Re: Democrats Should Just Admit That Judge Roy Moore Is The Greatest Child Molester Ever, And As A Republican Judge, He Is Above The Law

[TS]

Ubiquitous wrote

> Get used to it you whiners. Welcome to the new normal with Trump and
> Roy Moore leading the way. MAGA! MAGA! MAGA! MAGA! MAGA! MAGA!
> MAGA! MAGA! MAGA! MAGA! MAGA! MAGA! MAGA! MAGA!
>

It's a southern red state tradition. Just like spree shootings, Confederate
Flags, Statues and racism.

[Mr. B1ack]

Thing is, old judge Roy wasn't a judge way
back then ... just another lawyer. Definitely
not above the law, not very scary at all.
Yet nobody seemed particularly worried
about him ....

Why was that ?

[#BeamMeUpScotty]

Someone said he signed a year book, so was he really a judge when it was
signed? Or is it FAKE NEWS complete with FAKE DOCUMENTS like Dan Rather
had?

I mean, it's NOT like Liberals haven't used FAKE DOCUMENTS BEFORE.

--
That's Karma


*Rumination*
2- If Donald Trump deleted all of his emails, wiped his server with
Bleachbit and destroyed all of his phones with a hammer, would the
Mainstream Media suddenly lose all interest in the story and declare him
innocent?

[Mr. B1ack]

On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 22:21:14 -0500, #BeamMeUpScotty
<I'm-With-...@ideocracy.gov> wrote:

>On 11/14/2017 09:59 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>> Thing is, old judge Roy wasn't a judge way
>> back then ... just another lawyer. Definitely
>> not above the law, not very scary at all.
>> Yet nobody seemed particularly worried
>> about him ....
>>
>> Why was that ?
>>
>Someone said he signed a year book, so was he really a judge when it was
>signed? Or is it FAKE NEWS complete with FAKE DOCUMENTS like Dan Rather
>had?
>
>I mean, it's NOT like Liberals haven't used FAKE DOCUMENTS BEFORE.

Well ... according to the WikiPedia article, judge Roy
didn't become a judge until *1992*. He was nothing but
an on and off again lawyer before that - ambulance
chaser, insurance law, that kind of crap.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Moore

There is one theme in his life mentioned though ... that
a lot of people didn't like him because he was very anal
about law/order/regs. A bar complaint was filed against
him because he dared investigate whether the local
sheriff had been siphoning money out of his budget.
His troops in Vietnam threatened to frag him because
he was a by-the-book guy.

In any case, Moore had practically no authority or
position until he was appointed as a judge. Just
another asshole on the street - which kind of blows
any "I was too terrified to complain !" claims.

There's some dink on the TV today saying he was
told Moore was "banned from the mall" around 1980.
Right ..... 37 years later this guy can remember Moore ?
Likely whoever told him just waved his hand in some
general direction too ... was the boss even pointing
at Moore, somebody who kinda looked like Moore,
somebody completely different ???

Dunno if Moore is pure as rocky-mountain snow, but
a lot of this seriously STINKS of a set-up job. If it is,
FOLLOW THE MONEY and see where it leads.

[FPP]

On 11/14/17 10:21 PM, #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> On 11/14/2017 09:59 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>> Thing is, old judge Roy wasn't a judge way
>> back then ... just another lawyer. Definitely
>> not above the law, not very scary at all.
>> Yet nobody seemed particularly worried
>> about him ....
>>
>> Why was that ?
>>
> Someone said he signed a year book, so was he really a judge when it was
> signed? Or is it FAKE NEWS complete with FAKE DOCUMENTS like Dan Rather
> had?
>
> I mean, it's NOT like Liberals haven't used FAKE DOCUMENTS BEFORE.

Since he signed it "Roy Moore, DA", I'm assuming he was a D.A.

But, hey... it's not like morons would believe reality...

--
Hours after Trump says something dumb during a nuclear standoff, his
last living staffer will send a clarification to the last living
reporter. - Daniel Powell

[NoBody]

On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:47:37 -0500, FPP <fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 11/14/17 10:21 PM, #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>> On 11/14/2017 09:59 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>> Thing is, old judge Roy wasn't a judge way
>>> back then ... just another lawyer. Definitely
>>> not above the law, not very scary at all.
>>> Yet nobody seemed particularly worried
>>> about him ....
>>>
>>> Why was that ?
>>>
>> Someone said he signed a year book, so was he really a judge when it was
>> signed? Or is it FAKE NEWS complete with FAKE DOCUMENTS like Dan Rather
>> had?
>>
>> I mean, it's NOT like Liberals haven't used FAKE DOCUMENTS BEFORE.
>
>Since he signed it "Roy Moore, DA", I'm assuming he was a D.A.

