On 29/06/2016 9:20 PM, Peter Trei wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 at 2:14:09 AM UTC-4, Robert Bannister wrote:
>> On 28/06/2016 11:31 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote:
>
>>>
>>> There's an ICANN related FB group I'm in, which is currently pondering
>>> the implications of breaking up the UK for the DNS system. ccTLDs are
>>> required to be two characters, and the obvious ones are taken.
>>> .wa is available for Wales
>>
>> .wa is already in use for Western Australia and, for all I know, other
>> places.
>
> Not as a ccTLD, nor as a TLD. As part of my work, I download the official
> TLD list from
ftp.internic.net/domain/root.zone every day, and as of
> this morning, .wa is not in it.
>
> .wa.au is not a TLD, .au is. There's also .
wa.us, but that's under
> the .US ccTLD.
Yes. In post-Send mood, I suddenly realised this.