On 6/7/21 9:10 AM,
ele...@optonline.net wrote:
> <
https://www.npr.org/2021/06/06/1003231191/the-vaticans-space-
> observatory-wants-to-see-stars-and-faith-align>
I know he's sincere, but the two-magisteria approach is untenable. It
says that there are some subjects where you inquire, examine the
evidence, and weight the arguments, and other subjects where you
surrender your mind to an authority. It says you have to turn off your
judgment, but only on certain questions.
How do you decide when to operate by faith? Do you decide
scientifically, or by faith? If science and reason guide your decision,
there's no reason ever to regard anything as off-limits to critical
examination. But if faith determines when you're allowed to think, then
it can cut anything off from examination.
Worse yet, two different faiths can reach different conclusions, and
since both come from Ultimate Authority, there's no way to decide
between them except by arbitrarily picking one as more Ultimate than the
other. People have killed each other over such differences and still do.
Whoever survives must be favored by God.
You can't set aside an area and say, *this* is off-limits to reason, but
reason is allowed elsewhere. Once you start down that path, how do you stop?
--
Gary McGath
http://www.mcgath.com