Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
When Liberals take over a city
31 views
Skip to first unread message
RichA
Jan 16, 2020, 9:53:36 PM1/16/20
to
San Francisco
Pt. 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XgvPqtoP6c
Pt. 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJcWFkRiKIU
Pt. 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-bCiRNNfhc
Pt. 4: https://video.foxnews.com/v/6121243897001#sp=show-clips
Pt. 5: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJUMoN68yx8
The DA's campaign promise was to ALLOW crooks to get away
with their crimes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83raFxMicYE
Pt. 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XgvPqtoP6c
Pt. 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJcWFkRiKIU
Pt. 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-bCiRNNfhc
Pt. 4: https://video.foxnews.com/v/6121243897001#sp=show-clips
Pt. 5: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJUMoN68yx8
The DA's campaign promise was to ALLOW crooks to get away
with their crimes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83raFxMicYE
BTR1701
Jan 16, 2020, 10:57:08 PM1/16/20
to
In article <e97fbb0c-c32e-4157...@googlegroups.com>,
fellow citizens without consequence.
This is why I always put 'progressive' in quotation marks, because
despite their self-serving label, most of their policies are actually
quite regressive in nature.
"Prosecutors in the gang units were let go."
That's because this new communist D.A. doesn't believe in prosecuting
gang crimes. It was part of his campaign: he's going to treat crimes
committed by gangs as if they were just individual crimes committed by
unrelated criminals. So mass car thefts committed by a gang, for
example, would just be a lot of unrelated individual thefts and there
would be no gang enhancement applied as allowed under California law.
Same with gun enhancements. Boudin says he doesn't believe in them and
the D.A.'s office will no longer charge more heavily for crimes
committed with a firearm. What message does that send to the criminals?
Hey, go ahead and use a gun when you rob that liquor store because even
if you get caught, you won't have to worry about the extra ten year gun
enhancement sentence on top of your robbery charge.
And the voters of San Francisco apparently think this is just a-okay.
RichA <rande...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The DA's campaign promise was to ALLOW crooks to get away
> with their crimes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83raFxMicYE
I like how it's considered "progressive" to let people prey on their
> The DA's campaign promise was to ALLOW crooks to get away
> with their crimes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83raFxMicYE
fellow citizens without consequence.
This is why I always put 'progressive' in quotation marks, because
despite their self-serving label, most of their policies are actually
quite regressive in nature.
"Prosecutors in the gang units were let go."
That's because this new communist D.A. doesn't believe in prosecuting
gang crimes. It was part of his campaign: he's going to treat crimes
committed by gangs as if they were just individual crimes committed by
unrelated criminals. So mass car thefts committed by a gang, for
example, would just be a lot of unrelated individual thefts and there
would be no gang enhancement applied as allowed under California law.
Same with gun enhancements. Boudin says he doesn't believe in them and
the D.A.'s office will no longer charge more heavily for crimes
committed with a firearm. What message does that send to the criminals?
Hey, go ahead and use a gun when you rob that liquor store because even
if you get caught, you won't have to worry about the extra ten year gun
enhancement sentence on top of your robbery charge.
And the voters of San Francisco apparently think this is just a-okay.
Adam H. Kerman
Jan 16, 2020, 11:24:36 PM1/16/20
to
BTR1701 <atr...@mac.com> wrote:
>I like how it's considered "progressive" to let people prey on their
>fellow citizens without consequence.
>This is why I always put 'progressive' in quotation marks, because
>despite their self-serving label, most of their policies are actually
>quite regressive in nature.
>"Prosecutors in the gang units were let go."
>That's because this new communist D.A. doesn't believe in prosecuting
>gang crimes. It was part of his campaign: he's going to treat crimes
>committed by gangs as if they were just individual crimes committed by
>unrelated criminals. So mass car thefts committed by a gang, for
>example, would just be a lot of unrelated individual thefts and there
>would be no gang enhancement applied as allowed under California law.
Then the mastermind will never get prosecuted, just the henchmen. That's
>I like how it's considered "progressive" to let people prey on their
>fellow citizens without consequence.
>This is why I always put 'progressive' in quotation marks, because
>despite their self-serving label, most of their policies are actually
>quite regressive in nature.
