviously hate America.
> I'm calling you a moron because you seem incapable of typing the
> phrase Founding Fathers.
See? You knew exactly what I was talking about and were playing stupid just
like I said.
Thanks for the confirmation.
>thereby admitting that he hates America again.
>
> Jolly good show..
>
> > > Means you might have to get a job.
> > > I have a job, thank you.
>
> > Posting shit in UseNet for the DNC doesn't count. I'm talking about a
> > real
> > job.
> > Yawn.
>
> Got up early this morning at 2 pm, huh?
> 2PM is in the afternoon, not the morning, moron.
You just got up so 2 pm is your morning, moron.
> > > > Don't bother to reply, I'm out.
>
> > > Yes, out of your fucking mind.
> > > Yawn... is that all you've got?
>
> > It's all I need.
> > Wanna bet?
>
> Sure. How about $100.00? Post the router number on your bank account and
> I'll deposit it there as an act of good faith until this is settled.
>
> -Eddie Haskell
> You don't have $100.
Then why did you ask me to bet?
Conclusion: Chicken.
Bock bock ba-cock!
-Eddie Haskell
Tom
I feel sorry for you.
Tom
Eddie Haskell
Well, at least you admit it.
>> > Typical rightard.
>>
>> Insults, but still no retort.
>
> Can't read?
Well, at least you admit it.
>> > Insults.
>>
>> Projection, but still no retort.
>
> Can't read?
Well, at least you admit it.
>> > That's all you have since you don't have the intelligence to
>> > argue like a grown-up.
>>
>> More projection, but still no retort.
>>
>> I win again.
>
> Sure you wine
You can't write either.
> : the biggest moron of the day.
Another nice admission on your part.
> Congratulations, yankee moron.
Yankee? Now you've gone too far.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
> <idiocy snipped>
>
> I feel sorry for you.
No retort.
I win again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIotIGFN2oc
-Eddie Haskell
Tom
> "Tom" <drso...@aol.com> wrote in message
What did you win?
Can we see a picture of it?
I still fee sorry you.
Tom
Eddie Haskell
On Dec 22, 5:23 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <pm...@asswu.com> wrote:
> "Tom" <drso...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:99082bf3-d811-4711...@y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>
> > <idiocy snipped>
>
> > I feel sorry for you.
>
> No retort.
>
> I win again.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIotIGFN2oc
>
> -Eddie Haskell
> What did you win?
Your reliance on your pretense of stupidity routine confirms that it's not a
pretense.
Thanks a bunch..
> Can we see a picture of it?
It's already been spelled out in black in white.
> I still fee sorry you.
That's because you are sorry.
Now, when do we get to hear about why you believe that the principals of the
founding are extreme?
Tom: Founding of what? I don't understand. Duh.. Drool..
Verdict: You've been nailed to the wall and there is no way out. The mighty
Haskell is victorious again.
-Eddie Haskell
De Lurker
> De Lurker <delanc...@harvard.nospam.invalid> writes:
>
> 6> Newsgroups:
> rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa
>
> 6> I see that there continues to be a significant flux of off-topic
> traffic
> 6> into rec.arts.tv.
>
> How ironic that you just added to it, Lurker.
How ironic that you just added to it too.
Actually, on review, it looks like nearly ALL of your posts are off-topic
posts complaining about off-topic posts, so it's really quite remarkable
that you'd call MINE "ironic" for doing likewise -- it seems to be that
the irony's on you, tholen!
> 6> Tsk, tsk, tsk!
>
> "I see that torrents of off-topic posts continue to pour into
> comp.os.os2.advocacy, half of them on the topic of politics and half
> part of the big Seamus flamefest.
Yes, well, the trolls have hit more newsgroups than just rec.arts.tv. I'm
mainly concerned with rec.arts.tv.
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
7> Newsgroups:
rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa
7> How ironic that you just added to it too.
Where is the alleged irony, Lurker? I didn't make the remark
about the flux of off-topic traffic into rec.arts.tv, Lurker;
rather, you did.
7> Actually, on review, it looks like nearly ALL of your posts are off-
topic
7> posts complaining about off-topic posts,
What does your hallucination have to do with OS/2, Lurker?
