Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

AMC: fictional geographic shift?

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Aisling Willow Grey

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 1:49:26 PM12/29/09
to
This is something of a general commentary on the moving of AMC's production
to LA, but since I'm mentioning something that's breaking on the show today,
I'll leave some space...

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Okay, when Zach started talking about newness, and clean beginnings, at first
I thought he was talking about he and Kendall having another baby. I have
ALL kinds of objections to that, so I'm glad that wasn't what happened
(objections include: Kendall doesn't have a lot of luck being pregnant; she's
barely had time to be with her two existing children; soaps look at
pregnancies and babies as the solution to every problem). But the talk about
moving -- and Joe and Ruth's talk about moving -- leads me to wonder if they
are going to have ALL of the characters actually pick up their fictional
lives and move to L.A. (I realize Joe and Ruth are leaving the canvas and
their characters are moving to FL, not CA). I mean, I can see Ryan moving
next -- to be with Spike, and to keep Emma from Annie. And Erica following
him, primarily for business reasons but secondarily to be with Ryan.
Followed by Jake and Amanda, to get away from David once they realize he
isn't dying. Followed by David chasing them. Etc. etc.

I would personally be really disappointed to see the show no longer be based
on the east coast. There are four decades of history behind this! Please,
someone who follows the soap press, tell me that I'm wrong and that the
show's fictional location isn't changing!

Aisling
--
Ten Thousand Questions
A Question a Day for Journaling, Self-Discovery, and Transformation
"2009 is the Year of Questions"
tenthousandquestions.com

chicagofan

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 6:48:36 PM12/29/09
to

Maybe Zach and Kendall's departure and saying goodbye to that location,
was just to cover that set not being used again... but then again,
there are probably lots of sets that will be noticeably missing when
they move.

Anyway, I'm in your corner Aisling... I hope it's not an "on screen"
move to LA for the show too.
bj

Jofirey

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 7:44:03 PM12/29/09
to

"chicagofan" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:Dzw_m.2567$Iz5....@newsfe05.iad...

Wasn't that the official good-by for the characters of Zach and
Kendall, at least unless we get a recast?

I'm pretty sure the child that played Ian the last day wasn't the Ian
we are familiar with either. Gonna miss those babies.

Jo

Aisling Willow Grey

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 9:29:24 PM12/29/09
to
>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:44:03 -0500, Jofirey wrote
(in article <7pvm9i...@mid.individual.net>):

I haven't been following any casting issues, but you'd think that would be a
BIG story -- they really haven't signed Thorsten Kaye and Alicia Minshew to
go to L.A.??!

Aislng

MareCA

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 3:41:11 AM12/30/09
to
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:29:24 -0500, Aisling Willow Grey wrote
(in article <0001HW.C7602534...@news.eternal-september.org>):

I don't think they're going to LA - a lot of people are hoping that Thorsten
Kaye reprises his role on OLTL. I think that Alicia's husband has a
business in NY plus they have a new baby.

I totally agree, Aisling, that the show moving to LA would not be a good
thing. What a slap in the face to Agnes Nixon that would be!!!

Happy New Year, all.


Marilyn A

Aisling Willow Grey

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 8:09:45 AM12/30/09
to
>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 03:41:11 -0500, MareCA wrote
(in article <0001HW.C7607C57...@News.Individual.NET>):

I am...inconsolable. Well, at least I had a chance to reTiVO the show
overnight, so I can watch it again and be sad. No Zach?? No Kendall??
Seriously, they are basically the whole show! Are we supposed to once again
root for the horrible combo of Ryan and Greenlee? UGH!!!!

>> I totally agree, Aisling, that the show moving to LA would not be a good
> thing. What a slap in the face to Agnes Nixon that would be!!! <<

Well, now that I know the casting issue, I guess their comments -- and scene
yesterday -- make more sense. I am guessing from the anticlimactic exit, we
will be treated to recasts somewhere up the road. Otherwise, we might have
seen a bigger goodbye between Erica and Kendall, Kendall bidding farewell to
her big, "I-created-it-myself" company, more of an issue with Ryan about
taking Spike away, a scene of Kendall at Greenlee's so-called grave, etc. So
hopefully I was just reading the signs wrong, and the fictional town of Pine
Valley will still have a place on our screens.

>> Happy New Year, all. <<

Ditto!

