Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

40 Years

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Tim Bruening

unread,
Jul 20, 2009, 4:10:24 AM7/20/09
to
Its been 40 years since men first walked on the Moon.

silk

unread,
Jul 20, 2009, 5:55:58 AM7/20/09
to
On Jul 20, 9:10 am, Tim Bruening <tsbru...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
> Its been 40 years since men first walked on the Moon.

Roll on Mars!

T Guy

unread,
Jul 20, 2009, 7:45:07 AM7/20/09
to
(Tim Bruening <tsbru...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> ):

Its been 40 years since men first walked on the Moon.

(Tim B.):

Congratulations to the human race and particularly all those at NASA
who made it possible.

Tim

Howard Brazee

unread,
Jul 20, 2009, 7:58:30 AM7/20/09
to
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:55:58 -0700 (PDT), silk
<giles...@googlemail.com> wrote:

>> Its been 40 years since men first walked on the Moon.
>
>Roll on Mars!

I'd rather have a permanent presence on the moon than a short visit to
Mars.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Pelerin Galimatias

unread,
Jul 20, 2009, 12:54:41 PM7/20/09
to
In article <3um8651v6pqo2fos5...@4ax.com>, how...@brazee.net
says...

>
>On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:55:58 -0700 (PDT), silk
><giles...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Its been 40 years since men first walked on the Moon.
>>
>>Roll on Mars!
>
>I'd rather have a permanent presence on the moon than a short visit to
>Mars.
>
I'd rather have the two robots, controlled by NASA back on Earth, than
humans there. It would be a one way trip, with the radiation and bone
damage. Too much weight would be tied up with life support.
--
0000001000000100000110001000011010001111110010111011101000010000

Pelerin Galimatias

unread,
Jul 20, 2009, 12:59:05 PM7/20/09
to
In article <lj19m.447$MA3...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, pgali...@hotmail.com
says...

>
>In article <3um8651v6pqo2fos5...@4ax.com>, how...@brazee.net
>says...
>>
>>On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:55:58 -0700 (PDT), silk
>><giles...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Its been 40 years since men first walked on the Moon.
>>>
>>>Roll on Mars!
>>
>>I'd rather have a permanent presence on the moon than a short visit to
>>Mars.
>>
>I'd rather have the two robots, controlled by NASA back on Earth, than
>humans there. It would be a one way trip, with the radiation and bone
>damage. Too much weight would be tied up with life support.
>--
I'm talking about Mars above--more trips to the Moon make no sense.
--
0000001000000100000110001000011010001111110010111011101000010000

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Howard Brazee

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 9:20:24 PM7/21/09
to
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:59:05 GMT, pgali...@hotmail.com (Pelerin
Galimatias) wrote:

>I'm talking about Mars above--more trips to the Moon make no sense.

Why?

Jim Lovejoy

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 1:31:57 AM7/22/09
to
Tim Bruening <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in
news:4A642670...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us:

> Its been 40 years since men first walked on the Moon.
>

It's been 36 years, 7 months, and 10 days since man last walked on the
moon.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
0 new messages