Lori Loughlin arrested

[hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com]

"Full House" actress Lori Loughlin, known as Aunt Becky on the
TV show, was taken into custody by the FBI in Los Angeles
Wednesday morning as part of the investigation into a massive
college admissions scam. Loughlin was expected to appear in
federal court on conspiracy charges Wednesday afternoon.

She and her husband, designer Mossimo Giannulli, allegedly paid
half a million dollars to have their two daughters labeled as
recruits to the USC crew team even though neither participated
in the sport. Their 19-year-old daughter Olivia Jade is a
social media influencer, who apparently capitalized on her
experience at USC with sponsored posts.

The daughter had to apologize last year after saying this
on her YouTube channel: "I do want the experience of, like,
game days, partying. I don't really care about school as
you guys all know."

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/college-admissions-scandal-lori-loughlin-arrested-operation-varsity-blues-today-2019-03-13-live-updates/

[trotsky]

hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com Wrote in message:

> "Full House" actress Lori Loughlin, known as Aunt Becky on the TV show, was taken into custody by the FBI in Los Angeles Wednesday morning as part of the investigation into a massive college admissions scam.

These right wing morons are dropping like flies.
--

[NoBody]

On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 05:07:35 -0500 (CDT), trotsky <gms...@email.ccom>
wrote:

>hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com Wrote in message:
>> "Full House" actress Lori Loughlin, known as Aunt Becky on the TV show, was taken into custody by the FBI in Los Angeles Wednesday morning as part of the investigation into a massive college admissions scam.
>
>
>These right wing morons are dropping like flies.

So the libs who didn't care that Warren lied on her application now
care that someone else did something wrong.

[David Johnston]

It's not that they don't care. It's that they don't believe you.

[FPP]

Maybe it's because unsubstantiated smears from known liars aren't given
the same weight as claims that are backed up by facts.

--
"An immigrant who achieves the American Dream didn’t steal anything from
you or your family. They just wanted it more than you and worked harder
than you. And they did it with all the odds stacked against them. If
your life sucks lemons, a wall isn’t going to turn it to lemonade."

[Rhino]

On 2019-03-14 6:31 PM, FPP wrote:
> On 3/14/19 12:22 PM, David Johnston wrote:
>> On 2019-03-14 8:26 a.m., NoBody wrote:
>>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 05:07:35 -0500 (CDT), trotsky <gms...@email.ccom>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com Wrote in message:
>>>>> "Full House" actress Lori Loughlin, known as Aunt Becky on the TV
>>>>> show, was taken into custody by the FBI in Los Angeles Wednesday
>>>>> morning as part of the investigation into a massive college
>>>>> admissions scam.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> These right wing morons are dropping like flies.
>>>
>>> So the libs who didn't care that Warren lied on her application now
>>> care that someone else did something wrong.
>>>
>>
>> It's not that they don't care.  It's that they don't believe you.
>
> Maybe it's because unsubstantiated smears from known liars aren't given
> the same weight as claims that are backed up by facts.
>

I'm sure you've been the victim of that many, MANY times!

--
Rhino

[FPP]

Rhino, when do I say things I *can't* back up with citations of fact?
Go ahead... go and find something I stated as fact that you don't think
I can back up.

I'll wait...

[NoBody]

So you're saying libs live in the world of denial? Good to know that
you acknowledge that.

[BTR1701]

In article <q6ftdh$ns8$2...@dont-email.me>, FPP <fred...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 3/15/19 12:10 AM, Rhino wrote:
> > On 2019-03-14 6:31 PM, FPP wrote:
> >> On 3/14/19 12:22 PM, David Johnston wrote:
> >>> On 2019-03-14 8:26 a.m., NoBody wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 05:07:35 -0500 (CDT), trotsky <gms...@email.ccom>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com Wrote in message:
> >>>>>> "Full House" actress Lori Loughlin, known as Aunt Becky on the TV
> >>>>>> show, was taken into custody by the FBI in Los Angeles Wednesday
> >>>>>> morning as part of the investigation into a massive college
> >>>>>> admissions scam.