Aisling

chicagofan

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 3:44:59 PM12/31/09
to
Jofirey wrote:
> Wasn't that the official good-by for the characters of Zach and
> Kendall, at least unless we get a recast?
>
> I'm pretty sure the child that played Ian the last day wasn't the Ian
> we are familiar with either. Gonna miss those babies.
>
> Jo
>
>

I didn't know that. I hate to hear that, in case the show becomes
watchable again, after the Greenlee/Ryan "revival" show gets old. ;)

I agree, those were adorable kids.
bj

Ralph Trimble

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 2:13:16 AM1/2/10
to
Hi all,

I've been reading this newsgroup for ages and ages now, but have never
responded to any posts before. I have been a faithful viewer of AMC
since 1973 and have NEVER considered giving up on it! And never will.
However, it seems to me there is some confusion creeping in here....

The location of MAKING the show is moving to LA, but everything is still
going to be based in good old Pine Valley. There is no slap in the face
to Agnes Nixon.

Kendall is not leaving; Alicia Minshew is simply taking some more time
off to spend with her husband and new baby. She certainly IS coming back
to AMC in a few months.

Unlike David and Erica, who are going to commute to shoot their scenes,
Thorsten Kaye does not want to live apart from his family during such
times, so he is not moving to LA...YET. With bad omens looming for One
Life To Live, I can see a deal being made with Kaye to return to AMC
once OLTL is canned. Then he would be free to move his family to
California and come back from their 'trip.' Oh, and the less airtime for
Erica, the better! What a Godsend THAT will be! I'm one of those who
also loves to hate David, so I'm glad he's not leaving the show entirely.

While I'm writing, I might as well voice my opinion of a few of the
other characters here.

Unlike many on this group, I really like the new Jake (the best so far,
IMO) and Amanda (I really wish this actress was staying on!).

I also saw nothing wrong with the last Colby and preferred her to the
new one. I will miss Petey.

Tad is wonderful....One of the best characters the show has ever had. He
never intended to kill the Evil Doctor; the flood did that, so I hold no
bad feelings against Tad for it. I was SO glad to see Evil Doc go.

I can no longer stand Ryan (and his whispers!) and the plotline with old
EEK makes me nauseous.

I love Greenlee (Rebecca Budig is the ONLY Greenlee!), the most
beautiful actress on any soap.

I never liked Brooke and was glad to see her go.

I couldn't stand the 'soldier' they brought in with Jake (see, I can't
even think of her name). No loss there, either.

And to really set some folks off, I could not STAND the actor who played
Jonathan Lavery, and was so relieved to see the last of him.

OK...That's it for now.

Wishing you all a wonderful 2010!

Ralph


In article
<0001HW.C760BB49...@news.eternal-september.org>,


Aisling Willow Grey <ais...@fjordstone.com> wrote:

>>>>>>> leads me to
> >>>>> wonder if they
> >>>>> are going to have ALL of the characters actually pick up their
> >>>>> fictional
> >>>>> lives and move to L.A. (I realize Joe and Ruth are leaving the
> >>>>> canvas and
> >>>>> their characters are moving to FL, not CA). I mean, I can see
> >>>>> Ryan moving
> >>>>> next -- to be with Spike, and to keep Emma from Annie. And Erica
> >>>>> following
> >>>>> him, primarily for business reasons but secondarily to be with
> >>>>> Ryan.
> >>>>> Followed by Jake and Amanda, to get away from David once they
> >>>>> realize he
> >>>>> isn't dying. Followed by David chasing them. Etc. etc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I would personally be really disappointed to see the show no
> >>>>> longer be based
> >>>>> on the east coast. There are four decades of history behind this!
> >>>>> Please,
> >>>>> someone who follows the soap press, tell me that I'm wrong and
> >>>>> that the
> >>>>> show's fictional location isn't changing!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Aisling

snip

Aisling Willow Grey

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 9:44:38 AM1/2/10
to
>> On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 02:13:16 -0500, Ralph Trimble wrote
(in article <retrimble-FA375...@news.usenetmonster.com>):

> Hi all,
>
> I've been reading this newsgroup for ages and ages now, but have never
> responded to any posts before. I have been a faithful viewer of AMC
> since 1973 and have NEVER considered giving up on it! And never will.
> However, it seems to me there is some confusion creeping in here....
>
> The location of MAKING the show is moving to LA, but everything is still
> going to be based in good old Pine Valley. There is no slap in the face
> to Agnes Nixon. <<

