Re: My Comings and Goings

["The Great One"]

"Alan Sailsbury" <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote in message news:OsWdnS_686Snf5bW...@bt.com...
> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> > Alan Sailsbury wrote:
> >> john smith wrote:
> >>> "Alan Sailsbury" <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote in message
> >>> news:yuOdnarkI50vp5bW...@bt.com...
> >>>> John Fleming wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:33:30 -0500, while chained to a desk
> >>>>> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> >>>>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> $The Doctor wrote:
> >>>>>> $> In article <heci1...@news2.newsguy.com>,
> >>>>>> $> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> $>> The Doctor wrote:
> >>>>>> $>>> In article <Eo6dnScJbvqGXpTW...@scnresearch.com>,
> >>>>>> $>>> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> >>>>>> $>>>> "Mr.Smartypants" <bc...@canada.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>> $>>>>
> >>>>>> news:55b835b3-2c8d-4983...@13g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> $>>>> On Nov 18, 8:13 am, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> >>>>>> $>>>>> John Fleming wrote:
> >>>>>> $>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:10:41 -0500, while chained to a desk
> >>>>>> $>>>>>> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> >>>>>> $>>>>>> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> $>>>>>>> $The Doctor wrote:
> >>>>>> $>>>>>>> $>
> >>>>>> $>>>>>>> $> Pandora troll for you P.A.P.
> >>>>>> $>>>>>>> $
> >>>>>> $>>>>>>> $
> >>>>>> $>>>>>>> $ Pandora is perfectly lovely, and well behaved, usenet
> >>>>>> poster.
> >>>>>> $>>>>>> Pandora makes a wonderful contribution to the newsgroup, and
> >>>>>> $>>>>>> I really enjoy sharing ideas with her.
> >>>>>> $>>>>>> This newsgroup would be so dull if everyone thought like the
> >>>>>> $>>>>>> doctor.
> >>>>>> $>>>>> Absolutely true. I don't understand Yads' animosity to
> >>>>>> Pandora.
> >>>>>> $>>>>> Continually calling her a "whore" just because she doesn't
> >>>>>> share his
> >>>>>> $>>>>> p.o.v. is a new low even for him.-
> >>>>>> $>>>> I think it has a lot to do with his opinion of women in
> >>>>>> general and
> >>>>>> $>>>> his perceived role they should play.
> >>>>>> $>>>>
> >>>>>> $>>>> To him it's inconceivable that Pandora (or any woman) should
> >>>>>> have any
> >>>>>> $>>>> thoughts or opinions of her own; therefore she *must* be
> >>>>>> controlled by
> >>>>>> $>>>> someone, that someone being a man, and that man being *you*.
> >>>>>> Of course
> >>>>>> $>>>> any woman being controlled by any man other than her husband
> >>>>>> would
> >>>>>> $>>>> have to be a whore controlled by a pimp.
> >>>>>> $>>>>
> >>>>>> $>>>> Anyone else getting this vibe about Yads and his view of women?
> >>>>>> $>>>>
> >>>>>> $>>>> ***Yes, I have thought the very same thing. There is no other
> >>>>>> $>>>> reason for him to have labelled me such.
> >>>>>> $>>>>
> >>>>>> $>>>>
> >>>>>> $>>> Then stop hanging around trolls like MSP, Sailsbury, Wilson
> >>>>>> and smith !
> >>>>>> $>>
> >>>>>> $>> You know what? This is just shameful behavior from you.
> >>>>>> Calling $>> someone names because you don't like who they
> >>>>>> socialize with is just not $>> acceptable behavior.
> >>>>>> $>>
> >>>>>> $> $> Because such trolls are BAD news.
> >>>>>> $
> >>>>>> $
> >>>>>> $ You don't get to decide who other people like or socialize
> >>>>>> with, and $it's not acceptable for you to be namecalling about it.
> >>>>>> $
> >>>>>> $ It's shameful.
> >>>>> To borrow one of the doctor's lines, "10/10 Peachy".
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> I'll second that. Hopefully Yads will take heed of Peachy where he's
> >>>> ignored us on this matter.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Eeee, I do love an optimist... misguided though they usually are...
> >>>
> >>
> >> It's interesting. Yads claims he respects Peachy, so will he stand by
> >> that and take her words as food for thought, - or be his usual evasive
> >> self and ignore difficulties until they go away?
> >
> >
> > In the past he has shown that he respects me right up until the
> > second I disagree with him, then he chooses his own convenience over the
> > respect to or from anyone else.
>
> At least he doesn't go over the edge and start calling you a whore. I
> still don't understand why he singled out Pandora for that treatment
> when he doesn't do that with any other woman who communicates with
> people he doesn't like. (Not that he should behave like that to ANY
> woman of course.)

Because she's a SOCK, you Gay Twit !!
--
John C.

["The Great One"]

"pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message news:5dqdnf-zBJafp5HW...@scnresearch.com...

>
> "Alan Sailsbury" <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote in message

> news:EM2dnfOPVfswm5HW...@bt.com...
> > PV wrote:
> > > The Doctor wrote:
> > >> In article <66dmg550aio4aq2db...@4ax.com>,
> > >> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> > > <snip

> > >
> > >>>> $ You don't get to decide who other people like or socialize
> > >>>> with, and $it's not acceptable for you to be namecalling about it.
> > >>>> $
> > >>>> $ It's shameful.
> > >>> To borrow one of the doctor's lines, "10/10 Peachy".
> > >>>
> > >>>

> > >> Shameful that people associate with trolls and deluded
> > >> enough not to believe the truth.
> > >
> > >
> > > And then we have those that wouldn't know "Truth" if it bit them on the
> > > butt.
> > >
> >
> > Perhaps Yads could explain exactly what the "truth" is to us lesser
> > mortals?
> >
> I'd certainly like to see any "truth" he has that proves, nay even
> suggests that I'm a whore. OR that any he has labelled as trolls
> are indeed such. The only "truth" that I see with regards to him
> is that he is a troll himself.

"Lie on" SOCK Pandora !!
--
John C.

["The Great One"]

"john smith" <the_jo...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:4_VOm.80022$3e4....@newsfe27.ams2...
>
> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> news:heguhh$pb$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> > In article <uRIOm.22044$J94....@newsfe24.ams2>,
> > john smith <the_jo...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> >>news:hefbii$s7m$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> >>> In article <hefa8...@news6.newsguy.com>,

> >>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>The Doctor wrote:

> >>>>> In article <heci1...@news2.newsguy.com>,

> >>>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:

> >>>>>>> In article <Eo6dnScJbvqGXpTW...@scnresearch.com>,

> >>>>>>> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> "Mr.Smartypants" <bc...@canada.com> wrote in message

> >>>>>>>> news:55b835b3-2c8d-4983...@13g2000prl.googlegroups.com...

> >>>>>>>> On Nov 18, 8:13 am, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:

> >>>>>>>>> John Fleming wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:10:41 -0500, while chained to a desk

> >>>>>>>>>> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion

> >>>>>>>>>> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> $The Doctor wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> $>

> >>>>>>>>>>> $> Pandora troll for you P.A.P.
> >>>>>>>>>>> $
> >>>>>>>>>>> $

> >>>>>>>>>>> $ Pandora is perfectly lovely, and well behaved, usenet poster.

> >>>>>>>>>> Pandora makes a wonderful contribution to the newsgroup, and

> >>>>>>>>>> I really enjoy sharing ideas with her.

> >>>>>>>>>> This newsgroup would be so dull if everyone thought like the

> >>>>>>>>>> doctor.

> >>>>>>>>> Absolutely true. I don't understand Yads' animosity to Pandora.

> >>>>>>>>> Continually calling her a "whore" just because she doesn't share
> >>>>>>>>> his

> >>>>>>>>> p.o.v. is a new low even for him.-

> >>>>>>>> I think it has a lot to do with his opinion of women in general and

> >>>>>>>> his perceived role they should play.
> >>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>> To him it's inconceivable that Pandora (or any woman) should have
> >>>>>>>> any

> >>>>>>>> thoughts or opinions of her own; therefore she *must* be controlled
> >>>>>>>> by

> >>>>>>>> someone, that someone being a man, and that man being *you*. Of
> >>>>>>>> course

> >>>>>>>> any woman being controlled by any man other than her husband would

> >>>>>>>> have to be a whore controlled by a pimp.
> >>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>> Anyone else getting this vibe about Yads and his view of women?
> >>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>> ***Yes, I have thought the very same thing. There is no other

> >>>>>>>> reason for him to have labelled me such.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>> Then stop hanging around trolls like MSP, Sailsbury, Wilson and
> >>>>>>> smith
> >>>>>>> !
> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> You know what? This is just shameful behavior from you. Calling

> >>>>>> someone names because you don't like who they socialize with is just
> >>>>>> not

> >>>>>> acceptable behavior.

> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Because such trolls are BAD news.
> >>>>
> >>>>

> >>>> You don't get to decide who other people like or socialize with, and

> >>>>it's not acceptable for you to be namecalling about it.
> >>>>

> >>>> It's shameful.
> >>>
> >>> Ever heard you are whom you associate with?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>So why do you associate with (i.e. stalk) "Trollsbury" when he's killfiled
> >>you?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> --
> >>> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici
> >>> doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
> >>> God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware
> >>> AntiChrist
> >>> rising!
> >>> http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630
> >>> Merry Christmas 2009 and Happy New Year 2010
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Just like I 'associate' with you troll poster boy john smith?
>
>
> Exactly!
>
> So what's your answer?
> --
> john smith

The answer is: john smith is Gay !!
--
John C.

