Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Onlookers jeer as man is beaten, stripped and robbed by negroes in Baltimore
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Just TNB
Apr 12, 2012, 12:26:59 PM4/12/12
to
http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/09/us/maryland-
beating/index.html?iref=obnetwork
Baltimore (CNN) -- Onlookers laughed and did nothing to help as
a man was beaten, stripped and robbed on the street in Baltimore.
The attack, which police say happened on March 18 after St.
Patrick's Day celebrations, was captured by at least two
cameras. Video of it went viral.
"Not only did they rob him, but they attempted to strip him of
his dignity. They tore his clothes off; they mocked him. That
behavior just will not be tolerated," said Detective Nicole
Monroe with the Baltimore police.
Police say they have identified one suspect, but have made no
arrests.
They are not releasing the victim's identity except to say he
was a 31-year-old man from Arlington, Virginia.
The victim was on the way to his hotel from a downtown Baltimore
club when he was attacked, according to a police report. The man
had been drinking. He told police he couldn't recall exactly
what happened, but the videos fill in the blanks.
In them, a man is seen standing, unsteadily, against a row of
mailboxes. A crowd starts to gather and women dance suggestively
against him. Someone notices his watch and a hand seems to grab
something from one of the man's front pockets.
He pursues the supposed thief and is punched in the face. The
man falls over backward and his head hits the sidewalk so hard
it can be heard on the video.
"Smackdown!" someone yells.
His pockets are rifled and his clothes pulled off. Some people
can be heard laughing. No one comes to his aid.
According to the police report, the man lost his Tag Heuer
watch, which he valued at $1,300, his iPhone and car key.
CNN showed video of the attack to a number of people in
Baltimore to gauge their response.
"That's pretty sad," said Finley George of Virginia, who was
visiting the city with family. "I mean he obviously didn't do
anything to anybody. They just got up on him and started beating
him."
It's Baltimore. You don't seriously expect civilized behavior
from any of the black animals living there. Do you?
beating/index.html?iref=obnetwork
Baltimore (CNN) -- Onlookers laughed and did nothing to help as
a man was beaten, stripped and robbed on the street in Baltimore.
The attack, which police say happened on March 18 after St.
Patrick's Day celebrations, was captured by at least two
cameras. Video of it went viral.
"Not only did they rob him, but they attempted to strip him of
his dignity. They tore his clothes off; they mocked him. That
behavior just will not be tolerated," said Detective Nicole
Monroe with the Baltimore police.
Police say they have identified one suspect, but have made no
arrests.
They are not releasing the victim's identity except to say he
was a 31-year-old man from Arlington, Virginia.
The victim was on the way to his hotel from a downtown Baltimore
club when he was attacked, according to a police report. The man
had been drinking. He told police he couldn't recall exactly
what happened, but the videos fill in the blanks.
In them, a man is seen standing, unsteadily, against a row of
mailboxes. A crowd starts to gather and women dance suggestively
against him. Someone notices his watch and a hand seems to grab
something from one of the man's front pockets.
He pursues the supposed thief and is punched in the face. The
man falls over backward and his head hits the sidewalk so hard
it can be heard on the video.
"Smackdown!" someone yells.
His pockets are rifled and his clothes pulled off. Some people
can be heard laughing. No one comes to his aid.
According to the police report, the man lost his Tag Heuer
watch, which he valued at $1,300, his iPhone and car key.
CNN showed video of the attack to a number of people in
Baltimore to gauge their response.
"That's pretty sad," said Finley George of Virginia, who was
visiting the city with family. "I mean he obviously didn't do
anything to anybody. They just got up on him and started beating
him."
It's Baltimore. You don't seriously expect civilized behavior
from any of the black animals living there. Do you?
Dano
Apr 12, 2012, 12:43:57 PM4/12/12
to
"Just TNB" wrote in message news:DXLUQ6XU4101...@reece.net.au...
<snip>
It's Baltimore. You don't seriously expect civilized behavior
from any of the black animals living there. Do you?
==============================
No more than I expect reasonable behavior out of racists like you who scour
the press looking for justifications to your mindless obsessive hatred.
With folks like you around still...you expect anything different from those
you would oppress? Sucks don't it? Keep acting as you do and you'll
fulfill your dream of all out race war you ignorant fuck. Then you'll be
happy as your own loved ones pay the price of your idiocy. Perpetual spiral
you goddam fool.
<snip>
It's Baltimore. You don't seriously expect civilized behavior
from any of the black animals living there. Do you?
No more than I expect reasonable behavior out of racists like you who scour
the press looking for justifications to your mindless obsessive hatred.
With folks like you around still...you expect anything different from those
you would oppress? Sucks don't it? Keep acting as you do and you'll
fulfill your dream of all out race war you ignorant fuck. Then you'll be
happy as your own loved ones pay the price of your idiocy. Perpetual spiral
you goddam fool.
Hater @whitehouse.org Obama's War On Women
Apr 12, 2012, 1:09:40 PM4/12/12
to
"Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:jm70og$rd3$1...@dont-email.me...
> "Just TNB" wrote in message news:DXLUQ6XU4101...@reece.net.au...
>
> <snip>
>
> It's Baltimore. You don't seriously expect civilized behavior
> from any of the black animals living there. Do you?
>
> ==============================
>
> No more than I expect reasonable behavior out of racists like you who
> scour the press looking for justifications to your mindless obsessive
> hatred.
What do you call 120 Obama voters shot & killed by other Obama voters in
>
> <snip>
>
> It's Baltimore. You don't seriously expect civilized behavior
> from any of the black animals living there. Do you?
>
> ==============================
>
> No more than I expect reasonable behavior out of racists like you who
> scour the press looking for justifications to your mindless obsessive
> hatred.
Chitcago?
Racists?
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-chicago-homicides-soar-20120412,0,1713215.story
Chicago homicides soar in first quarter of 2012
RichA
Apr 12, 2012, 1:18:06 PM4/12/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On Apr 12, 12:43 pm, "Dano" <janeandd...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Just TNB" wrote in messagenews:DXLUQ6XU4101...@reece.net.au...
about the Trayvon case, would he? Liberal media...
> "Just TNB" wrote in messagenews:DXLUQ6XU4101...@reece.net.au...
>
> <snip>
>
> It's Baltimore. You don't seriously expect civilized behavior
> from any of the black animals living there. Do you?
>
> ==============================
>
> No more than I expect reasonable behavior out of racists like you who scour
> the press looking for justifications to your mindless obsessive hatred.
And yet he would hardly have had to "scour" the press to find info
> <snip>
>
> It's Baltimore. You don't seriously expect civilized behavior
> from any of the black animals living there. Do you?
>
> ==============================
>
> No more than I expect reasonable behavior out of racists like you who scour
> the press looking for justifications to your mindless obsessive hatred.
about the Trayvon case, would he? Liberal media...
RichA
Apr 12, 2012, 1:18:49 PM4/12/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On Apr 12, 1:09 pm, "Obama's War On Women" <Woman Hater @ White
House.org> wrote:
> "Dano" <janeandd...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:jm70og$rd3$1...@dont-email.me...
>
> > "Just TNB" wrote in messagenews:DXLUQ6XU4101...@reece.net.au...
