Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
I Started A Joke - Hillary 2016
69 views
Skip to first unread message
thinbl...@gmail.com
Jan 9, 2017, 11:20:45 AM1/9/17
to
Assange blasts 'embarrassing' ODNI report, says 'no evidence' given
9 Jan, 2017
https://www.rt.com/news/373071-wikileaks-odni-report-hacking/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Az8zRgsluJk
https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/5mxskv/wikileaks_press_conference_live/
Assange answered questions submitted via #AskWL on Twitter for over an hour, which was streamed live via Periscope from the Ecuadorian embassy in London.
He described the ODNI's report as containing "zero evidentiary weight" and being "deliberately political."
Asked about the source of the leaked emails from Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta Assange denied it was a state
"If our sources were a state we would have a lot less concern in attempting to protect them,” he said, adding that he would not provide additional information as this could lead to their identification.
"Take the data now, keep it under your bed or with your mother. You can give it to WikiLeaks,” Assange said, encouraging members of the Obama administration to prevent information being destroyed before he leaves office.
He denied that WikiLeaks posessed information from the Republican National Committee which they refused to publish, calling the claim "false."
Assange said he believed that whistleblowers would continue to be persecuted under Trump's administration, saying "No system of authority likes those who undermine their authority.”
The whistleblowing site has been accused of working with the Russian government to ensure Donald Trump’s victory in the US presidential elections.
Both WikiLeaks and founder Julian Assange have repeatedly denied the leaks came from state actors, with former UK ambassador and WikiLeaks associate Craig Murray stating the leak came from a “disgusted” whistleblower from within the Democratic establishment.
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s (ODNI) unclassified findings report released Friday has drawn much criticism and mockery for its apparent lack of evidence and its substantial padding with outdated details about RT.
RT stars in ODNI report on 'Russian activities and intentions' in US presidential election
It claims Russian President Vladimir Putin personally ordered a negative online campaign to influence the elections in a bid to facilitate a Trump victory, and that the Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) then fed the information to WikiLeaks.
“We assess with high confidence that the GRU relayed material it acquired from the DNC and senior Democratic officials to WikiLeaks,” it read.
Among critics was former CIA analyst Larry C Johnson who described the report as a “farce” and a “charade," claiming Hillary Clinton was effective in discrediting herself, without needing the help of Russia.
“I don’t think they’re hiding anything because they don’t have anything,” Johnson told RT. “These are ‘or and how’ intelligence estimates as opposed to an intelligence analysis based on fact. There’s no fact underlying this. There are analytical assumptions.”
READ MORE: ‘Clinton quite effective at discrediting herself, doesn’t need Putin’s help’ - ex CIA analyst
“You can tell that because whenever they use the language like ‘we assess that’ or ‘we believe that’ or ‘it’s likely that’,” he added. “That means they don’t know, because if you knew, you could say … in public ‘according to multiple sources we know that.’ You state facts.”
The report states the Russian government is behind the ‘DC Leaks’ website and Romanian hacker Guccifer 2.0, who released emails from the DNC and other Democrats.
While the report does state that Russians didn’t meddle with voter tallies to influence the results of the election, it claims that the Russian government smeared Clinton.
While the report states the CIA and FBI have “high confidence” the hacks were ordered to help Trump. The NSA, who deals in signals intelligence over human intelligence, have “moderate confidence.”
The report also cites Russian politicians celebrating Trump’s win as further evidence. It does not, however, draw the same conclusions about the Israeli government’s delight at Trump’s victory.
--------------
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrg1UAixGaM
9 Jan, 2017
https://www.rt.com/news/373071-wikileaks-odni-report-hacking/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Az8zRgsluJk
https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/5mxskv/wikileaks_press_conference_live/
Assange answered questions submitted via #AskWL on Twitter for over an hour, which was streamed live via Periscope from the Ecuadorian embassy in London.
He described the ODNI's report as containing "zero evidentiary weight" and being "deliberately political."
Asked about the source of the leaked emails from Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta Assange denied it was a state
"If our sources were a state we would have a lot less concern in attempting to protect them,” he said, adding that he would not provide additional information as this could lead to their identification.
"Take the data now, keep it under your bed or with your mother. You can give it to WikiLeaks,” Assange said, encouraging members of the Obama administration to prevent information being destroyed before he leaves office.
He denied that WikiLeaks posessed information from the Republican National Committee which they refused to publish, calling the claim "false."
Assange said he believed that whistleblowers would continue to be persecuted under Trump's administration, saying "No system of authority likes those who undermine their authority.”
The whistleblowing site has been accused of working with the Russian government to ensure Donald Trump’s victory in the US presidential elections.
