Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: NOMINATION: The Republican Party of the United States of America for Golden Killfile, Loony Maroon, George Pickett Memorial Trophy, and Busted Urinal
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
ent0loma
Jul 16, 2012, 1:06:57 AM7/16/12
to
On 15/07/2012 11:05 PM, murphy dusted off the old sock "Hydra-Blanket"
and wrote:
NaN> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.sf.tv,alt.usenet.kooks
NaN> paul (seamus) <no_offlin...@example.com> wrote:
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with OS/2, murphy? Suffering from reading comprehension problems as
well, murphy? Rhino wrote that post, murphy, not some "paul (seamus)".
And who is "paul (seamus)", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias.
NaN> > This line is specious frippery
Rhino did not write that, murphy, yet you attributed it to his email
anyway. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> errr.. how about the fact that IF you were capable of
NaN> such an operation it would be hilarious seeing your test posts.
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
television, murphy? Still suffering from reading comprehension problems,
murphy? And memory problems? You yourself quoted Rhino's User-Agent:
header proving that he is, in fact, capable of such an operation, in an
earlier post. Classic contradiction.
NaN> where are your test posts, paul?
Who is "paul", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> nope, no test posts there.
NaN> hmm.. none there either.
What do your URLs have to do with television, murphy? Classic illogic as
well, murphy. Just because someone hasn't made test posts doesn't mean
they aren't capable of posting. On the other hand, someone's actual
non-test, on-topic posts to a television newsgroup *do* mean that they
*are* capable of posting, and, unfortunately, your non-meaningful,
off-topic replies do mean that you are capable of trolling, murphy,
albeit not very successfully.
NaN> i say!.. lets do have a look again using one of your munges in
NaN> "from", yes?
What does your URL have to do with television, murphy?
NaN> oh my.. no test posts there either!
Classic illogic. Just because someone hasn't made test posts doesn't
mean they aren't capable of posting. On the other hand, someone's actual
non-test, on-topic posts to a television newsgroup *do* mean that they
*are* capable of posting, and, unfortunately, your non-meaningful,
off-topic replies do mean that you are capable of trolling, murphy,
albeit not very successfully.
NaN> you are indeed a disappointment, paul.
Who is "paul", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> especially for one so well steeped in the windows platform?
What does your URL have to do with television, murphy?
NaN> mmmm... very interesting. i may just wander around that place and
NaN> see if i can find a "paul" who can help you with your test posts ,
NaN> those ones that never propagated...heh
What does your presupposition, unsupported by any evidence, that Rhino
tried to make test posts that didn't propagate have to do with
television, murphy? Rhino made non-test posts that did propagate,
murphy. Rhino has, in fact, been making non-test posts that did
propagate for the past six years, long before you developed your recent
fixation with writing nonsensical followups to all of his posts, murphy.
NaN> give it over, loser.
Who is "loser", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> your "User-Agent" is just another manifestation of total lack of
NaN> cognition for others computer internet knowledge. period.
What does your non sequitur have to do with television, murphy?
NaN> now do tell why it is you are leaping to the tune of a kook in
NaN> [Tor] Phoenix?
What does your classic erroneous presupposition of a question of Rhino
have to do with television, murphy?
NaN> a poster of such sage years as yourself paul (Rhino) there is no
NaN> excuse to be taken in with such childish things, no?
Who is "paul (Rhino)", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias.
NaN> or is little paulie being again a very naughty boy looking for
NaN> some extra spanking??
Who is "little paulie", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias.
NaN> //laughs
What does your amusement have to do with television, murphy?
NaN> Hydra-Blanket - Usenet Agent Provocateur
NaN> [Systems Coordinator of that Murphy Cabal]
What do your increasingly-elaborate delusions have to do with
television, murphy?
NaN> Visit the Page we Occupy -
What do your URLs have to do with television, murphy?
NaN> And be sure to sign up and become a member of that
NaN> Murph...@aioe.news.helpdesk
What does your bogus email address have to do with television, murphy?
There is not currently a top-level domain ".helpdesk", murphy. Still
suffering from Internet how-to cluelessness, murphy?
NaN> Need to book est...@aioe.org
NaN> Call the office use...@aioe.org
What does your attempt to cause your own NSP's administrator to get
spammed with off-topic kooky foamage have to do with television, murphy?
You're rapidly running out of NSPs that will tolerate you, murphy, so
your continual badmouthing of AIOE's administrator, and now this attempt
to flood his inbox, are exceptionally unwise.
I don't see anything in your post with any apparent relationship to
television, murphy.
"violating one basic rule in continually posting to or creating "off
topic" messages is a violation of group's charters."
--murphy
How ironic.
"I had 'volunteered (years back) to support those who do endeavor
to provide free Free Usenet access, support those who offered
subscription based Free Usenet access, nothing more than
cooperation expected in return for what has been many
thousands of hours of work. I note most of those I joined with
are either deceased, severely disabled, or plain ole' MIA..
now it is my Time. ...
You just read my last. ...
For those who think they see me in future times I can only wish
you severe Tinnitus in your dreams. For those who know me
well (eMail, whatever) and see me, know I will be smiling also.
It is to you I say "adieu mein frenz and adios .. grazie' [hugs]
for all the Good Times! May you and yours always bear well
with all Life brings you".
/0ut"
--murphy
http://www.uffnet.com/kookkamp/goodbye.htm
And some people wonder why I call them Famous Last Words.