House.org> wrote:
> "Dano" <janeandd...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:jm70og$rd3$1...@dont-email.me...
>
> > "Just TNB" wrote in messagenews:DXLUQ6XU4101...@reece.net.au...
>
> > <snip>
>
> > It's Baltimore. You don't seriously expect civilized behavior
> > from any of the black animals living there. Do you?
>
> > ==============================
>
> > No more than I expect reasonable behavior out of racists like you who
> > scour the press looking for justifications to your mindless obsessive
> > hatred.
>
> What do you call 120 Obama voters shot & killed by other Obama voters in
> Chitcago?
"Civic minded."
> > <snip>
>
> > It's Baltimore. You don't seriously expect civilized behavior
> > from any of the black animals living there. Do you?
>
> > ==============================
>
> > No more than I expect reasonable behavior out of racists like you who
> > scour the press looking for justifications to your mindless obsessive
> > hatred.
>
> What do you call 120 Obama voters shot & killed by other Obama voters in
> Chitcago?
Dano
Apr 12, 2012, 1:48:04 PM4/12/12
to
"Obama's War On Women" wrote in message
news:d%Dhr.49405$V94....@newsfe19.iad...
========================================
Your very characterization of people of color as "Obama voters" illustrates
your rather obvious racism. There were far more white voters who sent Obama
to the White House than black you fraudulent scumbag. But keep trying. The
only folks you are impressing is other hate mongers and virulent racists.
Another reason for the utter failure of the Republican Party.
White folks kill more white folks too moron.
news:d%Dhr.49405$V94....@newsfe19.iad...
Your very characterization of people of color as "Obama voters" illustrates
your rather obvious racism. There were far more white voters who sent Obama
to the White House than black you fraudulent scumbag. But keep trying. The
only folks you are impressing is other hate mongers and virulent racists.
Another reason for the utter failure of the Republican Party.
White folks kill more white folks too moron.
Way Back Jack
Apr 12, 2012, 2:05:31 PM4/12/12
to
per capita.
White non-Hispanics are about 69% of the population while blacks are 13%.
So if their crime in any given category is higher in terms of raw figures,
it is to be expected.
Similarly, slightly under 50% of whites voted for Obama per ABC exit polls
while blacks were 96%
I'll grant you one thing, however: A higher percentage of whites voted for
Obama than for any other Dem president since LBJ. Sort of kills all the
talk about whites and their racism, eh.
Dano
Apr 12, 2012, 2:35:15 PM4/12/12
to
"Way Back Jack" wrote in message
news:1nx4xbhbz7neh$.nfpgvl0152bl$.dlg@40tude.net...
=====================================
None of which denies that what I stated was true. How many white
Republicans voted for Obama? What percentage of Republicans are black? We
can play these games all day. But you and your duplicitous, if not racist
ilk aren't worth the fucking bother.
news:1nx4xbhbz7neh$.nfpgvl0152bl$.dlg@40tude.net...
None of which denies that what I stated was true. How many white
Republicans voted for Obama? What percentage of Republicans are black? We
can play these games all day. But you and your duplicitous, if not racist
ilk aren't worth the fucking bother.
Dano
Apr 12, 2012, 2:47:22 PM4/12/12
to
"Way Back Jack" wrote in message
news:1nx4xbhbz7neh$.nfpgvl0152bl$.dlg@40tude.net...
news:1nx4xbhbz7neh$.nfpgvl0152bl$.dlg@40tude.net...
To bring this back to the actual point here...
http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/04/11/2743253/dont-white-people-kill-each-other.html
excerpt...
What Will, Steele and O’Reilly failed to mention is the exacting truth that
white Americans are just as likely to be killed by other whites. According
to Justice Department statistics, 84 percent of white people killed every
year are killed by other whites.
In fact, all races share similar ratios. Yet there’s no outrage or
racialized debate about “white on white” violence. Instead, the myth and
associated fear of “black on black” crime is sold as a legitimate,
mainstream descriptive and becomes American status quo.
The truth? As the largest racial group, whites commit the majority of crimes
in America. In particular, whites are responsible for the vast majority of
violent crimes. With respect to aggravated assault, whites led blacks 2-1 in
arrests; in forcible-rape cases, whites led all racial and ethnic groups by
more than 2-1. And in larceny theft, whites led blacks, again, 2-1.
Hater @whitehouse.org Obama's War On Women
Apr 12, 2012, 3:34:34 PM4/12/12
to
news:jm74gn$irj$1...@dont-email.me...
of the Whitey for President shows whos really racist.
All major exit polls showed between 96% and 97% of African Americans who
voted, voted for Obama.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081106121626AAAdKxO
> "Obama's War On Women" wrote in message
> news:d%Dhr.49405$V94....@newsfe19.iad...
>
>
>
> "Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:jm70og$rd3$1...@dont-email.me...
>> "Just TNB" wrote in message
>> news:DXLUQ6XU4101...@reece.net.au...
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> It's Baltimore. You don't seriously expect civilized behavior
>> from any of the black animals living there. Do you?
>>
>> ==============================
>>
>> No more than I expect reasonable behavior out of racists like you who
>> scour the press looking for justifications to your mindless obsessive
>> hatred.
>
>
> What do you call 120 Obama voters shot & killed by other Obama voters in
> Chitcago?
> Racists?
>
> http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-chicago-homicides-soar-20120412,0,1713215.story
>
> Chicago homicides soar in first quarter of 2012
>
> ========================================
>
> Your very characterization of people of color as "Obama voters"
> illustrates your rather obvious racism.
Actually People that brag how 97 % of their Color voted for Obama instead
> news:d%Dhr.49405$V94....@newsfe19.iad...
>
>
>
> "Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:jm70og$rd3$1...@dont-email.me...
>> "Just TNB" wrote in message
>> news:DXLUQ6XU4101...@reece.net.au...
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> It's Baltimore. You don't seriously expect civilized behavior
>> from any of the black animals living there. Do you?
>>
>> ==============================
>>
>> No more than I expect reasonable behavior out of racists like you who
>> scour the press looking for justifications to your mindless obsessive
>> hatred.
>
>
> What do you call 120 Obama voters shot & killed by other Obama voters in
> Chitcago?
> Racists?
>
> http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-chicago-homicides-soar-20120412,0,1713215.story
>
> Chicago homicides soar in first quarter of 2012
>
> ========================================
>
> Your very characterization of people of color as "Obama voters"
> illustrates your rather obvious racism.
of the Whitey for President shows whos really racist.
All major exit polls showed between 96% and 97% of African Americans who
voted, voted for Obama.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081106121626AAAdKxO
Hater @whitehouse.org Obama's War On Women
Apr 12, 2012, 3:35:56 PM4/12/12
to
news:jm7795$4ra$1...@dont-email.me...
Racism in America
Hater @whitehouse.org Obama's War On Women
Apr 12, 2012, 3:38:49 PM4/12/12
to
news:jm77vs$931$1...@dont-email.me...
=========================================
Since Whites are 67 % of the population, then 67 % of Murderd Blacks should
be murdered by Whites. Instead 93 % of Blakcs are murderd by Blacks who
are only 17 % of the population.
