Re: Where are the Carrie Prejean sex tapes and why haven't anyone seen them yet?
Major Debacle
> Almost 3 weeks ago there was a lot of liberal hoopla about some sex
> tapes with Ms. Prejean. From that time until now, there's been nothing
> but silence. No tapes. No one has reported seeing them. Nothing.
>
> Many stupid liberals jumped on this because Ms. Prejean is a pretty
> girl who is into men. She's not a homosexual. Is this why homosexual
> liberal men like to ridicule her?
Quit pretending this is anything more than an attempt to find where her
sex tapes are posted so you can satisfy yer voyeuristic urges.
Geez, what a jerk... here, knock yerself out.
http://www.celebjihad.com/celeb-jihad/harlots/carrie_prejean/carrie_prejean2.html
http://www.celebjihad.com/celeb-jihad/harlots/carrie_prejean/carrie_prejean1.html
http://www.celebjihad.com/celeb-jihad/carrie-prejean-sex-tape-screen-caps
--
When asked, years afterward, why his charge at Gettysburg failed,
General Pickett said: "I've always thought the Yankees had something to
do with it."
MC
Major Debacle <major_debacle@The_Pentagon.invalid> wrote:
> Not Defined wrote:
> > Almost 3 weeks ago there was a lot of liberal hoopla about some sex
> > tapes with Ms. Prejean. From that time until now, there's been nothing
> > but silence. No tapes. No one has reported seeing them. Nothing.
> >
> > Many stupid liberals jumped on this because Ms. Prejean is a pretty
> > girl who is into men. She's not a homosexual. Is this why homosexual
> > liberal men like to ridicule her?
>
> Quit pretending this is anything more than an attempt to find where her
> sex tapes are posted so you can satisfy yer voyeuristic urges.
>
> Geez, what a jerk... here, knock yerself out.
Christ, does *everything* have to be labeled "liberal"?
--
"If you can, tell me something happy."
- Marybones
wolfagain
> Almost 3 weeks ago there was a lot of liberal hoopla about some sex
> tapes with Ms. Prejean. From that time until now, there's been nothing
> but silence. No tapes. No one has reported seeing them. Nothing.
>
> Many stupid liberals jumped on this because Ms. Prejean is a pretty
> girl who is into men. She's not a homosexual. Is this why homosexual
> liberal men like to ridicule her?
Homosexuals don't like pretty normal girls! Who suspected that?
Will
"Not Defined" <farc...@newsrover.com> wrote in message
news:xn0ghzn4...@news.albasani.net...
> Major Debacle wrote:
>> Not Defined wrote:
>> > Almost 3 weeks ago there was a lot of liberal hoopla about some sex
>> > tapes with Ms. Prejean. From that time until now, there's been
>> > nothing but silence. No tapes. No one has reported seeing them.
>> > Nothing.
>> >
>> > Many stupid liberals jumped on this because Ms. Prejean is a pretty
>> > girl who is into men. She's not a homosexual. Is this why homosexual
>> > liberal men like to ridicule her?
>>
>> Quit pretending this is anything more than an attempt to find where
>> her sex tapes are posted so you can satisfy yer voyeuristic urges.
>>
>> Geez, what a jerk... here, knock yerself out.
>>
>> http://www.celebjihad.com/celeb-jihad/harlots/carrie_prejean/carrie_pr
>> ejean2.html
>> http://www.celebjihad.com/celeb-jihad/harlots/carrie_prejean/carrie_pr
>> ejean1.html
>>
>> http://www.celebjihad.com/celeb-jihad/carrie-prejean-sex-tape-screen-c
>> aps
>
>
> "Are these the first leaked screen caps from the former Miss California
> Carrie Prejean's sex tape?"
>
> It doesn't say that these are them. It just posts some black & white
> shots of some girl doing something to herself and asks the question.
> Stupid liberals look at pictures of a naked girl and the drool. You
> guys are fools.
>
> I'll ask again: where are the Carrie Prejean sex VIDEO TAPES and why
> haven't anyone seen them yet?