Thanks, Ralph -- we did ultimately figure that out. The confusion was mine;
since I don't follow casting matters, I didn't know that Alicia Minshew and
Thorsten Kaye were not moving to L.A. Thus, the talk of Kendall and Zach
going away someplace...combined with Joe and Ruth moving...plus Jake and
Amanda's arc ultimately moving toward need to get away from David (when they
find out he isn't dying)... All that combined to make me suspicious, and I
simply _wondered_ whether the powers that be were using the move -- and the
resulting change in some sets -- as an excuse to change the show's locale,
moving all of the remaining principles to yet another fictional town, this
one west coast.

Marilyn simply opined that, if this were true, it _would_ be a slap in the
face to Agnes Nixon.

>> Kendall is not leaving; Alicia Minshew is simply taking some more time
> off to spend with her husband and new baby. She certainly IS coming back
> to AMC in a few months. <<

That's not what I hear. I assumed it was going to be a recast when the
character returns. If you've heard differently, I'm delighted!

>> Oh, and the less airtime for
> Erica, the better! What a Godsend THAT will be! I'm one of those who
> also loves to hate David, so I'm glad he's not leaving the show entirely.<<

I don't mind Erica so much when they give Lucci the right material. Having
said that, I cannot _stand_ the current relationship of Erica and Ryan!

>> Unlike many on this group, I really like the new Jake (the best so far,
> IMO) and Amanda (I really wish this actress was staying on!). <<

I do like the actress playing Amanda, but I hate what the writers have done
to her.

>> Wishing you all a wonderful 2010! <<

A happy and healthy year to you, too -- and keep on posting! Come out of
lurkdom more often!

Victoria Kuttner

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 1:50:51 PM1/2/10
to
On 1/2/10 2:13 AM, in article
retrimble-FA375...@news.usenetmonster.com, "Ralph Trimble"
<retr...@rogers.com> wrote:

> Kendall is not leaving; Alicia Minshew is simply taking some more time
> off to spend with her husband and new baby. She certainly IS coming back
> to AMC in a few months.

I'm wondering how they're going to bring back Kendall but not Zach, and
hoping that it doesn't lead to an Erica/Ryan/Kendall triangle which would be
VERY hard to stomach!

Ruby

Jofirey

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 4:29:42 PM1/2/10
to

"Aisling Willow Grey" <ais...@fjordstone.com> wrote in message

>>> Kendall is not leaving; Alicia Minshew is simply taking some more
>>> time
>> off to spend with her husband and new baby. She certainly IS
>> coming back
>> to AMC in a few months. <<
>
> That's not what I hear. I assumed it was going to be a recast when
> the
> character returns. If you've heard differently, I'm delighted!
>
>>> Oh, and the less airtime for
>> Erica, the better! What a Godsend THAT will be! I'm one of those
>> who
>> also loves to hate David, so I'm glad he's not leaving the show
>> entirely.<<
>
> I don't mind Erica so much when they give Lucci the right material.
> Having
> said that, I cannot _stand_ the current relationship of Erica and
> Ryan!
>
I'm with you. I do not have a problem with Erica and a younger, even
a much younger man. (you go granny) But its been done plenty of
times before. It Erica with Ryan I can't stomach. Hate Ryan sure.
Don't like the way Erica behaves with him either. Very unErica.

Still waiting for the scenes where one of the kids stands at their
door, "Daddy, Grandma, who is going to fix me breakfast?"

Jo

Jofirey

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 4:30:49 PM1/2/10
to

"Victoria Kuttner" <ruby...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:C764FFBB.52F%ruby...@gmail.com...

I suppose they believe that Kendall, or even Zach could be recast.

