IF YOU DONT KNOW WHO TONY CAVALIER IS, CLICK HERE!!!
http://wsaz.com/news_team.php?cmd=view_member&member_id=78
Nader Isghonnawin wrote in message ...
"Nader Isghonnawin" <nader_is_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d0526fb5.04062...@posting.google.com...
Of course not.
It was an unfortunate pet shop accident.
--
best regards,
Ra
----------------------------------------------------
http://surfpick.com
Lignum Vitae
----------------------------------------------------
No, that was Richard Gere.
I never expected to see that on here. Of course, Bill Murray, if he
is still around, is quite probably nuts.
--
Jeff Murdock
You are only as old as the women you feel.
NO SHITHEAD--IT WAS GEORGE W BUSH.
HE WAS BUSY SHOVING RODENTS UP HIS ASS WHILE JOHN KERRY WAS OVER IN
VIETNAM FIGHTING IN THE WAR.
GET IT STRAIGHT BEFORE YOU EVER POST AGAIN!
KERRY 2004
Ah yes Kerry, Mr. "I voted for the war until I didn't". What the fuck
does that mean? Bush in 2004!
Kevin Flynn wrote:
>
> sirke...@hotmail.com (Keith) wrote in message news:<ca5da64.04062...@posting.google.com>...
> > Ah yes Kerry, Mr. "I voted for the war until I didn't". What the fuck
> > does that mean?
>
> It means you didn't study up on the issue and understand even the
> basics, starting with what he actually said. Then it means you never
> looked at the votes involved. It means you don't understand why
> someone will cast an earlier vote in favor of a a bill because of an
> amendment to it that earned your support, but then vote no on the
> final vote because that amendment has been stripped from it, which
> happens every day in Congress. And it means you're unaware the Bush
> threatened to veto the very same bill anyway if the final version
> contained something *he* didn't like.
>
> It means you're stupid.
>
I suppose this means you can tell readers what was removed or added to
the bill in question that caused Kerry to vote for it and then vote
against it. Put that right here ---->
--
"He named his second child Jim after the horse that had brought him to
Washington. He caught his son one day writing 'James' on his lessons,
and he told the boy without raising his voice that if he had wanted to
name him 'James', that is what he would have done." -+Edward P. Jones,
"The Known World"
Kevin Flynn wrote:
>
> "Bill Bonde ( ``There's sunshine in my stomach'' )" <std...@backpacker.com> wrote in message news:<40DC9EB6...@backpacker.com>...
> > Kevin Flynn wrote:
> > >
> > > sirke...@hotmail.com (Keith) wrote in message news:<ca5da64.04062...@posting.google.com>...
> > > > Ah yes Kerry, Mr. "I voted for the war until I didn't". What the fuck
> > > > does that mean?
> > >
> > > It means you didn't study up on the issue and understand even the
> > > basics, starting with what he actually said. Then it means you never
> > > looked at the votes involved. It means you don't understand why
> > > someone will cast an earlier vote in favor of a a bill because of an
> > > amendment to it that earned your support, but then vote no on the
> > > final vote because that amendment has been stripped from it, which
> > > happens every day in Congress. And it means you're unaware the Bush
> > > threatened to veto the very same bill anyway if the final version
> > > contained something *he* didn't like.
> > >
> > > It means you're stupid.
> > >
> > I suppose this means you can tell readers what was removed or added to
> > the bill in question that caused Kerry to vote for it and then vote
> > against it. Put that right here ---->
>
> Of course I can. Why don't you know it already? It was the method of
> actually *paying* for the $87 billion. The amendment that Kerry
> supported was to raise it partially through recission of the earlier
> Bush tax reduction affecting only the top 1 percent of filers.
>
Oh, Kerry's dishonest attempt to raise taxes.
> That
> measure was then voted out of the bill, so Kerry along with many
> others voted no on final.
>
> You can agree or disagree with the positions, but you at least ought
> to know them.
>
Kerry is simply dishonest and that is should be well known by now.
JUST LIKE ALL NEO CONMEN REPUBLICANS!
BUMP FOR THE HARSH TRUTH TO BE SEEN AND BELIEVED!
Just as long as you don't let the truth get in the way, everything
will be alright...
Later,
Chris
--
Chris Bessert
Bess...@aol.com
http://www.michiganhighways.org
http://www.wisconsinhighways.org
http://www.ontariohighways.org
<< Kerry is simply dishonest and that is should be well known by now. >>
It's well known; it's just that a lot of people don't care.
Hmmm. I didn't realize at first that I was responding to a cluck. My
bad. Now that this is clear, perhaps you could explain how any of this
situation (which occurs thousands of times in the course of a
legislative session at state or federal level, and is part of the
process of amending and changing bills -- even Bush threatened to veto
this bill in question unless certain provisions were left out) is in
any way dishonest, except of course through your entirely biased view.