2007 special report released by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, reveals
that approximately 8,000 — and, in certain years, as many as 9,000 African
Americans are murdered annually in the United States. This chilling figure
is accompanied by another equally sobering fact, that 93% of these murders
are in fact perpetrated by other blacks. The analysis, supported by FBI
records, finds that in 2005 alone, for example, African Americans accounted
for 49% of all homicide victims in the US — again, almost exclusively at the
hands of other African Americans.
Since Whites are 67 % of the population, then 67 % of Murderd Blacks should
be murdered by Whites. Instead 93 % of Blakcs are murderd by Blacks who
are only 17 % of the population.
2007 special report released by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, reveals
that approximately 8,000 — and, in certain years, as many as 9,000 African
Americans are murdered annually in the United States. This chilling figure
is accompanied by another equally sobering fact, that 93% of these murders
are in fact perpetrated by other blacks. The analysis, supported by FBI
records, finds that in 2005 alone, for example, African Americans accounted
for 49% of all homicide victims in the US — again, almost exclusively at the
hands of other African Americans.
Dano
Apr 12, 2012, 4:12:42 PM4/12/12
to
"Obama's War On Women" wrote in message
news:37Ghr.19439$5m.1...@newsfe20.iad...
Yeah. So what? The vast majority of blacks vote Democratic anyway. That's
mainly the fault of Republican positions on issues. Why should folks vote
against their own interests? You think they are as dumb as YOU? Same
reason most of the wealthiest Americans vote Republican. I'm from
Massachusetts...where we voted in the first black Senator in this country
elected by popular vote. And he was a Republican...back in an era that HAD
liberal Republicans. Hell...most conservative Republicans of that age would
be too liberal for today's Republican party. There wasn't another African
American elected for another 14 years. There have only been THREE black
senators in our nation's history. Er...what exactly WAS your point about
racism?
emoneyjoe
Apr 12, 2012, 4:37:27 PM4/12/12
to
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:35:15 -0400, "Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
What do you mean "how many republicans are black"?
If 90% of blacks vote a straight dimocrat ticket,
doesn't that tell you how many republicans are black?
This is more than a political issue, in fact politics
can't possibly be the only reason for the 90% bias,
maybe blacks loved being slaves, maybe they have
reasons to vote straight a democrat ticket, and it
is obvious they did not vote racist, the vote is 90%
every election (until 2012).
wrote:
If 90% of blacks vote a straight dimocrat ticket,
doesn't that tell you how many republicans are black?
This is more than a political issue, in fact politics
can't possibly be the only reason for the 90% bias,
maybe blacks loved being slaves, maybe they have
reasons to vote straight a democrat ticket, and it
is obvious they did not vote racist, the vote is 90%
every election (until 2012).
Dano
Apr 12, 2012, 4:38:13 PM4/12/12
to
"Obama's War On Women" wrote in message
news:2bGhr.55$ah5...@newsfe03.iad...
Since Whites are 67 % of the population, then 67 % of Murderd Blacks should
be murdered by Whites. Instead 93 % of Blakcs are murderd by Blacks who
are only 17 % of the population.
2007 special report released by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, reveals
that approximately 8,000 — and, in certain years, as many as 9,000 African
Americans are murdered annually in the United States. This chilling figure
is accompanied by another equally sobering fact, that 93% of these murders
are in fact perpetrated by other blacks. The analysis, supported by FBI
records, finds that in 2005 alone, for example, African Americans accounted
for 49% of all homicide victims in the US — again, almost exclusively at the
hands of other African Americans.
Just when I think you can't be any more simplistic and ignorant...you top
yourself. I don't suppose factors such as education...poverty
level...unemployment have anything to do with your cherry picked statistics
eh? Or are you using racial inferiority to explain these numbers?
Don't you need to pick up your sheets at the laundry for your upcoming
midnight ride?
Way Back Jack
Apr 12, 2012, 5:25:22 PM4/12/12
to
crimes when you fail to include the percentages. If whites lead by a 2-1
ratio, you ignore the fact that whites are 5-1 in terms of population
demographics over blacks.
Black perps commit the lion's share of interracial violent crime, in terms
of rates. The reason you are ignorant of this fact is because the media
ignores it, but even Holder's own DOJ supports what I say.
As for white-on-white, and black-on-black, all crime is detestable, but if
you don't mind that the homies are offing each other in record numbers,
then you shouldn't be pulling your Al Sharpton righteous indignation over
the Trayvon killing.
Way Back Jack
Apr 12, 2012, 5:25:49 PM4/12/12
to
way: there are 5.3X as many whites as blacks. If whites committed the same
violent crime at the same rates as blacks, citizens would be wearing armor,
living in bunkers, riding in Sherman tanks, and carrying bazookas.
As for the election numbers, I agree with you that whites really opened up
for Obama. Whites still have this guilt complex and wanted to prove to
themselves that they ain't racist. Now this time I hope they vote for
anyone but Obama to show they're not stupid.
I don't know the percentage of Repubs are black but consider this: they
favored Obama over Hillary 88-12 even tho Obama had no track record while
the Clintons sucked-up to them for years.
Way Back Jack
Apr 12, 2012, 5:45:56 PM4/12/12
to
racial preferences have been in effect for decades, the black rates of
crime, STDs, and out of wedlocks are FAR worse today than under Jim Crow
when blacks were oppressed and less educated, and the income gap was as
wide as a canyon?
And consider this: the people who engage in this behavior are for the most
part under 50. In other words, they never felt the sting of Jim Crow;
quite the contrary, they are affirmative action babies.
So stop making excuses for your people. I don't know the reason for your
pernicious behavir but partly blame the liberals for keeping you on the
entitlement plantation of self-pity and anger.
If your people would rise up and kill them, it might be a good start.
Message has been deleted
Dano
Apr 12, 2012, 7:07:03 PM4/12/12
to
"Way Back Jack" wrote in message
news:1rj3s8iztska7.1559ircrauw9k$.dlg@40tude.net...
My "people" came over from Ireland in the 20's and 30's you incredible
moron. With THAT I'm done with you. You have done a far better job of
exposing your repugnant thought process. Any fool can see you are a
complete, disgusting racist deserving of no consideration. You are also a
lying psychopath...probably a Neo-Nazi or Klansman. You have earned a
special place in my killfile for now...in hell eventually.
emoneyjoe
Apr 12, 2012, 8:33:31 PM4/12/12
to
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:38:13 -0400, "Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
No, the reason the stats for black on black violence
is because they are dimocrats, that is the dimocrat way,
no sense talking, just start spraying lead (even if it hits
children and strangers.
>Don't you need to pick up your sheets at the laundry for your upcoming
>midnight ride?
No me, at my age the blonde ponies won't even
talk to me.
wrote:
is because they are dimocrats, that is the dimocrat way,
no sense talking, just start spraying lead (even if it hits
children and strangers.
>Don't you need to pick up your sheets at the laundry for your upcoming
>midnight ride?
talk to me.
Way Back Jack
Apr 12, 2012, 10:22:41 PM4/12/12
to
have a crystal ball.
>With THAT I'm done with you. You have done a far better job of
> exposing your repugnant thought process. Any fool can see you are a
> complete, disgusting racist deserving of no consideration. You are also a
> lying psychopath...probably a Neo-Nazi or Klansman. You have earned a
> special place in my killfile for now...in hell eventually.
uncomfortable politically-incorrect truth is a racist.