Jo

SFJason

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 7:48:09 PM1/2/10
to
On Jan 2, 1:30 pm, "Jofirey" <jofi...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> "Victoria Kuttner" <rubyv...@gmail.com> wrote in message

>
> news:C764FFBB.52F%ruby...@gmail.com...
>
>
>
> > On 1/2/10 2:13 AM, in article
> > retrimble-FA3755.02131602012...@news.usenetmonster.com, "Ralph
> > Trimble"

> > <retrim...@rogers.com> wrote:
>
> >> Kendall is not leaving; Alicia Minshew is simply taking some more
> >> time
> >> off to spend with her husband and new baby. She certainly IS
> >> coming back
> >> to AMC in a few months.
>
> > I'm wondering how they're going to bring back Kendall but not Zach,
> > and
> > hoping that it doesn't lead to an Erica/Ryan/Kendall triangle which
> > would be
> > VERY hard to stomach!
>
> > Ruby
>
> I suppose they believe that Kendall, or even Zach could be recast.
>
> Jo

Well Kendall is a recast so apparently it is possible :-). While I
very much like both actors that play Kendall and Zach I do think they
could be replaced. It will be tough but I think people would accept
it if they get good actors (unlike their terrible choice for recast
Liza Colby)

SFJason

Jofirey

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 8:09:45 PM1/2/10
to

"SFJason" <sfja...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9264178b-378f-49af...@d20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

SFJason

*************

Really, I think pretty much any character can be recast. I just
don't think the recast of a 'supercouple' ever works.

Don't like the new Liza, especially with Tad who is at his best when
he has a sense of fun. She just seems to have no sense of humor or
even anything remotely resembling it.

Not to mention the whole 'lady in black' thing they have going on.

Jo

Aisling Willow Grey

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 10:10:37 PM1/2/10
to
>> On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 20:09:45 -0500, Jofirey wrote
(in article <7qa9dc...@mid.individual.net>):

I'm not sure why everyone's hackles are so raised by Jamie Luner as Liza; I'm
actually warming up to her. And I think she's at her best with Tad, in fact
(which is saying something because I dislike Tad SO much these days).
Anyway, my real issue with the character of Liza these days is the stupid and
implausible career arc. Not only is she suddenly the most competent lawyer
in town (after barely just graduating law school), but she's in line to
become D.A.??? Silly.

Christine

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 11:19:26 PM1/2/10
to
I really hope that was a real goodby to both Zach and Kendall. Once they
were my favorite couple but the writers have ruined them--good riddance.
I'd also like to see the whole Martin clan disappear. I have to ff when
Tad or Jake are in a scene, even Ryan doesn't raise the hair on the back
of my neck. like those 2 clowns. I'm staying with the show because of
David--here's hoping he does lots of commuting. I hope Adam and Annie
stay with the show, but the new Colby should jump ship along with Liza,
Krystal and Amanda. Bring back Petey and keep Opal. I hope Erica's
visits are brief, and would love to see Bianca return. Some new writers
and some new characters might salvage the show.

Christine

****Hollywood's cult of the body has
degenerated into the cult of the bawdy****
Steve Cochran 1963

Patricia Martin Steward

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 9:43:02 AM1/3/10
to
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 13:29:42 -0800, "Jofirey" <jof...@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

>
>Still waiting for the scenes where one of the kids stands at their
>door, "Daddy, Grandma, who is going to fix me breakfast?"

Huh. That is NEVER going to happen.

The "Grandma" part, I mean.

--
When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing
which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has
other people looking at it.
W. T. Pooh (aka A. A. Milne)

Liz G

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 3:27:21 PM1/3/10
to

"Christine" <KIN...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:25921-4B4...@storefull-3252.bay.webtv.net...


It's odd how people see things differently - I've been enjoying Tad and
Jake - listening to them talking at the same time, each trying to convince
the other of whatever! And I agree that Liza is interesting with Tad, but
the whole lawyer thing is a stretch!

lizg

I, too, hope David has a lot of scenes.

SFJason

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 5:55:20 PM1/3/10
to
On Jan 2, 7:10 pm, Aisling Willow Grey <aisl...@fjordstone.com> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 20:09:45 -0500, Jofirey wrote
>
> (in article <7qa9dcFhb...@mid.individual.net>):
>
>
>
>
>
> > "SFJason" <sfjay...@aol.com> wrote in message

I was never a fan of Jamie Luner in other shows she did (like Melrose
Place). I always thought she was kind of a bad actor. The few times
i've peeked into AMC didn't change my opinion of her. She just
*isn't* Liza Colby. It was a bad choice. The reasons they have gone
into on the PV Podcast I agree with regarding her. JMHO.

SFJason

Robin Coutellier

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 4:15:58 AM1/4/10
to
In article <retrimble-FA375...@news.usenetmonster.com>,
retr...@rogers.com says...

