1. Homeland. Interesting but not great ... yet. Morena Baccarin [the
wicked, slithery, serpentine beauty in V] looks yum-yum delicious.
This one gets the highest grade so far: 7 out of 10 [blending plot
potential 8 with overall execution 6, but it's actually more 6 than
7].
2. Free Agents. Of the three NBC couple-themed sitcoms, the pair in
this one is the most appealing of all of them, in a welcomed offbeat
way. Execution, however, is too curt and glib to find any of the
jokes funny. Still, as good as this should've been, it feels like it
just keeps missing the mark, maybe because of all its curtness and
glibness. It gets a 0 out of 10 not for being bad, but for just not
"getting" its own material.
3. Ringer. It tries to be something it can't be because it won't
allow itself to be that and because they've got the wrong girl for the
lead. Everything that's in this one that can be done without really
shouldn't be in it at all, i.e. Sarah Michelle Geller, sucky songs,
bad green screen, limp, uninspired direction, bad scripting and just a
plain never well thought-out premise. 0 out of 10.
4. Whitney. This comes oh-so-very close to being the worst show this
season. Maybe what saved it from that title was the role-playing sex
scene - not that it was particularly funny, but she was kind of doing
it for me in that nurse's outfit. Still, 0 out of 10. If the show
doesn't have a role-playing sex scene each week, then this one could
very well tie for worst show with:
5. Up All Night. Everything is so wrong and so bad with this one.
You name a fault, it's got it and works on it to overkill mode. It
makes me want to kill babies so there'd be no more supposed "sitcoms"
about babies. It's just a plain vile show and will deserve to be the
first one cancelled, and that can't happen soon enough. Grade: -0 out
of 10. Repeat: -, as in minus, 0 out of 10. Wait, that's too
generous, I'll amend that. -10 out of 10. There, that's better.
There's also H8R, but I don't do reality.
"Common"? Summer Glau? You must be joking.
As for "this group's taste" I'm sure by now you've noticed you're in a
minority of one.
P.S. You are aware that's Seamus you were arguing with, right? As you
still are in several other threads.
Then you must be crazy. The number of men in this newsgroup alone that
drool every time her name is mentioned must surely indicate that she's
far more attractive than the word "common" would seem to indicate.