You punks along with the black race hustling industry play the race card so
much it doesn't really mean anything anymore.
My dream is that the the New Black Panthers who have sworn to kill "honkies
and pink people" get you first.
Poetic justice, punk.
BTR1701
Apr 12, 2012, 10:21:43 PM4/12/12
to
In article <jm7cvs$9ar$1...@dont-email.me>, "Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> "Obama's War On Women" wrote in message
> news:37Ghr.19439$5m.1...@newsfe20.iad...
>
>
>
> "Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
color as "Obama voters" is racist' right out of the water.
wrote:
> "Obama's War On Women" wrote in message
> news:37Ghr.19439$5m.1...@newsfe20.iad...
>
>
>
> "Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > Your very characterization of people of color as "Obama voters"
> > illustrates your rather obvious racism.
>
> Actually People that brag how 97 % of their Color voted for Obama instead
> of the Whitey for President shows whos really racist.
>
>
> All major exit polls showed between 96% and 97% of African Americans who
> voted, voted for Obama.
> http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081106121626AAAdKxO
>
> ==========================================
>
> Yeah. So what?
So... it pretty much blows your theory that 'characterizing people of
> > illustrates your rather obvious racism.
>
> Actually People that brag how 97 % of their Color voted for Obama instead
> of the Whitey for President shows whos really racist.
>
>
> All major exit polls showed between 96% and 97% of African Americans who
> voted, voted for Obama.
> http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081106121626AAAdKxO
>
> ==========================================
>
> Yeah. So what?
color as "Obama voters" is racist' right out of the water.
trotsky
Apr 13, 2012, 7:03:29 AM4/13/12
to
Sore loser.
Fat Armed Negress
Apr 13, 2012, 2:25:19 PM4/13/12
to
I was be there.
I just wanted to see what this dude's cock looked like. Never did
want to do no harm, you see.
But I likes me some dick, I does. Up the chocolate canal, too!
I just wanted to see what this dude's cock looked like. Never did
want to do no harm, you see.
But I likes me some dick, I does. Up the chocolate canal, too!
WendysHotandGREASYHamburgers
Apr 13, 2012, 7:29:50 PM4/13/12
to
Maybe they jeered because of his tiny dick! Ever think of that?
Kenny
Apr 13, 2012, 7:50:42 PM4/13/12
to
On 12 Apr 2012, Way Back Jack <inv...@invalid.net> posted some
news:1nx4xbhbz7neh$.nfpgvl0152bl$.d...@40tude.net:
Not for Dano or the confused ho' posting under his name. Neither one of
the twits ever passed a math class.
news:1nx4xbhbz7neh$.nfpgvl0152bl$.d...@40tude.net:
the twits ever passed a math class.
Gunner Asch
Apr 14, 2012, 2:32:06 AM4/14/12
to
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:43:57 -0400, "Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>"Just TNB" wrote in message news:DXLUQ6XU4101...@reece.net.au...
>
><snip>
>
>It's Baltimore. You don't seriously expect civilized behavior
>from any of the black animals living there. Do you?
>
>==============================
>
>No more than I expect reasonable behavior out of racists like you who scour
>the press looking for justifications to your mindless obsessive hatred.
Scour the press? Son...I dont know how to tell you this...but there is
a reason race is left out of most news reports.
Because most...not all..but most serious crime is comitted by blacks.
Which is why 1 out of 4 blacks have a felony record.
Which is a very very sad thing.
It doesnt take any scouring at all to find blacks involved in serious
crimes.
Oh..before you start spewing "racist".....Im not white.
Gunner
--
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry
capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.
It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an
Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense
and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have
such a man for their? president.. Blaming the prince of the
fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of
fools that made him their prince".
wrote:
>"Just TNB" wrote in message news:DXLUQ6XU4101...@reece.net.au...
>
><snip>
>
>It's Baltimore. You don't seriously expect civilized behavior
>from any of the black animals living there. Do you?
>
>==============================
>
>No more than I expect reasonable behavior out of racists like you who scour
>the press looking for justifications to your mindless obsessive hatred.
a reason race is left out of most news reports.
Because most...not all..but most serious crime is comitted by blacks.
Which is why 1 out of 4 blacks have a felony record.
Which is a very very sad thing.
It doesnt take any scouring at all to find blacks involved in serious
crimes.
Oh..before you start spewing "racist".....Im not white.
Gunner
--
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry
capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.
It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an
Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense
and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have
such a man for their? president.. Blaming the prince of the
fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of
fools that made him their prince".
Gunner Asch
Apr 14, 2012, 2:35:52 AM4/14/12
to
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:48:04 -0400, "Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
So you are trying to deflect from the fact that blacks killed 120 other
blacks (and whites) in Chicago so far this year?
Can you tell us how many whites killed whites and blacks so far this
year in Chi? Think its going to be 120? More? Less?
Remember...blacks make up only 13% of our population, yet they commit
82% of the murders across the nation.
Why? And why would you try to deflect this fact?
Shouldnt blacks be held accountable for their criminality? The majority
of people that they kill..are other blacks. What..those victims have
no worth to you?
wrote:
blacks (and whites) in Chicago so far this year?
Can you tell us how many whites killed whites and blacks so far this
year in Chi? Think its going to be 120? More? Less?
Remember...blacks make up only 13% of our population, yet they commit
82% of the murders across the nation.
Why? And why would you try to deflect this fact?
Shouldnt blacks be held accountable for their criminality? The majority
of people that they kill..are other blacks. What..those victims have
no worth to you?
Gunner Asch
Apr 14, 2012, 2:45:54 AM4/14/12
to
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:47:22 -0400, "Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
In pure numbers...you are somewhat right.
However..you keep forgetting that blacks only make up 13% of the
population.
They would have to make up 25% to be "equal" in crime rates to whites.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States
http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2009/offenses/expanded_information/data/shrtable_03.html
Age Total Sex Race
Male Female Unknown White Black Other
Total 15,760 10,391 1,197 4,172 5,286 5,890 245
You will notice that blacks commited some 614 more homicides than did
whites.....yet blacks only make up 13% of the population
So there are some serious questions to be asked..why do blacks kill on a
ratio of 5 to 1 over those evil whites?
wrote:
However..you keep forgetting that blacks only make up 13% of the
population.
They would have to make up 25% to be "equal" in crime rates to whites.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States
http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2009/offenses/expanded_information/data/shrtable_03.html
Age Total Sex Race
Male Female Unknown White Black Other
Total 15,760 10,391 1,197 4,172 5,286 5,890 245
You will notice that blacks commited some 614 more homicides than did
whites.....yet blacks only make up 13% of the population
So there are some serious questions to be asked..why do blacks kill on a
ratio of 5 to 1 over those evil whites?
Gunner Asch
Apr 14, 2012, 2:47:20 AM4/14/12
to
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:38:13 -0400, "Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
You keep forgetting the KKK has always been a Democrat run organization.
And your attempts to divert from the facts is hysterically funny.
wrote:
And your attempts to divert from the facts is hysterically funny.