> Tad is wonderful....One of the best characters the show has ever had. He
> never intended to kill the Evil Doctor; the flood did that, so I hold no
> bad feelings against Tad for it. I was SO glad to see Evil Doc go.

A small point, but it was an earthquake. The evil doctor suffocated
when his little makeshift tomb caved in.

Robin "so he drowned in dirt (& his own filth)" Coutellier

--
Frango Crystal & Lifetime Achievement Award 2000
Boogie Chillens: http://rcboogiechillens.blogspot.com
Older Boogie Chillens & Updates: http://www.robinc.org/boogie.htm
Love: Pine Valley Podcast: pinevalleypodcast.blogspot.com

Ruby Villavicencio

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 4:04:53 PM1/7/10
to
On 1/2/10 10:10 PM, in article
0001HW.C76574DD...@news.eternal-september.org, "Aisling Willow
Grey" <ais...@fjordstone.com> wrote:

I don't have any problems with Jamie as Liza, but I DO have problems with
Tad. He's such sleazy character for being a "moral compass" for the show.
As far as Liza being a competent lawyer -- she's been gone for a long time.
She could very well have become competent. I just don't understand how she
could graduate from law school and pass the bar without Adam catching on to
where she was? Or did she wait and go to school after Colby ran away from
her to Adam.

Ruby

Jofirey

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 4:18:28 PM1/7/10
to

"Ruby Villavicencio" <ruby...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:C76BB6A5.5BC%ruby...@gmail.com...

Not only went to law school, but worked her way up in some law firm
somewhere that taught her all the ins and outs of running a law
practice with virtually no employees and no office but still
managing to do trial work. Both family and criminal. Heck, she
isn't even running the business from her home, for a while there she
was running it from a hotel suite. She has the concept of the
'paperless office' down cold apparently. All while hiding from Adam.
Plus what sort of idiot is Colby that she hasn't know ever since she
came back exactly where her mother was and what she was doing. She
might not be a computer whiz, but Petey was.

And Liza, they only was she could think of to communicate with Colby
was through letters addressed to her at Chandler Mansion?

Jo

ew...@aol.com

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 10:44:20 AM1/8/10
to

My Thoughts- I also have been enjoying Jamie Lunar as Liza. The main
problem I have with it, if I think about it too much, is that she is
not the same Liza we all knew. She's a playing a different character
who happens to be called Liza. Marcy Walker's personality so captured
who Liza was- Jamie Lunar is quite different. That said, I think Lunar
is a good actress and certainly gorgeous- she looked better I thought,
in the scenes without all the heavy make up.In a funny way, her beauty
rewrites history a bit-Part of the original Jenny/Liza competition was
that Marcy Walker as the young Liza was not a lovely as Jenny,
inwardly or outwardly. Jamie Lunar is more a conventional heroine.
And I think this Liza can do better than Tad, who lost all of his
boyish appeal a long time ago and now just seems to be a sort of
sleazy perv who is unemployed and lives with his ex wife and mother.
Mr. Knight also seems to be phoning in the performances a lot
lately.But in fairness, he really isn't being given much to do.
Unlike a lot of other people here, I am enjoying Ricky Paul Goldin's
improvs and he and Knight's overtalking each other. They are having
fun with the silly script. Yesterday, Jake said two times- I am free
as a bird, was that an improv or a flub? I don't know. He made it
seem natural. The only thing I don't like is the make up on him-in
many scenes he looks quite orange. I don't know if anyone else is
noticing it...
Marc

Ralph Trimble

unread,
Jan 9, 2010, 3:27:56 AM1/9/10
to
In article
<0b763045-42da-4536...@m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
SFJason <sfja...@aol.com> wrote:

> I was never a fan of Jamie Luner in other shows she did (like Melrose
> Place). I always thought she was kind of a bad actor. The few times
> i've peeked into AMC didn't change my opinion of her. She just
> *isn't* Liza Colby. It was a bad choice. The reasons they have gone
> into on the PV Podcast I agree with regarding her. JMHO.
>
> SFJason


I was never a fan of Marcie Walker....I couldn't understand how anyone
could find her the least bit attractive....so I'm just loving the new
Liza! I think it will be great to get she and Tad back together!

Ralph

0 new messages