Both WikiLeaks and founder Julian Assange have repeatedly denied the leaks came from state actors, with former UK ambassador and WikiLeaks associate Craig Murray stating the leak came from a “disgusted” whistleblower from within the Democratic establishment.
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s (ODNI) unclassified findings report released Friday has drawn much criticism and mockery for its apparent lack of evidence and its substantial padding with outdated details about RT.
RT stars in ODNI report on 'Russian activities and intentions' in US presidential election
It claims Russian President Vladimir Putin personally ordered a negative online campaign to influence the elections in a bid to facilitate a Trump victory, and that the Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) then fed the information to WikiLeaks.
“We assess with high confidence that the GRU relayed material it acquired from the DNC and senior Democratic officials to WikiLeaks,” it read.
Among critics was former CIA analyst Larry C Johnson who described the report as a “farce” and a “charade," claiming Hillary Clinton was effective in discrediting herself, without needing the help of Russia.
“I don’t think they’re hiding anything because they don’t have anything,” Johnson told RT. “These are ‘or and how’ intelligence estimates as opposed to an intelligence analysis based on fact. There’s no fact underlying this. There are analytical assumptions.”
READ MORE: ‘Clinton quite effective at discrediting herself, doesn’t need Putin’s help’ - ex CIA analyst
“You can tell that because whenever they use the language like ‘we assess that’ or ‘we believe that’ or ‘it’s likely that’,” he added. “That means they don’t know, because if you knew, you could say … in public ‘according to multiple sources we know that.’ You state facts.”
The report states the Russian government is behind the ‘DC Leaks’ website and Romanian hacker Guccifer 2.0, who released emails from the DNC and other Democrats.
While the report does state that Russians didn’t meddle with voter tallies to influence the results of the election, it claims that the Russian government smeared Clinton.
While the report states the CIA and FBI have “high confidence” the hacks were ordered to help Trump. The NSA, who deals in signals intelligence over human intelligence, have “moderate confidence.”
The report also cites Russian politicians celebrating Trump’s win as further evidence. It does not, however, draw the same conclusions about the Israeli government’s delight at Trump’s victory.
--------------
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrg1UAixGaM
J.B. Nicholson
Jan 9, 2017, 9:14:52 PM1/9/17
to
thinbl...@gmail.com <thinbl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Assange blasts 'embarrassing' ODNI report, says 'no evidence' given
> 9 Jan, 2017
> https://www.rt.com/news/373071-wikileaks-odni-report-hacking/
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Az8zRgsluJk
> https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/5mxskv/wikileaks_press_conference_live/
The "Extremely Careless" (per James Comey) Hillary Clinton,
> Assange blasts 'embarrassing' ODNI report, says 'no evidence' given
> 9 Jan, 2017
> https://www.rt.com/news/373071-wikileaks-odni-report-hacking/
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Az8zRgsluJk
> https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/5mxskv/wikileaks_press_conference_live/
2-time US presidential loser, reportedly once asked about
assassinating Julian Assange ("Can’t we just drone this guy?") and
then said she couldn't remember saying this while simultaneously
trying to reframe the question as a "joke" ("I don't recall any
joke. It would have been a joke, if it had been said, but I don't
recall that." according to
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/hillary-clinton-julian-assange-229123)[1]. As
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbkS26PX4rc shows, she lies about
important things.
Now her 2nd campaign for US president has handed vindication to
Assange when we see the US has no evidence to back up her apparent
lies about Russia somehow "hacking" the US election. Russia Today
("RT"), named in the US government's unclassified
https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf document, has also
made many segments and shows discussing the government's findings and
the entire 'Russian "hacking"' affair:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6upkKCiffc
an interview with Bill Binney
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVnvnjz5TPg
on discussing unproven Russian "hacking" instead of discussing
what was learned in the leaked emails
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4543Vxktiw
ODNI report met with widespread ridicule (more unproven allegations
of Russian meddling in other elections)
and more.
The same politico.com story quotes Hillary Clinton saying "Well, I
don't know anything about what he’s talking about" in response to
being asked about the DNC email leaks. Hard to believe she didn't know
what discussions were going on amongst Democrats about her campaign.
