On 2021-01-08 9:26 AM, Adam Warnock wrote:
> Y'know, pneumatics/hydralics would would make things simpler than using some supermaterial. And the point about info-dumping (especially with bad explanations) is duly noted. I wanted to know so that even if it never came up, I had a solid foundation to build details around.
While I'm entirely on board with the principles of "keep it simple" and
"don't over-explain what can better be left as a black box", you might
want to read about magnetorheological fluids. Ordinarily fluid, they
become much more viscous under magnetic fields. They might be useful in
providing some rigidity to the system that you're describing.
I was slightly irritated while overhearing an audio book that my partner
was listening to recently, in that the author kept referring to lights
as "LEDs". The book was set some 300 years in our future. Being
specific about the lighting technology implied that in 300 years,
despite tremendous advancements in other areas, we'd still be using
LEDs. Unless they intended to make a statement about the state of human
technology, the author would have been better off just using "lights" or
"lamps" or some such thing. The details of the lighting tech weren't
relevant to the story itself.
If your radiators were working by conduction or convection -- that is,
by transferring heat to another medium -- you'd want them to have as
much surface area as possible. If they're working strictly by
radiation to space, you want them to have as much unobstructed
line-of-sight exposure as possible. Radiation from one part of the radiator
that hits and is absorbed by another part of the radiator doesn't do
you any good.
Joel
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com