Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

TNG Rating Summary: "Dark Page" (2)

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Joseph W Reiss

unread,
Nov 9, 1993, 11:28:56 AM11/9/93
to
[TNG] S.O.S.: Dark Page (2)
Ratings collected by Joseph W Reiss <jre...@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
======================================================================

_______________________________________________________________________

There's a new look in S.O.S. land. Due to popular demand (and a tiny
bit of spare time that could have been better spent studying), I've
added a standard deviation calculation to the weekly S.O.S. To get it
to fit logically into the format, I've had to move things around a
little. The currently layout is still tentative and may shift a bit
in the next few weeks.
Joe
_______________________________________________________________________


Dark Page (62 ratings)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name Hist Weeks Curr StarBar
=======================================================================
Average 7.3 6.3 * * * * * * >
Standard Deviation 2.1
=======================================================================
David Hull 4.3 (4) 2.6 * * Y
Jeremy Jacobs 6.4 (4) 3.0 * * *
Robert Maas 5.2 (8) 3.0 * * *
Aidan Palmer 4.8 (14) 3.0 * * *
+ Jason Snell 6.8 (14) 3.0 * * *
Rob Knauerhase 7.2 (16) 3.5 * * * Y
Jeff Vogel 6.9 (10) 3.5 * * * Y
Scott Zeller 5.3 (7) 3.5 * * * Y
+ Kenneth DeMonn 4.8 (32) 4.0 * * * *
Jean-Yves Desbiens 4.0 (1) 4.0 * * * *
+ Dave Flewitt 6.1 (9) 4.0 * * * *
Jeff Hildebrand 6.8 (7) 4.0 * * * *
Tim Lynch 7.8 (25) 4.0 * * * *
Jeff Rupley 7.1 (28) 4.0 * * * *
Dan Wendelin 6.6 (8) 4.0 * * * *
Stew Barnes 4.5 (6) 4.5 * * * * Y
Toby Elliott 4.1 (21) 4.5 * * * * Y
Nick Gouskos 7.5 (3) 4.8 * * * * X
Craig Bryant 6.3 (5) 5.0 * * * * *
Blanche Cohen 5.0 (1) 5.0 * * * * *
Peter Janes 6.5 (7) 5.0 * * * * *
Holger Kruse 5.0 (1) 5.0 * * * * *
David Sandbrook 7.4 (5) 5.0 * * * * *
Marc DeRosa 8.0 (4) 5.5 * * * * * Y
Joshua Engel 5.8 (1) 5.8 * * * * * X
+ Vicki Botner 5.1 (6) 6.0 * * * * * *
Mike Heffner 8.2 (17) 6.0 * * * * * *
John Quintanilla 7.4 (5) 6.0 * * * * * *
Ken Papai 8.0 (22) 6.2 * * * * * * ,
John Manley 6.8 (2) 6.5 * * * * * * Y
+ Doug Riblet 6.4 (7) 6.5 * * * * * * Y
Si Rowe 7.0 (8) 6.7 * * * * * * X
Steve Fenster 7.6 (7) 7.0 * * * * * * *
+ Wity Ganda 7.0 (14) 7.0 * * * * * * *
+ Clifford Hall 8.9 (5) 7.0 * * * * * * *
Michael Hopkins 7.1 (12) 7.0 * * * * * * *
Mary Lee 7.8 (16) 7.0 * * * * * * *
Carol Mularski 6.1 (7) 7.0 * * * * * * *
Gregory Prince 7.9 (11) 7.0 * * * * * * *
Amy Sheldon 7.1 (7) 7.0 * * * * * * *
Gabe Ernst-Edwards 8.1 (7) 7.1 * * * * * * * ,
+ Paul Mackin 7.7 (6) 7.1 * * * * * * * ,
Greg Laughland 7.2 (7) 7.2 * * * * * * * ,
David Calvin 8.2 (2) 7.4 * * * * * * * >
Steven Reinhart 7.5 (1) 7.5 * * * * * * * Y
+ Anton Sanderfoot 8.3 (28) 7.5 * * * * * * * Y
John Evans 7.8 (1) 7.8 * * * * * * * X
Mark Wasserman 7.9 (1) 7.9 * * * * * * * *
Joe Reiss 8.1 (28) 8.0 * * * * * * * *
Donald Sutherland 8.0 (1) 8.0 * * * * * * * *
Michael Evans 8.4 (5) 8.2 * * * * * * * * ,
Ryan Tucker 8.3 (1) 8.3 * * * * * * * * >
+ Ellen Harder 8.5 (1) 8.5 * * * * * * * * Y
Dirk Loedding 8.8 (7) 8.5 * * * * * * * * Y
Daniel Zimmerman 8.9 (4) 9.0 * * * * * * * * *
+ David Henderson 8.9 (7) 9.2 * * * * * * * * * ,
+ Mark Ruzon 8.4 (19) 9.6 * * * * * * * * * Y
+ Andy Lee 9.5 (5) 9.8 * * * * * * * * * X
James Bow 7.1 (7) 9.9 * * * * * * * * * *
Ian Hutchings 8.4 (6) 9.9 * * * * * * * * * *
Shawn Bayern 10.0 (1) 10.0 * * * * * * * * * *
+ Sean Erwin 8.3 (7) 10.0 * * * * * * * * * *
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[+] Ratings included in the first S.O.S. posting for this week
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Partial point key:
[,] 0.1-0.2 [>] 0.3-0.4 [Y] 0.5-0.6 [X] 0.7-0.8 [*] 0.9-1.0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hit space to view the SEASON SUMMARY, or hit `n' to move along to the
next article...