[1] I'm reminded of Laura Schlessinger's (radio and former TV host
"Dr. Laura"; not a medical doctor but a PhD recipient) initial
reaction to an ex-lover of hers (Bill Ballance) releasing nude
pictures in 1998 from her more libidinous days in the 1970s. She tried
to simultaneously distance herself from the pictures and scold anyone
for looking at them -- she said the pictures weren't of her and
claimed to hold the copyright on the pictures -- so everyone
republishing those pictures was committing copyright infringement. She
later sued the nude pics publisher and lost that case because she did
not hold said copyright (possibly other reasons too). Of course, the
shame for Schlessinger wasn't the pictures themselves but her response
to the pictures which were all self-contradictory (thus telling)
lies. She later revealed her earlier statement to be a lie by taking
credit for being the woman in the pictures (but by the time she
admitted this everyone already knew this to be the case). The
situation with Clinton is far more serious than some naked pictures
but the contradictory coupling of the alleged lapse in Clinton's
memory about the statement and telling us how to properly interpret
the statement strikes me as embarrassingly similar to Schlessinger's.
FPP
Jan 9, 2017, 10:56:40 PM1/9/17
to
On 2017-01-09 21:14:51 -0500, "J.B. Nicholson" <j...@forestfield.org> said:
> Now her 2nd campaign for US president has handed vindication to
> Assange when we see the US has no evidence to back up her apparent
> lies about Russia somehow "hacking" the US election. Russia Today
> ("RT"), named in the US government's unclassified
> https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf document, has also
> made many segments and shows discussing the government's findings and
> the entire 'Russian "hacking"' affair:
What a load of crap.
> Now her 2nd campaign for US president has handed vindication to
> Assange when we see the US has no evidence to back up her apparent
> lies about Russia somehow "hacking" the US election. Russia Today
> ("RT"), named in the US government's unclassified
> https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf document, has also
> made many segments and shows discussing the government's findings and
> the entire 'Russian "hacking"' affair:
Is it hard being that gullible?
--
"Remember, remember, the 8th of November - Putin, Treason and Plot;
I know of no Reason why Putin and Treason should ever be forgot."
trotsky
Jan 10, 2017, 7:50:47 AM1/10/17
to
On 1/9/17 10:20 AM, thinbl...@gmail.com wrote:
> Assange blasts 'embarrassing' ODNI report, says 'no evidence' given
> 9 Jan, 2017
> https://www.rt.com/news/373071-wikileaks-odni-report-hacking/
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Az8zRgsluJk
> https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/5mxskv/wikileaks_press_conference_live/
>
>
> Assange answered questions
Who gives a shit?
> Assange blasts 'embarrassing' ODNI report, says 'no evidence' given
> 9 Jan, 2017
> https://www.rt.com/news/373071-wikileaks-odni-report-hacking/
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Az8zRgsluJk
> https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/5mxskv/wikileaks_press_conference_live/
>
>
> Assange answered questions
Rhino
Jan 10, 2017, 10:13:19 AM1/10/17
to
On 2017-01-09 10:56 PM, FPP wrote:
> On 2017-01-09 21:14:51 -0500, "J.B. Nicholson" <j...@forestfield.org> said:
>
>> Now her 2nd campaign for US president has handed vindication to
>> Assange when we see the US has no evidence to back up her apparent
>> lies about Russia somehow "hacking" the US election. Russia Today
>> ("RT"), named in the US government's unclassified
>> https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf document, has also
>> made many segments and shows discussing the government's findings and
>> the entire 'Russian "hacking"' affair:
>
> What a load of crap.
>
> Is it hard being that gullible?
It's hilarious seeing you dismiss Assange. You progs thought he was a
> On 2017-01-09 21:14:51 -0500, "J.B. Nicholson" <j...@forestfield.org> said:
>
>> Now her 2nd campaign for US president has handed vindication to
>> Assange when we see the US has no evidence to back up her apparent
>> lies about Russia somehow "hacking" the US election. Russia Today
>> ("RT"), named in the US government's unclassified
>> https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf document, has also
>> made many segments and shows discussing the government's findings and
>> the entire 'Russian "hacking"' affair:
>
> What a load of crap.
>
> Is it hard being that gullible?
highly credible source when he released things embarassing to the
government; now that the shoe is on the other foot, you're singing a
very different tune....
--
Rhino
thinbl...@gmail.com
Jan 10, 2017, 11:07:58 AM1/10/17
to
I am Julian Assange founder of WikiLeaks -- Ask Me Anything
https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/5n58sm/i_am_julian_assange_founder_of_wikileaks_ask_me/
submitted an hour ago * by _JulianAssangeWIKILEAKS
I am Julian Assange, founder, publisher and editor of WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks has been publishing now for ten years. We have had many battles. In February the UN ruled that I had been unlawfully detained, without charge. for the last six years. We are entirely funded by our readers. During the US election Reddit users found scoop after scoop in our publications, making WikiLeaks publications the most referened political topic on social media in the five weeks prior to the election. We have a huge publishing year ahead and you can help!
