On 2022-08-12 1:19 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 2022-08-12 1:14 a.m., RichA wrote:
>> On Thursday, 11 August 2022 at 23:16:35 UTC-4, kensi wrote:
>>> On 2022-08-10 8:02 p.m., RichA wrote:
>>>> Please, monkeys; take your pathetic little religious battles back to
>>>> f------ India.
>>>> It'll be a sad day when we have to string you all up to restore order.
>>> Once again, you forgot to end that missive with a "Sieg Heil!" ... you
>>> need to be more careful if you don't want to land on your orange
>>> Fuhrer's shitlist, ko0ky.
>> Sorry, I've seen a city with a crime rate like Sweden get turned into
>> a near s---hole thanks to non-white criminals.
>
> You mean, thanks to neoliberalism-induced poverty, a flood of American
> guns crossing the border, and violent far-right thugs.
>
You didn't see a single article on this incident did you? You simply
reacted to Rich and his standard racist spiel didn't you?
Well, there are several problems with your "analysis":
1. The victim lived in a visibly comfortable neighbourhood, not in
poverty, and was something of a celebrity in the Punjabi-language local
media, which he did as a side gig from his day job as a real estate agent.
2. There were no guns involved in the incident. The attackers used an
axe and a machete.
3. I could be wrong but what you can see of the attackers in the video,
they appear to be non-white, not some sort of white supremacist types.
https://globalnews.ca/news/9053548/brampton-attack-victim-had-safety-plan-death-threat/
But hey, you're like the hammer that sees everything as a nail and has
no ability to perceive any other possibilities. You don't actually NEED
to have actual information about an event before you spout off about it.
To you EVERY event is symptomatic of "capitalism run amuck" and the
solution is ALWAYS Marxism. You're completely unable to see that it's
far more likely that the victim said something that pissed off his
attackers on his podcast and encountered some violent payback.
But you keep doing you while we laugh at your broken-record analysis.
It's *your* credibility - such as it is - that you're undermining.
--
Rhino