The claim is that he signed it...

[Ubiquitous]

Well, there you go raining on FPPsky's hate-on...


--
Dems & the media want Trump to be more like Obama, but then he'd
have to audit liberals & wire tap reporters' phones.

[Rudy Canoza]

On 11/14/2017 7:48 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 22:21:14 -0500, #BeamMeUpScotty
> <I'm-With-...@ideocracy.gov> wrote:
>
>> On 11/14/2017 09:59 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>> Thing is, old judge Roy wasn't a judge way
>>> back then ... just another lawyer. Definitely
>>> not above the law, not very scary at all.
>>> Yet nobody seemed particularly worried
>>> about him ....
>>>
>>> Why was that ?
>>>
>> Someone said he signed a year book, so was he really a judge when it was
>> signed? Or is it FAKE NEWS complete with FAKE DOCUMENTS like Dan Rather
>> had?
>>
>> I mean, it's NOT like Liberals haven't used FAKE DOCUMENTS BEFORE.
>
>
> Well ... according to the WikiPedia article, judge Roy
> didn't become a judge until *1992*. He was nothing but
> an on and off again lawyer before that - ambulance
> chaser, insurance law, that kind of crap.

He was the fucking district attorney for the county in 1979, you rancid
cunt.

[#BeamMeUpScotty]

On 11/15/2017 12:47 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 11/14/17 10:21 PM, #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>> On 11/14/2017 09:59 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>> Thing is, old judge Roy wasn't a judge way
>>> back then ... just another lawyer. Definitely
>>> not above the law, not very scary at all.
>>> Yet nobody seemed particularly worried
>>> about him ....
>>>
>>> Why was that ?
>>>
>> Someone said he signed a year book, so was he really a judge when it was
>> signed? Or is it FAKE NEWS complete with FAKE DOCUMENTS like Dan Rather
>> had?
>>
>> I mean, it's NOT like Liberals haven't used FAKE DOCUMENTS BEFORE.
>
> Since he signed it "Roy Moore, DA", I'm assuming he was a D.A.
>
> But, hey... it's not like morons would believe reality...
>

The Morons did believe Dan Rather, so you may be right.

--
That's Karma


*Rumination*

29 - People who lie about Socialism are always doing Socialists a favor.
Because nothing is worse than the truth about Socialism.

[FPP]

On 11/15/17 12:38 PM, #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> On 11/15/2017 12:47 AM, FPP wrote:
>> On 11/14/17 10:21 PM, #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>> On 11/14/2017 09:59 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>>> Thing is, old judge Roy wasn't a judge way
>>>> back then ... just another lawyer. Definitely
>>>> not above the law, not very scary at all.
>>>> Yet nobody seemed particularly worried
>>>> about him ....
>>>>
>>>> Why was that ?
>>>>
>>> Someone said he signed a year book, so was he really a judge when it was
>>> signed? Or is it FAKE NEWS complete with FAKE DOCUMENTS like Dan Rather
>>> had?
>>>
>>> I mean, it's NOT like Liberals haven't used FAKE DOCUMENTS BEFORE.
>>
>> Since he signed it "Roy Moore, DA", I'm assuming he was a D.A.
>>
>> But, hey... it's not like morons would believe reality...
>>
>
> The Morons did believe Dan Rather, so you may be right.

It wouldn't matter if the signature was proven to be Moore's.
You morons wouldn't take it as fact anyway.

And this isn't the first child molester you guys have made excuses for.
--
"We have to accept that the winner of this election was a Washington
outsider who no one thought had a shot at running this country: Vladimir
Putin - Stephen Colbert

[Governor Swill]

Because he had no power then.

Swill
--
The difference between being ruled by a central government
or the 1% is that the government is ultimately answerable
to the voters - the 1% are answerable to no one.

[Governor Swill]

On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 08:21:41 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
wrote:

He's a racist, misogynist and religious fanatic.

[Governor Swill]

On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>I mean, it's NOT like Liberals haven't used FAKE DOCUMENTS BEFORE.

I mean, it's NOT like liberals and conservatives haven't used FAKE
DOCUMENTS BEFORE.

Fixed that sentence for ya!

