Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Be afraid!: Stargate Universe returns!

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Pete B

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 12:36:22 AM12/14/09
to

Smokie Darling (Annie)

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 12:30:57 PM12/14/09
to
On Dec 13, 10:36 pm, Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:
> http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/12/syfy-renews-stargate-universe-sanctuary-
> season-second-.html
>
> Eeek!

You didn't think they would? For SyFy, 2.2 mil live is pretty good
(and 2.6 DVR/7 days is even better).

Pete B

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 1:37:57 PM12/14/09
to
In article <e935dee1-85c0-4dfd-a191-8c938b99f766
@w19g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, Barnab...@yahoo.com says...

> On Dec 13, 10:36�pm, Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:
> > http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/12/syfy-renews-stargate-universe-sanctuary-
> > season-second-.html
> >
> > Eeek!
>
> You didn't think they would?

Yes, but one can hope.

> For SyFy, 2.2 mil live is pretty good
> (and 2.6 DVR/7 days is even better).

If course syfys boss says they can't make money of dvr

Smokie Darling (Annie)

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 2:05:56 PM12/14/09
to
On Dec 14, 11:37 am, Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:
> In article <e935dee1-85c0-4dfd-a191-8c938b99f766
> @w19g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, Barnabus1...@yahoo.com says...

>
> > On Dec 13, 10:36 pm, Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:
> > >http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/12/syfy-renews-stargate-universe-sanctuary-
> > > season-second-.html
>
> > > Eeek!
>
> > You didn't think they would?  
>
> Yes, but one can hope.

Nah, I've been enjoying it (yes, I *am* aware that I'm one of the few
that does in this group)

>
> > For SyFy, 2.2 mil live is pretty good
> > (and 2.6 DVR/7 days is even better).
>
> If course syfys boss says they can't make money of dvr

Presuming I interpreted this correctly.... All the nets consider Live
plus 7 (live viewing plus 7 days on DVR or online streaming) to be the
"advertiser rating" so they have 2.6 million viewers that advertisers
are paying for. That's why Neilsen tracks the plus 7 numbers.

Pete B

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 7:19:00 PM12/14/09
to
In article <bf597bbf-ae59-452c-8a73-
168594...@r24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Barnab...@yahoo.com
says...

> On Dec 14, 11:37�am, Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:
> > In article <e935dee1-85c0-4dfd-a191-8c938b99f766
> > @w19g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, Barnabus1...@yahoo.com says...
> >
> > > On Dec 13, 10:36 pm, Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:
> > > >http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/12/syfy-renews-stargate-universe-sanctuary-
> > > > season-second-.html
> >
> > > > Eeek!
> >
> > > You didn't think they would? �
> >
> > Yes, but one can hope.
>
> Nah, I've been enjoying it (yes, I *am* aware that I'm one of the few
> that does in this group)
>
> >
> > > For SyFy, 2.2 mil live is pretty good
> > > (and 2.6 DVR/7 days is even better).
> >
> > If course syfys boss says they can't make money of dvr
>
> Presuming I interpreted this correctly....

Want some capitals with that? ;)

> All the nets consider Live
> plus 7 (live viewing plus 7 days on DVR or online streaming) to be the
> "advertiser rating" so they have 2.6 million viewers that advertisers
> are paying for. That's why Neilsen tracks the plus 7 numbers.


I think that's what fans are wanking, either way Howe tells Forbes
"...we are the No. 1 DVRed network period and that's a challenge from a
monetization perspective"

Ie, DVR is worth shit - people just fast forward past the commercials
and everybody knows it (spin to the opposite not withstanding).


http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/01/syfy-battlestar-galactica-business-
entertainment-caprica.html

Mark Nobles

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 4:52:25 AM12/19/09
to
Annie <Barnab...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Nah, I've been enjoying it (yes, I *am* aware that I'm one of the few
> that does in this group)

I like it too. I like that space exploration is new and exciting to
these people, and that the main dangers they face are space itself, not
a bunch of bad guys.

The thing I like the least is the little dance that Eli and Chloe are
doing.

Pete B

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 12:15:37 PM12/19/09
to
In article <191220090352256634%cmn-n...@comcast.net>, cmn-
nos...@comcast.net says...

