On Jun 3, 4:27 pm, Seapig <
sea...@altavista.com> wrote:
> On Jun 2, 8:59 pm, David <
dimla...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 2, 11:42 pm, Seapig <
sea...@altavista.com> wrote:
>
> > > This makes no sense, within the world of the show or the real world.
> > > There's no reason for the character to still have a job, when she does
> > > nothing, and tried to steal the job of the guy who is now back in
> > > charge.
>
> > They showed in the finale that Andy is too soft to fire her, and he
> > ended up giving her some other job title.
>
> I had a hard time buying that. He had the balls to do what he had to
> do to get his job back, but not to get rid of the person who cost him
> the job in the first place? They spent a good chunk of the season
> trying to convince us that Andy is a competent manager, and then he
> lets a crazy woman have a job doing whatever she wants. If I remember
> the season finale correctly, she came right out and told him that she
> was going to do whatever she wants.
position where she'll be able to contribute the most. And imo not
sunny, positive person. The writers probably see him firing her as a