["The Great One"]

"pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message news:f7qdna1txa7A-JHW...@scnresearch.com...
>
> "Mr.Smartypants" <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote in message
> news:740a137e-061a-40ed...@a39g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 24, 12:09 pm, "pandora" <pand...@peak.org> wrote:
> > "John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> >
> > news:ltcmg59hd53u4bl7c...@4ax.com...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:23:10 -0800, while chained to a desk
> > > in the scriptorium "pandora" <pand...@peak.org> wrote:
> > > > $"PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote in message
> > > > $news:E8COm.54801$PH1.4389@edtnps82...
> > > > $> pandora wrote:
> > > > $> > "John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> > > > $> >news:5d0kg5tbierr45brk...@4ax.com...
> > > > $> >> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:12:45 +0000, while chained to a desk
> > > > $> >> in the scriptorium Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> > > > $> >>> $John Fleming wrote:
> > > > $> >>> $> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:53:30 -0000, while chained to a desk
> > > > $> >>> $> in the scriptorium "Stephen Wilson"
> > > > $> >>> $> <stephen.wilson2004nos...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> > > > $> >>> $>> $"peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote
> in
> > > > $> >>> message $>> $news:heci1...@news2.newsguy.com...
> > > > $> >>> $>> $>>
> > > > $> >>> $>> $>> Then stop hanging around trolls like MSP, Sailsbury,
> > Wilson
> > > > $> >>> and smith ! $>> $>
> > > > $> >>> $>> $> You know what? This is just shameful behavior from you.
> > > > $> >>> Calling $>> $> someone names because you don't like who they
> > > > $> >>> socialize with is just not $>> $> acceptable behavior.
> > > > $> >>> $>> $
> > > > $> >>> $>> $I especially like the fact that the person displaying the
> > most
> > > > $> >>> troll-like $>> $behaviour in this group has the temerity to
> label
> > > > $> >>> anyone else a troll. $>> $
> > > > $> >>> $>> $Yes, that's right Yads - I'm talking about you. You flood
> > this
> > > > $> >>> group with $>> $more posts than anyone else, and the majority
> are
> > > > $> >>> not only off-topic but are $>> $also derogatory in nature. Take
> a
> > > > $> >>> look at the nonsense you're posting. $>> $You're doing
> yourself,
> > > > $> >>> and this newsgroup, no favours. $>
> > > > $> >>> $> Well said Stephen and Peachy.
> > > > $> >>> $>
> > > > $> >>> $> His behaviour is not something I would expect in a 40 year
> > > > $> >>> $> old adult male small business owner.
> > > > $> >>> $>
> > > > $> >>> $> I could understand it in a preteenager who is still
> > > > $> >>> $> developing those socialization skills and learning to
> > > > $> >>> $> interact with the people around him or her. But by the time
> > > > $> >>> $> a person has reached 18, that behaviour is usually a thing
> > > > $> >>> $> of the past.
> > > > $> >>> $
> > > > $> >>> $If I was one of his clients and read his gibberish on here I'd
> > > > $> >>> swiftly $take my business elsewhere. No wonder he doesn't post
> > > > $> >>> under his own name.
> > > > $> >>
> > > > $> >> No argument there.
> > > > $> >>
> > > > $> >> Anyway, the many hours he spends posting to Usenet and
> > > > $> >> Twitter are hours he isn't spending building and developing
> > > > $> >> his ISP business.
> > > > $> >
> > > > $> > Indeed. When I worked for an ISP, we were way too busy to be
> > > > $> > online as much as he is.
> > > > $> >
> > > > $>
> > > > $> You probably had customers which tends to keep one busy.
> > > > $
> > > > $True enough. We were a small ISP though.
> >
> > > You would probably have had loads to do even if you were a
> > > big ISP. Employers don't like paying a lot of money to have
> > > people sitting around amusing themselves.
> >
> > Correct again. What with walkins wanting an account, people paying
> > their bills, and helping out on the support lines, work could be quite
> > hectic.
> >
>
>
>
> Stop and think about it. If you ended up talking to Yads concerning an
> internet account, how long do you think it would take before you'd be
> asking to speak with someone else?
>
> ***You do have a point there.
>
> Therein lies his secret.
>
> ***More than likely. I would bet he hides in the back room
> where no one can see him and just posts his one liners to Usenet..
> --
> Pandora (Smarty-Panty's SOCK)

How sweet ! A SOCK and her Owner have a nice chat !!
--
John C.

["The Great One"]

"peachy ashie passion" <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:hei7o...@news2.newsguy.com...

> john smith wrote:
> > "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message

> > news:hei34g$f8l$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> >> In article <r53pg5d13qvouc9s6...@4ax.com>,
> >> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:58:06 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
> >>> desk in the scriptorium Loaf of Bread <john...@hotmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> $On Nov 24, 11:55 am, "john smith" <the_johnsm...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> >>>> $> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> >>>> $> news:heguhh$pb$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> >>>> $> > In article <uRIOm.22044$J94.16...@newsfe24.ams2>,
> >>>> $> > john smith <the_johnsm...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> >>>> $>
> >>>> $> >>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> >>>> $> >>news:hefbii$s7m$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> >>>> $> >>> In article <hefa8b21...@news6.newsguy.com>,

> >>>> $> >>> peachy ashie passion <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> $> >>>>The Doctor wrote:

> >>>> $> >>>>> In article <heci1a02...@news2.newsguy.com>,

> >>>> $> >>>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> $> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
> >>>> $> >>>>>>> In article

> >>>> <Eo6dnScJbvqGXpTWnZ2dnUVZ_hWdn...@scnresearch.com>,
> >>>> $> >>>>>>> pandora <pand...@peak.org> wrote:
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>> "Mr.Smartypants" <b...@canada.com> wrote in message
> >>>> $>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>news:55b835b3-2c8d-4983...@13g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>> On Nov 18, 8:13 am, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>> John Fleming wrote:
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:10:41 -0500, while chained to a
> >>>> desk

> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>>> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>>> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>>>> $The Doctor wrote:
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>>>> $>
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>>>> $> Pandora troll for you P.A.P.

> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>>>> $
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>>>> $
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>>>> $ Pandora is perfectly lovely, and well behaved, usenet
> >>>> poster.
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>>> Pandora makes a wonderful contribution to the newsgroup,
> >>>> and
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>>> I really enjoy sharing ideas with her.
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>>> This newsgroup would be so dull if everyone thought like
> >>>> the
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>>> doctor.
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>> Absolutely true. I don't understand Yads' animosity to
> >>>> Pandora.
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>> Continually calling her a "whore" just because she doesn't
> >>>> share
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>> his
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>>> p.o.v. is a new low even for him.-
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>> I think it has a lot to do with his opinion of women in
> >>>> general and
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>> his perceived role they should play.
> >>>> $>
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>> To him it's inconceivable that Pandora (or any woman) should
> >>>> have
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>> any
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>> thoughts or opinions of her own; therefore she *must* be
> >>>> controlled
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>> by
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>> someone, that someone being a man, and that man being *you*.
> >>>> Of
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>> course
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>> any woman being controlled by any man other than her husband
> >>>> would
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>> have to be a whore controlled by a pimp.
> >>>> $>
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>> Anyone else getting this vibe about Yads and his view of
> >>>> women?
> >>>> $>
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>> ***Yes, I have thought the very same thing. There is no
> >>>> other
> >>>> $> >>>>>>>> reason for him to have labelled me such.

> >>>> $>
> >>>> $> >>>>>>> Then stop hanging around trolls like MSP, Sailsbury, Wilson

> >>>> and
> >>>> $> >>>>>>> smith
> >>>> $> >>>>>>> !

> >>>> $>
> >>>> $> >>>>>> You know what? This is just shameful behavior from you.

> >>>> Calling
> >>>> $> >>>>>> someone names because you don't like who they socialize with
> >>>> is just
> >>>> $> >>>>>> not
> >>>> $> >>>>>> acceptable behavior.
> >>>> $>
> >>>> $> >>>>> Because such trolls are BAD news.
> >>>> $>
> >>>> $> >>>> You don't get to decide who other people like or socialize with,
> >>>> and
> >>>> $> >>>>it's not acceptable for you to be namecalling about it.

> >>>> $>
> >>>> $> >>>> It's shameful.

> >>>> $>
> >>>> $> >>> Ever heard you are whom you associate with?
> >>>> $>
> >>>> $> >>So why do you associate with (i.e. stalk) "Trollsbury" when he's
> >>>> killfiled
> >>>> $> >>you?
> >>>> $>
> >>>> $> > Just like I 'associate' with you troll poster boy john smith?
> >>>> $>
> >>>> $> Exactly!
> >>>> $>
> >>>> $> So what's your answer?
> >>>> $
> >>>> $He doesn't have one.
> >>> Good point Loaf.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> John Fleming
> >>> Edmonton, Canada
> >>>
> >>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> >>> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> >>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> >>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> >>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> >> You know I do not respond to trolls like a Loaf of Bread, snowman and PV
> >> on a
> >> regular basis.
> >> --
> >
> >
> >
> > So why do you follow me around like a sick puppy?
>
>
> You know John, I think you need a new term for that, cuz you and I
> are the sick puppies around here.

IAWTP !!
--
John C.

["The Great One"]

"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message news:42apg5hpklbdh8frf...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:35:49 -0500, while chained to a desk

> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion

> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > $The Doctor wrote:
> > $> In article <hei7q...@news2.newsguy.com>,

> > $> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > $>> The Doctor wrote:

> > $>>> In article <hehr1...@news1.newsguy.com>,

> > $>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > $>>>> The Doctor wrote:

> > $>>>>> In article <hehj5...@news4.newsguy.com>,

> > $>>>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > $>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:

> > $>>>>>>> In article <heffg...@news2.newsguy.com>,

> > $>>>>>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > $>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:

> > $>>>>>>>>> In article <hefa8...@news6.newsguy.com>,

> > $>>>>>>>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > $>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:

> > $>>>>>>>>>>> In article <heci1...@news2.newsguy.com>,

> > $>>>>>>>>>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:

> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <Eo6dnScJbvqGXpTW...@scnresearch.com>,
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:

> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Mr.Smartypants" <bc...@canada.com> wrote in message

> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:55b835b3-2c8d-4983...@13g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 18, 8:13 am, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> John Fleming wrote:
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:10:41 -0500, while chained to a desk
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $The Doctor wrote:
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $> Pandora troll for you P.A.P.
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ Pandora is perfectly lovely, and well behaved, usenet poster.
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pandora makes a wonderful contribution to the newsgroup, and
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I really enjoy sharing ideas with her.
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This newsgroup would be so dull if everyone thought like the
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doctor.
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely true. I don't understand Yads' animosity to Pandora.

> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Continually calling her a "whore" just because she doesn't share his

> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> p.o.v. is a new low even for him.-
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it has a lot to do with his opinion of women in general and
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his perceived role they should play.
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To him it's inconceivable that Pandora (or any woman) should have any
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoughts or opinions of her own; therefore she *must* be controlled by
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone, that someone being a man, and that man being *you*. Of course

> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any woman being controlled by any man other than her husband would
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to be a whore controlled by a pimp.
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone else getting this vibe about Yads and his view of women?
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ***Yes, I have thought the very same thing. There is no other
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reason for him to have labelled me such.
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then stop hanging around trolls like MSP, Sailsbury, Wilson and smith !

> > $>>>>>>>>>>>> You know what? This is just shameful behavior from you. Calling

> > $>>>>>>>>>>>> someone names because you don't like who they socialize with is just not

> > $>>>>>>>>>>>> acceptable behavior.
> > $>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > $>>>>>>>>>>> Because such trolls are BAD news.
> > $>>>>>>>>>> You don't get to decide who other people like or socialize with, and
> > $>>>>>>>>>> it's not acceptable for you to be namecalling about it.
> > $>>>>>>>>>>
> > $>>>>>>>>>> It's shameful.
> > $>>>>>>>>> Ever heard you are whom you associate with?

> > $>>>>>>>> Ever heard that Jesus ate with the sinners and tax collectors?
> > $>>>>>>> And got them to repent. Point very well taken.
> > $>>>>>> Oh? What scripture says that?
> > $>>>>> Zacharius for starters. REcall the small Tax Collector?
> > $>>>> What scripture?
> > $>>>>
> > $>>>> You know, when you give someone a scripture, it has a chapter number
> > $>>>> and a line number.
> > $>>> Hate to say, but TRollsbury beat me to it, unless you want a
> > $>>> verbatim quote.
> > $>>
> > $>> I want chapter and verse, like I asked for.
> > $>
> > $> Then context it is.
> > $
> > $ if you provide anything other than the chapter and verse I asked for,
> > $you fail.
>
> Agreed. And he really has to learn to provide it *without*
> someone asking for it.
>
> There are enough Biblical references--annotated editions,
> condordances, collections of scripture by subject, Google,
> and so on--that he should be able to find the relevant quote
> pretty quickly.

> --
> John Fleming
> Edmonton, Canada

Why can't you read the Bible for yourself, Queer ??
--
John C.

[The Doctor]

In article <z-Kdne17TtmgfZHW...@centurytel.net>,
\"The Great One\" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>
>"Alan Sailsbury" <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote in message =

>news:OsWdnS_686Snf5bW...@bt.com...
>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>> > Alan Sailsbury wrote:
>> >> john smith wrote:

>> >>> "Alan Sailsbury" <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote in message=20

>> >>> news:yuOdnarkI50vp5bW...@bt.com...
>> >>>> John Fleming wrote:
>> >>>>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:33:30 -0500, while chained to a desk
>> >>>>> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> >>>>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>> $The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>>> $> In article <heci1...@news2.newsguy.com>,
>> >>>>>> $> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>> $>> The Doctor wrote:

>> >>>>>> $>>> In article =

><Eo6dnScJbvqGXpTW...@scnresearch.com>,
>> >>>>>> $>>> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>> >>>>>> $>>>> "Mr.Smartypants" <bc...@canada.com> wrote in message

>> >>>>>> $>>>>=20
>> >>>>>> =
>news:55b835b3-2c8d-4983...@13g2000prl.googlegroups.com... =
>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> $>>>> On Nov 18, 8:13 am, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> =

>wrote:
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> John Fleming wrote:

>> >>>>>> $>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:10:41 -0500, while chained to a =

>desk
>> >>>>>> $>>>>>> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> >>>>>> $>>>>>> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>> $>>>>>>> $The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>>> $>>>>>>> $>
>> >>>>>> $>>>>>>> $> Pandora troll for you P.A.P.
>> >>>>>> $>>>>>>> $
>> >>>>>> $>>>>>>> $

>> >>>>>> $>>>>>>> $ Pandora is perfectly lovely, and well behaved, =
>usenet=20
>> >>>>>> poster.
>> >>>>>> $>>>>>> Pandora makes a wonderful contribution to the =

>newsgroup, and
>> >>>>>> $>>>>>> I really enjoy sharing ideas with her.

>> >>>>>> $>>>>>> This newsgroup would be so dull if everyone thought =
>like the
>> >>>>>> $>>>>>> doctor.
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> Absolutely true. I don't understand Yads' animosity to=20
>> >>>>>> Pandora.
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> Continually calling her a "whore" just because she =
>doesn't=20

>> >>>>>> share his
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> p.o.v. is a new low even for him.-

>> >>>>>> $>>>> I think it has a lot to do with his opinion of women in=20

>> >>>>>> general and
>> >>>>>> $>>>> his perceived role they should play.
>> >>>>>> $>>>>

>> >>>>>> $>>>> To him it's inconceivable that Pandora (or any woman) =
>should=20
>> >>>>>> have any
>> >>>>>> $>>>> thoughts or opinions of her own; therefore she *must* be=20
>> >>>>>> controlled by
>> >>>>>> $>>>> someone, that someone being a man, and that man being =
>*you*.=20
>> >>>>>> Of course
>> >>>>>> $>>>> any woman being controlled by any man other than her =
>husband=20

>> >>>>>> would
>> >>>>>> $>>>> have to be a whore controlled by a pimp.
>> >>>>>> $>>>>

>> >>>>>> $>>>> Anyone else getting this vibe about Yads and his view of =
>women?
>> >>>>>> $>>>>
>> >>>>>> $>>>> ***Yes, I have thought the very same thing. There is no =

>other
>> >>>>>> $>>>> reason for him to have labelled me such.
>> >>>>>> $>>>>
>> >>>>>> $>>>>

>> >>>>>> $>>> Then stop hanging around trolls like MSP, Sailsbury, =
>Wilson=20
>> >>>>>> and smith !
>> >>>>>> $>>
>> >>>>>> $>> You know what? This is just shameful behavior from you. =
>
>> >>>>>> Calling $>> someone names because you don't like who they=20

>> >>>>>> socialize with is just not $>> acceptable behavior.
>> >>>>>> $>>
>> >>>>>> $> $> Because such trolls are BAD news.
>> >>>>>> $
>> >>>>>> $

>> >>>>>> $ You don't get to decide who other people like or socialize =
>
>> >>>>>> with, and $it's not acceptable for you to be namecalling about =

>it.
>> >>>>>> $
>> >>>>>> $ It's shameful.
>> >>>>> To borrow one of the doctor's lines, "10/10 Peachy".
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>

>> >>>> I'll second that. Hopefully Yads will take heed of Peachy where =
>he's=20

>> >>>> ignored us on this matter.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>

>> >>> Eeee, I do love an optimist... misguided though they usually =
>are...
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> It's interesting. Yads claims he respects Peachy, so will he stand =
>by=20
>> >> that and take her words as food for thought, - or be his usual =
>evasive=20

>> >> self and ignore difficulties until they go away?

>> >=20
>> >=20
>> > In the past he has shown that he respects me right up until the=20
>> > second I disagree with him, then he chooses his own convenience over =
>the=20

>> > respect to or from anyone else.

>>=20
>> At least he doesn't go over the edge and start calling you a whore. I=20
>> still don't understand why he singled out Pandora for that treatment=20
>> when he doesn't do that with any other woman who communicates with=20
>> people he doesn't like. (Not that he should behave like that to ANY=20

>> woman of course.)
>
>Because she's a SOCK, you Gay Twit !!
>--
>John C.

Rather a Suck puppet.

[The Doctor]

In article <i-CdnUdUbJpXeJHW...@centurytel.net>,

\"The Great One\" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>

>"john smith" <the_jo...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message =
>news:4_VOm.80022$3e4....@newsfe27.ams2...
>>=20
>> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message=20

>> news:heguhh$pb$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> > In article <uRIOm.22044$J94....@newsfe24.ams2>,
>> > john smith <the_jo...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>> >>news:hefbii$s7m$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> >>> In article <hefa8...@news6.newsguy.com>,
>> >>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>> In article <heci1...@news2.newsguy.com>,
>> >>>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>>>> In article <Eo6dnScJbvqGXpTW...@scnresearch.com>,
>> >>>>>>> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> "Mr.Smartypants" <bc...@canada.com> wrote in message

>> >>>>>>>> =

>news:55b835b3-2c8d-4983...@13g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
>> >>>>>>>> On Nov 18, 8:13 am, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> John Fleming wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:10:41 -0500, while chained to a desk
>> >>>>>>>>>> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> >>>>>>>>>> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> $The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> $>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> $> Pandora troll for you P.A.P.
>> >>>>>>>>>>> $
>> >>>>>>>>>>> $

>> >>>>>>>>>>> $ Pandora is perfectly lovely, and well behaved, usenet =
>poster.
>> >>>>>>>>>> Pandora makes a wonderful contribution to the newsgroup, =

>and
>> >>>>>>>>>> I really enjoy sharing ideas with her.

