The most recent example (for me) is his book "Arguing With Idiots".
Doesn't he recognize that the uniform he wears on the dust jacket is
very reminescent of the Nazis? You'd think that he wouldn't want to
give his detractors such an opening. Or is it something more sinister:
He's appealing to the subconcious of the kind of person who is turned on
by such appearances of authority?
Add your 25-cent psychological analysis here ...
Charlie
--
All the world's a stage, and most
of us are desperately unrehearsed. Sean O'Casey
Honestly...I just saw that book the other day and observing the cover and
the blurbs, it took a few minutes to determine if it was not a parody. I
really thought it was a hatchet job being done against him. There is
definitely something seriously wrong with him. As well as with his
followers. I once thought it was all an act...a cynical ploy to make
millions. I don't know anymore. I think he is insane.
>> Add your 25-cent psychological analysis here ...
>Honestly...I just saw that book the other day and observing the cover and
>the blurbs, it took a few minutes to determine if it was not a parody. I
>really thought it was a hatchet job being done against him. There is
>definitely something seriously wrong with him. As well as with his
>followers. I once thought it was all an act...a cynical ploy to make
>millions. I don't know anymore. I think he is insane.
How about Michelle Malkin? The Asian Ann Coulter. LOL.
I really haven't gotten deeper than assuming these people just
say/write that stuff because it makes them literally millions.
Then they stop sleeping well and go crazy. :-)
I am particularly interested in what M. Malkin's Rhodes Scholar hubby
thinks of her work.
Glenn Beck is an actor. His act is no more real than Stephen
Colbert's.
He is annoying because he enjoys getting under people's skin.
I don't like him because he's a phony. He's no Nazi. Nazis were
reptilian but alas
they were not kidding.
I have the choice NOT TO WATCH HIM. And I don't. You take Beck or any
rabble-rouser
on EITHER side seriously (I'm thinking as far back as the Hoffman-
Rubin "Politics of the put-on" of forty years ago)
and you invest them with more importance than they deserve.
The fact that you're talking about him indicates that what he does
works.
Stop talking about him. I stopped talking about Beck, Maddow, Olberman
and Hannity a long time ago, and their
opinions and behavior mean nothing to me.
You woudn't know a Nazi unless they were shoving you into the
showers...Why is it from global warming propaganda to political
discourse, liberals always exaggerate? Is it because it's part of the
structure of leftist propaganda?
Well it should. He may be putting on an act...or not...but he certainly IS
representative of many loons in this country today. People that are veering
into fairly dangerous territory and becoming violent in their own paranoid
delusions. It's very chilling to hear the hatred and anger in many of these
folks, and creeps like Beck and Rush who likely don't believe half of their
own balderdash are fanning the flames. I doubt many believed it was
possible for the Nazi's to ramp up the hate the way they did in pre-WWII
Germany either...until it was too late that is. Ignore at our own risk.
"Why is it liberals always exaggerate?" You don't see the delicious
irony in that sentence, do you? :)
If assassination happens, it will undoubtedly be committed by some
Rush- or Glenn-loving reichtard. Actually, I think it's a matter of
"when," not "if."
It's happened already. When that doctor was murdered. "Tiller The
Baby-Killer!" as O'Reilly gleefully dubbed him. That doesn't count
those three cops in Pittsburgh, and other acts of random right-wing
violence cause "Obama's gonna take our guns!"
> I wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > The most recent example (for me) is his book "Arguing With
> > Idiots". Doesn't he recognize that the uniform he wears on the dust
> > jacket is very reminescent of the Nazis? You'd think that he
> > wouldn't want to give his detractors such an opening. Or is it
> > something more sinister: He's appealing to the subconcious of the
> > kind of person who is turned on by such appearances of authority?
> >
> > ...
> >
>
> Honestly...I just saw that book the other day and observing the cover and
> the blurbs, it took a few minutes to determine if it was not a parody. I
> really thought it was a hatchet job being done against him. There is
> definitely something seriously wrong with him. As well as with his
> followers. I once thought it was all an act...a cynical ploy to make
> millions. I don't know anymore. I think he is insane.
