ele...@optonline.net <
evelynchim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with your basic assertion, and I don't think anyone is
> giving China a pass, but it has also been pointed out that the
> Chinese had their government forced upon them, while Floridians
> actually voted their guys in.
Yes and no. More than 10% of adult citizens in Florida are
permanently forbidden from voting due to felony convictions, and
many more wrongly think they're forbidden from voting. Also, lots
of Florida residents can't vote because they aren't US citizens.
Note that the 2000 presidential election depended on Florida, and that
the vote difference between Gore and Bush was more than a thousand
(!) times smaller than the number of Florida residents forbidden from
voting due to felony convictions.
Also, most of those convicts never got a trial, so there's no reason
to think they were guilty. Most accused people in the US take plea
bargains. It's the rational thing to do since the sentence you'll get
at trial is much higher than the sentence you'd get in a plea bargain,
and since you're almost certain to be convicted even if innocent
unless you can afford a good felony defense, which costs more than
a house.
Florida did restore the voting rights of felons in 2019, but only
those who had not only finished their sentence, but also paid off all
court costs, fines, and restitution, whether at the local, state, or
federal level. And it's all but impossible for any ex-convict to find
out whether they have any such debts. Since there's a severe criminal
penalty for voting, or even registering to vote, if you owe even one
cent to any government, and since lots of people have little knowledge
of the legal system, and may know that they "got in trouble," but
not know whether their charge was a tort, mental hold, infraction,
misdemeanor, or felony, or whether charges in other states, other
nations, or in the military count, or what the disposition of their
charge was, very few "justice-involved" people in Florida dare to
register to vote. Red flag gun laws, in which people can lose rights
due to malicious gossip with no criminal charges, further confuse the
picture, as does civil forfeiture, in which cops seize property on
the grounds that it's crime-related, again with no criminal charges.
China, Russia, North Korea, and all Communist and all Islamic
countries certainly have much worse justice systems. But the US is
still pretty bad in an absolute sense. Lots of Americans, including
Biden and I, are irate about Brittney Griner being sentenced to nine
years in prison in Russia for possessing a small amount of marijuana
oil, even though there's no doubt of her guilt. But some people in
the US are serving longer sentences for possessing less marijuana,
with less evidence of guilt, and Biden has the power to free them,
but doesn't.
Otto Warmbier was sentenced to 15 years in prison in North Korea for
allegedly attempting to steal a propaganda poster. But some people
are serving life sentences in the US for stealing similarly trivial
things, such as a slice of pizza or a pair of socks, often with less
evidence against them than there was in Warmbier's case.
Getting back to the Worldcon, SMOFs need to decide how, within the
existing rules, to make it impossible for unsuitable countries such
as China (hosting in 2023), Saudi Arabia (bidding for 2026), Iran,
Iraq, Afghanistan, or North Korea (no bids from any of them so far,
thankfully) to ever again host the Worldcon. (Until their governments
are reformed, of course.) Since the proposed rule change would have
to pass during two consecutive Worldcons, there's no more point in
voting on it in Chicago this year than in China next year, so we have
two years to decide.
One possibility is to define what is a rogue state for the purpose of
Worldcons. We'd have to be careful, since most such definitions are
inherently fuzzy. Even the US doesn't have absolute freedom of speech,
as Alex Jones just learned the hard way. (Though I have little doubt
that his secret paymasters will easily pay off the $49 million he owes,
and whatever the families of the other 25 Sandy Hook victims win in
their suits against him.)
Another possibility is to forbid residents of the bidding country from
voting on site selection, or perhaps just to require that at least a
third of non-residents vote for the site. (Note that China got very
few votes from non-Chinese people.)
Another approach is to just not worry about it. If Communists or
Islamists take over the Worldcon, they'll find they own nothing but a
few trademarks. The Worldcon and the Hugo award can be re-created by
the rest of us under new names.