>> >>>>>>>>>> This newsgroup would be so dull if everyone thought like =
>the
>> >>>>>>>>>> doctor.
>> >>>>>>>>> Absolutely true. I don't understand Yads' animosity to =
>Pandora.
>> >>>>>>>>> Continually calling her a "whore" just because she doesn't =
>share=20

>> >>>>>>>>> his
>> >>>>>>>>> p.o.v. is a new low even for him.-

>> >>>>>>>> I think it has a lot to do with his opinion of women in =

>general and
>> >>>>>>>> his perceived role they should play.
>> >>>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>>> To him it's inconceivable that Pandora (or any woman) should =
>have=20
>> >>>>>>>> any
>> >>>>>>>> thoughts or opinions of her own; therefore she *must* be =
>controlled
>> >>>>>>>> by
>> >>>>>>>> someone, that someone being a man, and that man being *you*. =
>Of
>> >>>>>>>> course
>> >>>>>>>> any woman being controlled by any man other than her husband =

>would
>> >>>>>>>> have to be a whore controlled by a pimp.
>> >>>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>>> Anyone else getting this vibe about Yads and his view of =
>women?
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> ***Yes, I have thought the very same thing. There is no =

>other
>> >>>>>>>> reason for him to have labelled me such.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>> Then stop hanging around trolls like MSP, Sailsbury, Wilson =
>and=20
>> >>>>>>> smith
>> >>>>>>> !
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> You know what? This is just shameful behavior from you. =
>Calling
>> >>>>>> someone names because you don't like who they socialize with is =

>just
>> >>>>>> not
>> >>>>>> acceptable behavior.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Because such trolls are BAD news.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>

>> >>>> You don't get to decide who other people like or socialize =

>with, and
>> >>>>it's not acceptable for you to be namecalling about it.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It's shameful.
>> >>>
>> >>> Ever heard you are whom you associate with?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>

>> >>So why do you associate with (i.e. stalk) "Trollsbury" when he's =
>killfiled
>> >>you?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> --=20

>> >>> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici
>> >>> doc...@nl2k.ab.ca

>> >>> God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware=20

>> >>> AntiChrist
>> >>> rising!
>> >>> http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630
>> >>> Merry Christmas 2009 and Happy New Year 2010
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > Just like I 'associate' with you troll poster boy john smith?

>>=20
>>=20
>> Exactly!
>>=20

>> So what's your answer?
>> --
>> john smith
>
>The answer is: john smith is Gay !!
>--
>John C.
>

Atheists are homosexual.

[The Doctor]

In article <dqadnRFhRsnoepHW...@centurytel.net>,

\"The Great One\" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>

>"pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message =
>news:f7qdna1txa7A-JHW...@scnresearch.com...
>>=20

>> "Mr.Smartypants" <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote in message

>> =
>news:740a137e-061a-40ed...@a39g2000pre.googlegroups.com...=

>
>> On Nov 24, 12:09 pm, "pandora" <pand...@peak.org> wrote:
>> > "John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
>> >
>> > news:ltcmg59hd53u4bl7c...@4ax.com...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:23:10 -0800, while chained to a desk
>> > > in the scriptorium "pandora" <pand...@peak.org> wrote:
>> > > > $"PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote in message
>> > > > $news:E8COm.54801$PH1.4389@edtnps82...
>> > > > $> pandora wrote:
>> > > > $> > "John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
>> > > > $> >news:5d0kg5tbierr45brk...@4ax.com...

>> > > > $> >> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:12:45 +0000, while chained to a =
>desk
>> > > > $> >> in the scriptorium Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> =

>wrote:
>> > > > $> >>> $John Fleming wrote:

>> > > > $> >>> $> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:53:30 -0000, while chained to a =

>desk
>> > > > $> >>> $> in the scriptorium "Stephen Wilson"
>> > > > $> >>> $> <stephen.wilson2004nos...@ntlworld.com> wrote:

>> > > > $> >>> $>> $"peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> =

>wrote
>> in
>> > > > $> >>> message $>> $news:heci1...@news2.newsguy.com...
>> > > > $> >>> $>> $>>

>> > > > $> >>> $>> $>> Then stop hanging around trolls like MSP, =

>Sailsbury,
>> > Wilson
>> > > > $> >>> and smith ! $>> $>

>> > > > $> >>> $>> $> You know what? This is just shameful behavior from =
>you.
>> > > > $> >>> Calling $>> $> someone names because you don't like who =

>they
>> > > > $> >>> socialize with is just not $>> $> acceptable behavior.
>> > > > $> >>> $>> $

>> > > > $> >>> $>> $I especially like the fact that the person =
>displaying the
>> > most
>> > > > $> >>> troll-like $>> $behaviour in this group has the temerity =

>to
>> label
>> > > > $> >>> anyone else a troll. $>> $

>> > > > $> >>> $>> $Yes, that's right Yads - I'm talking about you. You =
>flood
>> > this
>> > > > $> >>> group with $>> $more posts than anyone else, and the =
>majority
>> are
>> > > > $> >>> not only off-topic but are $>> $also derogatory in =

>nature. Take
>> a
>> > > > $> >>> look at the nonsense you're posting. $>> $You're doing
>> yourself,
>> > > > $> >>> and this newsgroup, no favours. $>
>> > > > $> >>> $> Well said Stephen and Peachy.
>> > > > $> >>> $>

>> > > > $> >>> $> His behaviour is not something I would expect in a 40 =

>year
>> > > > $> >>> $> old adult male small business owner.
>> > > > $> >>> $>
>> > > > $> >>> $> I could understand it in a preteenager who is still
>> > > > $> >>> $> developing those socialization skills and learning to

>> > > > $> >>> $> interact with the people around him or her. But by the =
>time
>> > > > $> >>> $> a person has reached 18, that behaviour is usually a =

>thing
>> > > > $> >>> $> of the past.
>> > > > $> >>> $

>> > > > $> >>> $If I was one of his clients and read his gibberish on =
>here I'd
>> > > > $> >>> swiftly $take my business elsewhere. No wonder he doesn't =

>post
>> > > > $> >>> under his own name.
>> > > > $> >>
>> > > > $> >> No argument there.
>> > > > $> >>
>> > > > $> >> Anyway, the many hours he spends posting to Usenet and

>> > > > $> >> Twitter are hours he isn't spending building and =

>developing
>> > > > $> >> his ISP business.
>> > > > $> >

>> > > > $> > Indeed. When I worked for an ISP, we were way too busy to =

>be
>> > > > $> > online as much as he is.
>> > > > $> >
>> > > > $>
>> > > > $> You probably had customers which tends to keep one busy.
>> > > > $
>> > > > $True enough. We were a small ISP though.
>> >
>> > > You would probably have had loads to do even if you were a
>> > > big ISP. Employers don't like paying a lot of money to have
>> > > people sitting around amusing themselves.
>> >
>> > Correct again. What with walkins wanting an account, people paying

>> > their bills, and helping out on the support lines, work could be =
>quite
>> > hectic.
>> >
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20

>> Stop and think about it. If you ended up talking to Yads concerning an
>> internet account, how long do you think it would take before you'd be
>> asking to speak with someone else?

>>=20

>> ***You do have a point there.

>>=20
>> Therein lies his secret.
>>=20

>> ***More than likely. I would bet he hides in the back room
>> where no one can see him and just posts his one liners to Usenet..
>> --

>> Pandora (Smarty-Panty's SOCK)=20

>
>How sweet ! A SOCK and her Owner have a nice chat !!
>--
>John C.

Such are porno shows.

[peachy ashie passion]

That's the first sensible thing you've said all day.

[Bernard Hedges]

The Doctor wrote:
>
>>
>
> Atheists are homosexual.

Can you prove that outrageous statement???

[The Doctor]

In article <hejf7...@news7.newsguy.com>,

You are agreeing with HJ?

[The Doctor]

In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DW...@bt.com>,

Using stats?

[PV]

No he can't and never will, he is just trolling for more followers. Doc is
our resident troll, psuedo-Christian and castrator of gays.

Welcome to the loony bin (edm.general that is).

--
PV

Stupidity is a condition
Ignorance is a choice

[David Johnston]

On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:31:41 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
(The Doctor) wrote:

>In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DW...@bt.com>,
>Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
>>The Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Atheists are homosexual.
>>
>>
>>Can you prove that outrageous statement???
>>
>
>Using stats?

That would be a "no" then.

[The Doctor]

In article <jp9rg5pcr5thotlp7...@4ax.com>,

0/10 .

[pandora]

"Bernard Hedges" <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote in message
news:acydnUdhD7YN_5DW...@bt.com...

> The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >>
> >
> > Atheists are homosexual.
>
>
> Can you prove that outrageous statement???

No, he cannot. He cannot prove anything he says.

[The Doctor]

In article <RMSdnb7gTd9tXJDW...@scnresearch.com>,

Lie on pandora!

["The Great One"]

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message news:hej99m$1ce$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...

YES....john Gay-smith is proof of that !!
--
John C.

[PV]

The Doctor wrote:
> In article <RMSdnb7gTd9tXJDW...@scnresearch.com>,
> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>
>> "Bernard Hedges" <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:acydnUdhD7YN_5DW...@bt.com...
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Atheists are homosexual.
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you prove that outrageous statement???
>>
>> No, he cannot. He cannot prove anything he says.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Lie on pandora!

Well then, prove it Doc, prove it.

Post your link to a respected site or source of information that proves your
statement.