This AMA will be answered by live video on Twitch.tv
FPP
Jan 10, 2017, 5:37:12 PM1/10/17
to
Right now, all he is a little rat who is holed up hiding from justice.
In the meantime, he works as a Russian cut-out.
thinbl...@gmail.com
Jan 10, 2017, 6:15:03 PM1/10/17
to
On Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 5:37:12 PM UTC-5, FPP wrote:
> On 2017-01-10 10:13:18 -0500, Rhino <no_offlin...@example.com> said:
>
> > On 2017-01-09 10:56 PM, FPP wrote:
> >> On 2017-01-09 21:14:51 -0500, "J.B. Nicholson" <j...@forestfield.org> said:
> >>
> >>> Now her 2nd campaign for US president has handed vindication to
> >>> Assange when we see the US has no evidence to back up her apparent
> >>> lies about Russia somehow "hacking" the US election. Russia Today
> >>> ("RT"), named in the US government's unclassified
> >>> https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf document, has also
> >>> made many segments and shows discussing the government's findings and
> >>> the entire 'Russian "hacking"' affair:
> >>
> >> What a load of crap.
> >>
> >> Is it hard being that gullible?
> >
> > It's hilarious seeing you dismiss Assange. You progs thought he was a
> > highly credible source when he released things embarassing to the
> > government; now that the shoe is on the other foot, you're singing a
> > very different tune....
>
> Assange was never a credible source of anything.
> Right now, all he is a little rat who is holed up hiding from justice.
>
> In the meantime, he works as a Russian cut-out.
"L" - Hillary 2017 ... For Mayor Of New York City
> On 2017-01-10 10:13:18 -0500, Rhino <no_offlin...@example.com> said:
>
> > On 2017-01-09 10:56 PM, FPP wrote:
> >> On 2017-01-09 21:14:51 -0500, "J.B. Nicholson" <j...@forestfield.org> said:
> >>
> >>> Now her 2nd campaign for US president has handed vindication to
> >>> Assange when we see the US has no evidence to back up her apparent
> >>> lies about Russia somehow "hacking" the US election. Russia Today
> >>> ("RT"), named in the US government's unclassified
> >>> https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf document, has also
> >>> made many segments and shows discussing the government's findings and
> >>> the entire 'Russian "hacking"' affair:
> >>
> >> What a load of crap.
> >>
> >> Is it hard being that gullible?
> >
> > It's hilarious seeing you dismiss Assange. You progs thought he was a
> > highly credible source when he released things embarassing to the
> > government; now that the shoe is on the other foot, you're singing a
> > very different tune....
>
> Assange was never a credible source of anything.
> Right now, all he is a little rat who is holed up hiding from justice.
>
> In the meantime, he works as a Russian cut-out.
-------------
Time for Grandma Hillary to go home and bake some cookies...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkwVgbkSCE8
Arc Michael
Jan 10, 2017, 6:16:08 PM1/10/17
to
On Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 2:37:12 PM UTC-8, FPP wrote:
> On 2017-01-10 10:13:18 -0500, Rhino <no_offlin...@example.com> said:
>
> > On 2017-01-09 10:56 PM, FPP wrote:
> >> On 2017-01-09 21:14:51 -0500, "J.B. Nicholson" <j...@forestfield.org> said:
> >>
> >>> Now her 2nd campaign for US president has handed vindication to
> >>> Assange when we see the US has no evidence to back up her apparent
> >>> lies about Russia somehow "hacking" the US election. Russia Today
> >>> ("RT"), named in the US government's unclassified
> >>> https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf document, has also
> >>> made many segments and shows discussing the government's findings and
> >>> the entire 'Russian "hacking"' affair:
> >>
> >> What a load of crap.
> >>
> >> Is it hard being that gullible?
> >
> > It's hilarious seeing you dismiss Assange. You progs thought he was a
> > highly credible source when he released things embarassing to the
> > government; now that the shoe is on the other foot, you're singing a
> > very different tune....
>
> Assange was never a credible source of anything.
only Nigger dick up my ass is anything worth of credibility.
> On 2017-01-10 10:13:18 -0500, Rhino <no_offlin...@example.com> said:
>
> > On 2017-01-09 10:56 PM, FPP wrote:
> >> On 2017-01-09 21:14:51 -0500, "J.B. Nicholson" <j...@forestfield.org> said:
> >>
> >>> Now her 2nd campaign for US president has handed vindication to
> >>> Assange when we see the US has no evidence to back up her apparent
> >>> lies about Russia somehow "hacking" the US election. Russia Today
> >>> ("RT"), named in the US government's unclassified
> >>> https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf document, has also
> >>> made many segments and shows discussing the government's findings and
> >>> the entire 'Russian "hacking"' affair:
> >>
> >> What a load of crap.
