Re: Where the hell is SVU?
David
<calg...@tcfreenet.invalid> wrote:
>David <diml...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>news:ta2og5ljkf636g790...@4ax.com:
>
>> Ah ha ha ha ha. I like this guy.
>>
>
>None of the things you say or imply about this guy are true.
Ha! He reminds me of the good old days, when most trolls weren't
political or repulsive and you could mess around with them without
feeling like you needed a shower afterwards.
Ian J. Ball
Extravagan <extra...@frogsoup.xelon.com> wrote:
> I just checked my cable service's interactive program guide to plan the
> evening's TV watching, and I was completely unable to find Law and Order
> at its usual time, or anywhere near it, on its usual channel.
>
> No new episode, no rerun, no nothing. It's just *gone*.
>
> What the hell happened? Did they finally cancel it? Why no fanfare?
Yes, they cancelled it.
Apparently Hargitay and Meloni got in a huge knock-down, drag out
fist-fight (that led to hospitalizations), and NBC Brass was so
disgusted with the turn of events, they just pulled the show mid-season.
Word on the street is that NBC is going to replace it with reruns of
"Late Night With Jimmy Fallon". Personally, I'm rather looking forward
to that.
--
"There's no business, like Cho business."
- Patrick Jane, "The Mentalist", 02/11/09
Extravagan
> On Nov 24, 4:29 pm, Patty Winter <pat...@wintertime.com> wrote:
>> In article <7bba6b16-6bd3-4f65-b93f-b4d693741...@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
>> Smokie Darling (Annie) <Barnabus1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 24, 3:23 pm, Patty Winter <pat...@wintertime.com> wrote:
>> [extraneous quotage deleted again]
>>
>>>> "Clouddreamer" didn't mention any specific shows in her original
>>>> posting, but if she had, I'm sure that she would have included
>>>> L&O:SVU, because it's one of this guy's most frequently mentioned
>>>> series.
>>> I meant the odds that were being taken to what the subject header
>>> would be <grin>.
>> Oh, I must have missed that. I would have signed up on the "SVU"
>> square.
>>
>> Patty
>
> Yeah, he kept 'reposting' his "the things you say or imply blah, blah,
> blah" and accusing everyone of deleting his posts. It would have been
> funny if it hadn't been so sad. Heck, even yours are being dropped
> (and mine).
Who does? What on earth is everyone babbling about? None of these posts
seem to be a straight answer to my questions. Instead they look like
some sort of a tangent. I've heard of topic drift, but the a major
derailment in the very first reply? Come on.
Some of the remarks seem to suggest you think I have a longer posting
history here than I actually do. I think I've posted all of maybe ten
posts to this newsgroup, ever. Maybe you have me confused with somebody
else.
Patty Winter
In article <b77e2324-9d87-4329...@b36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Smokie Darling (Annie) <Barnab...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[extraneous quotage deleted]
>Yeah, he kept 'reposting' his "the things you say or imply blah, blah,
>blah" and accusing everyone of deleting his posts. It would have been
>funny if it hadn't been so sad. Heck, even yours are being dropped
>(and mine).
Mine??! My posts are disappearing from Google Groups??!! Conspiracy!
Conspiracy!! I'll track the perpetrators to the ends of the earth!!!
We should file a class-action lawsuit!!
Patty
Michael Black
> On 25 Nov 2009 02:03:54 GMT, Patty Winter <pat...@wintertime.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> In article <hei1te$1q9$1...@aioe.org>,
>> Extravagan <extra...@frogsoup.xelon.com> wrote:
>>> Michael Black wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> Couldn't you have stayed with the "Little Green Man" name, so we'd know
>>>> right away to start insulting you?
>>>
>>> Pardon me, but I've never even heard of "Little Green Man" until reading
>>> this post. I mostly just lurk and don't read very many posts.
>>
>> You know, that shtick wore thin more than a year ago.
>>
>> But hey, it's really fun seeing you running around madly
>> changing browsers and Usenet servers to try to fool people.
>> Especially since it's so futile. Great entertainment. :-)
>>
>> Say, isn't it about time for your rant about how Canadians
>> should get a new episode of "L&O:SVU" tomorrow night even
>> though a new one isn't airing in the States this week?
>
> I'm deciding whether or not to watch SVU tonight actually. It's on at
> eight.
>
You mean I missed it? I was watching "NCIS".
I hate to say it, but CTV can't even follow itself. There was a little
"coming up tonigh" page earlier today that had SVU at 10pm.
Of course, they ran an ad for "V" on Sunday that said "tonight at 8pm".
Michael
Steve Newport
with them without feeling like you needed a shower afterwards>>>.
-------------------------------
Now it's "the regulars" like you, David, who make readers feel that way.
This thread is proof positive of this group's dull, shallow,
self-congratulatory clique.
clouddreamer
> In article <ANIM8Rfsk-26A07...@news.dc1.easynews.com>,
> Anim8rFSK <ANIM...@cox.net> wrote:
>> In article <hekbff$oc6$1...@aioe.org>,
>> Extravagan <extra...@frogsoup.xelon.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This is ludicrous. I make maybe my fifth post ever here and get called a
>>> liar?
>> That's ClodDreamer. Just killfile her and move on.
>
> Um, Anim, you obviously have some sort of bee in your bonnet about
> Clouddreamer, but if you're seriously defending this kook because
> of that, you're only making yourself look foolish.
>
>
> Patty
>
>
Careful. Animalfkr doesn't like women who can think for themselves.
;]
clouddreamer
> In article <mrGdnXwdDexcpJPW...@supernews.com>,
> clouddreamer <saveth...@save.money.too> wrote:
>
>> Extravagan wrote:
>>> clouddreamer wrote:
>>>> Extravagan wrote:
>>>>> Who does? What on earth is everyone babbling about? None of these
>>>>> posts seem to be a straight answer to my questions. Instead they look
>>>>> like some sort of a tangent. I've heard of topic drift, but the a
>>>>> major derailment in the very first reply? Come on.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some of the remarks seem to suggest you think I have a longer posting
>>>>> history here than I actually do. I think I've posted all of maybe ten
>>>>> posts to this newsgroup, ever. Maybe you have me confused with
>>>>> somebody else.
>>>> None of the things you say about yourself are true.
>>> This is ludicrous. I make maybe my fifth post ever here and get called a
>>> liar?
>>
>> our killfiles and whine about shows not being on at specific times even
>> though the rest of us know shows skip times for various reasons....like
>> Thanksgiving.
>>
>> Now, you'll want to come back and say TG is an American holiday and why
>> should it affect Canadians.
>>
>> We'll come back and tell you that Canadian broadcasters are contracted
>> to show the episodes on certain dates.
>>
>> You'll come back and say that shouldn't matter.
>>
>> We'll say then you're pretty dense.
>>
>> You'll delete the insult and proceed to throw out a few of your own.
>>
>> If this doesn't sound familiar then I'm guessing they've changed your
>> medication.
>>
>> ..
>
> Maybe it isn't the same guy each time we go through this. I'm starting
> to think that all Canadians take a "How to be a r.a.tv troll" class, and
> that's why they all sound alike.
>
Same guy has done the same denial act before then admitted it was him.
Seriously, I can't see two people on the planet being that dense.
..