[The Doctor]

In article <waSdnZE7rMNFgpPW...@centurytel.net>,

\"The Great One\" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>

>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message =

>news:hej99m$1ce$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <i-CdnUdUbJpXeJHW...@centurytel.net>,
>> \"The Great One\" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>> >

>> >"john smith" <the_jo...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message =3D
>> >news:4_VOm.80022$3e4....@newsfe27.ams2...
>> >>=3D20
>> >> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message=3D20

>> >> news:heguhh$pb$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> >> > In article <uRIOm.22044$J94....@newsfe24.ams2>,
>> >> > john smith <the_jo...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>> >> >>news:hefbii$s7m$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> >> >>> In article <hefa8...@news6.newsguy.com>,
>> >> >>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>>The Doctor wrote:
>> >> >>>>> In article <heci1...@news2.newsguy.com>,
>> >> >>>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:

>> >> >>>>>>> In article =

><Eo6dnScJbvqGXpTW...@scnresearch.com>,
>> >> >>>>>>> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>> "Mr.Smartypants" <bc...@canada.com> wrote in message

>> >> >>>>>>>> =3D
>> =
>>news:55b835b3-2c8d-4983...@13g2000prl.googlegroups.com...=
>
>> >> >>>>>>>> On Nov 18, 8:13 am, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> =
>wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>> John Fleming wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:10:41 -0500, while chained to a =

>desk
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> $The Doctor wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> $>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> $> Pandora troll for you P.A.P.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> $
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> $
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> $ Pandora is perfectly lovely, and well behaved, usenet =

>=3D

>> >poster.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Pandora makes a wonderful contribution to the newsgroup, =

>=3D

>> >and
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I really enjoy sharing ideas with her.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> This newsgroup would be so dull if everyone thought like =

>=3D

>> >the
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> doctor.
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Absolutely true. I don't understand Yads' animosity to =

>=3D
>> >Pandora.
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Continually calling her a "whore" just because she =
>doesn't =3D
>> >share=3D20

>> >> >>>>>>>>> his
>> >> >>>>>>>>> p.o.v. is a new low even for him.-
>> >> >>>>>>>> I think it has a lot to do with his opinion of women in =

>=3D

>> >general and
>> >> >>>>>>>> his perceived role they should play.
>> >> >>>>>>>>

>> >> >>>>>>>> To him it's inconceivable that Pandora (or any woman) =
>should =3D
>> >have=3D20

>> >> >>>>>>>> any
>> >> >>>>>>>> thoughts or opinions of her own; therefore she *must* be =

>=3D
>> >controlled
>> >> >>>>>>>> by
>> >> >>>>>>>> someone, that someone being a man, and that man being =
>*you*. =3D
>> >Of
>> >> >>>>>>>> course
>> >> >>>>>>>> any woman being controlled by any man other than her =
>husband =3D

>> >would
>> >> >>>>>>>> have to be a whore controlled by a pimp.
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> Anyone else getting this vibe about Yads and his view of =

>=3D

>> >women?
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> ***Yes, I have thought the very same thing. There is no =

>=3D

>> >other
>> >> >>>>>>>> reason for him to have labelled me such.
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Then stop hanging around trolls like MSP, Sailsbury, Wilson =

>=3D
>> >and=3D20

>> >> >>>>>>> smith
>> >> >>>>>>> !
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> You know what? This is just shameful behavior from you. =

>=3D
>> >Calling
>> >> >>>>>> someone names because you don't like who they socialize with =
>is =3D

>> >just
>> >> >>>>>> not
>> >> >>>>>> acceptable behavior.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Because such trolls are BAD news.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> You don't get to decide who other people like or socialize =

>=3D

>> >with, and
>> >> >>>>it's not acceptable for you to be namecalling about it.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> It's shameful.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Ever heard you are whom you associate with?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>So why do you associate with (i.e. stalk) "Trollsbury" when he's =

>=3D
>> >killfiled
>> >> >>you?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> --=3D20

>> >> >>> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici
>> >> >>> doc...@nl2k.ab.ca

>> >> >>> God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! =
>Beware=3D20

>> >> >>> AntiChrist
>> >> >>> rising!
>> >> >>> http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630
>> >> >>> Merry Christmas 2009 and Happy New Year 2010
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Just like I 'associate' with you troll poster boy john smith?

>> >>=3D20
>> >>=3D20
>> >> Exactly!
>> >>=3D20

>> >> So what's your answer?
>> >> --
>> >> john smith
>> >
>> >The answer is: john smith is Gay !!
>> >--
>> >John C.
>> >

>>=20
>> Atheists are homosexual.
>> --=20
>> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici =

>doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>
>YES....john Gay-smith is proof of that !!
>--
>John C.

And his ilk.

--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca

God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!

[Bernard Hedges]

The Doctor wrote:
> In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DW...@bt.com>,
> Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:

>>> Atheists are homosexual.
>>
>> Can you prove that outrageous statement???
>>
>
> Using stats?

If you would be so kind please go ahead. I await the result.

[PV]

Please settle back with good reading material and a large supply of food and
drink along with close proximity to washroom facilities.

Some of us have been waiting for years for the Doc to post actual proof to
support his outrageous statements. The "list" for one is still pending from
well of a year from now.

Just a friendly heads up in case you were expecting results.

[Loaf of Bread]

On Nov 26, 10:52 am, Bernard Hedges <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:

> > In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DWnZ2dnUVZ7qhi4...@bt.com>,

> > Bernard Hedges  <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> >> The Doctor wrote:
> >>> Atheists are homosexual.
>
> >> Can you prove that outrageous statement???
>
> > Using stats?
>
> If you would be so kind please go ahead. I await the result.

He won't supply them because he doesn't have any.

[Loaf of Bread]

On Nov 26, 11:02 am, "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
> Bernard Hedges wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:

> >> In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DWnZ2dnUVZ7qhi4...@bt.com>,

> >> Bernard Hedges  <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> >>> The Doctor wrote:
>
> >>>> Atheists are homosexual.
>
> >>> Can you prove that outrageous statement???
>
> >> Using stats?
>
> > If you would be so kind please go ahead. I await the result.
>
> Please settle back with good reading material and a large supply of food and
> drink along with close proximity to washroom facilities.
>
> Some of us have been waiting for years for the Doc to post actual proof to
> support his outrageous statements.  The "list" for one is still pending from
> well of a year from now.
>
> Just a friendly heads up in case you were expecting results.

I'm just about done the Encyclopedia Britannica.

[Bernard Hedges]

I am sure no one would make such a bold statement if it wasn't true.
Doctor? Your stats please.

[The Doctor]

In article <5fGdnRJt7-qMXZPW...@bt.com>,

Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DW...@bt.com>,
>> Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>
>>>> Atheists are homosexual.
>>>
>>> Can you prove that outrageous statement???
>>>
>>
>> Using stats?
>
>
>If you would be so kind please go ahead. I await the result.
>

I will enjoy my work ahead. NOw for every country.

[The Doctor]

In article <-4GdnbEZRp4VnZLW...@bt.com>,

A moment now that the parameters have been defined.

[PV]

The Doctor wrote:
> In article <5fGdnRJt7-qMXZPW...@bt.com>,
> Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DW...@bt.com>,
>>> Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>>>> Atheists are homosexual.
>>>>
>>>> Can you prove that outrageous statement???
>>>>
>>>
>>> Using stats?
>>
>>
>> If you would be so kind please go ahead. I await the result.
>>
>
> I will enjoy my work ahead. NOw for every country.

Please stop this pathetic attempt to impress somebody new.

You are only embarrassing yourself.

[Loaf of Bread]

On Nov 26, 3:44 pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> In article <5fGdnRJt7-qMXZPWnZ2dnUVZ8uadn...@bt.com>,

> Bernard Hedges  <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >The Doctor wrote:

> >> In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DWnZ2dnUVZ7qhi4...@bt.com>,

> >> Bernard Hedges  <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> >>> The Doctor wrote:
>
> >>>> Atheists are homosexual.
>
> >>> Can you prove that outrageous statement???
>
> >> Using stats?
>
> >If you would be so kind please go ahead. I await the result.
>
> I will enjoy my work ahead.  NOw for every country.

In other words, the doctor has no stats and, ergo, no evidence to back
up his wild claims.

[Loaf of Bread]

On Nov 26, 4:08 pm, "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:

> > In article <5fGdnRJt7-qMXZPWnZ2dnUVZ8uadn...@bt.com>,

> > Bernard Hedges  <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> >> The Doctor wrote:

> >>> In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DWnZ2dnUVZ7qhi4...@bt.com>,

> >>> Bernard Hedges  <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>> The Doctor wrote:
>
> >>>>> Atheists are homosexual.
>
> >>>> Can you prove that outrageous statement???
>
> >>> Using stats?
>
> >> If you would be so kind please go ahead. I await the result.
>
> > I will enjoy my work ahead.  NOw for every country.
>
> Please stop this pathetic attempt to impress somebody new.
>
> You are only embarrassing yourself.

It's long past time for the doctor to put up or shut up.

[Bernard Hedges]

The Doctor wrote:
> In article <-4GdnbEZRp4VnZLW...@bt.com>,
> Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
>> Loaf of Bread wrote:
>>> On Nov 26, 10:52 am, Bernard Hedges <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DWnZ2dnUVZ7qhi4...@bt.com>,
>>>>> Bernard Hedges <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:

>>>>>>> Atheists are homosexual.

>>>>>> Can you prove that outrageous statement???

>>>>> Using stats?

>>>> If you would be so kind please go ahead. I await the result.

>>> He won't supply them because he doesn't have any.
>>
>> I am sure no one would make such a bold statement if it wasn't true.
>> Doctor? Your stats please.
>>
>
> A moment now that the parameters have been defined.

A moment? I've waited a day. Where are those statistics? If you post
such comments you *must* back them up. Prove yourself man!

[PV]

Bernard Hedges wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <-4GdnbEZRp4VnZLW...@bt.com>,
>> Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
>>> Loaf of Bread wrote:
>>>> On Nov 26, 10:52 am, Bernard Hedges <fennstr...@thames.co.uk>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DWnZ2dnUVZ7qhi4...@bt.com>,
>>>>>> Bernard Hedges <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> Atheists are homosexual.
>
>>>>>>> Can you prove that outrageous statement???
>
>>>>>> Using stats?
>
>>>>> If you would be so kind please go ahead. I await the result.
>
>>>> He won't supply them because he doesn't have any.
>>>
>>> I am sure no one would make such a bold statement if it wasn't true.
>>> Doctor? Your stats please.
>>>
>>
>> A moment now that the parameters have been defined.
>
>
> A moment? I've waited a day. Where are those statistics? If you post
> such comments you *must* back them up. Prove yourself man!

As I posted previously, prepare yourself for a long long long wait.

While waiting for the Doctor to back up previous claims have almost read the
entire encyclopedia Britannica (Loaf of Bread), War and Peace and All's
Quiet on the Western Front (Myself) just to mention a few.

You would think a man of such strong convictions would have the courage and
ability to back them up with facts.

