On Apr 24, 12:19 am,
goldf...@ocf.berkeley.edu (David Goldfarb) wrote:
> In article <kl6pfg$
j7...@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>,
>
> Christian Weisgerber <
na...@mips.inka.de> wrote:
> >So that fact I knew turns out to be nonsense. Maybe Russian
> >sensibilities changed, but more likely it never was true in the
> >first place. Now, what I don't remember is where I originally read
> >the claim. But maybe other people's memory is better. Can we track
> >down where that myth started?
>
> In 1978 an anthology entitled _Black Holes_ came out, edited by
> Jerry Pournelle. I can recall reading Pournelle saying something
> like, "In Russia they say 'frozen stars' because in Russian 'black
> hole' is an obscenity that means exactly what you think it does."
> That's where I came across that claim.
Yes, on page 21 Pournelle writes: "Incidentally, the Russians call
them "frozen stars", because the phrase "black hole" in Russian is an
obscenity that means exactly what you think it does." However, the
very next sentence reads "(I am told that because the term black hole
is common in western astronomy, some Russians are beginning to use it
in their own literature, with what effect on lay sensibilities I don't
know.)".
The usage is confirmed in N. I. Shakura's "Disk Model of Gas Accretion
on a Relativistic Star in a Close Binary System" (Soviet Astronomy,
1973, vol. 16, p. 756 -- see
https://scholar.google.com): "An object
of this kind is frequently referred to in the literature as a frozen
or collapsed star, a collapsar, a gravitational tomb, or a black
hole." The rest of the article uses the terms "collapsed star" and
"collapsar" interchangeably.
Now, it so happens that Pournelle's article in _Black Holes_ ("Black
Holes and Cosmic Sensors") is based on his "A Step Farther Out" column
in the December 1974 issue of _Galaxy_. Scanning the text of the
latter, I see no references to "frozen stars" (even though he mentions
Russian scientists), but there is a discussion of censorship, which is
mostly absent from the book version of the article. The reason for the
discussion is that, as Pournelle wrote in _Galaxy_: "As I write this,
California courts are trying to decide whether the police have the
power to seize copies of the film "Deep Throat" and my friend Earl
Kemp may be headed for jail due to violation of censorship laws. Thus
I am tempted to write about censorship. But since this is a science
column and not a political essay I don't suppose I'll be able to.
However, one should never underestimate the ingenuity of a
columnist..."
So, putting the available evidence together, I wouldn't be surprised
if someone had approached Pournelle between December 1974 and early
1978 and said: "Hey, Jerry, speaking of black holes, censorship and
obscenity laws, did you know that Russians don't use the term "black
hole" because..."