>
> VIDEO TAPES are the two important words here. Come back when you can
> answer this.
Uh, she has admitted that the tapes exist. Don't know why you need other
people to run around and find proof that they do.
Will
"Not Defined" <farc...@newsrover.com> wrote in message
news:xn0ghzn4...@news.albasani.net...
> Major Debacle wrote:
>> > Almost 3 weeks ago there was a lot of liberal hoopla about some sex
>> > tapes with Ms. Prejean. From that time until now, there's been
>> > nothing but silence. No tapes. No one has reported seeing them.
>> > Nothing.
>> >
>> > Many stupid liberals jumped on this because Ms. Prejean is a pretty
>> > girl who is into men. She's not a homosexual. Is this why homosexual
>> > liberal men like to ridicule her?
>>
>> Quit pretending this is anything more than an attempt to find where
>> her sex tapes are posted so you can satisfy yer voyeuristic urges.
>>
>> Geez, what a jerk... here, knock yerself out.
>>
The Man From Another Place
<major_debacle@The_Pentagon.invalid> wrote:
>Not Defined wrote:
>> Almost 3 weeks ago there was a lot of liberal hoopla about some sex
>> tapes with Ms. Prejean. From that time until now, there's been nothing
>> but silence. No tapes. No one has reported seeing them. Nothing.
>>
>> Many stupid liberals jumped on this because Ms. Prejean is a pretty
>> girl who is into men. She's not a homosexual. Is this why homosexual
>> liberal men like to ridicule her?
>
>Quit pretending this is anything more than an attempt to find where her
>sex tapes are posted so you can satisfy yer voyeuristic urges.
>
>Geez, what a jerk... here, knock yerself out.
>
>http://www.celebjihad.com/celeb-jihad/harlots/carrie_prejean/carrie_prejean2.html
>http://www.celebjihad.com/celeb-jihad/harlots/carrie_prejean/carrie_prejean1.html
>
>http://www.celebjihad.com/celeb-jihad/carrie-prejean-sex-tape-screen-caps
Screencaps from a clip that has been around for years. As numerous
respondents on the sites posted have stated. The caps are not of
Carrie Prejean.
But then you never have relied on any facts regarding any of your
bullshit you post so there's nothing new here.
Will
"Not Defined" <farc...@newsrover.com> wrote in message
news:xn0ghzn4...@news.albasani.net...
> Major Debacle wrote:
>> > Almost 3 weeks ago there was a lot of liberal hoopla about some sex
>> > tapes with Ms. Prejean. From that time until now, there's been
>> > nothing but silence. No tapes. No one has reported seeing them.
>> > Nothing.
>> >
>> > Many stupid liberals jumped on this because Ms. Prejean is a pretty
>> > girl who is into men. She's not a homosexual. Is this why homosexual
>> > liberal men like to ridicule her?
>>
>> Quit pretending this is anything more than an attempt to find where
>> her sex tapes are posted so you can satisfy yer voyeuristic urges.
>>
>> Geez, what a jerk... here, knock yerself out.
>>
MC
<a47afb54-a247-4b18...@o31g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>,
wolfagain <wo...@provide.net> wrote:
> Homosexuals don't like pretty normal girls! Who suspected that?
Actually homosexuals tend to like pretty girls - and vice versa. And
"normal" doesn't enter into the discussion.
Ubiquitous
wrote:
>Almost 3 weeks ago there was a lot of liberal hoopla about some sex
>tapes with Ms. Prejean. From that time until now, there's been nothing
>but silence. No tapes. No one has reported seeing them. Nothing.
>
>Many stupid liberals jumped on this because Ms. Prejean is a pretty
>girl who is into men. She's not a homosexual. Is this why homosexual
>liberal men like to ridicule her?
And you posted this off-topic article here because?
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
And vice versa, evidently. LOL
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
>In article
><a47afb54-a247-4b18...@o31g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>,
> wolfagain <wo...@provide.net> wrote:
>
>> Homosexuals don't like pretty normal girls! Who suspected that?