[Loaf of Bread]

On Nov 27, 11:03 am, "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
> Bernard Hedges wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:

> >> In article <-4GdnbEZRp4VnZLWnZ2dnUVZ8nti4...@bt.com>,

> >> Bernard Hedges  <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> >>> Loaf of Bread wrote:
> >>>> On Nov 26, 10:52 am, Bernard Hedges <fennstr...@thames.co.uk>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> The Doctor wrote:
> >>>>>> In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DWnZ2dnUVZ7qhi4...@bt.com>,
> >>>>>> Bernard Hedges  <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> Atheists are homosexual.
>
> >>>>>>> Can you prove that outrageous statement???
>
> >>>>>> Using stats?
>
> >>>>> If you would be so kind please go ahead. I await the result.
>
> >>>> He won't supply them because he doesn't have any.
>
> >>> I am sure no one would make such a bold statement if it wasn't true.
> >>> Doctor? Your stats please.
>
> >> A moment now that the parameters have been defined.
>
> > A moment? I've waited a day. Where are those statistics? If you post
> > such comments you *must* back them up. Prove yourself man!
>
> As I posted previously, prepare yourself for a long long long wait.
>
> While waiting for the Doctor to back up previous claims have almost read the
> entire encyclopedia Britannica (Loaf of Bread), War and Peace and All's
> Quiet on the Western Front (Myself) just to mention a few.
>
> You would think a man of such strong convictions would have the courage and
> ability to back them up with facts.

I think he's just working on the basis of facts that don't fit his
theories must be discarded.

[Loaf of Bread]

On Nov 27, 10:26 am, Bernard Hedges <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:

> > In article <-4GdnbEZRp4VnZLWnZ2dnUVZ8nti4...@bt.com>,

> > Bernard Hedges  <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> >> Loaf of Bread wrote:
> >>> On Nov 26, 10:52 am, Bernard Hedges <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>> The Doctor wrote:
> >>>>> In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DWnZ2dnUVZ7qhi4...@bt.com>,
> >>>>> Bernard Hedges  <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
> >>>>>>> Atheists are homosexual.
> >>>>>> Can you prove that outrageous statement???
> >>>>> Using stats?
> >>>> If you would be so kind please go ahead. I await the result.
> >>> He won't supply them because he doesn't have any.
>
> >> I am sure no one would make such a bold statement if it wasn't true.
> >> Doctor? Your stats please.
>
> > A moment now that the parameters have been defined.
>
> A moment? I've waited a day. Where are those statistics? If you post
> such comments you *must* back them up. Prove yourself man!

Some of us have been waiting for years.

[Dragon Lady]

"Loaf of Bread" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5efb56eb-f08f-4893...@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com...

Heads up for you: when you answer his post, check and see what newsgroups
he's set the followup to - he's trying to drag rast and a bunch of other
unrealted groups into your flame wars again.

[The Doctor]

In article <hepjra$27ms$1...@news.telesweet.net>,

Who ? Bernard?

[Bernard Hedges]

Aha then The Doctor is a troll. That explains his provocative comments.

I shall waste no more time on him.

[John Fleming]

On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:00:59 +0000, while chained to a desk
in the scriptorium Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk>

wrote:
> $The Doctor wrote:
> $>

> $> Atheists are homosexual.
> $
> $Can you prove that outrageous statement???

This isn't the first time he's made this ridiculous claim,
and we are still waiting for him to provide proof from the
last time he made it.

I suggest you might want to read a good book while you are
waiting.

--

John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada

Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O

[John Fleming]

On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:53:36 GMT, while chained to a desk in
the scriptorium David Johnston <da...@block.net> wrote:
> $On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:31:41 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
> $(The Doctor) wrote:
> $>In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DW...@bt.com>,
> $>Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote:

> $>>The Doctor wrote:
> $>>>
> $>>> Atheists are homosexual.
> $>>

> $>>Can you prove that outrageous statement???
> $>
> $>Using stats?
> $
> $That would be a "no" then.

A study published in a reputable journal shaowing an
association with a P-value of less than 0.05 would be nice.

[John Fleming]

On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:01:28 +0000 (UTC), while chained to a
desk in the scriptorium doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
Doctor) wrote:
> $In article <jp9rg5pcr5thotlp7...@4ax.com>,
> $David Johnston <da...@block.net> wrote:
> $>On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:31:41 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
> $>(The Doctor) wrote:
> $>

> $>>In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DW...@bt.com>,
> $>>Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> $>>>The Doctor wrote:
> $>>>>
> $>>>>>
> $>>>>
> $>>>> Atheists are homosexual.
> $>>>
> $>>>

> $>>>Can you prove that outrageous statement???
> $>>>

> $>>
> $>>Using stats?
> $>

> $>That would be a "no" then.
> $
> $0/10 .

Then you will provide the proof forthwith, directly and
right away. Like within the next 48 hours.

[John Fleming]

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:03:56 GMT, while chained to a desk in
the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:

> $Bernard Hedges wrote:
> $> The Doctor wrote:

> $>> In article <-4GdnbEZRp4VnZLW...@bt.com>,

> $>> Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote:

> $>>> Loaf of Bread wrote:
> $>>>> On Nov 26, 10:52 am, Bernard Hedges <fennstr...@thames.co.uk>

> $>>>> wrote:
> $>>>>> The Doctor wrote:

> $>>>>>> In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DWnZ2dnUVZ7qhi4...@bt.com>,

> $>>>>>> Bernard Hedges <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> $>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
> $>

> $>>>>>>>> Atheists are homosexual.
> $>

> $>>>>>>> Can you prove that outrageous statement???

> $>
> $>>>>>> Using stats?
> $>

> $>>>>> If you would be so kind please go ahead. I await the result.
> $>
> $>>>> He won't supply them because he doesn't have any.
> $>>>
> $>>> I am sure no one would make such a bold statement if it wasn't true.
> $>>> Doctor? Your stats please.
> $>>>
> $>>
> $>> A moment now that the parameters have been defined.
> $>
> $>
> $> A moment? I've waited a day. Where are those statistics? If you post
> $> such comments you *must* back them up. Prove yourself man!
> $
> $As I posted previously, prepare yourself for a long long long wait.
> $
> $While waiting for the Doctor to back up previous claims have almost read the
> $entire encyclopedia Britannica (Loaf of Bread), War and Peace and All's
> $Quiet on the Western Front (Myself) just to mention a few.

I think I'll read Ullyses by James Joyce. I could use a
little steam of conciousness literature right about now.

> $You would think a man of such strong convictions would have the courage and
> $ability to back them up with facts.

--

[John Fleming]

On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:08:26 GMT, while chained to a desk in

the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:

> $The Doctor wrote:
> $> In article <5fGdnRJt7-qMXZPW...@bt.com>,

> $> Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> $>> The Doctor wrote:

> $>>> In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DW...@bt.com>,

> $>>> Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> $>>>> The Doctor wrote:
> $>>
> $>>>>> Atheists are homosexual.
> $>>>>

> $>>>> Can you prove that outrageous statement???
> $>>>>

> $>>>
> $>>> Using stats?
> $>>
> $>>

> $>> If you would be so kind please go ahead. I await the result.
> $>>
> $>
> $> I will enjoy my work ahead. NOw for every country.
> $
> $Please stop this pathetic attempt to impress somebody new.
> $
> $You are only embarrassing yourself.

Besides, proof for one country--Canada--would be sufficient.

I expect demonstration of validity of Canada could
reasonably be extended to other countries by inference.

[John Fleming]

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:24:31 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
desk in the scriptorium Loaf of Bread <john...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> $On Nov 26, 4:08�pm, "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
> $> The Doctor wrote:

> $> > In article <5fGdnRJt7-qMXZPWnZ2dnUVZ8uadn...@bt.com>,

> $> > Bernard Hedges �<fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> $> >> The Doctor wrote:

> $> >>> In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DWnZ2dnUVZ7qhi4...@bt.com>,

> $> >>> Bernard Hedges �<fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> $> >>>> The Doctor wrote:
> $>
> $> >>>>> Atheists are homosexual.
> $>

> $> >>>> Can you prove that outrageous statement???

> $>
> $> >>> Using stats?
> $>

> $> >> If you would be so kind please go ahead. I await the result.
> $>
> $> > I will enjoy my work ahead. �NOw for every country.
> $>
> $> Please stop this pathetic attempt to impress somebody new.
> $>
> $> You are only embarrassing yourself.
> $
> $It's long past time for the doctor to put up or shut up.

Agreed.

[John Fleming]

On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:01:31 +0000 (UTC), while chained to a

desk in the scriptorium doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
Doctor) wrote:

> $In article <RMSdnb7gTd9tXJDW...@scnresearch.com>,
> $pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> $>
> $>"Bernard Hedges" <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote in message
> $>news:acydnUdhD7YN_5DW...@bt.com...

> $>> The Doctor wrote:
> $>> >
> $>> >>
> $>> >
> $>> > Atheists are homosexual.
> $>>
> $>>
> $>> Can you prove that outrageous statement???
> $>

> $>No, he cannot. He cannot prove anything he says.
> $>
> $>
> $>
> $
> $Lie on pandora!

Then provide the stats that support your assertion.

Remember, all we need is a study for one country--for
example, Canada--published in a reputable journal that
demonsttates an association with a P-value of 0.05 or less.

[pandora]

"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:1821h5htodvmpupnu...@4ax.com...

> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:00:59 +0000, while chained to a desk
> in the scriptorium Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk>
> wrote:
> > $The Doctor wrote:
> > $>
> > $> Atheists are homosexual.
> > $
> > $Can you prove that outrageous statement???
>
> This isn't the first time he's made this ridiculous claim,
> and we are still waiting for him to provide proof from the
> last time he made it.
>
> I suggest you might want to read a good book while you are
> waiting.

I have a good murder mystery that I'm just finishing up. Let
me know if he comes up with any proof of his claim. Of course,
I've already disproven it since he did imply (with his comment)
that ALL atheists are homosexual and I'm an atheist but I'm
not a homosexual.

[The Doctor]

In article <LqWdnctq3_sfGI3W...@bt.com>,

Nice troll BH the BS.

[The Doctor]

In article <lc21h5pesorje7hmo...@4ax.com>,

You would like to do that to a census?

