Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Brian Keith —_Horrible_Toupee_in_“The_Parent_Trap”

966 views
Skip to first unread message

Ubiquitous

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 4:26:17 AM3/21/12
to
Brain Keith, the late actor and star of the stupid 60s sitcom “Family
Affair” also played the dad in the original version of The Parent Trap
starring Hayley Mills — not the newer one with that drug addict drunk
Lindsay Lohan.

Anyway, while The Parent Trap was being filmed back in the early 1960s,
Brain keith wore what was probably the worst toupee in the history of
cinema. At one point during filming he was so disturbed by the way
the wig looked in the daily rushes (prints) of the movie, that he
insisted that a scene be added where he falls into the lake and climbs
out — his hair still intact. He figured that by doing this, people who
watched the movie and otherwise wondered if indeed he was was wearing a
toupee would be swayed to assume he wasn’t were he to fall into the
water and emerge with his hair still intact.

“We had to film that scene months after the movie was finished,” said a
source close to the production. “It cost us almost as much to film that
one segment that it did to film the entire movie. We had to fly people
in and re-rent the location — a house near Lake Tahoe — it was a
nightmare, but there was no saying “no” to Brian Keith because he was an
ego maniac who thought that he was the pillar of masculine virility.

“The producers insisted that he stop trying to film shirtless scenes
because he had that in-shape but really outta shape old man body. One
scene was filmed where he takes off his shirt to take a shower but when
the movie came out that scene was cut in such a way that you only see
him unbutton his shirt but you don’t see him walk across the bathroom
shirtless. Brian was so infuriated that the director did this that he
walked out of the premier of the movie at the Chinese Theater.”

TheDamienZone notes that Brian Keith had the worst toupee of his time
and he refused to listen to stylists who told him that you can’t have a
thick wavy mop of strawberry blond hair on the top of your head when the
sides of your head are thinning and grayish black. If you watch the
movie the toupee will drive you out of your mind. It may have driven
Brian Keith out of his mind too because he eventually committed suicide.


--
"If Barack Obama isn't careful, he will become the Jimmy Carter of the
21st century."

Hass

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 7:08:31 AM3/21/12
to
On Mar 21, 3:26 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> Brain Keith, the late actor and star of the stupid 60s sitcom “Family

TROLL-O-METER

5* 6* *7
4* *8
3* *9
2* *10
1* | *stuporous
0* -*- *catatonic
* |\ *comatose
* \ *clinical death
* \ *biological death
* _\/ *demonic apparition
* * *damned for all eternity



RichA

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 8:42:01 AM3/21/12
to
On Mar 21, 4:26 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> Brain Keith, the late actor and star of the stupid 60s sitcom “Family
> Affair” also played the dad in the original version of The Parent Trap
> starring Hayley Mills — not the newer one with that drug addict drunk
> Lindsay Lohan.
>
> Anyway, while The Parent Trap was being filmed back in the early 1960s,
> Brain keith wore what was probably the worst toupee in the history of
> cinema.    At one point during filming he was so disturbed by the way
> the wig looked in the daily rushes (prints) of the movie, that he
> insisted that a scene be added where he falls into the lake and climbs
> out — his hair still intact.  He figured that by doing this,  people who
> watched the movie and otherwise wondered if indeed he was was wearing a
> toupee would be swayed to assume he wasn’t were he to fall into the
> water and emerge with his hair still intact.

Much like Connery's awful carved-from-stone toupe in "Never Say Never
Again."


anim8rFSK

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 9:28:13 AM3/21/12
to
In article <jkc3cf$lgu$1...@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:

> Brain Keith, the late actor and star of the stupid 60s sitcom “Family
> Affair” also played the dad in the original version of The Parent Trap
> starring Hayley Mills — not the newer one with that drug addict drunk
> Lindsay Lohan.
>
> Anyway, while The Parent Trap was being filmed back in the early 1960s,
> Brain keith wore what was probably the worst toupee in the history of
> cinema. At one point during filming he was so disturbed by the way
> the wig looked in the daily rushes (prints) of the movie, that he
> insisted that a scene be added where he falls into the lake and climbs
> out — his hair still intact. He figured that by doing this, people who
> watched the movie and otherwise wondered if indeed he was was wearing a
> toupee would be swayed to assume he wasn’t were he to fall into the
> water and emerge with his hair still intact.
>
> “We had to film that scene months after the movie was finished,” said a
> source close to the production. “It cost us almost as much to film that
> one segment that it did to film the entire movie. We had to fly people
> in and re-rent the location — a house near Lake Tahoe — it was a
> nightmare, but there was no saying “no” to Brian Keith because he was an
> ego maniac who thought that he was the pillar of masculine virility.

