The Queering of America's Future Men
tj
The Queering of America's Future Men by Obama & Jennings
The Way One Vike Sees It ^ | 12/08/09 | One Vike
Posted on 10 December 2009 01:49:25 by FredJake
We have all heard about the many nightmares associated with government
taking over the health-care industry, but are we really ready for the
actual consequences? Think about that for a moment and let the many
possibilities sink into the gray matter inside your skull. When all is
said and done there really are no limits. And please do not give me
any of this foolishness about the Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats
forcing amendments into the final bill that will disallow certain
procedures or conversely that there will be no limitations upon the
care given to Americans. I am not saying that there will be no
amendments, or that the liberals in control won't be forced to accept
some conditions they dislike to get the bill passed and signed into
law. No, what I am talking about is what will happen should this bill,
in whatever form, become the law of the land. After all, I have
learned through the years that whatever laws get passed by congress
eventually gets changed by unelected and unaccountable judges.
It is these many changes in the laws that have made this a much
different country then the one I was born into. When I was a child,
abortion was illegal, parents were considered the rulers of their
homes and their children while the teachers actually taught their
students to read books about Jack and Jill not Heather has two Mommies
or Daddies got a friend. Also, Dad was portrayed as a man who worked
hard and deserved to be respected and looked up to, not ridiculed like
Homer Simpson. Sadly, the world I live in now is much different, and I
have learned that I am in the minority when it comes to common sense.
When I think of this massive bill being debated in Congress my
thoughts automatically wander to the future with visions of
politically appointed judges deciding what these fools in Congress
actually meant when they voted for the takeover of 1/7 of the American
economy.
History tells us that eventually some activist lawyer will be in front
of some judge trying to convince him that the men who wrote this bill
really meant to say something that is not in it, regardless of the
language. So it will inevitably come down to a politically appointed
judge deciding what will be and what will not be covered by the
governments health care bill. Look around at the many laws we now live
under and you will see that many of the major laws have been forced
upon us by activists using the courts to enact law, the constitution,
the representative system, and the voters be damned. Or has everyone
been living in the closet for the last 50 years, because from my
vantage point I see a country manipulated by unaccountable activist
judges. And once we have Obama care, it will inevitably end up in
front of some hack judge at some level who will decide what is covered
and what is limited.
OK, now that I have your attention, I ask that you take a gander at
the 19 pictures posted with this article. These are pictures of men
who have had gender re-assignment procedures. That's right, they have
all had sex change operations. If they were standing in front of you
naked, you would think they were women, right down to the
removeadickfrome surgery. Republicans have attempted to get an
amendment added to the bill that would deny keep such operations from
being covered, just as they are attempting to keep abortions from
being covered. The language in their amendment has the following
section in it:
“None of the funds authorized or appropriated under this act (or an
amendment made by this Act) shall be used to cover any part or portion
of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of” any sex or
gender reassignment procedure, surgery related to such a sex change,
hormone therapy for a sex change or pre- and post-operation treatments
for a sex change."
As of the time I am writing this article I’m not sure if the amendment
has passed, but does it matter? Like I said, it will inevitably come
down to some judge at some level, maybe even the Supreme Court, who
will eventually decide the limits of health care. This is the same
Supreme Court, minus one or two judges or plus one or two, that gave
us Roe v. Wade on abortion, upheld campaign finance reform, mandated
school busing, ruled that carbon dioxide is poison, etc. etc. etc.
Knowing this, are you confident that your future health care will be
secure in the hands of such individuals? I'm not! Check out this
document where convicts appealed a lower court ruling in an attempt to
get their gender reassignment covered by the government. They failed,
but history shows us that individuals like those of Transadvocate will
never stop trying, and eventually they will find a judge who will
agree with them.
So let's look at what America will be like in 20 to 30 years after an
entire new generation of men have been raised in our education system.
If progressives continue to have their way, it will be an education
system that will have spent years brainwashing young men with reading
material and a curriculum forced upon them from the time they were 6
years old. Believe me, there has been more than enough evidence to
prove that Obama's Safe Schools Czar, Kevin Jennings, has a perverted
idea of how our boys should be raised. If you doubt me, just check out
this out about the GLSEN material being handed to your sons at some
schools across America. I caution you though, because what you will
see is very perverted and graphic, but your children have probably
already seen it. So what do you think 30 years of such schooling will
do to the minds of young men in America? The way I see it, if you are
smart you might want to raise your boys to be very aware of whom they
are dating. Again, I ask that you study the pictures I’m posting with
this story.