[The Doctor]

In article <gj21h5hmtorfh24cm...@4ax.com>,

Try Homer.

[The Doctor]

In article <3m21h554m4caa6gav...@4ax.com>,

Stats Can can be impossible, but still viable.

[Bernard Hedges]

You may be a nice troll but I'm still disappointed in you. Go elsewhere
with your flames.

[John Fleming]

On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:47:02 +0000 (UTC), while chained to a

desk in the scriptorium doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
Doctor) wrote:

> $In article <lc21h5pesorje7hmo...@4ax.com>,
> $John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:53:36 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>the scriptorium David Johnston <da...@block.net> wrote:
> $>> $On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:31:41 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
> $>> $(The Doctor) wrote:
> $>> $>In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DW...@bt.com>,
> $>> $>Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote:

> $>> $>>The Doctor wrote:
> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>> Atheists are homosexual.
> $>> $>>
> $>> $>>Can you prove that outrageous statement???
> $>> $>
> $>> $>Using stats?
> $>> $
> $>> $That would be a "no" then.

> $>
> $>A study published in a reputable journal shaowing an
> $>association with a P-value of less than 0.05 would be nice.
> $>
> $You would like to do that to a census?

Doctor, we are asking you to support your claim that
Atheists are homosexuals.

To my knowledge, Statscan doesn't collect data on sexual
orientation, so if you think you are going to find support
for your claim in census data, you are sadly mistaken. (I
think I can safely assume that most national census bureaus
don't collect that kind of information.)

Hence, you are going to have to supply some kind of
independent study by a group of social scientists published
in a reputable journal (i.e., you pastors sermon notes don'd
count) that demonstate an association between homosexuality
and atheism.

Failure on your part to do so is simply evidence to support
the assertions others here have made that you don't have
evidence to support your claim. In other words, you don't
have a leg to stand on.

[John Fleming]

On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:06:53 +0000, while chained to a desk
in the scriptorium Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk>
wrote:
> $Dragon Lady wrote:
> $> "Loaf of Bread" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> $> news:5efb56eb-f08f-4893...@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> $>> On Nov 26, 3:44 pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) >wrote:
> $>>> In article <5fGdnRJt7-qMXZPWnZ2dnUVZ8uadn...@bt.com>,

> $>>> Bernard Hedges <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> $>>>
> $>>>> The Doctor wrote:

> $>>>>> In article ><acydnUdhD7YN_5DWnZ2dnUVZ7qhi4...@bt.com>,
> $>>>>> Bernard Hedges <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:

> $>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
> $>>>>>>> Atheists are homosexual.
> $>>>>>> Can you prove that outrageous statement???
> $>>>>> Using stats?
> $>>>> If you would be so kind please go ahead. I await the result.
> $>>> I will enjoy my work ahead. NOw for every country.
> $>> In other words, the doctor has no stats and, ergo, no evidence to >back
> $>> up his wild claims.
> $>
> $> Heads up for you: when you answer his post, check and see what newsgroups
> $> he's set the followup to - he's trying to drag rast and a bunch of other
> $> unrealted groups into your flame wars again.
> $
> $Aha then The Doctor is a troll. That explains his provocative comments.

The only one who seems to believe otherwise is the doctor
himself.

> $I shall waste no more time on him.

[John Fleming]

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:58:57 -0800, while chained to a desk
in the scriptorium "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $news:1821h5htodvmpupnu...@4ax.com...
> $> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:00:59 +0000, while chained to a desk
> $> in the scriptorium Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk>
> $> wrote:

> $> > $The Doctor wrote:
> $> > $>
> $> > $> Atheists are homosexual.
> $> > $
> $> > $Can you prove that outrageous statement???

> $>
> $> This isn't the first time he's made this ridiculous claim,
> $> and we are still waiting for him to provide proof from the
> $> last time he made it.
> $>
> $> I suggest you might want to read a good book while you are
> $> waiting.
> $
> $I have a good murder mystery that I'm just finishing up. Let
> $me know if he comes up with any proof of his claim. Of course,
> $I've already disproven it since he did imply (with his comment)
> $that ALL atheists are homosexual and I'm an atheist but I'm
> $not a homosexual.

You'd just be discarded as an outlier.

Anyway, the fact the doctor keeps trying to wriggle off the
hook every time he is challenged to produce data to support
his claims can be taken as evidence he has no data.

After all, if he had some scientifically valid research to
support his claims, then he would provide it. In Usenet,
that would generally be in the form of a link to a reputable
source for the information--even if the page is only an
abstract to a study that highlights the findings.

In the absence of a URL, a citation to a book or similar
publication would also work.

[pandora]

"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message

news:4mr2h5ds3kdar6v2d...@4ax.com...

Well, I AM an alien. :-)

> Anyway, the fact the doctor keeps trying to wriggle off the
> hook every time he is challenged to produce data to support
> his claims can be taken as evidence he has no data.

Of course not. He's merely parroting his fundie religious beliefs.

> After all, if he had some scientifically valid research to
> support his claims, then he would provide it. In Usenet,
> that would generally be in the form of a link to a reputable
> source for the information--even if the page is only an
> abstract to a study that highlights the findings.

Yep.

> In the absence of a URL, a citation to a book or similar
> publication would also work.

Yes. He doesn't have any such proof, merely his own ravings.

[The Doctor]

In article <Ic2dncvQsarSoYzW...@bt.com>,

Hey troll! Neuter yourself.

[John Fleming]

On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:10:56 -0800, while chained to a desk

in the scriptorium "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message

> $news:4mr2h5ds3kdar6v2d...@4ax.com...
> $> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:58:57 -0800, while chained to a desk
> $> in the scriptorium "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> $> > $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $> > $news:1821h5htodvmpupnu...@4ax.com...
> $> > $> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:00:59 +0000, while chained to a desk
> $> > $> in the scriptorium Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk>
> $> > $> wrote:

> $> > $> > $The Doctor wrote:
> $> > $> > $>
> $> > $> > $> Atheists are homosexual.
> $> > $> > $
> $> > $> > $Can you prove that outrageous statement???
> $> > $>
> $> > $> This isn't the first time he's made this ridiculous claim,

> $> > $> and we are still waiting for him to provide proof from the
> $> > $> last time he made it.

> $> > $>
> $> > $> I suggest you might want to read a good book while you are

> $> > $> waiting.
> $> > $

> $> > $I have a good murder mystery that I'm just finishing up. Let

> $> > $me know if he comes up with any proof of his claim. Of course,
> $> > $I've already disproven it since he did imply (with his comment)
> $> > $that ALL atheists are homosexual and I'm an atheist but I'm
> $> > $not a homosexual.
> $>
> $> You'd just be discarded as an outlier.
> $
> $Well, I AM an alien. :-)

See what I mean?

> $> Anyway, the fact the doctor keeps trying to wriggle off the
> $> hook every time he is challenged to produce data to support
> $> his claims can be taken as evidence he has no data.
> $
> $Of course not. He's merely parroting his fundie religious beliefs.

It appears to be a religious belief that (a) is not
supported by any evidence gathered in a scientific sort of
way and (b) apparently not supported by anything that
appears in the Bible.

> $> After all, if he had some scientifically valid research to
> $> support his claims, then he would provide it. In Usenet,
> $> that would generally be in the form of a link to a reputable
> $> source for the information--even if the page is only an
> $> abstract to a study that highlights the findings.
> $
> $Yep.
> $
> $> In the absence of a URL, a citation to a book or similar
> $> publication would also work.
> $
> $Yes. He doesn't have any such proof, merely his own ravings.

Absolutely!!

[John Fleming]

On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:47:37 +0000 (UTC), while chained to a

desk in the scriptorium doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
Doctor) wrote:

> $In article <gj21h5hmtorfh24cm...@4ax.com>,
> $John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:03:56 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
> $>> $Bernard Hedges wrote:
> $>> $> The Doctor wrote:
> $>> $>> In article <-4GdnbEZRp4VnZLW...@bt.com>,
> $>> $>> Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk> wrote:
> $>> $>>> Loaf of Bread wrote:
> $>> $>>>> On Nov 26, 10:52 am, Bernard Hedges <fennstr...@thames.co.uk>
> $>> $>>>> wrote:
> $>> $>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
> $>> $>>>>>> In article <acydnUdhD7YN_5DWnZ2dnUVZ7qhi4...@bt.com>,
> $>> $>>>>>> Bernard Hedges <fennstr...@thames.co.uk> wrote:

> $>> $>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
> $>> $>
> $>> $>>>>>>>> Atheists are homosexual.
> $>> $>
> $>> $>>>>>>> Can you prove that outrageous statement???
> $>> $>
> $>> $>>>>>> Using stats?
> $>> $>
> $>> $>>>>> If you would be so kind please go ahead. I await the result.
> $>> $>
> $>> $>>>> He won't supply them because he doesn't have any.
> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>> I am sure no one would make such a bold statement if it wasn't true.

> $>> $>>> Doctor? Your stats please.
> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>

> $>> $>> A moment now that the parameters have been defined.
> $>> $>

> $>> $>

> $>> $> A moment? I've waited a day. Where are those statistics? If you post

> $>> $> such comments you *must* back them up. Prove yourself man!

> $>> $
> $>> $As I posted previously, prepare yourself for a long long long wait.
> $>> $
> $>> $While waiting for the Doctor to back up previous claims have almost read the

> $>> $entire encyclopedia Britannica (Loaf of Bread), War and Peace and All's
> $>> $Quiet on the Western Front (Myself) just to mention a few.
> $>
> $>I think I'll read Ullyses by James Joyce. I could use a
> $>little steam of conciousness literature right about now.
> $>
> $>> $You would think a man of such strong convictions would have the courage and
> $>> $ability to back them up with facts.
> $
> $Try Homer.

What's wrong with the James Joyce version?

[pandora]

"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message

news:cud5h5lf1130b5o7v...@4ax.com...

Hehehehehe. Well, not to him exactly. That is if he lives
in Canada. I'm a Canadian but I'm an alien in the US.