>"Prosecutors in the gang units were let go."
>That's because this new communist D.A. doesn't believe in prosecuting
>gang crimes. It was part of his campaign: he's going to treat crimes
>committed by gangs as if they were just individual crimes committed by
>unrelated criminals. So mass car thefts committed by a gang, for
>example, would just be a lot of unrelated individual thefts and there
>would be no gang enhancement applied as allowed under California law.
a really confusing issue to run on.
>Same with gun enhancements. Boudin says he doesn't believe in them and
>the D.A.'s office will no longer charge more heavily for crimes
>committed with a firearm. What message does that send to the criminals?
>Hey, go ahead and use a gun when you rob that liquor store because even
>if you get caught, you won't have to worry about the extra ten year gun
>enhancement sentence on top of your robbery charge.
>And the voters of San Francisco apparently think this is just a-okay.
Bonk
Should I ask if he believes in enforcing the state's gun licensing laws
when it's known that criminals have used a gun to commit a crime?
FPP
Jan 16, 2020, 11:36:18 PM1/16/20
to
On 1/16/20 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> That's because this new communist D.A. doesn't believe in prosecuting
> gang crimes.
>It was part of his campaign: he's going to treat crimes
> committed by gangs as if they were just individual crimes committed by
> unrelated criminals.
Then you're lying. AGAIN.
> That's because this new communist D.A. doesn't believe in prosecuting
> gang crimes.
>It was part of his campaign: he's going to treat crimes
> committed by gangs as if they were just individual crimes committed by
> unrelated criminals.
If he's treating gang crimes as crimes, and prosecuting them, then HOW
can he not believe in prosecuting gang crimes?
You just fucking admitted he's prosecuting them.
There's that "logic trap" you keep whacking off over again.
Sure, they may not be treated with extra measures, but to say he doesn't
believe in prosecuting gang crimes (like he's somehow letting run free)
is another "conservative" lie.
I put quotes around "conservative", because there are no real
conservatives any more... just Trumpers. Real conservatives believe in
the Constitution.
Oh, and aren't you the clown who keeps bitching about "hate crimes"?
Logic trap... snap!
--
And now, another in a series of Mental Health Bulletins:
"... If Turkey does anything that I, in my great and unmatched wisdom,
consider to be off limits, I will totally destroy and obliterate the
Economy of Turkey (I’ve done before!)." -Donald J. Trump 10-7-19
Next up: "Kneel before ZOD!"
Rhino
Jan 16, 2020, 11:58:41 PM1/16/20
to
inconvenient at times. It would be interesting to take him up in a plane
and see if he wanted a parachute or if he was just going to float gently
down to the ground without it....
Clearly, this bozo simply wants to see the crime rate go up - way up.
After all, anything that is rewarded, increases in quantity and not
holding it against someone for being in a gang or using a gun is
effectively a reward.
I think he's trying to implement the Cloward-Piven Strategy and flat out
break the entire system so that society itself collapses. I'm at a loss
to think of any other coherent reason for his policies.
--
Rhino
BTR1701
Jan 17, 2020, 12:09:44 AM1/17/20
to
In article <qvretv$i31$1...@dont-email.me>,
Which is bizarre. Remember when even soft-on-crime leftists had to
pretend to be hard on crime when they were campaigning in order to get
elected? Well, now here in California, they're all competing to see who
can be the softest on crime and cause the most damage to society.
But hey, I gotta hand it to them. They seem to know their audience
because that's what the lunatic voters are pulling the lever for. These
communist politicians have clearly read the room and are behaving
accordingly. Can't blame 'em for that.
pretend to be hard on crime when they were campaigning in order to get
elected? Well, now here in California, they're all competing to see who
can be the softest on crime and cause the most damage to society.
But hey, I gotta hand it to them. They seem to know their audience
because that's what the lunatic voters are pulling the lever for. These
communist politicians have clearly read the room and are behaving
accordingly. Can't blame 'em for that.
BTR1701
Jan 17, 2020, 12:12:59 AM1/17/20
to
In article <qvrcu1$9pk$1...@dont-email.me>,
It's a particularly schizophrenic position coming from the left, which
is usually obsessed with gun control and harsh penalties for anything
involving a gun.
