The "E!" channel shows beaver
butterman
on Episode 5 of "Nearly Famous 2: Vegas showgirls". It was toward the end,
when Alex is posing for a photo shoot(Playboy?). Any way she is standing up
and they for got to fuzz the fuzz. Pretty cool.
So what other shows have you all seen naked people male, female when you
were not suppose to? I think this will make an interesting thread. TIA
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.491 / Virus Database: 290 - Release Date: 6/18/03
G. M. Lupo
: So what other shows have you all seen
: naked people male, female when you
: were not suppose to? I think this will
: make an interesting thread. TIA
I caught a brief glimpse of nudity once on All in the Family, but rather
than reminisce about it I'd rather just forget it ever happened.
Matt Lupo
--
G. M. Lupo a.k.a. matt at lupo dot com
Up on the hill, they think I'm okay
Or so they say...
shoof
"butterman" <thebu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f2OMa.2020$ZT5....@news2.east.cox.net...
> The "E!" channel shows beaver, Yes that's right. It blew me away. It was
> on Episode 5 of "Nearly Famous 2: Vegas showgirls". It was toward the
end,
> when Alex is posing for a photo shoot(Playboy?). Any way she is standing
up
> and they for got to fuzz the fuzz. Pretty cool.
>
> So what other shows have you all seen naked people male, female when you
> were not suppose to? I think this will make an interesting thread. TIA
>
The Howard Stern show forgot to pixillate a long section of footage
featuring a women topless. Oops.
Even more amazing was the lack of public response. Noone seemed to blink an
eye.
RA
> The Howard Stern show forgot to pixillate a long section of footage
> featuring a women topless. Oops.
> Even more amazing was the lack of public response. Noone seemed to blink an
> eye.
>
Speaking of censorship...
Did anyone catch that segment on Jimmy Kimmel Live,
where he played the excerpt from one of the ABC soap operas?
Two women are arguing and one says, clear as a bell;
"No Fucking Way!" (or words to that effect) ... clear as a bell.
Kimmel asked the ABC censors about it and they insisted that
she's saying "freaking".
He played it back a few times, of course, including a slow motion version
and it is NOT 'freaking'.
It says 'freaking' in the woman's script though..
so the censors are insisting that is what she said.
It was odd to hear it over and over again on network TV.
Those stubborn censors have allowed it, in their reluctance to admit they were wrong.
He should play it every night!
In other 'fuck' news...
The South Park movie is playing on Comedy Central at 1AM, I believe
on Friday night/ Saturday morning.
Sounds like more F Bombs headed our way there?
regards,
RA
Meat-->Plow
>The "E!" channel shows beaver, Yes that's right. It blew me away. It was
>on Episode 5 of "Nearly Famous 2: Vegas showgirls". It was toward the end,
>when Alex is posing for a photo shoot(Playboy?). Any way she is standing up
>and they for got to fuzz the fuzz. Pretty cool.
>
>So what other shows have you all seen naked people male, female when you
>were not suppose to? I think this will make an interesting thread. TIA
But they bleep nuts and bush among other things.
Daniel L. Bateman
>
> The Howard Stern show forgot to pixillate a long section of footage
> featuring a women topless. Oops.
> Even more amazing was the lack of public response. Noone seemed to blink an
> eye.
That's probably because anyone who would object to the Howard Stern
show would have already passed out from sheer shock long before now...
They need to have a showdown with "No self-esteem women who need
Howard's abuse" versus "Militant butch women's libbers." Let the
women's libbers come in and berate howard. Maybe Hillary Clinton
could be one in the latter category. And she's right there in NYC.
Jackie Marlow
if he signs again for another 3 or 5 years, he should consider moving
the E show off of E and trying either Showtime or TNN/Spike, and tell
E to go F themselves.
Meat-->Plow
I wholly agree.
nulllo
That's right! As can be seen here: http://tinyurl.com/g030
J e l l o ł
>
>> The Howard Stern show forgot to pixillate a long section of footage
>> featuring a women topless. Oops.
>> Even more amazing was the lack of public response. Noone seemed to
>> blink an
>> eye.
>>
>
> Speaking of censorship...
>
> Did anyone catch that segment on Jimmy Kimmel Live,
> where he played the excerpt from one of the ABC soap operas?