[#BeamMeUpScotty]

On 11/16/2017 01:14 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>> I mean, it's NOT like Liberals haven't used FAKE DOCUMENTS BEFORE.
>
> I mean, it's NOT like liberals and conservatives haven't used FAKE
> DOCUMENTS BEFORE.
>
> Fixed that sentence for ya!

It's the Democrats like Dan Rather that are in question so the
Republicans are sort of a moot point unless they are the ones calling
for Roy More to step aside and collude to undermine the voters.

I suppose you might include McConnell as a Democrat in this case.

--
That's Karma


*Rumination*

35 - If you're not the lead dog, the view never changes.

[FPP]

On 11/16/17 5:52 PM, #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> On 11/16/2017 01:14 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>> I mean, it's NOT like Liberals haven't used FAKE DOCUMENTS BEFORE.
>>
>> I mean, it's NOT like liberals and conservatives haven't used FAKE
>> DOCUMENTS BEFORE.
>>
>> Fixed that sentence for ya!
>
> It's the Democrats like Dan Rather that are in question so the
> Republicans are sort of a moot point unless they are the ones calling
> for Roy More to step aside and collude to undermine the voters.

I've seen random word generators that made more sense than that sentence...

[#BeamMeUpScotty]

On 11/16/2017 06:44 PM, FPP wrote:
> On 11/16/17 5:52 PM, #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>> On 11/16/2017 01:14 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>> I mean, it's NOT like Liberals haven't used FAKE DOCUMENTS BEFORE.
>>>
>>> I mean, it's NOT like liberals and conservatives haven't used FAKE
>>> DOCUMENTS BEFORE.
>>>
>>> Fixed that sentence for ya!
>>
>> It's the Democrats like Dan Rather that are in question so the
>> Republicans are sort of a moot point unless they are the ones calling
>> for Roy More to step aside and collude to undermine the voters.
>
> I've seen random word generators that made more sense than that sentence...
>

Pretend you're smart this time, and read it again.

--
That's Karma


*Rumination*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrA9zj94NuU
This Liberal is all about government taking over....
-Maxine Waters-

[FPP]

On 11/16/17 7:09 PM, #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> On 11/16/2017 06:44 PM, FPP wrote:
>> On 11/16/17 5:52 PM, #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>> On 11/16/2017 01:14 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>>> I mean, it's NOT like Liberals haven't used FAKE DOCUMENTS BEFORE.
>>>>
>>>> I mean, it's NOT like liberals and conservatives haven't used FAKE
>>>> DOCUMENTS BEFORE.
>>>>
>>>> Fixed that sentence for ya!
>>>
>>> It's the Democrats like Dan Rather that are in question so the
>>> Republicans are sort of a moot point unless they are the ones calling
>>> for Roy More to step aside and collude to undermine the voters.
>>
>> I've seen random word generators that made more sense than that sentence...
>>
>
> Pretend you're smart this time, and read it again.

"...that are in question so..." "So" what?

"...Republicans are sort of a moot point..." How are a group of people
a "moot point", genius?

"...Roy More..." More (or less than) what?

"...Roy More to step aside and collude..." Indicates More (sic) would
be doing the colluding.

If you WRITE in fucking English, I'll READ it as English.

[Governor Swill]

On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 20:23:50 -0500, FPP <fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 11/16/17 7:09 PM, #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>> On 11/16/2017 06:44 PM, FPP wrote:
>>> On 11/16/17 5:52 PM, #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>> On 11/16/2017 01:14 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>>>> I mean, it's NOT like Liberals haven't used FAKE DOCUMENTS BEFORE.
>>>>>
>>>>> I mean, it's NOT like liberals and conservatives haven't used FAKE
>>>>> DOCUMENTS BEFORE.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixed that sentence for ya!
>>>>
>>>> It's the Democrats like Dan Rather that are in question so the
>>>> Republicans are sort of a moot point unless they are the ones calling
>>>> for Roy More to step aside and collude to undermine the voters.
>>>
>>> I've seen random word generators that made more sense than that sentence...
>>>
>>
>> Pretend you're smart this time, and read it again.
>
>"...that are in question so..." "So" what?
>
>"...Republicans are sort of a moot point..." How are a group of people
>a "moot point", genius?
>
>"...Roy More..." More (or less than) what?
>
>"...Roy More to step aside and collude..." Indicates More (sic) would
>be doing the colluding.
>
>If you WRITE in fucking English, I'll READ it as English.

You're expecting too much of him.

[RichA]

California is shooting spree central, you libby queer.

[TS]