P.S. Your latest post also had a ludicrously long signature, murphy. The
generally accepted maximum is four lines, while yours is currently
closer to 80 lines. Still suffering from netiquette cluelessness, murphy?
and wrote:
NaN> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.sf.tv,alt.usenet.kooks
NaN> paul (seamus) <no_offlin...@example.com> wrote:
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with OS/2, murphy? Suffering from reading comprehension problems as
well, murphy? Rhino wrote that post, murphy, not some "paul (seamus)".
And who is "paul (seamus)", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias.
NaN> > This line is specious frippery
Rhino did not write that, murphy, yet you attributed it to his email
anyway. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> errr.. how about the fact that IF you were capable of
NaN> such an operation it would be hilarious seeing your test posts.
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
television, murphy? Still suffering from reading comprehension problems,
murphy? And memory problems? You yourself quoted Rhino's User-Agent:
header proving that he is, in fact, capable of such an operation, in an
earlier post. Classic contradiction.
NaN> where are your test posts, paul?
Who is "paul", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> nope, no test posts there.
NaN> hmm.. none there either.
What do your URLs have to do with television, murphy? Classic illogic as
well, murphy. Just because someone hasn't made test posts doesn't mean
they aren't capable of posting. On the other hand, someone's actual
non-test, on-topic posts to a television newsgroup *do* mean that they
*are* capable of posting, and, unfortunately, your non-meaningful,
off-topic replies do mean that you are capable of trolling, murphy,
albeit not very successfully.
NaN> i say!.. lets do have a look again using one of your munges in
NaN> "from", yes?
What does your URL have to do with television, murphy?
NaN> oh my.. no test posts there either!
Classic illogic. Just because someone hasn't made test posts doesn't
mean they aren't capable of posting. On the other hand, someone's actual
non-test, on-topic posts to a television newsgroup *do* mean that they
*are* capable of posting, and, unfortunately, your non-meaningful,
off-topic replies do mean that you are capable of trolling, murphy,
albeit not very successfully.
NaN> you are indeed a disappointment, paul.
Who is "paul", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> especially for one so well steeped in the windows platform?
What does your URL have to do with television, murphy?
NaN> mmmm... very interesting. i may just wander around that place and
NaN> see if i can find a "paul" who can help you with your test posts ,
NaN> those ones that never propagated...heh
What does your presupposition, unsupported by any evidence, that Rhino
tried to make test posts that didn't propagate have to do with
television, murphy? Rhino made non-test posts that did propagate,
murphy. Rhino has, in fact, been making non-test posts that did
propagate for the past six years, long before you developed your recent
fixation with writing nonsensical followups to all of his posts, murphy.
NaN> give it over, loser.
Who is "loser", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> your "User-Agent" is just another manifestation of total lack of
NaN> cognition for others computer internet knowledge. period.
What does your non sequitur have to do with television, murphy?
NaN> now do tell why it is you are leaping to the tune of a kook in
NaN> [Tor] Phoenix?
What does your classic erroneous presupposition of a question of Rhino
have to do with television, murphy?
NaN> a poster of such sage years as yourself paul (Rhino) there is no
NaN> excuse to be taken in with such childish things, no?
Who is "paul (Rhino)", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias.
NaN> or is little paulie being again a very naughty boy looking for
NaN> some extra spanking??
Who is "little paulie", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias.
NaN> //laughs
What does your amusement have to do with television, murphy?
NaN> Hydra-Blanket - Usenet Agent Provocateur
NaN> [Systems Coordinator of that Murphy Cabal]
What do your increasingly-elaborate delusions have to do with
television, murphy?
NaN> Visit the Page we Occupy -
What do your URLs have to do with television, murphy?
NaN> And be sure to sign up and become a member of that
NaN> Murph...@aioe.news.helpdesk
What does your bogus email address have to do with television, murphy?
There is not currently a top-level domain ".helpdesk", murphy. Still
suffering from Internet how-to cluelessness, murphy?
NaN> Need to book est...@aioe.org
NaN> Call the office use...@aioe.org
What does your attempt to cause your own NSP's administrator to get
spammed with off-topic kooky foamage have to do with television, murphy?
You're rapidly running out of NSPs that will tolerate you, murphy, so
your continual badmouthing of AIOE's administrator, and now this attempt
to flood his inbox, are exceptionally unwise.
I don't see anything in your post with any apparent relationship to
television, murphy.
"violating one basic rule in continually posting to or creating "off
topic" messages is a violation of group's charters."
--murphy
How ironic.
"I had 'volunteered (years back) to support those who do endeavor
to provide free Free Usenet access, support those who offered
subscription based Free Usenet access, nothing more than
cooperation expected in return for what has been many
thousands of hours of work. I note most of those I joined with
are either deceased, severely disabled, or plain ole' MIA..
now it is my Time. ...
You just read my last. ...
For those who think they see me in future times I can only wish
you severe Tinnitus in your dreams. For those who know me
well (eMail, whatever) and see me, know I will be smiling also.
It is to you I say "adieu mein frenz and adios .. grazie' [hugs]
for all the Good Times! May you and yours always bear well
with all Life brings you".
/0ut"
--murphy
http://www.uffnet.com/kookkamp/goodbye.htm
And some people wonder why I call them Famous Last Words.
P.S. Your latest post also had a ludicrously long signature, murphy. The
generally accepted maximum is four lines, while yours is currently
closer to 80 lines. Still suffering from netiquette cluelessness, murphy?
0 new messages