>
> Two women are arguing and one says, clear as a bell;
>
> "No Fucking Way!" (or words to that effect) ... clear as a bell.
>
> Kimmel asked the ABC censors about it and they insisted that
> she's saying "freaking".
>
> He played it back a few times, of course, including a slow motion
> version and it is NOT 'freaking'.
>
> It says 'freaking' in the woman's script though..
> so the censors are insisting that is what she said.
That's interesting. The first time I heard the clip it was without
Jimmy's introduction and it sounded like "freaking" or "Friggin" to me.
When we played it back on Tivo I realized that Jimmy's "look what they're
getting away with on other shows rap" probably led people to expect a
"bad" word, and of course, they heard it.
--
J e l l o ł
William December Starr
"butterman" <thebu...@yahoo.com> said:
> So what other shows have you all seen naked people male, female
> when you were not suppose to? I think this will make an
> interesting thread. TIA
It wasn't a show, but long ago -- 1984 or 1985 -- when "Conan the
Barbarian" was being shown on tv for the first time, NBC, I think it
was[1] showed a promo for it that included about two frames of female
toplessness from the movie.
1: It was whatever network carried "V"; I know this because the
only reason I saw it was that I was taping "V" as a favor for a
then-apartmentmate and I was checking the start and end of the
tape to make sure I'd gotten it, so I was able to rewind and
freeze the tape to make sure I hadn't imagined it.
-- William December Starr <wds...@panix.com>
David
Starr) wrote:
>In article <f2OMa.2020$ZT5....@news2.east.cox.net>,
>"butterman" <thebu...@yahoo.com> said:
>
>> So what other shows have you all seen naked people male, female
>> when you were not suppose to? I think this will make an
>> interesting thread. TIA
>
>It wasn't a show, but long ago -- 1984 or 1985 -- when "Conan the
>Barbarian" was being shown on tv for the first time, NBC, I think it
>was[1] showed a promo for it that included about two frames of female
>toplessness from the movie.
"Frames"? Sounds like someone wore out the pause button on the vcr :-)
William December Starr
diml...@yahoo.com (David) said:
>> It wasn't a show, but long ago -- 1984 or 1985 -- when "Conan the
>> Barbarian" was being shown on tv for the first time, NBC, I think
>> it was showed a promo for it that included about two frames of
>> female toplessness from the movie. [wdstarr]
>
> "Frames"? Sounds like someone wore out the pause button on the vcr :-)
Ha. Details: The promo included a scene from the movie in which (if
I recall correctly; it's been a long time since I saw the movie)
during Young Conan's days in slavery a young woman, also a slave,
presumably, is led into into his tent/hut/whatever to be mated with
him. She's wearing a sort of cloak, and whoever brought her in takes
it off her from behind and she's nude underneath it. In the promo,
they let the scene go on just a _bit_ too long, so that her breasts
were revealed just as the promo was about to cut to a different
scene.
If there had just been a two-frame flash of a scene that involved
nudity I probably would have missed it; it was the fact that the
nudity was at the end of an ongoing scene that was leading up to it
that made it (somewhat) obvious.
ANIM8Rfsk
<< > "Frames"? Sounds like someone wore out the pause button on the vcr :-) >>
<< If there had just been a two-frame flash of a scene that involved
nudity I probably would have missed it; it was the fact that the
nudity was at the end of an ongoing scene that was leading up to it
that made it (somewhat) obvious. >>
Are you saying you DIDN'T wear out that pause button? Huh? Huh?
___________
NATIONAL DO NOT CALL REGISTRY
<A HREF="http://www.donotcall.gov/">http://www.donotcall.gov/</A>
Most telemarketers cannot call your telephone number
if it is in the National Do Not Call Registry.
J e l l o ł
> In article <f2OMa.2020$ZT5....@news2.east.cox.net>,
> "butterman" <thebu...@yahoo.com> said:
>
>> So what other shows have you all seen naked people male, female
>> when you were not suppose to?
On The Howard Stern E! Show when David Spade was a guest. They brought
in a couple girls who wanted to meet Spade and asked them what they'd be
willing to do for the honor. One girl wouldn't agree to anything but her
friend, a deaf girl, agreed to moon Howard and the gang, and they showed
it. Not during the actually segment, but before the previous commercial
break in a "Next on Howard" bumper.
