On Fri, 25 May 2012 12:17:54 -0500, "Jim G." <
jimg...@geemail.com>
wrote:
>tdciago sent the following on 5/24/2012 11:13 AM:
>> On May 23, 11:25 am, "Jim G."<
jimgy...@geemail.com> wrote:
>>> It's nice to know that she took someone else's big day--a lot of someone
>>> elses, actually--and turned it into an opportunity to climb onto her own
>>> cross and complain about being a victim. I'm sure that it made it all
>>> extra special for the graduates.
>>
>> You hit the nail on the head. That's what infuriated me when I read
>> about this. Keeping it TV-related, I flashed back to the annoyance I
>> felt when Rory Gilmore made her valedictory speech all about herself
>> on "Gilmore Girls."
>>
>> At the University of Georgia, we got Gov. Nathan Deal talking about
>> _Through the Looking Glass_ and _Tuck Everlasting_, which was rather
>> weird, but at least he didn't make the speech all about himself:
>>
http://commencement.uga.edu/article/georgia-governor-nathan-deal-2012-spring-semester/
>
>The older I get, the less tolerant I am with self-absorbed people have
>to turn everything into Something About Them.
If you want somebody to utter shibboleths about Life, Hardship, Hope,
and Dreams you can get any schlub off the street, have him read five
self-help books, shower and shave him, and shove him out there.
But when you hire a Somebody to speak it's because they've done
something in their life the sponsors of the speech think might be
interesting. The speaker's challenge is to meld their life experiences
with the hopey-dreamy stuff. Some do it better than others.
Politicians often do it very badly, and the more senior they get the
more they use graduation speeches to do policy pronouncements.
Presidents often speak at military academy graduations because the
graduates are new employees, and to speak about foreign policy and how
the military interfaces with that. No one should be surprised at that
IMO.
From what little I read about Katie's speech she blended her
experiences as a female working in a male world in 1980 with the
expectations of her audience, particularly the female graduates. Being
related to a 25-YO female professional I can say that many in that
generation have no idea what conditions were like for their mothers
when they started working. You may not like the topic, but it was
relevant for graduation. And I'm sure Katie was funny in places, as is
appropriate.
Steve