Gunner Asch
Apr 14, 2012, 2:51:33 AM4/14/12
to
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:07:03 -0400, "Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>"Way Back Jack" wrote in message
>news:1rj3s8iztska7.1559ircrauw9k$.dlg@40tude.net...
>
>On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:38:13 -0400, Dano wrote:
>
>> "Obama's War On Women" wrote in message
>> news:2bGhr.55$ah5...@newsfe03.iad...
>>
>> Since Whites are 67 % of the population, then 67 % of Murderd Blacks
>> should
>> be murdered by Whites. Instead 93 % of Blakcs are murderd by Blacks who
>> are only 17 % of the population.
>>
>>
>> 2007 special report released by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, reveals
>> that approximately 8,000 ¡X and, in certain years, as many as 9,000
Neo Nazis are Socialists and Klansmen are Democrats.
Sorry you are so stupid, ignorant or in denial
http://www.nationalblackrepublicans.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=pages.DYKKKKTerroristArmoftheDemocratParty&page_id=93&tp_preview=true
KKK Terrorist Arm of the Democratic Party
By Frances Rice
History shows that the Ku Klux Klan was the terrorist arm of the
Democrat Party. This ugly fact about the Democrat Party is detailed in
the book, A Short History of Reconstruction, (Harper & Row Publishers,
Inc., 1990) by Dr. Eric Foner, the renown liberal historian who is the
DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University. As a
further testament to his impeccable credentials, Professor Foner is only
the second person to serve as president of the three major professional
organizations: the Organization of American Historians, American
Historical Association, and Society of American Historians.
Democrats in the last century did not hide their connections to the Ku
Klux Klan. Georgia-born Democrat Nathan Bedford Forrest, a Grand Dragon
of the Ku Klux Klan wrote on page 21 of the September 1928 edition of
the Klan’s “The Kourier Magazine”: “I have never voted for any man who
was not a regular Democrat. My father … never voted for any man who was
not a Democrat. My grandfather was …the head of the Ku Klux Klan in
reconstruction days…. My great-grandfather was a life-long Democrat….
My great-great-grandfather was…one of the founders of the Democratic
party.”
Dr. Foner in his book explores the history of the origins of Ku Klux
Klan and provides a chilling account of the atrocities committed by
Democrats against Republicans, black and white.
On page 146 of his book, Professor Foner wrote: “Founded in 1866 as a
Tennessee social club, the Ku Klux Klan spread into nearly every
Southern state, launching a ‘reign of terror‘ against Republican leaders
black and white.” Page 184 of his book contains the definitive
statements: “In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the
interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who
desired the restoration of white supremacy. It aimed to destroy the
Republican party’s infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state,
reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial
subordination in every aspect of Southern life.”
Heartbreaking are Professor Foner’s recitations of the horrific acts of
terror inflicted by Democrats on black and white Republicans. Recounted
on pages 184-185 of his book is one such act of terror: “Jack Dupree, a
victim of a particularly brutal murder in Monroe County, Mississippi -
assailants cut his throat and disemboweled him, all within sight of his
wife, who had just given birth to twins - was ‘president of a republican
club‘ and known as a man who ‘would speak his mind.’”
“White gangs roamed New Orleans, intimidating blacks and breaking up
Republican meetings,“ wrote Dr. Foner on page 146 of his book. On page
186, he wrote: “An even more extensive ‘reign of terror’ engulfed
Jackson, a plantation county in Florida’s panhandle. ‘That is where
Satan has his seat,‘ remarked a black clergyman; all told over 150
persons were killed, among them black leaders and Jewish merchant Samuel
Fleischman, resented for his Republican views and for dealing fairly
with black customers.“
http://gopcapitalist.tripod.com/democratrecord.html
http://www.tysknews.com/Depts/pcism/sad_history.htm
The Long, Sad, Violent History of Democrats'
Racial Hatred for Blacks
Perry Drake
May 2003
It has always seemed unnatural and unwise to me whenever I hear someone
who's been slandered by a particularly egregious lie reply that they're
not going to dignify that accusation with a response.
For it has always been crystal clear to me that whenever your honor,
integrity and reputation are called into question that you should be
quick, thorough and – when circumstances demand – quite loud in defense
of them.
Otherwise, people will assume that the accusation must carry some weight
and the falsity levied against you just might end up sticking.
That's what has happened to the political party that I belong to – the
Republicans. For decades the Party of Lincoln has been under almost
constant assault for being "racist" and "openly hostile" to blacks.
However, nothing could be further from the truth – but you would never
know it by the party's spineless, practically nonexistent defense of its
record on race and civil rights.
From the days of Lincoln until the present, blacks have had no better
friend, party-wise, than the Republicans. Since its inception in the
mid-19th century, the GOP has built an exemplary record on civil rights,
particularly if you want to use the Democrat Party as a comparison.
The party's first president, Abraham Lincoln, issued the Emancipation
Proclamation on Jan. 1, 1863, the height of the Civil War, squelching
any chance that the European powers of the day would intervene in the
conflict in favor of the Confederacy. With the stroke of his pen,
Lincoln destroyed the last real hope the Confederacy had for a victory.
Soon after the war ended, it was a Republican-controlled Congress that
rammed through the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution
that, among other things, abolished slavery, guaranteed equal protection
and due process and addressed blacks' right to vote.
In the late 19th century, Democrat governors and Democrat-controlled
state legislatures in the South couldn't pass Jim Crow laws fast enough.
Those Democrats created a nearly century-long, legal racial caste system
that relegated blacks to the lowest educational, political, economic and
social strata. I have family members who grew up under Jim Crow. To hear
them tell it, it weren't no joke.
And let us not forget that during the same period it was Democrats
throughout the United States who organized and ran America's premier
terrorist organization – the Ku Klux Klan.
And speaking of the Klan, remember the great Democrat President Woodrow
Wilson? After a screening of D.W. Griffith's paean to the Ku Klux Klan,
"Birth of a Nation," Wilson, turned-movie critic, said of the film: "It
is like writing history with lightning. And my only regret is that it is
all so terribly true."
Needless to say, the NAACP had a different outlook. After its viewing,
the civil rights organization was mortified to the point of launching a
nationwide protest in 1915 against the film. The group was equally
appalled by President Wilson's comments and it launched a public protest
against him.
Before we move on, one more thing about President Wilson. He was the
president who led our nation into WWI with the ringing declaration that
it was to make the world "safe for democracy." In Woodrow's mind,
though, "democracy" applied to everyone except those annoying little
dark-skinned people in America who are always clamoring for civil
rights. In 1913, Wilson introduced segregation into the federal
government.
Yes, dear readers, the man who is worshipped as the utmost "progressive"
(where and by who have you heard that term used lately?) of his time
allowed federal officials to segregate "toilets, cafeterias and work"
areas of various federal departments.
It was left to Wilson's successor, Republican Warren G. Harding to scrap
the segregation policy. And Warren G. didn't stop there. In 1922,
Harding delivered a bold speech in Birmingham, Ala., (A Democrat
stronghold that was later known by blacks as "Bombingham") in which he
called for black equality. Up to then, no U.S. president had ever spoken
so forcefully about civil rights.