>
>Actually homosexuals tend to like pretty girls - and vice versa. And
>"normal" doesn't enter into the discussion.
Not in this case.
Will
> Will wrote:
>> "Not Defined" <farc...@newsrover.com> wrote in message
>> news:xn0ghzn4...@news.albasani.net...
>> > Major Debacle wrote:
>> > > Not Defined wrote:
>> >>> Almost 3 weeks ago there was a lot of liberal hoopla about some
>> sex >>> tapes with Ms. Prejean. From that time until now, there's been
>> >>> nothing but silence. No tapes. No one has reported seeing them.
>> >>> Nothing.
>> > > >
>> >>> Many stupid liberals jumped on this because Ms. Prejean is a
>> pretty >>> girl who is into men. She's not a homosexual. Is this why
>> homosexual >>> liberal men like to ridicule her?
>> > >
>> > > Quit pretending this is anything more than an attempt to find
>> > > where her sex tapes are posted so you can satisfy yer voyeuristic
>> > > urges.
>> > >
>> > > Geez, what a jerk... here, knock yerself out.
>> > >
>> > > http://www.celebjihad.com/celeb-jihad/harlots/carrie_prejean/carri
>> > > e_pr ejean2.html
>> > > http://www.celebjihad.com/celeb-jihad/harlots/carrie_prejean/carri
>> > > e_pr ejean1.html
>> > >
>> > > http://www.celebjihad.com/celeb-jihad/carrie-prejean-sex-tape-scre
>> >
>> > This is how the web site begins:
>> >
>> > "Are these the first leaked screen caps from the former Miss
>> > California Carrie Prejean's sex tape?"
>> >
>> > It doesn't say that these are them. It just posts some black & white
>> > shots of some girl doing something to herself and asks the question.
>> > Stupid liberals look at pictures of a naked girl and the drool. You
>> > guys are fools.
>> >
>> > I'll ask again: where are the Carrie Prejean sex VIDEO TAPES and why
>> > haven't anyone seen them yet?
>> >
>> > VIDEO TAPES are the two important words here. Come back when you can
>> > answer this.
>>
>> Uh, she has admitted that the tapes exist.
>
> TAPES. Only stupid liberals have said that.
>
>> Don't know why you need
>> other people to run around and find proof that they do.
>
Going by you, conservatives are idiots. Prejean has spent the last two
weeks acknowledging the tapes and, of course, regretting making them.
Ubiquitous
wrote:
>Ubiquitous wrote:
>> farc...@newsrover.com wrote:
>This is not off-topic. Do try to keep up. Videos are being discussed.
Wrong. Videos are most definitely not on-topic here.
Will
"Knifefight Afterdance" <switchb...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xn0ghzsw...@news.albasani.net...
> name. When it comes to you, you don't need to think. All you need to do
> is believe. You are like a terrorist Muslim. You think that there are
> 72 virgins waiting for you somewhere. rotfl
She's far too Christian to use the word SEX. ROFL.
Kris Baker
> Will wrote:
>>
>> Uh, she has admitted that the tapes exist.
>
> TAPES. Only stupid liberals have said that.
WRONG, WRONG, WRONG.
Lynn Vincent (definitely not a liberal, and who actually wrote
Sarah Palin's book) called them "sex tapes" and is quoted
on both the right-wing NewsBusters.com website AND on the
right-wing Brietbart.com website.
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/lynn-vincent/2009/11/14/my-interview-carrie-prejean
and
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lvincent/2009/11/12/interview-former-miss-california-carrie-prejean/
If you want to continue Prejean's charade that taping yourself
while you masturbate "is not a sex tape", well.......
Kris
lab~rat >:-)
I think she's a normal, hot horny young woman that hates fags.
lab~rat >:-)
<paralle...@ggmail.com> puked:
So getting a blowjob from a fat intern isn't sex, but masturbating is.
Got it.
Will
"lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net> wrote in message
news:41olg5png480l18gr...@4ax.com...
Well, she's never screwing you.