Also, The USA Network experiented with showing brief nudity in the early
90's. It was only for a few months/weeks and only after midnight when
they aired cheesy erotic thrillers and 80's bikini beach sexploitation
flicks.
They'd show women completely nude from the rear and the side, but not
full frontal. It wasn't quite Skinemax, but much more than they'd
subsequently show on NYPD Blue. But after a few weeks they were back to
completely blurring out everything.
lab~rat
puked:
Nudity on tv is overrated. I prefer seeing it in person.
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
J e l l o ł
If the subject had been televised vs. live nudity I would answered the
same.
--
lab~rat
puked:
>> Nudity on tv is overrated. I prefer seeing it in person.
>
>If the subject had been televised vs. live nudity I would answered the
>same.
Of course, there's always the nudist camp nudity, which I'm sure would
be better viewed on tv, as most probably shouldn't be nude to begin
with and you could change the channel...
Meanwhile, who sends their kids to a nudist summer camp for children?
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/state/6253341.htm
Posted on Tue, Jul. 08, 2003
Congressman, nudists exchange views
Foley calls for background checks
WEST PALM BEACH - (AP) -- U.S. Rep. Mark Foley asked organizers of a
nudist summer camp for children to strengthen their background checks
of employees Monday after meeting with leaders of nudist organizations
that were defending the camp.
A coalition of groups representing recreational nudists asked to meet
with Foley, appealing to him to respect the privacy of the families
that choose to send their children to the camp.
Foley called attention to the camp last month when he asked Gov. Jeb
Bush to investigate whether the summer program was illegal.
Bush staff members responded that they found no indication of illegal
activity, but they said they would check to see whether any complaints
had been filed.
The weeklong summer camp run by the American Association for Nude
Recreation outside Tampa allows children ages 11 to 18 to get together
for games and sports and discussions about their choice to stay in the
buff.
''I want to make sure that they're properly regulated, properly secure
and that they're not going to have kids come in contact with
undesirables,'' said Foley, a West Palm Beach Republican who is
running for U.S. Senate.
Nudists who met with Foley said they wanted him to stop harassing the
camp, now that state officials said it was legal.
''It's a fundamental freedom in this country to make such personal
choices,'' Shirley Mason, executive director of BEACHES Foundation
Institute, a group that supports clothing-free beaches, said in a
statement.
She accused Foley of criticizing the camp to gain publicity for his
Senate run.
Foley said his concern is for the children's safety.
nulllo
> 90's. It was only for a few months/weeks and only after midnight when
> they aired cheesy erotic thrillers and 80's bikini beach sexploitation
> flicks.
Was it back in the days when cable tv didn't have commercials? They
would just show a picture of breakfast cereal for a couple seconds?
Lifetime used to show nudity all the time...from breast examinations
to a screenshot displayed on Regis' old show. I wouldn't watch that
channel, but flipping through the channels and you see a woman
kneading her breast... you have to leave the channel on a few seconds.
William December Starr
anim...@aol.comNOSPAM (ANIM8Rfsk) said:
>> If there had just been a two-frame flash of a scene that involved
>> nudity I probably would have missed it; it was the fact that the
>> nudity was at the end of an ongoing scene that was leading up to
>> it that made it (somewhat) obvious. [wdstarr]
>
> Are you saying you DIDN'T wear out that pause button? Huh? Huh?
Given that I'd seen the entire scene in when I saw the movie in the
theater and although I'd appreciated the view of a nice set of
breasts -- I usually do, provided that "human" and "female" are part
of the equation -- I hadn't exploded in a paroxysm of lust, no, I
didn't re-watch the scene on tape after I'd confirmed that yes, by
golly, somebody somewhere in the chain of production at the network
really _had_ done what I'd thought they'd done.
Besides, I still _have_ that early-1980s vcr -- it's one where the
whole tape holder pops out of the top, pre-dating front-loaders by a
few years -- and last time I checked the pause button still worked.
So there. Nyah.
Quiet Desperation
<wds...@panix.com> wrote:
> Besides, I still _have_ that early-1980s vcr -- it's one where the
> whole tape holder pops out of the top, pre-dating front-loaders by a
> few years -- and last time I checked the pause button still worked.
> So there. Nyah.
Yeah, well my cousin has one of those original Ampex recorders that
looked like a horizontal reel to reel deck.
That's about as far back as you can go. Ampex invented the thing!