Harding was elected in 1920. Funny thing about the Republican Party
platform that Harding ran under. It called for federal anti-lynching
legislation. Guess which party didn't? If you said Democrat, go to the
head of the line.
Moving on, in answer to the burgeoning civil rights movement in the
'50s, it was Democrat governors and Democrat-controlled state
legislatures in the South that placed the Confederate battle flag on
their state capitol flags. It's an issue that continues to inflame
racial passions even today.
In 1957, Orval Faubus, the governor of Arkansas, called out his state's
National Guard to prevent the integration of Central High School in
Little Rock. In response, President Dwight D. Eisenhower sent U.S.
troops to the city to escort nine frightened black teens into the school
past riotous mobs inflamed by Faubus' defiance of a federal court order.
Faubus was a Democrat. Eisenhower was a Republican.
On June 11, 1963, Alabama Gov. George Wallace stood in the doorway of
the University of Alabama to block its integration. Wallace was a
Democrat. Now, I grant you, John F. Kennedy was the Democrat president
who federalized the Alabama National Guard and ordered its units to the
university to force its doors open to black students. But it's not
generally known that the then-Sen. Kennedy – with an eye on the Democrat
presidential nomination for 1960 – voted against the Civil Rights Act of
1957, the law that really got the ball rolling on federal civil rights
legislation.
And it was Kennedy's brother, Robert, who in 1964 assisted the FBI's
efforts to destroy Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. by approving the
wiretapping of the man considered the heart and soul of the civil rights
movement.
And to think at one time you could find in black homes across the nation
what I used to call the Black Person's Trinity: chintzy, black-velvet
portraits of JFK, RFK and Dr. King painted side by side.
As far as other important civil rights legislation, the 1964 Civil
Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 would never have became law
if not for Republican senators and congressmen whose overwhelming
support offset extreme Democrat opposition.
Now honesty demands that I admit that I have never been in favor of
affirmative action programs. As a black man I find them demeaning, and
as an American, divisive. But that's an argument for another day.
However, the fact remains that it was President Nixon who implemented
the first affirmative action program with the Philadelphia Plan in the
late 1960s. The plan required government contractors to set goals and
timetables for hiring minorities. Nixon was a Republican.
Sure, some will say that it's all well and good to cite the historical
record, but what about now? What have the Republicans done of late? I
begin by pointing out that Democrats continue to demonstrate a curious
affinity for standing in schoolhouse doors, especially when black
children are involved.
But of late, Democrats are not trying to keep black children out, but
in. In public opinion polls on school choice, blacks overwhelmingly
favor vouchers to rescue their children from failing schools. No one
knows better the damage that poor schools can do to their children's
future and communities than blacks. Republicans are in favor of school
choice. Democrats aren't.
Also in more contemporary times, President Bush appointed two blacks to
the highest positions in government ever occupied by blacks in America.
Today, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice and Secretary of State
Colin Powell are very powerful, influential members of the Bush
administration. Powell, in fact, is fourth in the succession line for
the presidency.
Oh, by the way, do you know who is third in line? Sen. Robert Byrd of
West Virginia. Old "Sheets" himself. The same Byrd of the "white
niggers" comments on March 5, 2001, and who was a member of the KKK. And
Sen. Byrd was not just any old member. No, sir. He was a "grand kleagle"
– a recruiter!
Does anyone remember the late war with Iraq? It lasted about a minute
but you may have had a chance to notice that the vice chief of
operations at Central Command was a brotha – Army Brig. Gen. Vincent
Brooks.
And let's not let the "fair and free" press off the hook. Back when Jim
Crow and segregation were "the law of the land" in the South, the press
served as cheerleaders for all those kind, compassionate Democrats as
they lovingly lynched black people by the hundreds on a yearly basis.
Small wonder that the press behaved as badly as it did, though. The
people who ran those papers, which proudly featured the brutalized and
desecrated bodies of black lynching victims on their front pages quite
frequently, were all Democrats.
Today, whenever a Republican says anything that can be twisted by
Democrats and race hustlers to smack the least bit of racism, the press
is quick to pounce on him like Jesse Jackson on a bag of stolen federal
dollars.
The hypocrisy of the press on matters of race is appalling. Just take a
walk into your average newsroom and tell me what you see? Wait, I'll
save you the trip – a sea of white faces and sprinkled here and there, a
black face or two. Or better still, tune in to any one of the numerous
weekly Sunday news shows and what you'll find is overwhelming white.
Now here's a homework assignment – what political party do you think
most of the members of the press belong to? Here's a hint – Democrat.
I need not end here. I could go on all day citing example after example
on this matter (Does the name Bull Connor ring a bell, for instance? A
Democrat. Hah!). But it would be heartening indeed if the next time
accusations of racism are hurled against them, that Republicans would
grow a spine and quickly, thoroughly and – when circumstances demand –
quite loudly defend their honor, integrity and reputation.
Perry Drake
Toogood Reports contributor and "Best of the Web" award-winning writer
Perry Drake is a professional journalist in Plainfield, Ill. He is a
great American conservative who writes with a unique perspective on the
issues of the day. Perry is married and has two children. You can email
him at pdrak...@cs.com.
Oh..btw..before you go running off at the mouth..all 3 authors of the
above articles...are black.
<VBG>
wrote:
>"Way Back Jack" wrote in message
>news:1rj3s8iztska7.1559ircrauw9k$.dlg@40tude.net...
>
>On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:38:13 -0400, Dano wrote:
>
>> "Obama's War On Women" wrote in message
>> news:2bGhr.55$ah5...@newsfe03.iad...
>>
>> Since Whites are 67 % of the population, then 67 % of Murderd Blacks
>> should
>> be murdered by Whites. Instead 93 % of Blakcs are murderd by Blacks who
>> are only 17 % of the population.
>>
>>
>> 2007 special report released by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, reveals
>> African
>> Americans are murdered annually in the United States. This chilling figure
>> is accompanied by another equally sobering fact, that 93% of these murders
>> are in fact perpetrated by other blacks. The analysis, supported by FBI
>> records, finds that in 2005 alone, for example, African Americans
>> accounted
>> for 49% of all homicide victims in the US ¡X again, almost exclusively at
>> Americans are murdered annually in the United States. This chilling figure
>> is accompanied by another equally sobering fact, that 93% of these murders
>> are in fact perpetrated by other blacks. The analysis, supported by FBI
>> records, finds that in 2005 alone, for example, African Americans
>> accounted
Sorry you are so stupid, ignorant or in denial
http://www.nationalblackrepublicans.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=pages.DYKKKKTerroristArmoftheDemocratParty&page_id=93&tp_preview=true
KKK Terrorist Arm of the Democratic Party
By Frances Rice
History shows that the Ku Klux Klan was the terrorist arm of the
Democrat Party. This ugly fact about the Democrat Party is detailed in
the book, A Short History of Reconstruction, (Harper & Row Publishers,
Inc., 1990) by Dr. Eric Foner, the renown liberal historian who is the
DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University. As a
further testament to his impeccable credentials, Professor Foner is only
the second person to serve as president of the three major professional
organizations: the Organization of American Historians, American
Historical Association, and Society of American Historians.