> >>>>> These right wing morons are dropping like flies.
> >>>>
> >>>> So the libs who didn't care that Warren lied on her application now
> >>>> care that someone else did something wrong.

> >>> It's not that they don't care.  It's that they don't believe you.
> >>
> >> Maybe it's because unsubstantiated smears from known liars aren't
> >> given the same weight as claims that are backed up by facts.
> >>
> > I'm sure you've been the victim of that many, MANY times!
>
> Rhino, when do I say things I *can't* back up with citations of fact?
> Go ahead... go and find something I stated as fact that you don't think
> I can back up.

When you claimed I was a member of the Republican Party.

[David Johnston]

When's the last time you voted for a Democrat?

[Adam H. Kerman]

David Johnston <davidjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On 2019-03-15 8:43 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>>FPP <fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>On 3/15/19 12:10 AM, Rhino wrote:
>>>>On 2019-03-14 6:31 PM, FPP wrote:
>>>>>On 3/14/19 12:22 PM, David Johnston wrote:
>>>>>>On 2019-03-14 8:26 a.m., NoBody wrote:

>>>>>>>On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 05:07:35 -0500 (CDT), trotsky <gms...@email.ccom>:
>>>>>>>>hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com Wrote:

>>>>>>>>>"Full House" actress Lori Loughlin, known as Aunt Becky on the TV
>>>>>>>>>show, was taken into custody by the FBI in Los Angeles Wednesday
>>>>>>>>>morning as part of the investigation into a massive college
>>>>>>>>>admissions scam.

>>>>>>>>These right wing morons are dropping like flies.

>>>>>>>So the libs who didn't care that Warren lied on her application now
>>>>>>>care that someone else did something wrong.

>>>>>>It's not that they don't care. It's that they don't believe you.

>>>>>Maybe it's because unsubstantiated smears from known liars aren't
>>>>>given the same weight as claims that are backed up by facts.

>>>>I'm sure you've been the victim of that many, MANY times!

>>>Rhino, when do I say things I *can't* back up with citations of fact?
>>>Go ahead... go and find something I stated as fact that you don't think
>>>I can back up.

>>When you claimed I was a member of the Republican Party.

>When's the last time you voted for a Democrat?

When's the last time you didn't take a cheap shot, Johnston?

When did it occur that political party affiliation is no longer self
determined? I didn't get the memo.

While my state never had party registration under state law as many
other states do, I can declare my party affiliation because of primary
participation and that I've mentioned that years ago, I used to make a
poor living doing political work. I've also made campaign and party
contributions. When I was very young, I was an elected committeeman.

If BTR1701 isn't a registered party member, doesn't do political work
(not to mention that he's Hatched), doesn't make contributions, etc.,
he can say truthfully that he's just not a party member regardless of
whether Johnston defines "Republican Party membership" as someone who
hasn't voted for a Democratic candidate recently.

[shawn]

Perhaps a better word might be aligned. As in sharing many of the
philosophies and goals of a particular party while not actively part
of said party.

[BTR1701]

The last election. I often vote for Democrats in state and local elections
for a variety of reasons. Sometimes I have no choice-- which was why Kamala
Harris got my vote for senator; our only choices were Democrats-- or
because in city and county elections the Democrat candidates are the more
reasonable and not insanely religious choice.

But even if I never voted for a Democrat, Johnston, that doesn't make me a
*member* of the Republican Party as FPP repeatedly claimed I was. But he
never states facts he can't back up. Just ask him, he'll tell you so.

