: Just for fun (and after OD-ing on too many other codes), I've spent the
: last couple weeks or so coming up with the Faanish Code. (Inspired by
: the Geek Code). I'm afraid it's on a rather slow server at the moment,
: and it may not be very complete, but I welcome any and all input on it!
: Mostly, it's just for fun, so I hope you'll check it out...
: http://solutions.solon.com/~phantos/fencode
I took a quick glance at, which immediately reveals that I have reason to
emphatically suggest, first, you change the name from "Faan Code" to "Fan
Code." Faanishness is, in fact, one of the subcategories you need to add,
so people can rate themselves, and absolutely does not encompass the rest.
After that, there's a lot there to discuss and argue about, but the title
itself leaps out as a complete problem that needs immediate redress, in
my opinion.
--
-- Gary Farber gfa...@panix.com
Copyright 1997 Brooklyn, NY, USA
Just for fun (and after OD-ing on too many other codes), I've spent the
last couple weeks or so coming up with the Faanish Code. (Inspired by
the Geek Code). I'm afraid it's on a rather slow server at the moment,
and it may not be very complete, but I welcome any and all input on it!
Mostly, it's just for fun, so I hope you'll check it out...
http://solutions.solon.com/~phantos/fencode
Yours,
Dave Rust
--
================================================
Geek:
GCS/GL/CP d- s:+ a- C+/++ U P+ L W+++ N++ K- w-- O++ M+ PS++ PE- Y+ PGP-
t+ 5+++ X+ R+++ tv++ b DI++ D+ G e++ h- r- y++**>+**
Magick:
MWI/TA S-() W++() N+ PCE++ A(-) a C+ G QH+ 666- Y
Faanish:
FnGA/FI/FR/PH/LI/CM[*] d++:+ L+>+++ l++>+++ TV++ tv+++ M++ PRO a+* s:+>
O z++**>+** r- R-->--- C+++ sc+ mg++>++++ SM++* li++ F++
Furry:
FCWmt3mw/EHm3mw/CFm3mw A- C+>+++ D>+ H++ M+ P++ R++/--- T+++ W+>+++ Z++
Sm/p+++>+ RLCT>LW a c++m/o d+ e++ f++ h++ i++/+++ p** sm++>+
================================================
http://solutions.solon.com/~phantos
> I took a quick glance at, which immediately reveals that I have reason to
> emphatically suggest, first, you change the name from "Faan Code" to "Fan
> Code." Faanishness is, in fact, one of the subcategories you need to add,
> so people can rate themselves, and absolutely does not encompass the rest.
I considered that, but originally rejected it because of the extreme
amounts of detail that may be required initially. (I have, in fact,
planned on doing something like this in a later version when I have more
time). What would you suggest?
> After that, there's a lot there to discuss and argue about, but the title
> itself leaps out as a complete problem that needs immediate redress, in
> my opinion.
Fair enough... However, I'm not exactly sure why the title would be
inaccurate. Before I make the edit, could you please elaborate?
Thanks for the feedback Gary!
Yours,
Dave.