Democrats in the last century did not hide their connections to the Ku
Klux Klan. Georgia-born Democrat Nathan Bedford Forrest, a Grand Dragon
of the Ku Klux Klan wrote on page 21 of the September 1928 edition of
the Klan’s “The Kourier Magazine”: “I have never voted for any man who
was not a regular Democrat. My father … never voted for any man who was
not a Democrat. My grandfather was …the head of the Ku Klux Klan in
reconstruction days…. My great-grandfather was a life-long Democrat….
My great-great-grandfather was…one of the founders of the Democratic
party.”
Dr. Foner in his book explores the history of the origins of Ku Klux
Klan and provides a chilling account of the atrocities committed by
Democrats against Republicans, black and white.
On page 146 of his book, Professor Foner wrote: “Founded in 1866 as a
Tennessee social club, the Ku Klux Klan spread into nearly every
Southern state, launching a ‘reign of terror‘ against Republican leaders
black and white.” Page 184 of his book contains the definitive
statements: “In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the
interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who
desired the restoration of white supremacy. It aimed to destroy the
Republican party’s infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state,
reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial
subordination in every aspect of Southern life.”
Heartbreaking are Professor Foner’s recitations of the horrific acts of
terror inflicted by Democrats on black and white Republicans. Recounted
on pages 184-185 of his book is one such act of terror: “Jack Dupree, a
victim of a particularly brutal murder in Monroe County, Mississippi -
assailants cut his throat and disemboweled him, all within sight of his
wife, who had just given birth to twins - was ‘president of a republican
club‘ and known as a man who ‘would speak his mind.’”
“White gangs roamed New Orleans, intimidating blacks and breaking up
Republican meetings,“ wrote Dr. Foner on page 146 of his book. On page
186, he wrote: “An even more extensive ‘reign of terror’ engulfed
Jackson, a plantation county in Florida’s panhandle. ‘That is where
Satan has his seat,‘ remarked a black clergyman; all told over 150
persons were killed, among them black leaders and Jewish merchant Samuel
Fleischman, resented for his Republican views and for dealing fairly
with black customers.“
http://gopcapitalist.tripod.com/democratrecord.html
http://www.tysknews.com/Depts/pcism/sad_history.htm
The Long, Sad, Violent History of Democrats'
Racial Hatred for Blacks
Perry Drake
May 2003
It has always seemed unnatural and unwise to me whenever I hear someone
who's been slandered by a particularly egregious lie reply that they're
not going to dignify that accusation with a response.
For it has always been crystal clear to me that whenever your honor,
integrity and reputation are called into question that you should be
quick, thorough and – when circumstances demand – quite loud in defense
of them.
Otherwise, people will assume that the accusation must carry some weight
and the falsity levied against you just might end up sticking.
That's what has happened to the political party that I belong to – the
Republicans. For decades the Party of Lincoln has been under almost
constant assault for being "racist" and "openly hostile" to blacks.
However, nothing could be further from the truth – but you would never
know it by the party's spineless, practically nonexistent defense of its
record on race and civil rights.
From the days of Lincoln until the present, blacks have had no better
friend, party-wise, than the Republicans. Since its inception in the
mid-19th century, the GOP has built an exemplary record on civil rights,
particularly if you want to use the Democrat Party as a comparison.
The party's first president, Abraham Lincoln, issued the Emancipation
Proclamation on Jan. 1, 1863, the height of the Civil War, squelching
any chance that the European powers of the day would intervene in the
conflict in favor of the Confederacy. With the stroke of his pen,
Lincoln destroyed the last real hope the Confederacy had for a victory.
Soon after the war ended, it was a Republican-controlled Congress that
rammed through the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution
that, among other things, abolished slavery, guaranteed equal protection
and due process and addressed blacks' right to vote.
In the late 19th century, Democrat governors and Democrat-controlled
state legislatures in the South couldn't pass Jim Crow laws fast enough.
Those Democrats created a nearly century-long, legal racial caste system
that relegated blacks to the lowest educational, political, economic and
social strata. I have family members who grew up under Jim Crow. To hear
them tell it, it weren't no joke.
And let us not forget that during the same period it was Democrats
throughout the United States who organized and ran America's premier
terrorist organization – the Ku Klux Klan.
And speaking of the Klan, remember the great Democrat President Woodrow
Wilson? After a screening of D.W. Griffith's paean to the Ku Klux Klan,
"Birth of a Nation," Wilson, turned-movie critic, said of the film: "It
is like writing history with lightning. And my only regret is that it is
all so terribly true."
Needless to say, the NAACP had a different outlook. After its viewing,
the civil rights organization was mortified to the point of launching a
nationwide protest in 1915 against the film. The group was equally
appalled by President Wilson's comments and it launched a public protest
against him.
Before we move on, one more thing about President Wilson. He was the
president who led our nation into WWI with the ringing declaration that
it was to make the world "safe for democracy." In Woodrow's mind,
though, "democracy" applied to everyone except those annoying little
dark-skinned people in America who are always clamoring for civil
rights. In 1913, Wilson introduced segregation into the federal
government.
Yes, dear readers, the man who is worshipped as the utmost "progressive"
(where and by who have you heard that term used lately?) of his time
allowed federal officials to segregate "toilets, cafeterias and work"
areas of various federal departments.
It was left to Wilson's successor, Republican Warren G. Harding to scrap
the segregation policy. And Warren G. didn't stop there. In 1922,
Harding delivered a bold speech in Birmingham, Ala., (A Democrat
stronghold that was later known by blacks as "Bombingham") in which he
called for black equality. Up to then, no U.S. president had ever spoken
so forcefully about civil rights.
Harding was elected in 1920. Funny thing about the Republican Party
platform that Harding ran under. It called for federal anti-lynching
legislation. Guess which party didn't? If you said Democrat, go to the
head of the line.
Moving on, in answer to the burgeoning civil rights movement in the
'50s, it was Democrat governors and Democrat-controlled state
legislatures in the South that placed the Confederate battle flag on
their state capitol flags. It's an issue that continues to inflame
racial passions even today.
In 1957, Orval Faubus, the governor of Arkansas, called out his state's
National Guard to prevent the integration of Central High School in
Little Rock. In response, President Dwight D. Eisenhower sent U.S.
troops to the city to escort nine frightened black teens into the school
past riotous mobs inflamed by Faubus' defiance of a federal court order.
Faubus was a Democrat. Eisenhower was a Republican.
On June 11, 1963, Alabama Gov. George Wallace stood in the doorway of
the University of Alabama to block its integration. Wallace was a
Democrat. Now, I grant you, John F. Kennedy was the Democrat president
who federalized the Alabama National Guard and ordered its units to the
university to force its doors open to black students. But it's not
generally known that the then-Sen. Kennedy – with an eye on the Democrat
presidential nomination for 1960 – voted against the Civil Rights Act of
1957, the law that really got the ball rolling on federal civil rights
legislation.
And it was Kennedy's brother, Robert, who in 1964 assisted the FBI's
efforts to destroy Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. by approving the
wiretapping of the man considered the heart and soul of the civil rights
movement.
And to think at one time you could find in black homes across the nation
what I used to call the Black Person's Trinity: chintzy, black-velvet
portraits of JFK, RFK and Dr. King painted side by side.