> >>
> >> Is it hard being that gullible?
> >
> > It's hilarious seeing you dismiss Assange. You progs thought he was a
> > highly credible source when he released things embarassing to the
> > government; now that the shoe is on the other foot, you're singing a
> > very different tune....
>
> Assange was never a credible source of anything.
finished what is in your ape mind, fag!
TomB...@agent.com
Jan 10, 2017, 6:21:56 PM1/10/17
to
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:37:10 -0500, FPP <fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 2017-01-10 10:13:18 -0500, Rhino <no_offlin...@example.com> said:
>
>> On 2017-01-09 10:56 PM, FPP wrote:
>>> On 2017-01-09 21:14:51 -0500, "J.B. Nicholson" <j...@forestfield.org> said:
>>>
>>>> Now her 2nd campaign for US president has handed vindication to
>>>> Assange when we see the US has no evidence to back up her apparent
>>>> lies about Russia somehow "hacking" the US election. Russia Today
>>>> ("RT"), named in the US government's unclassified
>>>> https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf document, has also
>>>> made many segments and shows discussing the government's findings and
>>>> the entire 'Russian "hacking"' affair:
>>>
>>> What a load of crap.
>>>
>>> Is it hard being that gullible?
>>
>> It's hilarious seeing you dismiss Assange. You progs thought he was a
>> highly credible source when he released things embarassing to the
>> government; now that the shoe is on the other foot, you're singing a
>> very different tune....
>
>Assange was never a credible source of anything.
>Right now, all he is a little rat who is holed up hiding from justice.
>
>In the meantime, he works as a Russian cut-out.
I knew if I waited long enough, we'd agree on something, Fred...though
>On 2017-01-10 10:13:18 -0500, Rhino <no_offlin...@example.com> said:
>
>> On 2017-01-09 10:56 PM, FPP wrote:
>>> On 2017-01-09 21:14:51 -0500, "J.B. Nicholson" <j...@forestfield.org> said:
>>>
>>>> Now her 2nd campaign for US president has handed vindication to
>>>> Assange when we see the US has no evidence to back up her apparent
>>>> lies about Russia somehow "hacking" the US election. Russia Today
>>>> ("RT"), named in the US government's unclassified
>>>> https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf document, has also
>>>> made many segments and shows discussing the government's findings and
>>>> the entire 'Russian "hacking"' affair:
>>>
>>> What a load of crap.
>>>
>>> Is it hard being that gullible?
>>
>> It's hilarious seeing you dismiss Assange. You progs thought he was a
>> highly credible source when he released things embarassing to the
>> government; now that the shoe is on the other foot, you're singing a
>> very different tune....
>
>Assange was never a credible source of anything.
>Right now, all he is a little rat who is holed up hiding from justice.
>
>In the meantime, he works as a Russian cut-out.
I rather think you have a higher opinion of JA than I do.
thinbl...@gmail.com
Jan 10, 2017, 8:06:42 PM1/10/17
to
Allegations by FPP (recepiant of the first A&W Rootbeer award for thickheadedness):
1) Assange was never a credible source of anything.
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=collateral+murder+assange
2) Assange is a little rat who is holed up hiding from justice.
https://www.google.com/search?gs_ivs=1&q=us+politician+calls+to+assassinate+Julian+Assange
3) In the meantime, Assange works as a Russian cut-out.
https://www.google.com/search?gs_ivs=1&q=Julian+Assange+podesta+emails+American+University+Forest+Park#q=craig+murray+wikileaks
Ed Stasiak
Jan 10, 2017, 8:48:33 PM1/10/17
to
> FPP
when he was exposing the Bush administration’s shenanigans
but somehow now he’s a traitor and Putin’s puppet...
>
> Assange was never a credible source of anything.
> Right now, all he is a little rat who is holed up hiding from justice.
> In the meantime, he works as a Russian cut-out.
He was the darling of the Left and a valiant freedom activist,
> Assange was never a credible source of anything.
> Right now, all he is a little rat who is holed up hiding from justice.
> In the meantime, he works as a Russian cut-out.
when he was exposing the Bush administration’s shenanigans
but somehow now he’s a traitor and Putin’s puppet...
RichA
Jan 10, 2017, 9:03:34 PM1/10/17
to
https://newmatilda.com/2015/07/31/julian-assange-untold-story-epic-struggle-justice/
J.B. Nicholson
Jan 10, 2017, 10:24:24 PM1/10/17
to
thinbl...@gmail.com <thinbl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 3) In the meantime, Assange works as a Russian cut-out.
