On 7/20/2016 8:13 AM, Arthur Lipscomb wrote:
> On 7/20/2016 6:09 AM, Obveeus wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/20/2016 12:17 AM, anim8rfsk wrote:
>>> In article <nmmju1$jn9$
1...@dont-email.me>, Obveeus <
Obv...@aol.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 7/19/2016 6:40 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>>> On 7/19/2016 6:18 PM, David wrote:
>>>>>>
http://variety.com/2016/film/news/jj-abrams-re-cast-anton-yelchin-character
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -star-trek-1201817719/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> J.J. Abrams Won¹t Re-Cast Anton Yelchin¹s Role in ŒStar Trek¹ Movies
>>>>>> by Dave McNary
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Producer J.J. Abrams has decided that Anton Yelchin¹s Pavel Chekov
>>>>>> character will not be re-cast for future ³Star Trek² movies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ³I would say there¹s no replacing him,² Abrams told the Toronto Sun.
>>>>>> ³There¹s no recasting. I can¹t possibly imagine that, and I think
>>>>>> Anton deserves better.²
>>>
>>> JJ, you're an idiot. He thinks he invented these characters.
>>
>> I don't think that is the case. I doubt he would have any problem
>> recasting Chekov if he was recasting the entire crew. His point is that
>> it wouldn't make sense to recast Chekov within this universe/iteration
>> of the characters.
>
> If they can recast Bruce Banner and Rhodey in the Marvel universe, they
> *can* recast Chekov in the Star Trek universe. We're already on our
> third cinematic Spider-Man
No, each one was a reboot. Which is why they keep telling us his
origin. We KNOW HIS BLOODY ORIGIN!