2 Smelly Dogs
lab~rat <ch...@cheese.net> wrote:
> Meanwhile, who sends their kids to a nudist summer camp for children?
>
> http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/state/6253341.htm
it's within your rights as a parent to beat your kids to a bloody pulp,
call them every disgusting curse word you can think of at any given
moment...or better yet, tell them they're stupid all the time, dress
them up like little gangstas, or worse, don't even bother picking the
lice off their little heads, "home school" them, indoctrinate the most
heinous and hateful thoughts and philosophys into their everyday thought
processes, feed them fastfood shitfood and sugar filled carbo loaded
"fortified" bullshit and then dope them up because they can't sit still
for more than two seconds.
but don't let them get naked, learn sex ed or hear it's okay to
masterbate and/or to use condoms.
this country is more than a little nuts if you ask me.
(hey now)
lab~rat
<justi...@hotmail.cow> puked:
Are you saying you were raised in a nudist camp?
2 Smelly Dogs
lab~rat
<justi...@hotmail.cow> puked:
There's a nudist camp down the street from me, and from the looks of
the clientele, you didn't miss much.
Who Me?
Erin Grey, of the Buck Rogers TV show fame grew up in a nudist family.
She turned out pretty good, still looks ok for a woman in her 50s.
lab~rat
puked:
I never got that whole 'nudity' thing. I mean, when you go to these
camps, I imagine that you have to sit down to eat meals. Do you bring
a towel? The though of sitting on some dude's skidmark left on the
seat really kinda sickens me.
And when you have to piss, can you just go on a tree? Do the
bathrooms have stalls, for that matter? Do people acknowledge a guy
when they have a hardon, or do they pretend they don't see it? What
about tampon strings?
Is the fascination about them being naked or being naked around other
people? Is it the reason some guys go to a movie theater to watch
porn opposed to renting a video and watching it at home?
J e l l o ł
> On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 20:11:26 GMT, "J e l l o ł" <nolo...@aol.com>
> puked:
>
>>> Nudity on tv is overrated. I prefer seeing it in person.
>>
>>If the subject had been televised vs. live nudity I would answered the
>>same.
>
> Of course, there's always the nudist camp nudity, which I'm sure would
> be better viewed on tv, as most probably shouldn't be nude to begin
> with and you could change the channel...
>
> Meanwhile, who sends their kids to a nudist summer camp for children?
I don't get the whole nudist thing. I can see doing it within a family,
I guess. But the camp thing... I get nervous when my neighbor starts
eyeing my new rake, nevermind the thought of some dude whackin' it to my
naked wife or daughter.
--
lab~rat
puked:
>lab~rat <ch...@cheese.net> wrote :
>
>> On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 20:11:26 GMT, "J e l l o ł" <nolo...@aol.com>
>> puked:
>>
>>>> Nudity on tv is overrated. I prefer seeing it in person.
>>>
>>>If the subject had been televised vs. live nudity I would answered the
>>>same.
>>
>> Of course, there's always the nudist camp nudity, which I'm sure would
>> be better viewed on tv, as most probably shouldn't be nude to begin
>> with and you could change the channel...
>>
>> Meanwhile, who sends their kids to a nudist summer camp for children?
>
>I don't get the whole nudist thing. I can see doing it within a family,
>I guess. But the camp thing... I get nervous when my neighbor starts
>eyeing my new rake, nevermind the thought of some dude whackin' it to my
>naked wife or daughter.
But how does your neighbor feel when he sees you whacking it to his
naked wife or daughter?
J e l l o ł
>> Also, The USA Network experiented with showing brief nudity in the
>> early 90's. It was only for a few months/weeks and only after
>> midnight when they aired cheesy erotic thrillers and 80's bikini
>> beach sexploitation flicks.
>
> Was it back in the days when cable tv didn't have commercials? They
> would just show a picture of breakfast cereal for a couple seconds?
Cable never had commercials? For as long as I can remember there have
always been commercial-sponsored cable channels, but admittedly I can
only vouche for post 1980 cable programming. USA and Lifetime have
always had commercials, I thought. There have been a few "premium"
commerical-free stations that due to low ratings subsequently had to
start airing commercials, as well as editing previously uneditted
programming. Off the top of my head Bravo and American Movie Classics
are two channels that recently that made this change.
