Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Captain Janeway topless - mulgrew.jpg (1/1)

491 views
Skip to first unread message

Gregg T. Allinson

unread,
Aug 29, 1996, 3:00:00 AM8/29/96
to

someone (some...@outer.space) wrote:

(A great big honkin' binary)

This was posted to the wrong newsgroup. It should be in
alt.binaries.startrek.

On a more personal note...Janeway topless?! The immortal words of Al
Bundy come to mind: "Help Peg, I'm blind!".

--
Au Bon Pain!,
Gregg "Dave" Allinson

Visit The Scrapyard ("The 'G' is for great!") @ http://miso.wwa.com/~roscoe
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Indeed, you won't die. However, living forever could be a hell if you're
beaten into a helpless pulp."
-Piccolo-San- Dragonball Z: Garlic Gains Eternal Life
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAVE DOCTOR WHO! Write FOX at fox...@delphi.com and the BBC at P...@bbc.co.uk
and request a new season of Doctor Who!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hiran Perera

unread,
Aug 29, 1996, 3:00:00 AM8/29/96
to


someone <some...@outer.space> wrote in article
<322695...@outer.space>...
> Pretty interesting fake
>

Shouldn`t this be on a binaries.perv group?

shannara

unread,
Aug 29, 1996, 3:00:00 AM8/29/96
to

In article <504d82$f...@kirin.wwa.com>,
ros...@wwa.com says...
someone (some...@outer.space) wrote:

(A great big honkin' binary)

This was posted to the wrong newsgroup. It
should be in
alt.binaries.startrek.

On a more personal note...Janeway topless?! The
immortal words of Al
Bundy come to mind: "Help Peg, I'm blind!".

It's a so-so fake.

Paul & Michelle

unread,
Aug 29, 1996, 3:00:00 AM8/29/96
to

Didn't see the binary, but I can tell you definitively that Kate Mulgrew
has never done a topless shot or scene in her life, so unless the poster
has access to her bedroom, I'm inclined to believe it's a fake...

Michelle

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* tig...@cais.cais.com/the...@aol.com *
* Now Voyager, Kate Mulgrew's Official Fan Club *
* P.O. Box 34745, Bethesda, MD 20827-4745 *
* http://gl.umbc.edu/~mpanti1/kate/kate.html *
* JANEWAY/CHAKOTAY '96! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ps...@seldon.terminus.com

unread,
Aug 29, 1996, 3:00:00 AM8/29/96
to

Hiran Perera wrote:

> > Pretty interesting fake


The other day on the local news there was a story about how computer
junkies can take a picture of someone's body and superimpose a famous
person's face onto that body. I think some...@outer.space did this to
Kate Mulgrew - its her face but not her body.

Andrew Schischka

unread,
Aug 30, 1996, 3:00:00 AM8/30/96
to

"Hiran Perera" <hi...@doc-h.demon.co.uk > wrote:

Don't spose anyone could repost it...


---
Sent from Wolf 359 BBS, Auckland, New Zealand, (649)443-0395

someone

unread,
Aug 30, 1996, 3:00:00 AM8/30/96
to
Pretty interesting fake
MULGREW.JPG

T Heinis

unread,
Aug 30, 1996, 3:00:00 AM8/30/96
to

Duhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!

ps...@seldon.terminus.com wrote in article
<32268E...@seldon.terminus.com>...

John Darcy

unread,
Aug 31, 1996, 3:00:00 AM8/31/96
to

On Thu, 29 Aug 1996 ps...@seldon.terminus.com wrote:

> Hiran Perera wrote:
>
> > > Pretty interesting fake
>
>
> The other day on the local news there was a story about how computer
> junkies can take a picture of someone's body and superimpose a famous
> person's face onto that body. I think some...@outer.space did this to
> Kate Mulgrew - its her face but not her body.
>

But was it her (ugh!) voice??