7> so it's really quite remarkable
7> that you'd call MINE "ironic" for doing likewise -- it seems to be
that
7> the irony's on you, tholen!
What does your hallucination have to do with OS/2, Lurker?
7> Yes, well, the trolls have hit more newsgroups than just
rec.arts.tv. I'm
7> mainly concerned with rec.arts.tv.
What does your main concern have to do with OS/2, Lurker?
De Lurker
> De Lurker <delanc...@harvard.nospam.invalid> writes:
>
> 7> Newsgroups:
> rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa
>
> 7> How ironic that you just added to it too.
>
> Where is the alleged irony, Lurker? I didn't make the remark about the
> flux of off-topic traffic into rec.arts.tv, Lurker; rather, you did.
But you did remark about the flux of off-topic traffic into
comp.os.os2.advocacy.
Indeed, you do little else BUT remark about the flux of off-topic traffic
into comp.os.os2.advocacy.
> 7> Actually, on review, it looks like nearly ALL of your posts are off-
> topic
> 7> posts complaining about off-topic posts,
>
> What does your hallucination
I'm sorry, but you must have confused me with someone who *has*
hallucinations.
Please rewrite and address to the appropriate party.
(Insult returned to sender as undeliverable.)
> 7> so it's really quite remarkable
> 7> that you'd call MINE "ironic" for doing likewise -- it seems to be
> that
> 7> the irony's on you, tholen!
>
> What does your hallucination have to do with OS/2, Lurker?
I'm sorry, but you must have confused me with someone who *has*
hallucinations.
Please rewrite and address to the appropriate party.
(Insult returned to sender as undeliverable.)
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
11> Newsgroups:
rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa
11> But you did remark about the flux of off-topic traffic into
11> comp.os.os2.advocacy.
I've asked questions about what a posting in comp.os.os2.advocacy
has to do with OS/2, Lurker.
11> Indeed, you do little else BUT remark about the flux of off-topic
traffic
11> into comp.os.os2.advocacy.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Recently, however,
most of the traffic in comp.os.os2.advocacy has nothing obviously
related to OS/2, Lurker.
11> I'm sorry, but you must have confused me with someone who *has*
11> hallucinations.
Not at all, Lurker, given that you've not been able to see the
relevance of OS/2 to OS/2.
11> Please rewrite and address to the appropriate party.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
11> (Insult returned to sender as undeliverable.)
Non sequitur.
11> I'm sorry, but you must have confused me with someone who *has*
11> hallucinations.
Not at all, Lurker, given that you've not been able to see the
relevance of OS/2 to OS/2.
11> Please rewrite and address to the appropriate party.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
11> (Insult returned to sender as undeliverable.)
Non sequitur.
De Lurker
> De Lurker <delanc...@harvard.nospam.invalid> writes:
>
> 11> Newsgroups:
> rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa
>
> 11> But you did remark about the flux of off-topic traffic into 11>
> comp.os.os2.advocacy.
>
> I've asked questions about what a posting in comp.os.os2.advocacy has to
> do with OS/2, Lurker.
Exactly.
> 11> Indeed, you do little else BUT remark about the flux of off-topic
> traffic
> 11> into comp.os.os2.advocacy.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Is not!
> Recently, however, most of the traffic in comp.os.os2.advocacy has
> nothing obviously related to OS/2, Lurker.
That'd be the crows coming home to roost, Tholen.
> 11> I'm sorry, but you must have confused me with someone who *has* 11>
> hallucinations.
>
> Not at all, Lurker
Sure you have. You wrote something for someone who hallucinates. I do not
hallucinate, ergo you mis-addressed what you wrote.
> 11> Please rewrite and address to the appropriate party.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
I don't think so.
> 11> (Insult returned to sender as undeliverable.)
>
> Non sequitur.
Oh, you just WISH it didn't make sense.
> 11> I'm sorry, but you must have confused me with someone who *has* 11>
> hallucinations.
>
> Not at all, Lurker
Sure you have. You wrote something for someone who hallucinates. I do not
hallucinate, ergo you mis-addressed what you wrote.
> 11> Please rewrite and address to the appropriate party.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
I don't think so.