Commercial-sponsored cable channels have always followed the standards
and practices of open-air networks like ABC and CBS because they want to
keep their sponsors happy.
> Lifetime used to show nudity all the time...from breast examinations
> to a screenshot displayed on Regis' old show. I wouldn't watch that
> channel, but flipping through the channels and you see a woman
> kneading her breast... you have to leave the channel on a few seconds.
Many channels have shown breast examinations, because it's "clinical"
nudity. For example, MTV aired a show a couple years ago called "True
Life: I Want Breast Implants" and it was pretty much 60 minutes of wall-
to-wall boobage. They profiled a stripper who was getting implants and
while they blurred out her breasts during the strip club scenes you could
see it all when she was sitting next to a doctor in his office.
J e l l o ł
I'm picturing my current neighbors and I can safely say that my lotion
and tissues will never be used with them in mind.
I'm getting sick just thinking about it. I guess I can hold off mowing
the lawn one more day.
--
lab~rat
puked:
Any excuse will work.
My neighbors are all pretty ugly, too. But the girls outnumber the
boys about 5 to 1, so in about ten years...
J e l l o ł
There are a couple married milfs in my neighborhood, but I only ever see
them in sweats walking their dogs or husbands. There's a 17-18 year old
chick across the street, but she looks more primed for the LPGA tour than
a Girls Gone Wild video.
Slim pickins here. If I want good scenery, I gotta hit the beach. Which
luckily is only a two minute car ride away.
--
William December Starr
SnapTrap@ouchyouf*cker.ork said:
> I never got that whole 'nudity' thing. I mean, when you go to
> these camps, I imagine that you have to sit down to eat meals. Do
> you bring a towel?
Yes. A New York times article about that same youth camp included a
line about the mandatory towel policy making everybody look a bit
like Linus from "Peanuts" carrying his security blanket everywhere he
went.
nulllo
> always been commercial-sponsored cable channels, but admittedly I can
> only vouche for post 1980 cable programming.
When cable tv first reared it's had in early 1980 in sleepy New
England, the channels had promotions for products, but they wouldn't
show anything like a regular TV commercial like network tv. It would
just say something like "sponsered by Captn. Crunch" and show a quick
picture of the product. Maybe it was the cable provider or the area.
When we finally had cable come to town we finally could surf through
30 whole channels.
J e l l o ł
You might be right. I had cable in NE in 1980, but don't remember those
kind of commercials. But admittedly I spent most of my time watching the
bad movies on HBO over and over again. And the ultra low-budget
wrestling matches on TBS.
Jorabi
"nulllo" wrote ...
I have had cable since 1975 (upstate NY) and always remember commercials
on the imported independent stations, among other channels.
My earliest memory of cable was HBO showing "Return to Macon County"
with Don Johnson and Robin Mattson, and "Le Folie Bergere", which was
a big deal at the time (to see women's breasts in a Las Vegas show).
natch
> The "E!" channel shows beaver, Yes that's right. It blew me away. It was
> on Episode 5 of "Nearly Famous 2: Vegas showgirls". It was toward the end,
> when Alex is posing for a photo shoot(Playboy?). Any way she is standing up
> and they for got to fuzz the fuzz. Pretty cool.
>
> So what other shows have you all seen naked people male, female when you
>
>
I saw nudity on MTV recently on that series Real Life, or whatever it
is called. This was about breast implants. They focused on 4 young
attractive women. They had clear shots, and I dont mean surgery shots,
of their breasts, but the strange thing is on some scenes they blurred
it and others they didnt. I thought "what the heck?" Then I watched
the program again a month or so later and it was all blurred. Gets me
to thinking with this and the E! show you talk about, if these
networks are testing the waters, purposely allowing things to slip by
to see if they get complaints. I bet if you watch that same program
again it would be blurred.
Corwin2
>Meanwhile, who sends their kids to a nudist summer camp for children?
>
>http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/state/6253341.htm
http://www.poise.cc/didyouknow/archives/000112.html
It might be better than sending a 13 year old girl to a cheerleadling camp at
the Air Force Academy. (I think I first heard this story on NBC Dateline.)
butterman
time after that only the bush was fuzzed. The boobs were covered up and
couldn't really see anything any way.
"natch" <na...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1c4f9312.03071...@posting.google.com...
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.497 / Virus Database: 296 - Release Date: 7/4/03