> Annie <Barnab...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Nah, I've been enjoying it (yes, I *am* aware that I'm one of the few
> > that does in this group)
>
> I like it too. I like that space exploration is new and exciting to
> these people,

What show have you been watching? Rush is the only one who is excited
about space exploration, the rest just sit around whining that they want
to go home (and some go clubbing via the stones)

> and that the main dangers they face are space itself, not
> a bunch of bad guys.

Give it (a lot of) time

>
> The thing I like the least is the little dance that Eli and Chloe are
> doing.

Not excited about that either.

Mark Nobles

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 2:53:33 PM12/19/09
to
Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:

> In article <191220090352256634%cmn-n...@comcast.net>, cmn-
> nos...@comcast.net says...
> > Annie <Barnab...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Nah, I've been enjoying it (yes, I *am* aware that I'm one of the few
> > > that does in this group)
> >
> > I like it too. I like that space exploration is new and exciting to
> > these people,
>
> What show have you been watching? Rush is the only one who is excited
> about space exploration, the rest just sit around whining that they want
> to go home (and some go clubbing via the stones)

True, all that, but when the ship dives into a star to drink deeply of
the hydrogen within, everybody drops what they're doing and goes up to
Ten-Forward to watch the light show out the big window.


>
> > and that the main dangers they face are space itself, not
> > a bunch of bad guys.
>
> Give it (a lot of) time

I've heard the rumors, but I'll sure hate their showing up.


>
> >
> > The thing I like the least is the little dance that Eli and Chloe are
> > doing.
>
> Not excited about that either.

It just dawned on me that the "Sam & Diane" or "Dave & Maddie" act they
are doing is the exact opposite of "Romeo & Juliet". Romeo and Juliet
declared their love for one another and then had to struggle to
overcome the obstacles keeping them apart. There is no obstacle for Eli
and Chloe to overcome except their own expectations. They are both
smart enough that they should be able to see what's going on and Chloe
at least ought to be bold enough to act.

But maybe she sees herself as an alpha female who is bound by convention
to belong to an alpha male, in this case Scott. But in this day and age,
she should be offended by the very suggestion that this convention
applies to her, or the one that makes her have to wait for him to make
the first move.

But now Eli moves up the hierarchy. If Rush is gone, Eli moves into his
spot as top genius that everyone turns to to solve every problem and
Scott is SOL.

TB

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 3:47:05 PM12/19/09
to
On Dec 19, 11:53 am, Mark Nobles <cmn-nos...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:
> > In article <191220090352256634%cmn-nos...@comcast.net>, cmn-
> > nos...@comcast.net says...

I suggest that Scott start dating TJ so that he and Young can tell
Emily that TJ isn't dating Young.

David V. Loewe, Jr

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 3:54:29 PM12/19/09
to
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:47:05 -0800 (PST), TB <tsbr...@dcn.davis.ca.us>
wrote:

I suggest you stop cross-posting to the humor groups.

I further suggest you stop making silly suggestions.
--
"You tell 'em I'M coming... and Hell's coming with me, you hear?!
Hell's coming with me!"
- Kurt Russell as Wyatt Earp in Tombstone

Jette Goldie

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 7:20:41 PM12/19/09
to


Like Tim's suggestion, that also ain't gonna happen.

--
Jette Goldie
jette....@gmail.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wolfette/
http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
http://wolfette.livejournal.com/
("reply to" is spamblocked - use the email addy in sig)

Pete B

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 12:14:47 AM12/20/09
to
In article <191220091353333179%cmn-n...@comcast.net>, cmn-
nos...@comcast.net says...

> Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <191220090352256634%cmn-n...@comcast.net>, cmn-
> > nos...@comcast.net says...
> > > Annie <Barnab...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Nah, I've been enjoying it (yes, I *am* aware that I'm one of the few
> > > > that does in this group)
> > >
> > > I like it too. I like that space exploration is new and exciting to
> > > these people,
> >
> > What show have you been watching? Rush is the only one who is excited
> > about space exploration, the rest just sit around whining that they want
> > to go home (and some go clubbing via the stones)
>
> True, all that, but when the ship dives into a star to drink deeply of
> the hydrogen within, everybody drops what they're doing and goes up to
> Ten-Forward to watch the light show out the big window.