Assange relayed a summary of some other equally baseless smears
> 3) In the meantime, Assange works as a Russian cut-out.
against him in his https://www.twitch.tv/reddit/v/113771480 video
answers to questions put to him on reddit.com. Claims that he's a
Russian spy, a Mossad spy, or a recent one from CNN that he's a
pedophile, etc.
In one of the responses Assange points out that people can't assail
WikiLeaks on their record because they have a perfect accuracy
record -- the documents they release are what WikiLeaks says they
are -- so objectors go for ad hominem attacks against Assange.
thinbl...@gmail.com
Jan 10, 2017, 10:26:18 PM1/10/17
to
http://mondoweiss.net/2013/06/reneged-progressive-promises/
and President John F Kennedy.
https://www.sott.net/article/268807-RFK-Jr-My-father-was-convinced-rogue-CIA-killed-his-brother
Obama would not, could not do anything directly as you suggest. Case in point WJ Clinton knew his White House phone conversations were tapped by a foreign embassy (dare guess which foreign country?). But Obama is wiley, and he may have done something to subvert Clinton's run at the White House covertly, while on the golf course, or on the beaches of Hawaii, where voice surveillance is much more difficult.
If you read or listen to Kerry's speech which had the stamp of approval by Obama, his policy is in direct conflict with those of Clinton. (see AIPAC speech and BDS letter from HRC to Haim Saban)
The President of the United States may have the best personal protection of any person on the planet, but is still a VERY dangerous place to be.
FPP
Jan 10, 2017, 10:44:47 PM1/10/17
to
out there...
FPP
Jan 10, 2017, 10:46:52 PM1/10/17
to
one month.
Whose party is he the head of again?
FPP
Jan 10, 2017, 10:48:09 PM1/10/17
to
Lets's see... Obama wants to see him in prison. Trump wants to
nominate him to his administration.
You were saying what, again?
FPP
Jan 10, 2017, 10:50:49 PM1/10/17
to
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/300327-trump-i-love-wikileaks
…
and Wikileaks loves him right back.
> Julian Assange gives guarded praise of Trump and blasts Clinton in interview.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/dec/24/julian-assange-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-interview
FPP
Jan 10, 2017, 11:00:13 PM1/10/17
to
Funny how people that are innocent need to hide in embassies, isn't it?
thinbl...@gmail.com
Jan 10, 2017, 11:02:02 PM1/10/17
to
On Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 10:48:09 PM UTC-5, FPP wrote:
> On 2017-01-10 20:48:31 -0500, Ed Stasiak <esta...@att.net> said:
>
> >> FPP
> >>
> >> Assange was never a credible source of anything.
> >> Right now, all he is a little rat who is holed up hiding from justice.
> >> In the meantime, he works as a Russian cut-out.
> >
> > He was the darling of the Left and a valiant freedom activist,
> > when he was exposing the Bush administration’s shenanigans
> > but somehow now he’s a traitor and Putin’s puppet...
> He's always been a traitor and a puppet.
Assange can't be a traitor, dumbass, he is Australian, and a full fledged member in good standing of the press.
> On 2017-01-10 20:48:31 -0500, Ed Stasiak <esta...@att.net> said:
>
> >> FPP
> >>
> >> Assange was never a credible source of anything.
> >> Right now, all he is a little rat who is holed up hiding from justice.
> >> In the meantime, he works as a Russian cut-out.
> >
> > He was the darling of the Left and a valiant freedom activist,
> > when he was exposing the Bush administration’s shenanigans
> > but somehow now he’s a traitor and Putin’s puppet...
> He's always been a traitor and a puppet.
-------------
...what a dumbass...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMe3WDmxBEI
thinbl...@gmail.com
Jan 10, 2017, 11:26:53 PM1/10/17
to
On Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 10:50:49 PM UTC-5, FPP wrote:
> On 2017-01-10 20:48:31 -0500, Ed Stasiak <esta...@att.net> said:
>
> >> FPP
> >>
> >> Assange was never a credible source of anything.
> >> Right now, all he is a little rat who is holed up hiding from justice.
> >> In the meantime, he works as a Russian cut-out.
> >
> > He was the darling of the Left and a valiant freedom activist,
> > when he was exposing the Bush administration’s shenanigans
> > but somehow now he’s a traitor and Putin’s puppet...
>
> > “I love WikiLeaks,” - Donald J(offrey) Trump
>
> http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/300327-trump-i-love-wikileaks
>
> …
>
> and Wikileaks loves him right back.