[BTR1701]

shawn <nanof...@notforgmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 17:23:12 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
> <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>
>> David Johnston <davidjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>> On 2019-03-15 8:43 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:

>>>> FPP <fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Rhino, when do I say things I *can't* back up with citations of fact?
>>>>> Go ahead... go and find something I stated as fact that you don't think
>>>>> I can back up.
>>
>>>> When you claimed I was a member of the Republican Party.
>>
>>> When's the last time you voted for a Democrat?
>>
>> When's the last time you didn't take a cheap shot, Johnston?
>>

>> If BTR1701 isn't a registered party member, doesn't do political work
>> (not to mention that he's Hatched), doesn't make contributions, etc.,
>> he can say truthfully that he's just not a party member regardless of
>> whether Johnston defines "Republican Party membership" as someone who
>> hasn't voted for a Democratic candidate recently.
>
> Perhaps a better word might be aligned. As in sharing many of the
> philosophies and goals of a particular party while not actively part
> of said party.

Even that doesn't work with me because I hold many views that would get me
kicked out of Republican gatherings. Atheist, pro-choice, pro-drug
legalization, etc.

[David Johnston]

He can, but if he votes a straight Republican ticket that's a quibble.

[Rhino]

BTR1701 has said on several occasions that he's a libertarian. Whether
he votes for the Libertarian Party is less clear to me.

--
Rhino

[BTR1701]

More precisely, I've said my views lean more libertarian than Republican. I
am not a member of any political party.

[moviePig]

Hell, you could be for pussy-grabbing and you wouldn't be kicked out.
Whatever wins, baby...

--

- - - - - - - -
YOUR taste at work...
http://www.moviepig.com

[Adam H. Kerman]

shawn <nanof...@notforgmail.com> wrote:
>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 17:23:12 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com>:

I know what you're getting at but it doesn't work that way for a voter
who doesn't consider himself to be a Party member. Political parties are
always coalitions. They don't have philisophies and goals, and party
platforms tend to be embarassments that no candidate ever runs on.

An unaligned voter should be influenced directly by the candidate's
background and issues he raises in his current campaign. There's no
reason to look toward a political party platform.

What's a conservative voter to do who just can't stand Donald Trump?
There isn't a lot of room in the Republican Party for him at the moment,
and Trump supporters will attempt boot out incumbants in the primary
they don't consider to be allied with the president on enough issues.

Some conservatives have chosen to run as Democrats. There are a number
of them in Congress and state legislatures. If you're running in an area
in which Donald Trump is very popular among Republican primary voters,
you won't get nominated if you oppose Trump.

In a situation like that, a conservative voter might vote for the
Democratic nominee.

Or if there's a Libertarian Party candidate who isn't a clown, he might
vote that way.

Johnston was just be obnoxious, as per usual.

[Adam H. Kerman]

moviePig, make the better place and choose not to spread STOOPID. You
can do it. Take it one day at a time.

[Adam H. Kerman]

The Koch Brothers ruined the Libertarian Party decades ago.

[Adam H. Kerman]

No, it's really not. You're clearly not familiar with the clause in the
First Amendment of the Constitution that protects party affiliation,
labor unions, and groups in general, "the right to peaceably
assemble". You get to take part or not. It's an individaul choice.

Whether one takes part is not "a quibble", Johnston. It's a civil right.

You're wrong again, Johnston.

[Adam H. Kerman]

If necessary, the Democratic Party in my state can be persuaded to vote
to keep Kamala Harris in your state.

[Ubiquitous]

You might be asking too much from RAT's own Norm Chomsky.

--
Dems & the media want Trump to be more like Obama, but then he'd
have to audit liberals & wire tap reporters' phones.

[FPP]

By your own rules, you are.

You say AOC is a Communist, but she doesn't belong to the Communist Party.
Then, by your own logic, you ARE a Republican, whether you belong to the
party, or not.

YOUR standard, not mine. You made up the rule, not me... now live by it.

[FPP]

Why ask? All you'll get is another lie.

If AOC is a Communist without belonging to that party, then Thanny can
be a Republican without belonging to that party as well.

Goose, meet gander.

[FPP]

Kicked out? You'd be running it!

[FPP]

That's what all Republicans say when they're confronted with Republican
hypocrisy.

[FPP]

No need to ask me... ask yourself. YOU'RE the one who likes to label
people.