Take 30 years of homosexual activism in schools from kindergarten to
college, then add Obama's health care that some judge will rule has to
cover gender re-assignment procedures, and what will you have? Think
it won't happen? Think again, because all it will take is a judge or
even the Supreme Court to rule that the government has to cover the
surgery because it is not about elective cosmetic surgery, it is about
correcting a medical abnormality just like surgically repairing a
persons legs if they were born with deformed legs and feet, or someone
suffering from cancer. So the American taxpayers will eventually pay
for the $50,000 to $100,000 operation plus any ongoing medical needs
that may arise from such an operation, an operation that is for many
Americans morally wrong.
I call it the queering of American men by Obama and Jennings, and it
is happening right in front of us. Want to change it? We can, but it
will take a concerted effort to replace every politician who votes for
the bill, and any who refuses to stand in the way of it getting
passed. America is at a crossroads, and we can either fight and take
it back, or watch our sons and grandsons become some of the hundreds
of thousands who will be inspired to get gender re-assignment
procedures at the taxpayers expense because of the gender identity
disorder they suffer from, just like the men in the pictures.
archie dux
Gee, there are around 120,000,000 adult males in this country,
of which 100-500 a year choose to have sex-change surgery.
Drama queen much?
archie
Morton Davis
news:4173aa72-91f3-4447...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2404180/posts
You can't turn straight human being gay.
anonymous
Well, in those days, daddy had to hang out at rest stations and mommy
had to go away for the weekend so as not to draw the neighbour's
attention.
> Also, Dad was portrayed as a man who worked
> hard and deserved to be respected and looked up to, not ridiculed like
> Homer Simpson.
Well, in those days, daddies earned enough money to pay the pastor every
sunday in the collection plate and then feed his family. He also had a
pension and likihood of steady work until retirement. So what happened
10 to 15 years ago when homos wanted the right to marry. The church of
heterosxuals stood on their head and fought tooth and nail to prevent
homosexuals getting married. But the corporate, didn't stand by, they
slipped a few goals into the new family values, no steady work for the
husband, drag the wife out of the house to put her to work and leave her
screaming babies for some other women to look after while the mother
sobbed at work thinking about her babies. Where was God? Where was the
pastor during all these changes? Printing anti gay material in the
church basment unless it was the pastors day off then he was golfing.
> Sadly, the world I live in now is much different, and I
> have learned that I am in the minority when it comes to common sense.
Auh, no what happened was that while you were praying day in and day out
society gave women the right to vote, the right of abortion, the right
of divorce and the the right to an education and a right to be employed
on their terms, not just making sandwiches for the church tea or doing
the pastors dirty laundry. No, women became lawyers, judges,
politicans, engineers and changed the world.
> When I think of this massive bill being debated in Congress my
> thoughts automatically wander to the future with visions of
> politically appointed judges deciding what these fools in Congress
> actually meant when they voted for the takeover of 1/7 of the American
> economy.
>
If any judge can cause you to think beyond wishing less for others, then
they are in deed worthy of their judicial position.
> History tells us that eventually some activist lawyer will be in front
> of some judge trying to convince him that the men who wrote this bill
> really meant to say something that is not in it, regardless of the
> language. So it will inevitably come down to a politically appointed
> judge deciding what will be and what will not be covered by the
> governments health care bill. Look around at the many laws we now live
> under and you will see that many of the major laws have been forced
> upon us by activists using the courts to enact law, the constitution,
> the representative system, and the voters be damned.
Hey, good buddy, the collection plate money has been used historically
to fight legal challenges in the courst and there is no suggestion that
religous people don't go to court and win.
> Or has everyone
> been living in the closet for the last 50 years, because from my
> vantage point I see a country manipulated by unaccountable activist
> judges.
Sadly, you are not seeing much else you would give a hand full of good
examples that you see that you don't like. Like a good salesman you are
smart enough to hint at the inferiority of the other guys position
without giving examples.
> And once we have Obama care, it will inevitably end up in
> front of some hack judge at some level who will decide what is covered
> and what is limited.
>
If got and the church can set limits then why not leaders of a country.
> OK, now that I have your attention, I ask that you take a gander at
> the 19 pictures posted with this article. These are pictures of men
> who have had gender re-assignment procedures.
Who are you to say that someone can't have a corrective medical
procedure?
> That's right, they have
> all had sex change operations. If they were standing in front of you
> naked, you would think they were women, right down to the
> removeadickfrome surgery. Republicans have attempted to get an
> amendment added to the bill that would deny keep such operations from
> being covered, just as they are attempting to keep abortions from
> being covered. The language in their amendment has the following
> section in it:
>
> “None of the funds authorized or appropriated under this act (or an
> amendment made by this Act) shall be used to cover any part or portion
> of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of” any sex or
> gender reassignment procedure, surgery related to such a sex change,
> hormone therapy for a sex change or pre- and post-operation treatments
> for a sex change."