So what you are saying is we need a better pilot and all will be fine?
;)


> > > and that the main dangers they face are space itself, not
> > > a bunch of bad guys.
> >
> > Give it (a lot of) time
>
> I've heard the rumors, but I'll sure hate their showing up.

I generally don't like a standard enemy, mostly because it hasn't really
been done well (with B5 the possibly exeception).

But i guess they focus will mostly be on the 'crew' of the Destiny and
not any external danger.

Though I am mildly curious about one future aspect i've been spoiled
about.

> But maybe she sees herself as an alpha female who is bound by convention
> to belong to an alpha male, in this case Scott. But in this day and age,
> she should be offended by the very suggestion that this convention
> applies to her, or the one that makes her have to wait for him to make
> the first move.
>
> But now Eli moves up the hierarchy. If Rush is gone, Eli moves into his
> spot as top genius that everyone turns to to solve every problem and
> Scott is SOL.

Heh, I thought she had just put in him the friend corner a long time
ago.

Though, given that food should be somewhat scarce, shouldn't he be
losing weight?

Dimensional Traveler

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 2:34:15 AM12/20/09
to
It takes a while to really lose a lot of visible weight on just short
rations.

--
"Dude. They've gone fractal."

spi...@freenet.co.uk

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 7:44:38 AM12/20/09
to
And so it was that in the sacred domain of alt.tv.stargate-sg1, Jette Goldie <jgold...@btinternet.com> uttered the following pearls of wisdom:

>> I suggest you stop cross-posting to the humor groups.
>>
>> I further suggest you stop making silly suggestions.
>
>
> Like Tim's suggestion, that also ain't gonna happen.
>
I suggest tim setup a website and start writing fan fiction.
Then he can take the plot in any direction that he wishes... And we can stop
hearing about it as I doubt anyone here would read them (unless they had a
morbid sense of curiosity).
--
| spi...@freenet.co.uk | Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
| Andrew Halliwell BSc | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
| in |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
| Computer Science | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |

Mark Nobles

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 2:14:26 PM12/20/09
to
In article <MPG.2597d134d...@news.usenetserver.com>, Pete B
<xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:

> In article <191220091353333179%cmn-n...@comcast.net>, cmn-
> nos...@comcast.net says...
> > Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <191220090352256634%cmn-n...@comcast.net>, cmn-
> > > nos...@comcast.net says...
> > > > Annie <Barnab...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Nah, I've been enjoying it (yes, I *am* aware that I'm one of the few
> > > > > that does in this group)
> > > >
> > > > I like it too. I like that space exploration is new and exciting to
> > > > these people,
> > >
> > > What show have you been watching? Rush is the only one who is excited
> > > about space exploration, the rest just sit around whining that they want
> > > to go home (and some go clubbing via the stones)
> >
> > True, all that, but when the ship dives into a star to drink deeply of
> > the hydrogen within, everybody drops what they're doing and goes up to
> > Ten-Forward to watch the light show out the big window.
>
> So what you are saying is we need a better pilot and all will be fine?
> ;)

No, I think I am saying the opposite - everyone trusts the autopilot
now. But mainly that they still have their sense of wonder and when
something spectacular is happening they look out the windows.

Compare to the Babylon 5 season 5 episode where the two maintenance men
are working and happen to look out the window to see a huge battle
going
on. After a quick glance, they go back to work and figure they'll learn
everything they need to know about the battle when they suddenly find
themselves trying to breath vacuum.


>
>
> > > > and that the main dangers they face are space itself, not
> > > > a bunch of bad guys.
> > >
> > > Give it (a lot of) time
> >
> > I've heard the rumors, but I'll sure hate their showing up.
>
> I generally don't like a standard enemy, mostly because it hasn't really
> been done well (with B5 the possibly exeception).

I thought the Klingons were a pretty good enemy most of the time. They
had an understandable goal other than just causing mayhem or thwarting
the heroes' plans. That's what make a good Big Bad, having a different
definition of good and believing that they are doing good by that
definition.