> 11> (Insult returned to sender as undeliverable.)
>
> Non sequitur.
Oh, you just WISH it didn't make sense.
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
16> Newsgroups:
rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa
16> Exactly.
That's not the same thing as remarking on the flux, Lurker.
16> Is not!
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
16> That'd be the crows coming home to roost, Tholen.
Classic ambiguity.
16> Sure you have. You wrote something for someone who hallucinates.
As you did when you couldn't see the connection between OS/2 and
OS/2, Lurker.
16> I do not hallucinate,
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
16> ergo you mis-addressed what you wrote.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
16> I don't think so.
What does your uncertainty have to do with OS/2, Lurker?
16> Oh, you just WISH it didn't make sense.
What does your hallucination have to do with OS/2, Lurker?
16> Sure you have. You wrote something for someone who hallucinates.
As you did when you couldn't see the connection between OS/2 and
OS/2, Lurker.
16> I do not hallucinate,
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
16> ergo you mis-addressed what you wrote.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
16> I don't think so.
What does your uncertainty have to do with OS/2, Lurker?
16> Oh, you just WISH it didn't make sense.
Sulfide Eater
> tho...@antispam.ham writes:
>> De Lurker<delanc...@harvard.nospam.invalid> writes:
>> 16> Exactly.
>> That's not the same thing as remarking on the flux, Lurker.
>
>
>> 16> Is not!
>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>
>> 16> That'd be the crows coming home to roost, Tholen.
>> Classic ambiguity.
>
> shit, and as a result people are deliberately adding
> comp.os.os2.advocacy to their crossposts just to tweak your nose.
>
>> 16> Sure you have. You wrote something for someone who hallucinates.
>> As you did
>
>
>> 16> I do not hallucinate,
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> erroneous claim".
>
>> 16> ergo you mis-addressed what you wrote.
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>
>> 16> Oh, you just WISH it didn't make sense.
>> What does your hallucination have to do with OS/2, Lurker?
>
> Tholen.
>
>> 16> Sure you have. You wrote something for someone who hallucinates.
>> As you did
>
>
>> 16> I do not hallucinate,
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> erroneous claim".
>
>> 16> ergo you mis-addressed what you wrote.
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>
>> 16> Oh, you just WISH it didn't make sense.
>> What does your hallucination have to do with OS/2, Lurker?
>
> Tholen.
>
> Now get your off-topic traffic the hell out of rec.arts.tv!!
Yeah, you go, De Lurker!
Teach that nasty tholenbot who's boss!
Go!
Go Lurker!
Go!
Go Lurker!
Go!
Go Lurker!
Go!
Go Lurker!
Go!
Go Lurker!
Go!
Go Lurker!
Go!
Go Lurker!
Go!
Go Lurker!
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
54> Newsgroups:
rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa
54> Yeah, you go, De Lurker!
What does your response to Lurker have to do with OS/2, Eater?
54> Teach that nasty tholenbot who's boss!
Who is "tholenbot", Eater? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias.
54> Go!
What does that have to do with OS/2, Eater?
54> Go Lurker!
What does your response to Lurker have to do with OS/2, Eater?
54> Go!
What does that have to do with OS/2, Eater?
54> Go Lurker!
What does your response to Lurker have to do with OS/2, Eater?
54> Go!
What does that have to do with OS/2, Eater?
54> Go Lurker!
What does your response to Lurker have to do with OS/2, Eater?
54> Go!
What does that have to do with OS/2, Eater?
54> Go Lurker!
What does your response to Lurker have to do with OS/2, Eater?
54> Go!
What does that have to do with OS/2, Eater?
54> Go Lurker!
What does your response to Lurker have to do with OS/2, Eater?
54> Go!
What does that have to do with OS/2, Eater?
54> Go Lurker!
What does your response to Lurker have to do with OS/2, Eater?
54> Go!
What does that have to do with OS/2, Eater?
54> Go Lurker!
What does your response to Lurker have to do with OS/2, Eater?
54> Go!
What does that have to do with OS/2, Eater?
54> Go Lurker!
What does your response to Lurker have to do with OS/2, Eater?