On 2021-10-21 11:33 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 20:45:01 -0400, Rhino
> <
no_offlin...@example.com> wrote:
>
>>> Well given neither the mayors of Edmonton or Calgary were seeking
>>> re-election it's pretty much inevitable each mayor-elect would be
>>> new...
>>>
>> This is going to be like Kim Campbell all over again. For her entire 4
>> or 5 months in office, EVERY story involving her included the phrase
>> "Canada's first female prime minister", as if we hadn't yet figured that
>> out.
>
> My daughter was in primary school when Campbell became PM as this was
> her first inkling women COULD take the top job - then saw first that
> she was quickly turfed and assumed it was because she had done a bad
> job as opposed to her predecessor's record.
>
I believe Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) had the first woman PM in the person of
Sirimavo Bandaranaike, who was in office from 1960 to 1965. After that,
we Golda Meir, Indira Gandhi and Maggie Thatcher had all been leaders of
their respective countries. And of course any number of women had been
queens regnant, including Queen Victoria and Queen Elizabeth II, so
there was plenty of precedent for the idea that a woman could be in
charge of a country.
> I completely lost any respect for Brian Mulroney when he said that
> even the (post-1991) Communists in Poland did better than Campbell
> which while factually true - governments in power don't normally go
> from 169 to 2 seats - ignores why he himself did not complete his term
> in the first place. (My personal view is that Mulroney WOULD have
> gotten more than 2 seats in 1992 but nowhere near enough to stay in
> power - and likely less than the 40 seats the Liberals won in 1984
> which before then was the worst a ruling party seeking election had
> ever done)
>
Mulroney, while initially popular, and still popular enough to win a
second majority, had clearly worn out his welcome by 1993 with the
failure of the Charlottetown Accord. You didn't need to be psychic to
realize he was going to lose and probably pretty badly, so I think he
decided to wash his hands of it and hoped the blame would fall on his
successor rather than on him so that his "legacy" wouldn't be too badly
tarnished. Whether he succeeded in that is something the pundits will
surely argue about until the proverbial cows come home. I remember all
too well how HATED he was by the middle of his second term. I don't
think Campbell deserves nearly as much blame as Mulroney does for the
result of the 1993 election.
--
Rhino