This all stems back to your repeatedly calling AOC a "Communist".
You made the bed... but you don't seem too comfortable lying in it.

Lying in general, sure... just not lying in the bed you made.

[BTR1701]

In article <q6hb9i$m85$1...@dont-email.me>, FPP <fred...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 3/15/19 2:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > David Johnston <davidjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2019-03-15 8:43 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:
> >
> >>> In article <q6ftdh$ns8$2...@dont-email.me>, FPP <fred...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Rhino, when do I say things I *can't* back up with citations of
> >>>> fact? Go ahead... go and find something I stated as fact that you
> >>>> don't think I can back up.
> >>>
> >>> When you claimed I was a member of the Republican Party.
> >>>
> >> When's the last time you voted for a Democrat?
> >
> > The last election. I often vote for Democrats in state and local
> > elections for a variety of reasons. Sometimes I have no choice-- which
> > was why Kamala Harris got my vote for senator; our only choices were
> > Democrats-- or because in city and county elections the Democrat
> > candidates are the more reasonable and not insanely religious choice.
> >
> > But even if I never voted for a Democrat, Johnston, that doesn't make
> > me a *member* of the Republican Party as FPP repeatedly claimed I was.
> > But he never states facts he can't back up. Just ask him, he'll tell
> > you so.

> This all stems back to your repeatedly calling AOC a "Communist".

Bullshit. You've claimed repeatedly that I'm a member the Republican
Party going back years, long before anyone even knew who
Occasional-Cortex was.

You've seized on this as some kind of get-out-of-jail card for having
been caught in a blatant and intentional lie that you can't spin away,
but no one's buying it, mainly because it doesn't make any sense. One
can be a communist without being a party member-- something a
self-proclaimed history expert ought to know, but just ask any survivor
of the Soviet Union if you don't know how that works-- but one cannot be
a member of the Republican Party without being a member of the
Republican Party.

[moviePig]

In fairness, Trump may have only advised *others* to pussy-grab...

[trotsky]

Who gives a fuck if you're a "member" of any party. It's not a fucking
health club.

[trotsky]

On 3/15/19 1:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> David Johnston <davidjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2019-03-15 8:43 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:
>
>>> In article <q6ftdh$ns8$2...@dont-email.me>, FPP <fred...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Rhino, when do I say things I *can't* back up with citations of fact?
>>>> Go ahead... go and find something I stated as fact that you don't think
>>>> I can back up.
>>>
>>> When you claimed I was a member of the Republican Party.
>>>
>> When's the last time you voted for a Democrat?
>
> The last election. I often vote for Democrats in state and local elections
> for a variety of reasons. Sometimes I have no choice-- which was why Kamala
> Harris got my vote for senator; our only choices were Democrats-- or
> because in city and county elections the Democrat candidates are the more
> reasonable and not insanely religious choice.
>
> But even if I never voted for a Democrat, Johnston, that doesn't make me a
> *member* of the Republican Party

No, you're a Libertarian and you don't have the fucking balls to admit it.

[trotsky]

On 3/15/19 1:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

OMG, you're a cutting edge asshole. WOW!

[FPP]

Sure you can. Why not? Is there a law against it?

[FPP]

A libertarian is usually just a Republican that won't admit it.

[FPP]

Thanny just doesn't like the way his own medicine tastes.

He likes to call people names, and label them unfairly - but just HATES
it when you apply the same standards to HIM.

[trotsky]

Thom Hartmann says Libertarians are just Republicans who want to get
laid and smoke dope a lot.

[trotsky]

On 3/16/19 8:00 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 3/16/19 6:36 AM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 3/15/19 9:43 AM, BTR1701 wrote:

>>> When you claimed I was a member of the Republican Party.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Who gives a fuck if you're a "member" of any party.  It's not a
>> fucking health club.
>
> Thanny just doesn't like the way his own medicine tastes.
>
> He likes to call people names, and label them unfairly - but just HATES
> it when you apply the same standards to HIM.