> > $> Anyway, the fact the doctor keeps trying to wriggle off the
> > $> hook every time he is challenged to produce data to support
> > $> his claims can be taken as evidence he has no data.
> > $
> > $Of course not. He's merely parroting his fundie religious beliefs.
>
> It appears to be a religious belief that (a) is not
> supported by any evidence gathered in a scientific sort of
> way and (b) apparently not supported by anything that
> appears in the Bible.

Correct.

> > $> After all, if he had some scientifically valid research to
> > $> support his claims, then he would provide it. In Usenet,
> > $> that would generally be in the form of a link to a reputable
> > $> source for the information--even if the page is only an
> > $> abstract to a study that highlights the findings.
> > $
> > $Yep.
> > $
> > $> In the absence of a URL, a citation to a book or similar
> > $> publication would also work.
> > $
> > $Yes. He doesn't have any such proof, merely his own ravings.
>
> Absolutely!!

What do I win? :-)

[The Doctor]

In article <nsd5h51tjctjss3ev...@4ax.com>,

Homer is the original.

[The Doctor]

In article <mOWdnferzZt8RI_W...@scnresearch.com>,

A free long term trip to Alert Bay,

[John Fleming]

On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:27:19 -0800, while chained to a desk

in the scriptorium "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message

> $news:cud5h5lf1130b5o7v...@4ax.com...
> $> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:10:56 -0800, while chained to a desk

> $> in the scriptorium "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> $> > $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message

> $> > $news:4mr2h5ds3kdar6v2d...@4ax.com...
> $> > $> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:58:57 -0800, while chained to a desk
> $> > $> in the scriptorium "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> $> > $> > $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $> > $> > $news:1821h5htodvmpupnu...@4ax.com...
> $> > $> > $> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:00:59 +0000, while chained to a desk
> $> > $> > $> in the scriptorium Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk>
> $> > $> > $> wrote:

> $> > $> > $> > $The Doctor wrote:
> $> > $> > $> > $>
> $> > $> > $> > $> Atheists are homosexual.
> $> > $> > $> > $

> $> > $> > $> > $Can you prove that outrageous statement???

> $> > $> > $>
> $> > $> > $> This isn't the first time he's made this ridiculous claim,

> $> > $> > $> and we are still waiting for him to provide proof from the
> $> > $> > $> last time he made it.

> $> > $> > $>
> $> > $> > $> I suggest you might want to read a good book while you are

> $> > $> > $> waiting.

> $> > $> > $
> $> > $> > $I have a good murder mystery that I'm just finishing up. Let

> $> > $> > $me know if he comes up with any proof of his claim. Of course,
> $> > $> > $I've already disproven it since he did imply (with his comment)
> $> > $> > $that ALL atheists are homosexual and I'm an atheist but I'm
> $> > $> > $not a homosexual.

> $> > $>
> $> > $> You'd just be discarded as an outlier.
> $> > $
> $> > $Well, I AM an alien. :-)

> $>
> $> See what I mean?
> $
> $Hehehehehe. Well, not to him exactly. That is if he lives
> $in Canada. I'm a Canadian but I'm an alien in the US.
> $
> $> > $> Anyway, the fact the doctor keeps trying to wriggle off the
> $> > $> hook every time he is challenged to produce data to support
> $> > $> his claims can be taken as evidence he has no data.

> $> > $
> $> > $Of course not. He's merely parroting his fundie religious beliefs.

> $>
> $> It appears to be a religious belief that (a) is not
> $> supported by any evidence gathered in a scientific sort of
> $> way and (b) apparently not supported by anything that
> $> appears in the Bible.
> $
> $Correct.
> $
> $> > $> After all, if he had some scientifically valid research to
> $> > $> support his claims, then he would provide it. In Usenet,
> $> > $> that would generally be in the form of a link to a reputable
> $> > $> source for the information--even if the page is only an
> $> > $> abstract to a study that highlights the findings.
> $> > $
> $> > $Yep.
> $> > $

> $> > $> In the absence of a URL, a citation to a book or similar

> $> > $> publication would also work.

> $> > $
> $> > $Yes. He doesn't have any such proof, merely his own ravings.

> $>
> $> Absolutely!!
> $
> $What do I win? :-)

Nothing, unfortunately. All you get is the satisfaction of
knowing you are right.

[John Fleming]

On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:51:35 +0000 (UTC), while chained to a

desk in the scriptorium doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
Doctor) wrote:

> $In article <nsd5h51tjctjss3ev...@4ax.com>,
> $John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:47:37 +0000 (UTC), while chained to a
> $>desk in the scriptorium doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
> $>Doctor) wrote:
> $>> $In article <gj21h5hmtorfh24cm...@4ax.com>,

> $>> $John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:

> $>> $>I think I'll read Ullyses by James Joyce. I could use a

> $>> $>little steam of conciousness literature right about now.
> $>> $
> $>> $Try Homer.
> $>
> $>What's wrong with the James Joyce version?
> $
> $Homer is the original.

Lousy reason.

[pandora]

"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message

news:bkp5h5lbbnocg0tf1...@4ax.com...

Heh. Except when I'm left eh?

[John Fleming]

On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:19:23 -0800, while chained to a desk

in the scriptorium "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message

> $news:bkp5h5lbbnocg0tf1...@4ax.com...
> $> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:27:19 -0800, while chained to a desk

> $> in the scriptorium "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> $> > $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message

> $> > $news:cud5h5lf1130b5o7v...@4ax.com...
> $> > $> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:10:56 -0800, while chained to a desk

> $> > $> in the scriptorium "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> $> > $> > $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message

> $> > $> > $news:4mr2h5ds3kdar6v2d...@4ax.com...
> $> > $> > $> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:58:57 -0800, while chained to a desk
> $> > $> > $> in the scriptorium "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> $> > $> > $> > $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $> > $> > $> > $news:1821h5htodvmpupnu...@4ax.com...
> $> > $> > $> > $> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:00:59 +0000, while chained to a desk
> $> > $> > $> > $> in the scriptorium Bernard Hedges <fenns...@thames.co.uk>
> $> > $> > $> > $> wrote:

> $> > $> > $> > $> > $The Doctor wrote:
> $> > $> > $> > $> > $>
> $> > $> > $> > $> > $> Atheists are homosexual.
> $> > $> > $> > $> > $

> $> > $> > $> > $> > $Can you prove that outrageous statement???

> $> > $> > $> > $>
> $> > $> > $> > $> This isn't the first time he's made this ridiculous claim,

> $> > $> > $> > $> and we are still waiting for him to provide proof from the
> $> > $> > $> > $> last time he made it.

> $> > $> > $> > $>
> $> > $> > $> > $> I suggest you might want to read a good book while you are

> $> > $> > $> > $> waiting.
> $> > $> > $> > $
> $> > $> > $> > $I have a good murder mystery that I'm just finishing up. Let
> $> > $> > $> > $me know if he comes up with any proof of his claim. Of
> $course,
> $> > $> > $> > $I've already disproven it since he did imply (with his
> $comment)
> $> > $> > $> > $that ALL atheists are homosexual and I'm an atheist but I'm
> $> > $> > $> > $not a homosexual.

> $> > $> > $>
> $> > $> > $> You'd just be discarded as an outlier.
> $> > $> > $
> $> > $> > $Well, I AM an alien. :-)
> $> > $>
> $> > $> See what I mean?
> $> > $
> $> > $Hehehehehe. Well, not to him exactly. That is if he lives

> $> > $in Canada. I'm a Canadian but I'm an alien in the US.
> $> > $
> $> > $> > $> Anyway, the fact the doctor keeps trying to wriggle off the
> $> > $> > $> hook every time he is challenged to produce data to support
> $> > $> > $> his claims can be taken as evidence he has no data.

> $> > $> > $
> $> > $> > $Of course not. He's merely parroting his fundie religious

> $beliefs.
> $> > $>

> $> > $> It appears to be a religious belief that (a) is not

> $> > $> supported by any evidence gathered in a scientific sort of
> $> > $> way and (b) apparently not supported by anything that
> $> > $> appears in the Bible.

> $> > $
> $> > $Correct.
> $> > $

> $> > $> > $> After all, if he had some scientifically valid research to
> $> > $> > $> support his claims, then he would provide it. In Usenet,
> $> > $> > $> that would generally be in the form of a link to a reputable
> $> > $> > $> source for the information--even if the page is only an
> $> > $> > $> abstract to a study that highlights the findings.

> $> > $> > $
> $> > $> > $Yep.
> $> > $> > $

> $> > $> > $> In the absence of a URL, a citation to a book or similar
> $> > $> > $> publication would also work.

> $> > $> > $
> $> > $> > $Yes. He doesn't have any such proof, merely his own ravings.
> $> > $>

> $> > $> Absolutely!!
> $> > $

> $> > $What do I win? :-)

> $>
> $> Nothing, unfortunately. All you get is the satisfaction of
> $> knowing you are right.
> $
> $Heh. Except when I'm left eh?

Bad. :)

[The Doctor]

In article <1au5h5hcsjjg8ronq...@4ax.com>,

John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:51:35 +0000 (UTC), while chained to a
>desk in the scriptorium doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
>Doctor) wrote:
>> $In article <nsd5h51tjctjss3ev...@4ax.com>,
>> $John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>> $>On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:47:37 +0000 (UTC), while chained to a
>> $>desk in the scriptorium doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
>> $>Doctor) wrote:
>> $>> $In article <gj21h5hmtorfh24cm...@4ax.com>,
>> $>> $John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>
>> $>> $>I think I'll read Ullyses by James Joyce. I could use a
>> $>> $>little steam of conciousness literature right about now.
>> $>> $
>> $>> $Try Homer.
>> $>
>> $>What's wrong with the James Joyce version?
>> $
>> $Homer is the original.
>
>Lousy reason.
>

Who wants a non-original?

[pandora]

"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message

news:lka6h51i0d7jkm6gk...@4ax.com...

It was yads made me do it! I swear!

[The Doctor]

In article <SuudnfpKPayvmInW...@scnresearch.com>,

Lie on.