== from ========================================================
_____ John P Darcy LIVR email: da...@nlc.net.au
/ \ Seven Hills, NSW __________________________________
|___ | Australia Visit Friends of Science Fiction
| | | at http://www.nlc.net.au/~fsf/
\__|__/ ----------------------------------
"Sir is most evidently alive, otherwise I would not
attempt to serve sir."
================================================================

>

Mary T

unread,
Aug 31, 1996, 3:00:00 AM8/31/96
to

Michelle said --

>Didn't see the binary, but I can tell you definitively that Kate Mulgrew
>has never done a topless shot or scene in her life, so unless the poster
>has access to her bedroom, I'm inclined to believe it's a fake...

Would you believe that some turkey got up to the mike in Detroit and
told Kate that someone he knows saw a nude photo of her? Kate, being
the incredibly poised and elegant person that she is didn't rip the
idiot apart but did tell him that such an occurrence was impossible as
she had never posed nude or done a nude scene. Sometimes I really
wonder what possesses people when they ask actors dumb things like
that.

Catbyte


Mary T <cat...@starnetinc.com>

Florian Treiss

unread,
Aug 31, 1996, 3:00:00 AM8/31/96
to

*Hello!*

Please do not post binaries to de.rec.sf.startrek.

ciao, Florian

--
------------------------------------------
| Florian Treiss :<I |
| pic...@trashcan.mcnet.de |
| http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/6340/ |
------------------------------------------

Tim Archer

unread,
Sep 1, 1996, 3:00:00 AM9/1/96
to

someone <some...@outer.space> wrote:
<binary deleted>

Och, this is an old fake.

--

Tim Archer
...............................................
w...@hunterlink.net.au
http://www2.hunterlink.net.au/~ddpa/index.html
http://www2.hunterlink.net.au/~ddpa/tlog.html
...............................................
"Ventress, I will not have one of my men wasting
valuable police time wrapping plastic ducks."
- Sgt Blaketon

Christopher Holt

unread,
Sep 1, 1996, 3:00:00 AM9/1/96
to

cat...@starnetinc.com (Mary T) wrote:

>Michelle said --

>Catbyte

Sounds like she prepares herself for those kind of occurences. She
handled that the best way anyone could, by not letting it get to her.
She probably startled the *turkey* you mentioned by responding
intelligently. As they say, ask a stupid question...
As to what possesses people to ask those kind of questions, they do it
to see the response on the actor's/actres' face. So when Kate didn't
have any reaction, and responded like that he must have felt like the
idiot he is. I'm surprised he could do it in front of anyone, no
matter what Kate's response was. For no matter how she responded,
people are going to think that he's the idiot for asking the question
rather than seeing how Kate responds as he might have thought.

P.S. There is no picture as stated above, obviously. Just wanted to
state acurately what was posted before, that it definately was NOT
Kate Mulgrew but some fake. I wouldn't dare post a binary in a
non-binary group. Don't want to get flamed.

Bill HR

unread,
Sep 6, 1996, 3:00:00 AM9/6/96
to

Tim Archer <w...@hunterlink.net.au> wrote:

>someone <some...@outer.space> wrote:
><binary deleted>

>Och, this is an old fake.

Double-Ouch! And a piss-poor one, at that!

Mulgrew has more dignity, IMHO.......

Bill Heiser
bil...@prolog.net
http://home.prolog.net/~billhr
"Bill_HR" on IRC (#Delta_Quadrant)
<===>

All I ever needed to know I've learned from watching Star Trek:

* Seek out new life and new civilizations * When your logic fails,
trust a hunch * Insufficient data does not compute * Live long and
prosper * If it can't be fixed, just ask Scotty * Keep your phaser set
on stun * Even in our own world, sometimes we are aliens * Humans are
highly illogical * When going out into the Universe, remember: "Boldy
go where no one has gone before!"


Todd

unread,
Oct 28, 1996, 3:00:00 AM10/28/96
to

"T Heinis" <high...@csinet.net> wrote:

>Duhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!

>Hiran Perera wrote:

>> > Pretty interesting fake


>The other day on the local news there was a story about how computer
>junkies can take a picture of someone's body and superimpose a famous
>person's face onto that body. I think some...@outer.space did this to
>Kate Mulgrew - its her face but not her body.

Or the other way 'round :)

0 new messages