It's as if this D.A. only wants the *criminals* to be armed. It'll be
interesting to see how he treats incidents where people have used guns
in self-defense. If he goes after them balls-to-the-wall, then it will
be clear that in his version of utopia, only the criminals are allowed
to be armed.
is usually obsessed with gun control and harsh penalties for anything
involving a gun.
It's as if this D.A. only wants the *criminals* to be armed. It'll be
interesting to see how he treats incidents where people have used guns
in self-defense. If he goes after them balls-to-the-wall, then it will
be clear that in his version of utopia, only the criminals are allowed
to be armed.
RichA
Jan 17, 2020, 12:14:41 AM1/17/20
to
FPP
Jan 17, 2020, 4:42:06 AM1/17/20
to
On 1/17/20 12:14 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> It's as if this D.A. only wants the *criminals* to be armed. It'll be
> interesting to see how he treats incidents where people have used guns
> in self-defense. If he goes after them balls-to-the-wall, then it will
> be clear that in his version of utopia, only the criminals are allowed
> to be armed.
>
Fuck, is there NOTHING you won't distort?
> It's as if this D.A. only wants the *criminals* to be armed. It'll be
> interesting to see how he treats incidents where people have used guns
> in self-defense. If he goes after them balls-to-the-wall, then it will
> be clear that in his version of utopia, only the criminals are allowed
> to be armed.
>
--
The No. 1 scam to NOT fall for: Anything Trump, his campaign, or his
sycophants say.
They are all liars. He is little more than a cult leader with a rabid
base of followers who have left reason, logic, critical thinking, and
common sense behind.
Let’s face it: If Trump had not been born rich, he would either be
unemployable or he would be running some boiler room scamming people out
of their hard-earned money.
trotsky
Jan 17, 2020, 7:32:49 AM1/17/20
to
On 1/17/20 3:42 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 1/17/20 12:14 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> It's as if this D.A. only wants the *criminals* to be armed. It'll be
>> interesting to see how he treats incidents where people have used guns
>> in self-defense. If he goes after them balls-to-the-wall, then it will
>> be clear that in his version of utopia, only the criminals are allowed
>> to be armed.
>>
>
> Fuck, is there NOTHING you won't distort?
>
His downward trajectory mentally appears to follow that of Trump's.
> On 1/17/20 12:14 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> It's as if this D.A. only wants the *criminals* to be armed. It'll be
>> interesting to see how he treats incidents where people have used guns
>> in self-defense. If he goes after them balls-to-the-wall, then it will
>> be clear that in his version of utopia, only the criminals are allowed
>> to be armed.
>>
>
> Fuck, is there NOTHING you won't distort?
>
BTR1701
Jan 17, 2020, 11:20:04 AM1/17/20
to
In article <qvrvhb$3ps$3...@dont-email.me>, FPP <fred...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 1/17/20 12:14 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > It's as if this D.A. only wants the *criminals* to be armed.
> > It'll be interesting to see how he treats incidents where
> > people have used guns in self-defense. If he goes after them
> > balls-to-the-wall, then it will be clear that in his version
> > of utopia, only the criminals are allowed to be armed.
> Fuck, is there NOTHING you won't distort?
Is there no insane 'progressive' policy that you won't condemn?
wrote:
> On 1/17/20 12:14 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > It's as if this D.A. only wants the *criminals* to be armed.
> > It'll be interesting to see how he treats incidents where
> > people have used guns in self-defense. If he goes after them
> > balls-to-the-wall, then it will be clear that in his version
> > of utopia, only the criminals are allowed to be armed.
> Fuck, is there NOTHING you won't distort?
FPP
Jan 17, 2020, 6:13:50 PM1/17/20
to
FPP
Jan 17, 2020, 6:14:48 PM1/17/20
to
On 1/17/20 11:21 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
Ubiquitous
Jan 18, 2020, 9:09:27 PM1/18/20
to
I am sure FPP's reply will be in multiple postings.
--
Democrats and the liberal media hate President Trump more than they
love this country.
RichA
Jan 19, 2020, 12:01:49 AM1/19/20
to
https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/18/us/santa-rosa-homeless-camp/index.html
0 new messages