Ubiquitous
>You are seriously confused. Videos are some of the things discussed
>here. American Funniest Videos is a great hint for you. You need to
>wise up.
Wrong. That's a _TV show_.
Are you trying to claimg her sex tape is a TV show now?
KK
>> Uh, she has admitted that the tapes exist.
>
> She has admitted that SOMETHING exist. She did not say they were SEX
> TAPES. Only stupid liberals have said that.
>
>> Don't know why you need
>> other people to run around and find proof that they do.
>
> Because liberals lie.
So, let me get this right. Do you *not* believe that the tapes she was
shown (after which she immediately dropped all claims against the
pageant) were sexually oriented?
Presumably, since you're dumb enough to think that liberals lie but not
other politicans or people of other ideologies, you'll believe Fox and
Hannity:
Hannity, who wrote [Prejean's] book's forward, started the interview with
the sex tape scandal, "We might as well go right to it."
Prejean verified that she made a sex tape, but said that it was private
and done when she was a teenager. "It was the biggest mistake of my
life," Prejean told Hannity. "I was all by myself at the time, I was
sending a boyfriend at the time that I loved and cared about a video of
me.
"Never did I think it would come out. But it was bad judgment," she went
on. "It's embarrassing and it's humiliating to be talking about it now on
national TV."
But Prejean said she is owning up to the tape, "I'm taking total
responsibility for it."
Describing the tape she said that "she was all by herself, no one was in
the room with me. I was not having sex with anybody."
lab~rat >:-)
Right. Because I'm already married, but it's nice to have attractive
women around, and the less they wear the better. Call me crazy.
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
When is it on? I'll give it a watch.
Will
So do I but can't figure out why you are making an effort to let me know
that.
lab~rat >:-)
>>
>> Because liberals lie.
>
>So, let me get this right. Do you *not* believe that the tapes she was
>shown (after which she immediately dropped all claims against the
>pageant) were sexually oriented?
Think there's a possibility that she was playing with her tits and
maybe just flashed a little beav? I mean, what I thought of at first
was that she was fingering herself, but she claims it wasn't a sex
tape, so what do you think?
Steve Newport
fuck up, Mike "Ubi" Weber.
KK
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:56:16 GMT, KK <_K...@furburger.net> puked:
>
>
>>> Because liberals lie.
>>
>>So, let me get this right. Do you *not* believe that the tapes she was
>>shown (after which she immediately dropped all claims against the
>>pageant) were sexually oriented?
>
> Think there's a possibility that she was playing with her tits and maybe
> just flashed a little beav? I mean, what I thought of at first was that
> she was fingering herself, but she claims it wasn't a sex tape, so what
> do you think?
I think she wouldn't have folded on her $1M claim if it were essentially
a breast self-exam.
Thanatos
"Will" <wi...@will.net> wrote:
> "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net> wrote in message
> news:erqlg5tk4u55n7rc9...@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:37:56 -0800, "Will" <wi...@will.net> puked:
> >>Well, she's never screwing you.
> > Right. Because I'm already married, but it's nice to have attractive
> > women around, and the less they wear the better. Call me crazy.
> So do I but can't figure out why you are making an effort to let me know
> that.
He's says "I'm already married" and you respond with "So do I"?
Care to try again in English this time?
ArmyOfDorkness
"Not Defined" <farc...@newsrover.com> wrote in message
news:xn0ghzuq...@news.albasani.net...
> A TV show about videos. Videos are on-topic. I don't know why you don't
> get it.
Not sex videos
thanatoid
<SNIP>
> VIDEO TAPES are the two important words here. Come back
> when you can answer this.
Try:
http://rapidlibrary.com/index.php?q=prejean&filetype=0
And tell us if they're at all related to what they claim to be.
--
There are only two classifications of disk drives: Broken drives
and those that will break later.
- Chuck Armstrong
lab~rat >:-)
Wait, what was the suit about again? If it were against the pageant
the tape would have proven violation of her suit if she were nude
only.
Jim Sumner
> "Not Defined" <farce5...@newsrover.com> wrote in message
>
> news:xn0ghzn4...@news.albasani.net...
