On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 17:04:27 -0600, George <
george...@gmail.com>
wrote:
During the recent kerfluffle, I identified, listed, curated, and
rented a /lot/ of movies with IMDb ratings below 6. Including below 5,
if the subject interested me.
Almost all of them were definitely better than watching paint dry,
something that cannot be said of a lot of biopics with much higher
IMDb ratings by Famous Directors.
How does someone who clearly knows how to make a very good movie make
a film about a plane landing in the Hudson River and make it so dull
that the scenes of the crash are uninteresting? How does someone who
clearly knows how to make a really good movie make one about of music
group that is so dull that he, himself, insists on ending it with a
nice, peppy dance number because he knows that, otherwise, the faces
of the audience going out will discourage anyone else from ever going
in?
Many of them were actually entertaining, at least if you paid
attention to the movie and not your inner critic.
A very few were actually quite good. But there have always been
low-cost films that were actually quite good. Just not a lot of them.
And, BTW, the really useful part of IMDb isn't the rating
(particularly if based on less than 100 votes, which is often the case
for obscure films), but rather the reviews. Not the one-line "10" and
"1" reviews; the multiline reviews that actually say something about
the film. As opposed to saying something (generally not very
complimentary) about the reviewer.