>
> > Julian Assange gives guarded praise of Trump and blasts Clinton in interview.
>
> https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/dec/24/julian-assange-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-interview
I'm going to drop this here for those interested and because dumbass Freddie has me blocked and won't see it anyway.
> On 2017-01-10 20:48:31 -0500, Ed Stasiak <esta...@att.net> said:
>
> >> FPP
> >>
> >> Assange was never a credible source of anything.
> >> Right now, all he is a little rat who is holed up hiding from justice.
> >> In the meantime, he works as a Russian cut-out.
> >
> > He was the darling of the Left and a valiant freedom activist,
> > when he was exposing the Bush administration’s shenanigans
> > but somehow now he’s a traitor and Putin’s puppet...
>
> > “I love WikiLeaks,” - Donald J(offrey) Trump
>
> http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/300327-trump-i-love-wikileaks
>
> …
>
> and Wikileaks loves him right back.
>
> > Julian Assange gives guarded praise of Trump and blasts Clinton in interview.
>
> https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/dec/24/julian-assange-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-interview
Look at a map of the middle east. At the center of the storm is Israel. To the north Syria, to the east Iran, and further to the north, Russia.
Russia, Syria and Iran have a defense alliance.
Israel wants to expand it's non-existent borders into Syria (and beyond), to incorporate the promised land of GREATER ISRAEL, as outlined in the Old Testament, and alluded to in Kerry's speech on Israeli settlements.
Russia's defense of Syria has blocked Israel's plans. Clinton supported Israel 100%, even blasting BDS against settlements of Israel. Clinton in a wikileaks memo wanted to overthrow Syria's Assad by causing internal dissent, arming rebels and advocating for a no fly zone. She warmongers against Russia, in large part because of Russia's support for Assad.
Clinton slipped-up and said she was for a nuclear action against Iran if Iran violated the nuclear agreement, which was primarily for the security of Israel.
Clinton was funded for the 2016 election by Israel firster Haim Saban, who was going to use his influence with Clinton in the White House to "advance" Israel's security and land grab.
There is/was a lot more going on that most Americans don't see, because they are concerned primarily with domestic issues, not foreign policy.
Bottom line: Clinton was/is a bitch that sold her soul to Haim Saban and Netanyahu to get into the White House. She failed, I hope she burns in a special place in hell.
We return you now to your regularly scheduled MSM programming....
Ed Stasiak
Jan 10, 2017, 11:53:26 PM1/10/17
to
> thinbl...@gmail.com
is Israel, who just got their allotment of American tax dollars
bumped up to $7 BILLION per year...
>
> Look at a map of the middle east. At the center of the storm is Israel.
The only nation benefiting from the Arab Spring and its fallout,
> Look at a map of the middle east. At the center of the storm is Israel.
is Israel, who just got their allotment of American tax dollars
bumped up to $7 BILLION per year...
thinbl...@gmail.com
Jan 11, 2017, 12:04:39 AM1/11/17
to
..with Little Lindsey Graham and Lockjawed John McCain leading the pack the money was still approved because Egypt needed the money to "guarantee" it's security agreement with....
wait for it....
...it's security agreement with ISRAEL.
So Israel seems to benefit from nearly everything bad that comes out of the middle east.
Must be the hand of Gawd, yeah, That's the ticket! The Good Lard done did it for that ugly little Spartan State.
trotsky
Jan 11, 2017, 7:18:52 AM1/11/17
to
On 1/10/17 9:46 PM, FPP wrote:
> On 2017-01-10 20:48:31 -0500, Ed Stasiak <esta...@att.net> said:
>
>>> FPP
>>>
>>> Assange was never a credible source of anything.
>>> Right now, all he is a little rat who is holed up hiding from justice.
>>> In the meantime, he works as a Russian cut-out.
>>
>> He was the darling of the Left and a valiant freedom activist,
>> when he was exposing the Bush administration’s shenanigans
>> but somehow now he’s a traitor and Putin’s puppet...
>
> And, yet, Trump loves him! He's mentioned him over a hundred times in
> one month.
>
> Whose party is he the head of again?
Are you saying Trump is "showering" him with praises?
> On 2017-01-10 20:48:31 -0500, Ed Stasiak <esta...@att.net> said:
>
>>> FPP
>>>
>>> Assange was never a credible source of anything.
>>> Right now, all he is a little rat who is holed up hiding from justice.
>>> In the meantime, he works as a Russian cut-out.
>>
>> He was the darling of the Left and a valiant freedom activist,
>> when he was exposing the Bush administration’s shenanigans
>> but somehow now he’s a traitor and Putin’s puppet...
