According to cognitive psychologist Donald Hoffmann,
you are not something in Spacetime.
Because, well, SpaceTime isn't really there...
Hoffmann is inspired by work of physicist
Nima Arkani-Hamed and others.
Interpreting Nima Arkani-Hamed's work, Hoffmann argue, that we can start by saying that Spacetime has no operational meaning below the
''Planck scale'', roughly 10-33 centimeters and 10-43 seconds.
''For instance, to measure the position of a subatomic particle with higher resolution, we must use radiation of smaller wavelength.
Quantum theory tells us that as wavelengths shrink their energy grows.
But, as we increase resolution we pack more energy, and therefore more mass, into less space.
When the resolution approaches the Planck scale,
the density of mass grows so large that gravity spoils the party, creates a black hole, and destroys our measurement''.
''Indeed, quantum field theory and gravity together warn us that spacetime is not fundamental.
But they cannot tell us what is fundamental, what lies beyond spacetime.
We must take a creative leap. We must propose a new theory,
with new structures and processes beyond spacetime. This is fun,
exciting and speculative. But there is a rule. Any theory we propose
must project onto spacetime. The physics of spacetime must arise,
precisely, as a special case of our new theory. Quantum field theory
can’t say what objects lie beyond spacetime, but it can veto bad hunches''.
''Yes, our senses guide adaptive behavior. No, they are not a window on reality.
...And that’s what evolution did for us. Spacetime and physical objects are just our VR headset.
They let us play the game of life, blissfully ignorant of the nitty-gritty of a reality beyond''.
''The BCFW recursion relations hinted that there may be structures beyond spacetime.
This hint was pursued by a colleague of Witten at Princeton, Nima Arkani-Hamed, who with his graduate student Jaroslav Trnka discovered in 2013 a remarkable geometric object, the amplituhedron....''
''Particles are in spacetime. Yet things like an amplituhedron is postulated to be beyond spacetime.
In what sense is it ''an object'' if it is beyond spacetime? How is it
''projecting down'' onto spacetime and ''encoding'' properties of spacetime?''
''But the amplituhedron is a geometric object that can have trillions of dimensions and more, and these dimensions are not about space and time, but about something else, where it is anyones guess what this ''something'' is''.
''Giving a new answer to an old question: Who am I?
Not an object in spacetime''.
https://iai.tv/articles/donald-hoffman-spacetime-is-not-fundamental-auid-2281