Read the story "The Slave Princess", by Shabby Blue. It shows EXACTLY
what happened to Leia during her time in the palace.
There is too much evidence in the movie that hints at Jabba enslaving
Leia for sexual purposes--for although Hutts are hermaphrodites, they
assume gender roles. Jabba was male, but lacking sexual organs, he
got off on the pain and suffering in others; by making Leia a sex
slave, she would experience much of these--especially from sexual
abuse. And anyway, Jabba DOES have hands, a tongue, and a nice long
tail...so there.
Don't even try to argue. Jabba made Leia his sex slave.
they confirmed that in the EU. Jabba likes to watch.
--
Skuzz the Merciless
<Insert witty line here>
Yeah, it is true that Jabba intended to make Leia his sex slave, but he was
ultimately disappointed. He kept waiting for her to lay her eggs in the
bottom of the pond so that he could ejaculate his sperm over them.
Hah. Hah. Very cute. Listen to me: he was just being a jerk; one
does not need sexual cravings in order to please a woman; he might
have pleasured her, teased her, humiliated her, perhaps had OTHERS
rape her, but certainly not "had sex"--not in the usual sense of the
phrase anyway.
No, no, no, no! You're missing the point. The correct question
is -- what if Jabba had used viagra?
Hmmm. Jabba looks like one of the Rancor's testicles...
- Cryo
You think too much.
Or maybe not enough.
--
C'Pi
"I now inform you that
you are too far from reality."
-Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf
> AND, something new that I JUST noticed: when Leia's looking out the
> window of the Sail Barge and Jabba yanks her chain, look carefully at
> her chain. It's situated on the BACK of her neck. Jabba pulled the
> chain, she yelped, and somehow she went from over at least four feet
> away from him right up onto his throne and against him--and the chain
> is on the FRONT of her neck. Now there are two problems with this:
> one, obviously, the chain switched sides.
I'm just GUESSING ;) here, but I imagine that slave collars aren't
riveted to people's necks. OK, the leather ones may fit a bit snug
(another wild guess), but have you looked at metal ones? (I certainly
NEVER would have done this. Nope. Never.) *snicker*
Anyway, it was clear that when she was resisting Jabba later that there
is a reason the chain ended up in the front. She was holding onto the
chain while trying to tug-o-war with Jabba. They showed us this.
> Two, I think that one hard
> tug, regardless of Jabba's strength, would simply not be enough to
> make her go that whole distance.
Which brings up an important fact:
Leia wanted to struggle some, but then ultimately used her chain to kill
Jabba.
Now for a not so wild opinion:
She couldn't have strangled him using her chain if she hadn't come that
whole distance. It also helped to force the old slug to struggle a bit
trying to reel her in first, with the hopes that he'd be out of breathe
by the time she strangled him.
Whooops, I just "tried" to argue. Didn't I? What are you going to do
to me now? Don't for a minute think about turning me or anybody else
into Jabba's *SEX* slaves. Why? 'cause like Leia and her "magic"
chain, we now know how to escape. =P
Michael
n.p. das ich