He also has this bloviated view of himself, "I'm so fucking unique you
can't pin any labels on me!" Well, Twinkles, "asshole" always fits.
And shitbird, ignoramus, dipshit, douchebag, clown college grad., fake
lawyure, one of Trump's poorly educated, Nancy boy, etc.

[BTR1701]

In article <q6irsn$2ij$2...@dont-email.me>, FPP <fred...@gmail.com>

Nope.

[FPP]

You mean that ONLY applies to Communism?
Explain.

[FPP]

Being a Republican (or a Democrat) in America is simply a matter of
self-identification. No official identification is required.Being a
REGISTERED Republican (or Democrat) requires you to formally affiliate
with the party.

But, yeah, you're a Republican all right.

[BTR1701]

FPP <fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rhino, when do I say things I *can't* back up with citations of
>>>>>>>>> fact? Go ahead... go and find something I stated as fact that you
>>>>>>>>> don't think I can back up.
>>>>

>>>>> This all stems back to your repeatedly calling AOC a "Communist".
>>>>
>>>> Bullshit. You've claimed repeatedly that I'm a member the Republican
>>>> Party going back years, long before anyone even knew who
>>>> Occasional-Cortex was.
>>>>
>>>> You've seized on this as some kind of get-out-of-jail card for having
>>>> been caught in a blatant and intentional lie that you can't spin away,
>>>> but no one's buying it, mainly because it doesn't make any sense. One
>>>> can be a communist without being a party member-- something a
>>>> self-proclaimed history expert ought to know, but just ask any survivor
>>>> of the Soviet Union if you don't know how that works-- but one cannot be
>>>> a member of the Republican Party without being a member of the
>>>> Republican Party.
>>>
>>> Sure you can.
>>
>> Nope.
>
> You mean that ONLY applies to Communism?
> Explain.

I already *have* explained multiple times. One more time for the
exceptionally thick among us:

A person can be a communist without being a member of the Communist Party.

A person can be a Republican without being a member of the Republican
Party.

A person cannot, however, be a *member* of the Republican Party without
joining the Republican Party and being added to the party's rolls.

You repeatedly claimed I'm a *member* of the Republican Party. I am not.
Conversely, I never claimed Che Ocasio is a *member* of the Communist
Party.

That's why your comparison fails and you can't spin your way out of your
lie.

And now you've compounded the lie by declaring to Rhino that you never post
anything you can't back up. That's clearly false and clearly yet another
lie.

[BTR1701]

However, being a *member* of the Republican Party-- which is what you
repeatedly claimed about me-- requires affirmative registration and
inclusion on the party rolls. That's factually not true of me and you lie
every time you say it, which makes your claim to Rhino that you never post
things you can't back up with cites a lie also.

Otherwise, post the cite to my inclusion on the rolls of the Republican
Party here--->

If you can't you're a liar.

[FPP]

Nope. I'm using YOUR rules.

[FPP]

On 3/16/19 5:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

Sure will!
Just as soon as you show AOC's inclusion in the Communist Party.

[FPP]

On 3/16/19 5:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

So give me your name, and I'll check the California voter rolls.
Outside of that, it's YOUR word that you're not affiliated with the party.

And we both know what THAT'S worth.

[mog...@hotmail.com]

Give us a break. You don't even spell correctly.

[FPP]

You CAN prove it, you know. Or you can keep your privacy.
But you can't do both.

[trotsky]

"Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> Wrote in message:
> moviePig, make the better place

What?

[BTR1701]

You're the one who claimed you never post anything you can't back up with a
cite. It's not my responsibility to do your work for you and save your lie.

You posted it. According to you, you have cites to back up everything you
post. So you must already have a cite that proves I'm on the party rolls
because if you don't, you're a liar.

[FPP]

Sure. Give me name to check.
Otherwise, I'll just pick one at random, and let you prove it isn't you.

Like I said, counselor... you made the rules here.

[Adam H. Kerman]

I think you get to state your non-affiliations and you get the last word
on it.