>
> And, yet, Trump loves him! He's mentioned him over a hundred times in
> one month.
>
> Whose party is he the head of again?
FPP
Jan 11, 2017, 7:34:47 AM1/11/17
to
Russian Hacking-gate. Russian Blackmail-gate. Monica Crowley-gate.
Son-in-law-gate. And that was this week alone!
He hasn't even set foot in the Oval, and already he's got one foot out
the door. At this rate, he'll be the first president to be inaugurated
in a Federal Penitentiary.
--
"Remember, remember, the 8th of November: Putin, Treason and Plot.
I know of no reason why Putin and Treason, should ever be forgot!"
trotsky
Jan 11, 2017, 7:43:25 AM1/11/17
to
On 1/11/17 6:34 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 2017-01-11 12:18:49 +0000, trotsky <gms...@email.com> said:
>
>> On 1/10/17 9:46 PM, FPP wrote:
>>> On 2017-01-10 20:48:31 -0500, Ed Stasiak <esta...@att.net> said:
>>>
>>>>> FPP
>>>>>
>>>>> Assange was never a credible source of anything.
>>>>> Right now, all he is a little rat who is holed up hiding from justice.
>>>>> In the meantime, he works as a Russian cut-out.
>>>>
>>>> He was the darling of the Left and a valiant freedom activist,
>>>> when he was exposing the Bush administration’s shenanigans
>>>> but somehow now he’s a traitor and Putin’s puppet...
>>>
>>> And, yet, Trump loves him! He's mentioned him over a hundred times in
>>> one month.
>>>
>>> Whose party is he the head of again?
>>
>>
>> Are you saying Trump is "showering" him with praises?
>
> Trump's not even in office, and the scandals are piling up...
>
> Russian Hacking-gate. Russian Blackmail-gate. Monica Crowley-gate.
> Son-in-law-gate. And that was this week alone!
>
> He hasn't even set foot in the Oval, and already he's got one foot out
> the door. At this rate, he'll be the first president to be inaugurated
> in a Federal Penitentiary.
I envision something like the end of "The Blues Brothers": the second
> On 2017-01-11 12:18:49 +0000, trotsky <gms...@email.com> said:
>
>> On 1/10/17 9:46 PM, FPP wrote:
>>> On 2017-01-10 20:48:31 -0500, Ed Stasiak <esta...@att.net> said:
>>>
>>>>> FPP
>>>>>
>>>>> Assange was never a credible source of anything.
>>>>> Right now, all he is a little rat who is holed up hiding from justice.
>>>>> In the meantime, he works as a Russian cut-out.
>>>>
>>>> He was the darling of the Left and a valiant freedom activist,
>>>> when he was exposing the Bush administration’s shenanigans
>>>> but somehow now he’s a traitor and Putin’s puppet...
>>>
>>> And, yet, Trump loves him! He's mentioned him over a hundred times in
>>> one month.
>>>
>>> Whose party is he the head of again?
>>
>>
>> Are you saying Trump is "showering" him with praises?
>
> Trump's not even in office, and the scandals are piling up...
>
> Russian Hacking-gate. Russian Blackmail-gate. Monica Crowley-gate.
> Son-in-law-gate. And that was this week alone!
>
> He hasn't even set foot in the Oval, and already he's got one foot out
> the door. At this rate, he'll be the first president to be inaugurated
> in a Federal Penitentiary.
the inauguration finishes they slap the cuffs on him.
thinbl...@gmail.com
Jan 12, 2017, 1:57:40 PM1/12/17
to
The intelligence concerns, which have been discussed in closed forums recently, are based on suspicions of unreported ties between President-elect Donald Trump, or his associates, and the government of Vladimir Putin in Moscow.
As Russian intelligence is associated with intelligence officials in Tehran, highly classified information, such as Israel's clandestine methods of operation and intelligence sources, could potentially reach Iran. Such information has been shared with the United States in the past.
American intelligence officials expressed despair at the election of Trump during a recent meeting with their Israeli counterparts, Bergman reported. They said that they believed that Putin had “leverages of pressure” over Trump, though they did not elaborate. The American media reported on Wednesday that Russia has embarrassing intelligence about the president-elect.
According to Bergman, the American intelligence officials implied that Israel should “be careful” when transferring intelligence information to the White House and the National Security Council (NSC) following Trump's inauguration – at least until it is clear that Trump does not have inappropriate connections with Russia.
Shared information could be leaked to Russia and onward to Iran, American officials implied to Israelis in closed meeting, saying Kremlin has 'leverages of pressure' over Trump, Ronen Bergman reports.
Haaretz Jan 12, 2016
http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.764711
0 new messages