Has anybody read enough of the book to know if the cover (uniform)
is at all relevant to the contents? I certainly haven't and I don't
plan to. It's an application of the Nixonian "Don't buy books from
crooks" idea. I don't want to support his getting even a couple of
dollars richer
Well, when even the blurb on the back cover makes no sense at all...it
hardly seems worth the effort to go inside. I wouldn't bother to read it if
it were offered free of charge. For anyone who hasn't seen this...
http://www.popdecay.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/glenn-beck-book-cover-323x400.jpg
Yeah. Bob and Carole come to mind.
And I can't think of anyone who wouldn't turn Bob down.
so much insanity in the world today
Is Trotsky getting jealous?
Is "Not Sure" that douche who's always posting about "try not to cry"?
When I go to sleep at night, I pray to God to help that poor,
unfortunate soul, and make him less pathetic and, if it is God's will,
to bestow upon said douche AN IMAGINATION, for no one on the entire
internet is quite so lacking in one as the "try not to cry" man.
Strangely, he seems to alternate between "try not to cry" and "continue
wailing/sobbing". He's as stupid as a bag of hammers.
Ubi doesn't bother me. And when's the last time TNTC posted something
accurate and interesting about Sandra Lee?
I have an easy time looking past things, perhaps. I don't expect Ubi
and I will ever see eye to eye on politics, so I look past that aspect
of his postings. Nobody else posts such great stuff about Sandra Lee,
whom I find at least as destructive an influence on society as Bush/
Republicanism, and Ubi's who goes out and finds that stuff and brings
it here. I hate Sandra Lee much more than I hate any of a bunch of
internet newsgroup posters, so Ubi gets a pass, I guess you'd say.
I have none.
(singing)
Look at me
I'm Sandra Lee
Lousy with
um
we need a 4 syllable word for 'food poisoning' that rhymes with
'virginity'
--
Tiger Woods has just been named "Athlete of the Decade"
His chosen event? The Broad Jump.
e.colinity--no, it has five. But it works if you say it fast.
ooo, I like it!
I'll even subsitute 'full of' for 'lousy with' just to make it fit
:)
>Doesn't he recognize that the uniform he wears on the dust jacket is
>very reminescent of the Nazis?
Godwin's Law violation noted. Get back to us when you have a real
argument to make.
--
It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with which
the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to turn
our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire. Too bad
for them, it's failing.
Godwin's Law = rhetoreich
Why is it that liberals think ersonal attacks amount to a valid
argument? You sound like me 8-year-old nephew. "I hate you! You
have cooties!" except you replaced cooties with a mental disease.
Very child-like.
>>>It is exhausting watching him.
Funny? I have no problem following his arguments whatsoever. Maybe
that's why you need to yell "Beck's got cooties!" rather than engage
in a logic-based, adult, mature conversation.
Beck is wearing a RUSSIAN uniform. Don't insult the Russians by
comparing them to Nazis - Germany would have won the war, if not for
the bravery of the Russians pushing them back.
>Godwin's Law = rhetoreich
No, it's doing the reich thing.
--
It's now time for healing, and for fixing the damage the Democrats did
to America.
Today he was doing one on the radio whereby he "proved" that someone,
I forget who, in Congress "thinks Congress is God" because he made a
speech in which he described adequate health care as "an inalienable
right." Beck argued that since it's not up there in the constitution
with "our right to own guns," that Congress is declaring itself "God"
because only God can ordain one with inalienable rights.
I'm, like, "God actually told Thomas Jefferson, et al, that owning a
gun was an inalienable right?" Yeah. Right.
Do you know of a website that has good illustrations of
Soviet/Russian uniforms? When I first saw the dust jacket, the Soviet
army was what came first to my mind. However, something doesn't look
quite right to me, although I'm no expert on military uniforms of any
country. For example, because of the way the picture is cropped I can't
see the star on the front of the hat.
If it really is a Soviet/Russian uniform, that's even more bizarre
for Beck than my first guess that he was alluding to the Nazis.
I doubt that many Americans are aware of the Soviet Union's
contributions in WWII, even after you get past the nasty detail of the
Molotov-Ribbentrop pact. As important as those contributions were, it
will be difficult to argue that Germany would have won without them. It
certainly would have been a quite different war though.
Charlie
--
All the world's a stage, and most
of us are desperately unrehearsed. Sean O'Casey