[BTR1701]

In article <q6k6d5$91o$2...@dont-email.me>, FPP <fred...@gmail.com>

wrote:

> On 3/16/19 8:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

> > FPP <fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >> On 3/16/19 5:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

> >>> And now you've compounded the lie by declaring to Rhino that you never
> >>> post anything you can't back up. That's clearly false and clearly yet
> >>> another lie.
> >>>
> >> So give me your name, and I'll check the California voter rolls.
> >
> > You're the one who claimed you never post anything you can't back up with a
> > cite. It's not my responsibility to do your work for you and save your lie.
> >
> > You posted it. According to you, you have cites to back up everything you
> > post. So you must already have a cite that proves I'm on the party rolls
> > because if you don't, you're a liar.
>
> Sure. Give me name to check.

You already have the cite. Because you said you can back up everything
you post with cites.

> Otherwise, I'll just pick one at random

Well, now that you've admitted your cite will be bogus, we can just skip
to the conclusion that you're a liar.

[FPP]

You can skip to any conclusion you like, counselor. Nothing has ever
stopped you before.

[trotsky]

He's a Special Agent for the govt. in charge of toilet detail and can't
give you his name. I think it's listed under "Twinkles" anyway.

[trotsky]

I think it's cute that he gave her a pet name, just like when Anim8r
calls his dick "the little engine that could."

[Ubiquitous]

Well, there you go posting nonsense when you've lost the debate again!

Nonresponse noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.

--
Trump: A president so great that Democrats who said they would leave
America if he won decided to stay!

[Ubiquitous]

Poor FPP just can't win.

--

"Rhino, when do I say things I *can't* back up with citations of
fact? Go ahead... go and find something I stated as fact that you
don't think I can back up."

-- FPPsky

[Ubiquitous]

fred...@gmail.com wrote:

>>Sure will!
>>Just as soon as you show AOC's inclusion in the Communist Party.
>

>You CAN prove it, you know. Or you can keep your privacy.
>But you can't do both.

You can tell FPP has lost the debate when he posts two followups to the same
article in rapid succession and then starts posting followups to himself.

#Triggered

[FPP]

Sure. Whatever. It's not like I haven't heard you before.

--
"Following the racist mass murder of Muslims in New Zealand, Trump
shrugged off the threat of white nationalism, saying "I think it's a
small group of people that have very, very serious problems."

"This is the first time Trump has minimized the size of his rallies."
-Victor Laszlo

[FPP]

Sure. Whatever. Pure genius.

[Ubiquitous]

Congrats! Admitting your problem is half the battle!

[Ubiquitous]

Congrats! Admitting you have a problem is half the battle!

[moviePig]

I just realized... '#Triggered' is actually a confession.

--

- - - - - - - -
YOUR taste at work...
http://www.moviepig.com

[Ubiquitous]

atr...@mac.com wrote:
> FPP <fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 3/16/19 8:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> FPP <fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 3/16/19 5:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

>>>>> And now you've compounded the lie by declaring to Rhino that you never
>>>>> post anything you can't back up. That's clearly false and clearly yet
>>>>> another lie.
>>>>>
>>>> So give me your name, and I'll check the California voter rolls.
>>>
>>> You're the one who claimed you never post anything you can't back up with
>>> a cite. It's not my responsibility to do your work for you and save your
>>> lie.
>>>
>>> You posted it. According to you, you have cites to back up everything you
>>> post. So you must already have a cite that proves I'm on the party rolls
>>> because if you don't, you're a liar.
>>
>> Sure. Give me name to check.
>
>You already have the cite. Because you said you can back up everything
>you post with cites.
>
>> Otherwise, I'll just pick one at random
>
>Well, now that you've admitted your cite will be bogus, we can just skip
>to the conclusion that you're a liar.

And here's where he claims you're another sockpuppet of mine.
(Don't ask for proof)

--

"Rhino, when do I say things I *can't* back up with citations of
fact? Go ahead... go and find something I stated as fact that you
don't think I can back up."

-- FPPsky