Uh ... how can there be 'no saying no' to Brian Keith? It's not like he
had any star power, and the movie was wrapped months before. Just say
'no'

Professor Bubba

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 10:45:02 AM3/21/12
to
In article <anim8rfsk-5B1A2...@news.easynews.com>,
The story sounds bogus. Walt wouldn't have spent the extra money,
period.

The needless introductory swipe at Lohan (who was, what, 11 when they
shot The Parent Trap?) also goes to the veracity of the piece.

Madara0806

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 11:05:50 AM3/21/12
to
On Mar 21, 10:45 am, Professor Bubba <bu...@nowhere.edu.invalid>
wrote:
> In article <anim8rfsk-5B1A2E.06281321032...@news.easynews.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
> anim8rFSK <anim8r...@cox.net> wrote:
> > In article <jkc3cf$lg...@dont-email.me>,
Agreed. Keith was never that big a star that he could make such
demands. I don't know what he was like off-camera, but it's doubtful
he would have had the long career he had if he was this obnoxious. And
if he was this difficult on PARENT TRAP, Disney never would have hired
him again. Yet Keith worked on several more Disney films.

Don't believe everything you read on the internet, especially THIS
forum.

notbob

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 11:15:06 AM3/21/12
to
On 2012-03-21, Professor Bubba <bu...@nowhere.edu.invalid> wrote:

> The needless introductory swipe at Lohan (who was, what, 11 when they
> shot The Parent Trap?).....

While I don't give the story any credence, what? There's no such
thing as an eleven yr old alky? Get a clue.

nb

--
Fight internet CENSORSHIP - Fight SOPA-PIPA
Contact your congressman and/or representative, now!
http://projects.propublica.org/sopa/
vi --the heart of evil!

gtr

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 12:05:55 PM3/21/12
to
I agree--but it's funny!
--
I do not feel obligated to believe that the same God who has endowed us
with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forego their use.
-- Galileo

anim8rFSK

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 2:14:41 PM3/21/12
to
In article <210320121045020049%bu...@nowhere.edu.invalid>,
Walt's famous for ponying up big bucks to fix the giant skwid attack in
20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, but that was the set piece of the film.
It had to be done. This story? As reported? Nonsense. And how could
it have almost doubled the budget? It sounds like one afternoon's work.
>
> The needless introductory swipe at Lohan (who was, what, 11 when they
> shot The Parent Trap?) also goes to the veracity of the piece.

Yep.

Howard Brazee

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 3:26:40 PM3/21/12
to
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:05:50 -0700 (PDT), Madara0806
<madar...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Agreed. Keith was never that big a star that he could make such
>demands. I don't know what he was like off-camera, but it's doubtful
>he would have had the long career he had if he was this obnoxious. And
>if he was this difficult on PARENT TRAP, Disney never would have hired
>him again. Yet Keith worked on several more Disney films.

And he certainly wasn't the biggest star of that movie.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison

Tom

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 4:17:51 PM3/21/12
to
<plagiarized article snipped>

A) From whom did you steal this article?

B) Who fucking cares about his toupe from a 51 year old movie? Do you
expect the writer from whom you stole the article to do something
about the toupe now?

Tom

tomcervo

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 4:28:36 PM3/21/12
to
Stolen from this asshole:
http://thedamienzone.com/about-damien-zone/

Don't go there unless you've got a taste for bullshit.

gtr

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 6:16:28 PM3/21/12
to
On 2012-03-21 20:17:51 +0000, Tom said:

> B) Who fucking cares about his toupe from a 51 year old movie? Do you
> expect the writer from whom you stole the article to do something
> about the toupe now?

Terrible to admit, but I care. I found it damned funny/stupid/amazing.
Yes, and certainly dubious. One vanity shot trumping the entire budget?
That's a stretch.

Anyway, it may not have been true, but seemingly no one was hurt.
Perhaps Brian Keith's "legacy" was bruised.

Frankly, it makes me want to see the thing again just to check it out.
When I first saw it, I was entranced with Hayley Mills. At age 12, I
wasn't quite sure what, but I knew she had something I wanted.

Tom

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 7:55:17 PM3/21/12
to
On Mar 21, 5:16 pm, gtr <x...@yyy.zzz> wrote:
> On 2012-03-21 20:17:51 +0000, Tom said:
>
> > B) Who fucking cares about his toupe from a 51 year old movie? Do you
> > expect the writer from whom you stole the article to do something
> > about the toupe now?
>
> Terrible to admit, but I care. I found it damned funny/stupid/amazing.
> Yes, and certainly dubious. One vanity shot trumping the entire budget?
>  That's a stretch.

Agreed, it's a stretch.

>
> Anyway, it may not have been true, but seemingly no one was hurt.
> Perhaps Brian Keith's "legacy" was bruised.
>
> Frankly, it makes me want to see the thing again just to check it out.
> When I first saw it, I was entranced with Hayley Mills. At age 12, I
> wasn't quite sure what, but I knew she had something I wanted.