>
>
>
> > Major Debacle wrote:
> >> > Almost 3 weeks ago there was a lot of liberal hoopla about some sex
> >> > tapes with Ms. Prejean. From that time until now, there's been
> >> > nothing but silence. No tapes. No one has reported seeing them.
> >> > Nothing.
>
> >> > Many stupid liberals jumped on this because Ms. Prejean is a pretty
> >> > girl who is into men. She's not a homosexual. Is this why homosexual
> >> > liberal men like to ridicule her?
>
> >> her sex tapes are posted so you can satisfy yer voyeuristic urges.
>
> >> Geez, what a jerk... here, knock yerself out.
>
> >>http://www.celebjihad.com/celeb-jihad/harlots/carrie_prejean/carrie_pr
> >> ejean2.html
> >>http://www.celebjihad.com/celeb-jihad/harlots/carrie_prejean/carrie_pr
> >> ejean1.html
>
> >>http://www.celebjihad.com/celeb-jihad/carrie-prejean-sex-tape-screen-c
> >> aps
>
> > This is how the web site begins:
>
> > "Are these the first leaked screen caps from the former Miss California
> > Carrie Prejean's sex tape?"
>
> > It doesn't say that these are them. It just posts some black & white
> > shots of some girl doing something to herself and asks the question.
> > Stupid liberals look at pictures of a naked girl and the drool. You
> > guys are fools.
>
> > I'll ask again: where are the Carrie Prejean sex VIDEO TAPES and why
> > haven't anyone seen them yet?
>
> > answer this.
>
> people to run around and find proof that they do.
That's his game, he demands proof which of course in his mind has to
be from a Republican source. If the source is "liberal" then he'll
dismiss it and again ask for real proof.
Jim Sumner
> Will wrote:
> > "Not Defined" <farce5...@newsrover.com> wrote in message
> >news:xn0ghzn4...@news.albasani.net...
> > > Major Debacle wrote:
> > > > Not Defined wrote:
> > >>> Almost 3 weeks ago there was a lot of liberal hoopla about some
> > sex >>> tapes with Ms. Prejean. From that time until now, there's been
> > >>> nothing but silence. No tapes. No one has reported seeing them.
> > >>> Nothing.
>
> > >>> Many stupid liberals jumped on this because Ms. Prejean is a
> > pretty >>> girl who is into men. She's not a homosexual. Is this why
> > homosexual >>> liberal men like to ridicule her?
>
> > > > Quit pretending this is anything more than an attempt to find
> > > > where her sex tapes are posted so you can satisfy yer voyeuristic
> > > > urges.
>
> > > > Geez, what a jerk... here, knock yerself out.
>
> > > > e_pr ejean2.html
> > > >http://www.celebjihad.com/celeb-jihad/harlots/carrie_prejean/carri
> > > > e_pr ejean1.html
>
> > > >http://www.celebjihad.com/celeb-jihad/carrie-prejean-sex-tape-scre
>
> > > This is how the web site begins:
>
> > > "Are these the first leaked screen caps from the former Miss
> > > California Carrie Prejean's sex tape?"
>
> > > It doesn't say that these are them. It just posts some black & white
> > > shots of some girl doing something to herself and asks the question.
> > > Stupid liberals look at pictures of a naked girl and the drool. You
> > > guys are fools.
>
> > > I'll ask again: where are the Carrie Prejean sex VIDEO TAPES and why
> > > haven't anyone seen them yet?
>
> > > VIDEO TAPES are the two important words here. Come back when you can
> > > answer this.
>
> > Uh, she has admitted that the tapes exist.
>
> TAPES. Only stupid liberals have said that.
>
> > other people to run around and find proof that they do.
>
Fox lies.
Kris Baker
"Jim Sumner" <JimSum...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8ffdb671-c3c9-48d6...@u20g2000vbq.googlegroups.com...
---------------------
and when shown a Republican source, she disclaims it.
I admit, I took her bait twice.
Kris