>
> But i guess they focus will mostly be on the 'crew' of the Destiny and
> not any external danger.
>
> Though I am mildly curious about one future aspect i've been spoiled
> about.
>
> > But maybe she sees herself as an alpha female who is bound by convention
> > to belong to an alpha male, in this case Scott. But in this day and age,
> > she should be offended by the very suggestion that this convention
> > applies to her, or the one that makes her have to wait for him to make
> > the first move.
> >
> > But now Eli moves up the hierarchy. If Rush is gone, Eli moves into his
> > spot as top genius that everyone turns to to solve every problem and
> > Scott is SOL.
>
> Heh, I thought she had just put in him the friend corner a long time
> ago.

Yeah, but that's a flexible category. They could be friends with
benefits.

erilar

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 5:52:18 PM12/20/09
to
In article <4b2dd373$0$1606$742e...@news.sonic.net>,
Dimensional Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:

> It takes a while to really lose a lot of visible weight on just short
> rations.

It's not as if he were also getting lots of exercise.

--
Erilar, biblioholic medievalist


http://www.chibardun.net/~erilarlo

Pete B

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 12:34:32 PM12/21/09
to
In article <201220091314269549%cmn-n...@comcast.net>, cmn-
nos...@comcast.net says...

> >
> > Heh, I thought she had just put in him the friend corner a long time
> > ago.
>
> Yeah, but that's a flexible category. They could be friends with
> benefits.
>

Wow, you do believe in miracles don't you :)

Mark Nobles

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 1:23:45 PM12/21/09
to
Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:

Yep, hopeless romantic.

Pete B

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 1:57:35 PM12/21/09
to
In article <drache-96A029....@news.eternal-september.org>,
dra...@chibardun.net.invalid says...

> In article <4b2dd373$0$1606$742e...@news.sonic.net>,
> Dimensional Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:
>
> > It takes a while to really lose a lot of visible weight on just short
> > rations.
>
> It's not as if he were also getting lots of exercise.

But he should be unable to have the same caloric intake on the ship, so
he should get lighter - assuming they are going to be "realistic" ;)

A Watcher

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 3:15:46 PM12/21/09
to

That sounds good in theory, but it doesn't work for people who have been
chronically overweight for long periods. If you have dieted off and on
several times your body becomes very efficient at utilizing input
calories. I know people who can cut way back on eating and still not
lose any weight. People in that situation have to go on a starvation
diet to lose weight.

Pete B

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 4:53:03 PM12/21/09
to
In article <hgol1k$t6g$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
stoc...@earthlink.net says...

or start eating at very regular times - its surprising how much it
matters to eat at the exact same time with 3-4 hour intervals every day.

Harold Groot

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 6:00:14 PM12/21/09
to
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:57:35 +0100, Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com>
wrote:

It will be a mystery - until someone checks his quarters and finds
these packages that say "Dharma Initiative" on them. <g>


Pete B

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 8:14:42 PM12/21/09
to

Chet Weaver

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 11:54:26 PM12/21/09
to

<spi...@freenet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:mqi107-...@librarian.sky.com...

> And so it was that in the sacred domain of alt.tv.stargate-sg1, Jette
> Goldie <jgold...@btinternet.com> uttered the following pearls of wisdom:
>>> I suggest you stop cross-posting to the humor groups.
>>>
>>> I further suggest you stop making silly suggestions.
>>
>>
>> Like Tim's suggestion, that also ain't gonna happen.
>>
> I suggest tim setup a website and start writing fan fiction.
> Then he can take the plot in any direction that he wishes... And we can
> stop
> hearing about it as I doubt anyone here would read them (unless they had a
> morbid sense of curiosity).
>
He could join fanfiction.net or something. I swear, it's like I've
subscribed to his Twitter feed, and it's all fix fics written 140 characters
at a time.

-- Chet Weaver


Nemo

unread,
Feb 10, 2010, 1:16:30 PM2/10/10
to

"TB" <tsbr...@dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
news:0681ac9a-99c6-41db...@h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

Captin Kink: "Scotty - you take the lift down to the engine room . . . "

Scotty: "But its awful heavy, Captin!!"

ISIRTA Start Wreck spoof.


0 new messages