Me, too!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Htdk3UpFiDc&feature=related

WOW!

Tom

Mack A. Damia

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 8:15:52 PM3/21/12
to
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:55:17 -0700 (PDT), Tom <drs...@aol.com> wrote:

>On Mar 21, 5:16 pm, gtr <x...@yyy.zzz> wrote:
>> On 2012-03-21 20:17:51 +0000, Tom said:
>>
>> > B) Who fucking cares about his toupe from a 51 year old movie? Do you
>> > expect the writer from whom you stole the article to do something
>> > about the toupe now?
>>
>> Terrible to admit, but I care. I found it damned funny/stupid/amazing.
>> Yes, and certainly dubious. One vanity shot trumping the entire budget?
>>  That's a stretch.
>
>Agreed, it's a stretch.
>
>>
>> Anyway, it may not have been true, but seemingly no one was hurt.
>> Perhaps Brian Keith's "legacy" was bruised.
>>
>> Frankly, it makes me want to see the thing again just to check it out.
>> When I first saw it, I was entranced with Hayley Mills. At age 12, I
>> wasn't quite sure what, but I knew she had something I wanted.
>
>Me, too!
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Htdk3UpFiDc&feature=related
>
>WOW!

(Music by Paul McCartney)

Go to 46:50 for a minute or two if you like WOW!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoupaOy9LvM

Walt Disney turned over in his grave.
--

Tom

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 8:43:04 PM3/21/12
to
On Mar 21, 7:15 pm, Mack A. Damia <mybaconbu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
WOW! Indeed!

Thanks!

Tom

trotsky

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 9:39:06 PM3/21/12
to
I'll bet that Brain Keith was a smart dude.

trotsky

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 9:49:46 PM3/21/12
to
I don't know--I'm looking forward to Ubi's comprehensive list of movie
toupees. I can't think of a better way for him to spend his time.

trotsky

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 9:57:23 PM3/21/12
to
I claim that Disney is too deeply frozen to turn over in his grave.

Mack A. Damia

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 10:13:35 PM3/21/12
to
I could understand him being stiff.
--


Tom

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 10:27:12 PM3/21/12
to
On Mar 21, 3:28 pm, tomcervo <tomce...@aol.com> wrote:
> Stolen from this asshole:http://thedamienzone.com/about-damien-zone/
>
> Don't go there unless you've got a taste for bullshit.

Apparently, Ubi's taste for it is insatiable.

Tom

Tom

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 10:28:31 PM3/21/12
to
I'll bet his toupee was smarter than Ubi.

Tom

Not Sure

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 10:44:11 PM3/21/12
to
Why are you responding to yourself, whore? :)

>
> Tom

Professor Bubba

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 10:58:46 PM3/21/12
to
In article <4vednWze-6ynGPfS...@mchsi.com>, trotsky
TOUPEE-O-METER

5* 6* *7
4* *8
3* *9

2* *10
1* | *Carl Reiner
0* -*- *William Shatner
* |\ *Dabney Coleman
* \ *Brian Keith
* \ *Steve Allen
* _\/ *Ted Koppel
* * *Charlton Heston

notbob

unread,
Mar 21, 2012, 11:43:08 PM3/21/12
to
On 2012-03-22, Mack A Damia <mybaco...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Go to 46:50 for a minute or two if you like WOW!
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoupaOy9LvM
>
> Walt Disney turned over in his grave.


Nonsense. If the geezer was still alive heda strommed his thurmond like
the rest of us. ;)

gtr

unread,
Mar 22, 2012, 2:13:02 AM3/22/12
to
I had an actor friend in Dallas in the 70's. He worked with a improv
comedy crew. Pretty well bald at an early age, just the fring around
the sides. So he had a pretty good toupe done for whenever a role might
demand.

He always got a kick out of going into bars and bending over and
dropping it on the floor. Or "throwing back" a shot and letting the
hairpiece fly. Taking off his hat and leaving the toupe inside. And
then of coure the scramble to put it back on--backwards.

Great fun.

trotsky

unread,
Mar 22, 2012, 7:28:52 AM3/22/12
to
Outstanding.

Tom

unread,
Mar 22, 2012, 11:14:27 PM3/22/12
to
On Mar 21, 9:58 pm, Professor Bubba <bu...@nowhere.edu.invalid> wrote:
> In article <4vednWze-6ynGPfSnZ2dnUVZ_rGdn...@mchsi.com>, trotsky
Nicely done!

Tom

Pithy and Original ?

unread,
Apr 5, 2012, 9:18:57 PM4/5/12
to

"gtr" <x...@yyy.zzz> wrote in message news:2012032123130249357-xxx@yyyzzz...
Good story. I'm still laughing.


0 new messages