As far as other important civil rights legislation, the 1964 Civil
Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 would never have became law
if not for Republican senators and congressmen whose overwhelming
support offset extreme Democrat opposition.
Now honesty demands that I admit that I have never been in favor of
affirmative action programs. As a black man I find them demeaning, and
as an American, divisive. But that's an argument for another day.
However, the fact remains that it was President Nixon who implemented
the first affirmative action program with the Philadelphia Plan in the
late 1960s. The plan required government contractors to set goals and
timetables for hiring minorities. Nixon was a Republican.
Sure, some will say that it's all well and good to cite the historical
record, but what about now? What have the Republicans done of late? I
begin by pointing out that Democrats continue to demonstrate a curious
affinity for standing in schoolhouse doors, especially when black
children are involved.
But of late, Democrats are not trying to keep black children out, but
in. In public opinion polls on school choice, blacks overwhelmingly
favor vouchers to rescue their children from failing schools. No one
knows better the damage that poor schools can do to their children's
future and communities than blacks. Republicans are in favor of school
choice. Democrats aren't.
Also in more contemporary times, President Bush appointed two blacks to
the highest positions in government ever occupied by blacks in America.
Today, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice and Secretary of State
Colin Powell are very powerful, influential members of the Bush
administration. Powell, in fact, is fourth in the succession line for
the presidency.
Oh, by the way, do you know who is third in line? Sen. Robert Byrd of
West Virginia. Old "Sheets" himself. The same Byrd of the "white
niggers" comments on March 5, 2001, and who was a member of the KKK. And
Sen. Byrd was not just any old member. No, sir. He was a "grand kleagle"
– a recruiter!
Does anyone remember the late war with Iraq? It lasted about a minute
but you may have had a chance to notice that the vice chief of
operations at Central Command was a brotha – Army Brig. Gen. Vincent
Brooks.
And let's not let the "fair and free" press off the hook. Back when Jim
Crow and segregation were "the law of the land" in the South, the press
served as cheerleaders for all those kind, compassionate Democrats as
they lovingly lynched black people by the hundreds on a yearly basis.
Small wonder that the press behaved as badly as it did, though. The
people who ran those papers, which proudly featured the brutalized and
desecrated bodies of black lynching victims on their front pages quite
frequently, were all Democrats.
Today, whenever a Republican says anything that can be twisted by
Democrats and race hustlers to smack the least bit of racism, the press
is quick to pounce on him like Jesse Jackson on a bag of stolen federal
dollars.
The hypocrisy of the press on matters of race is appalling. Just take a
walk into your average newsroom and tell me what you see? Wait, I'll
save you the trip – a sea of white faces and sprinkled here and there, a
black face or two. Or better still, tune in to any one of the numerous
weekly Sunday news shows and what you'll find is overwhelming white.
Now here's a homework assignment – what political party do you think
most of the members of the press belong to? Here's a hint – Democrat.
I need not end here. I could go on all day citing example after example
on this matter (Does the name Bull Connor ring a bell, for instance? A
Democrat. Hah!). But it would be heartening indeed if the next time
accusations of racism are hurled against them, that Republicans would
grow a spine and quickly, thoroughly and – when circumstances demand –
quite loudly defend their honor, integrity and reputation.
Perry Drake
Toogood Reports contributor and "Best of the Web" award-winning writer
Perry Drake is a professional journalist in Plainfield, Ill. He is a
great American conservative who writes with a unique perspective on the
issues of the day. Perry is married and has two children. You can email
him at pdrak...@cs.com.
Oh..btw..before you go running off at the mouth..all 3 authors of the
above articles...are black.
<VBG>
Harry Reams
Apr 14, 2012, 3:18:16 AM4/14/12
to
Gunner Asch wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:07:03 -0400, "Dano" <janeandd...@yahoo.com>
You assholes forget the civil rights act of 1964 and you have been
well informed by history about how things changed, but are so dumb,
that you still believe that Republicans are the party of the
minorities.
I guess that's why black people support the Democrats.
How Americans from the right still think that they are the righteous,
amazes me.
Where did you learn history?
Are you implying that the right wing in the US south, who embrace the
flag of those who lost the civil war, endorse the idea of civil rights
and racial equality?
Are southerners that stupid?
You are one bunch of dumb mother fuckers.
That is certain.
Say? When your Daddy taught you that crap, was it before or after he
fucked you and raped your sister?
You live in an impossible past.
You are like Way Back Jack, a bunch of Nigger Hating, Southern
assholes. Who support the GOP.
That, my boy. Is reality.
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:07:03 -0400, "Dano" <janeandd...@yahoo.com>
well informed by history about how things changed, but are so dumb,
that you still believe that Republicans are the party of the
minorities.
I guess that's why black people support the Democrats.
How Americans from the right still think that they are the righteous,
amazes me.
Where did you learn history?
Are you implying that the right wing in the US south, who embrace the
flag of those who lost the civil war, endorse the idea of civil rights
and racial equality?
Are southerners that stupid?
You are one bunch of dumb mother fuckers.
That is certain.
Say? When your Daddy taught you that crap, was it before or after he
fucked you and raped your sister?
You live in an impossible past.
You are like Way Back Jack, a bunch of Nigger Hating, Southern
assholes. Who support the GOP.
That, my boy. Is reality.
Lamont Cranston
Apr 15, 2012, 1:35:48 AM4/15/12
to
From Benito Mussolini, the Father of Fascism:
"...Fascism [is] the complete opposite of…Marxian Socialism"
"...given that the nineteenth century was the century of Socialism, of
Liberalism, and of Democracy, it does not necessarily follow that the
twentieth century must also be a century of Socialism, Liberalism and
Democracy: political doctrines pass, but humanity remains, and it may
rather be expected that this will be a century of authority...a century
of Fascism."
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/mussolini-fascism.asp
Groksplynk
Apr 16, 2012, 6:00:23 AM4/16/12
to
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:43:57 -0400, Dano - whined, cried and carried on
like an moronic 8 year old little girl and bashed out this crap on its
keyboard:
> When I piss and cry, my mommy slaps me. Why?
So you'll get over not being able to suck her titty whenever you want
and get back on your daddy's dick, you fucktarded buffoon.
--
Conservatives Are from Mars, Liberals Are from Uranus
like an moronic 8 year old little girl and bashed out this crap on its
keyboard:
> When I piss and cry, my mommy slaps me. Why?
So you'll get over not being able to suck her titty whenever you want
and get back on your daddy's dick, you fucktarded buffoon.
--
Conservatives Are from Mars, Liberals Are from Uranus
Groksplynk
Apr 16, 2012, 6:01:31 AM4/16/12
to
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:48:04 -0400, Dano - whined, cried and carried on
It's called a 'clit', you fucktard.
like an moronic 8 year old little girl and bashed out this crap on its
keyboard:
> My weewee looks funny!
keyboard:
It's called a 'clit', you fucktard.
Groksplynk
Apr 16, 2012, 6:03:25 AM4/16/12
to
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:35:15 -0400, Dano - whined, cried and carried on
That's your biological daddy, you fucktard.
like an moronic 8 year old little girl and bashed out this crap on its
keyboard:
> I can jerkoff my neighbor 14 times a day!
keyboard:
That's your biological daddy, you fucktard.
0 new messages