On 9/16/2021 10:50 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 13:01:43 GMT,
djh...@kithrup.com (Dorothy J
> Heydt) wrote:
>
>> In article <
pg6b1i-...@paranoia.mcleod-schmidt.id.au>,
>> Gary R. Schmidt <
grsc...@acm.org> wrote:
>>> On 16/09/2021 09:15, Lynn McGuire wrote:
>>>> On 9/15/2021 11:02 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:42:14 -0500, Lynn McGuire
>>>>> <
lynnmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/14/2021 5:08 PM, William Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 at 5:16:19 PM UTC-4, Lynn McGuire wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/14/2021 3:11 PM, William Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 at 2:03:33 PM UTC-4, Lynn McGuire
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/14/2021 12:26 PM,
jdni...@panix.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Five Doomed Attempts at Planetary Colonization
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>
https://www.tor.com/2021/09/14/five-doomed-attempts-at-planetary-colonization/
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And I have read two of the five, the awesome "Methuselah’s
>>>>>>>>>> Children" by
>>>>>>>>>> Robert A. Heinlein (1958) and "Four-Day Planet" by H. Beam Piper
>>>>>>>>>> (1961).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I might add "Starman Jones" by Robert Heinlein to this list. Or
>>>>>>>>>> is it
>>>>>>>>>> "Time For The Stars" by Heinlein ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In the former they're stranded accidentally, are they not? I don't
>>>>>>>>> recall it as a planned colonization. In the latter they are
>>>>>>>>> exploring, not colonizing. Some of the places they find look like
>>>>>>>>> great sites for a later failed colonization. Unfortunately
>>>>>>>>> Heinlein didn't write the sequels.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We see a colonization effort almost fail in "Farmer in the Sky". A
>>>>>>>>> prelude to it's inevitable total failure, no doubt.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> William Hyde
>>>>>>>> I cannot remember if "Starman Jones" or "Time For The Stars" got lost
>>>>>>>> and considered colonizing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Definitely the former. One of their key navigators dies, the aged
>>>>>>> captain makes a navigation error, the suckup navigator agrees with
>>>>>>> it ("I check you, Sir"), and they wind up in an unknown but deadly
>>>>>>> location. The captain dies, the suckup is killed, Max (?) gets the
>>>>>>> girl and the command, and he manages to reverse the navigation error
>>>>>>> which got them lost in the first place.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> First book which ever gave me pi to more than 3.14159 - Max has a
>>>>>>> perfect memory for numbers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the latter the last planet they visited was quite deadly and
>>>>>>> killed off much of the crew. But they had a functioning starship
>>>>>>> all through the book. And presumably at least two competent
>>>>>>> navigators.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> William Hyde
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I memorized ? in trig at Rice University in the summer of 1976 to 10
>>>>>> places. 3.141592654. Never went beyond that but I had a nerd buddy at
>>>>>> TAMU who memorized it to 100 places.
>>>>>
>>>>> <pendantry>
>>>>> I would think that
>>>>> 3. 141 592 654
>>>>> was Pi to /nine/ (decimal) places.
>>>>>
>>>>> But perhaps you meant what I would call "ten digits".
>>>>> </pendantry>
>>>>
>>>> Oh well, not a word smith. I are a programmer !
>>>>
>>> Who can't count!! ;-)
>>
>> But he can get the computer to do that for him.
>>
>> ObSF: Asimov, "The Feeling of Power."
>
> Wasn't there once an Intel chip that turned out ... not to count to
> well?
>
> Well, not /count/, perhaps, but perform certain math functions?
>
> There was also an Israeli experience where they left an antimissile
> control computer on for a week and the accumulated error caused it to
> start missing. Have to reboot those suckers periodically!
That Intel chip caused us a lot of problems. I had to put a check in
our software for it as it would cause recycle flowsheets to fail and
then we would get an angry phone call. In fact, it is still there.
double precision chptst
double precision divtwo
double precision top
double precision bottom
C data for bad pentium test
data top / 4195835.0D0 /
data bottom / 3145727.0D0 /
C check for bad pentium math coprocessor
C
DIVTWO = top / bottom
CHPTST = (DIVTWO * bottom) - top
IF (CHPTST .gt. 1.0e-8) THEN
call scrwri (' ')
call scrwri ('WARNING: Your Intel Pentium CPU apparently ' //
* 'has a bad math coprocessor or some other')
call scrwri ('WARNING: application has changed the floating '//
* 'point roundoff. Your simulation results')
call scrwri ('WARNING: may be adversely affected. Please ' //
* 'contact Intel and replace your FPU. Please')
call scrwri ('WARNING: note that this test is sometimes ' //
* 'falsely activated by Virtual Machine servers.')
write (screenbuffer, 10234) chptst
10234 format ('WARNING: The actual floating point test error was ',
* g14.7, ' (should be 0.0). (runchk)')
call scrwri (screenbuffer)
call scrwri (' ')
END IF
Lynn