BY AIRDATE BY RATING
---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
Descent <II> 6.3 Liaisons 5.6
Liaisons 5.6 Descent <II> 6.3
Interface 6.6 [Dark Page 6.3]
Gambit <I> 8.3 Interface 6.6
Gambit <II> 8.3 Phantasms 7.9
Phantasms 7.9 Gambit <I> 8.3
[Dark Page 6.3] Gambit <II> 8.3
================================== ==================================
Average 7.1 Average 7.1
---------------------------------- ----------------------------------


If you're new to the S.O.S., hit space and keep reading. If you're
familiar with the system, hit `n' now

WHAT IS IT?
The S.O.S. (Spoiler-free Opinion Summary) is a twice-weekly posting
made by yours truly. Its purpose is to provide an indication of the
net's reaction to new episodes of both current series, TNG and DS9.
The first posting is made Thursday and is intended to give those
people who don't see the episode until later in the week a hint as
to the quality of episode to expect. The second posting is made
Monday and gives the final ratings for the entire week, to summarize
the opinions of the viewing populace (or at least those who
participate :-)

HOW DO I JOIN IN?
Becoming a part of the S.O.S. is simple. After you've seen the
episode, send me email at `jre...@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu'.
Include a simple rating on a numeric scale. Please do NOT include
any spoiler information. I usually don't get to see the episodes
until Saturday or Sunday, and I like to go in fresh. Also, if your
name does not appear in the "From:" line of your emails, try to be
sure to include your first and last name somewhere in the message.
Having it in your .sig is fine.

WHEN CAN I SUBMIT?
You can submit any time you like. It's best if you submit before
the posting times (sometime Monday and Thursday evenings). All
ratings I get up until the minute I post will be included in the
postings. Ratings I get after the second posting will be included
in the database and used to calculate episode averages, but they
will not be seen individually in any postings.

This concludes this installment of the S.O.S. Join us next posting
for more exciting adventures... and thanks for your opinions!

Joe
--
__________ | NeXTMail? We can do NeXTMail!!!
| |___) | """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
\_/OE | \EISS | If we keep up at this bandwidth, we'll blow up any
`---- | minute now. Me poor bairns canna take much more.

0 new messages