>
Again, the medical community is best to decide what is right for
patients.
> As of the time I am writing this article I’m not sure if the amendment
> has passed, but does it matter? Like I said, it will inevitably come
> down to some judge at some level, maybe even the Supreme Court, who
> will eventually decide the limits of health care. This is the same
> Supreme Court, minus one or two judges or plus one or two, that gave
> us Roe v. Wade on abortion,
Women make up half the world's population. They have been tired
throughout history having a drunken husband coming home and forcing
himself on her to keep her pregant and and home bound while he is out
drinking and chasing women who can have sex for a non-reproductive
purpose.
> upheld campaign finance reform, mandated
> school busing, ruled that carbon dioxide is poison, etc. etc. etc.
> Knowing this, are you confident that your future health care will be
> secure in the hands of such individuals? I'm not! Check out this
> document where convicts appealed a lower court ruling in an attempt to
> get their gender reassignment covered by the government. They failed,
> but history shows us that individuals like those of Transadvocate will
> never stop trying, and eventually they will find a judge who will
> agree with them.
>
> So let's look at what America will be like in 20 to 30 years after an
> entire new generation of men have been raised in our education system.
> If progressives continue to have their way, it will be an education
> system that will have spent years brainwashing young men with reading
> material and a curriculum forced upon them from the time they were 6
> years old.
And what is religion?
> Believe me, there has been more than enough evidence to
> prove that Obama's Safe Schools Czar, Kevin Jennings, has a perverted
> idea of how our boys should be raised. If you doubt me, just check out
> this out about the GLSEN material being handed to your sons at some
> schools across America. I caution you though, because what you will
> see is very perverted and graphic, but your children have probably
> already seen it.
If a boy of sex had access to a computer, particularly that of a
sibling, he can type in Google: "free porn vidoes" where he will see
heterosexual men putting their hardened penises in the mouths, anuses
and vaginas all for free and then squirt his love juice in the woman'
face and eyes while pulling the woman's hair or forcing the woman's neck
down onto his tool of love. And you wonder why women want the right of
abortions when there are heterosexual men like that?
> So what do you think 30 years of such schooling will
> do to the minds of young men in America? The way I see it, if you are
> smart you might want to raise your boys to be very aware of whom they
> are dating.
Homosexuals are created either genetically or environmentally by the age
of 6 and probably by the age of 4, so the dropping of the testicles is
way, way, to late to worry about who he is dating. Especially because
homosexuals can't be changed.
Again, I ask that you study the pictures I’m posting with
> this story.
>
Heterosexuals aren't interested in gender reassignment in the way you
are.
> Take 30 years of homosexual activism in schools from kindergarten to
> college, then add Obama's health care that some judge will rule has to
> cover gender re-assignment procedures, and what will you have? Think
> it won't happen? Think again, because all it will take is a judge or
> even the Supreme Court to rule that the government has to cover the
> surgery because it is not about elective cosmetic surgery, it is about
> correcting a medical abnormality just like surgically repairing a
> persons legs if they were born with deformed legs and feet, or someone
> suffering from cancer. So the American taxpayers will eventually pay
> for the $50,000 to $100,000 operation plus any ongoing medical needs
> that may arise from such an operation, an operation that is for many
> Americans morally wrong.
The people of most countries get to vote how they want their country to
be run.
>
> I call it the queering of American men by Obama and Jennings, and it
> is happening right in front of us. Want to change it? We can, but it
> will take a concerted effort to replace every politician who votes for
> the bill, and any who refuses to stand in the way of it getting
> passed.
So instead of spending your day reading the bible or preacing on the
internet, you can get out of the church and influence how your
neighbours vote.
> America is at a crossroads, and we can either fight and take
> it back, or watch our sons and grandsons become some of the hundreds
> of thousands who will be inspired to get gender re-assignment
> procedures at the taxpayers expense because of the gender identity
> disorder they suffer from, just like the men in the pictures.
If you believe what you have written, then God has a special place for
you.
anonymous
Some men were meant to stay in the closet for the benefit of society! !
! !
archie dux
I had not realized that the individual exists for
the benefit of society.
So, what are you doing to benefit society?
archie
Sulfate
<snip>
> When I was a child,
> abortion was illegal, parents were considered the rulers of their
> homes and their children while the teachers actually taught their
> students to read books about Jack and Jill not Heather has two Mommies
> or Daddies got a friend. Also, Dad was portrayed as a man who worked
> hard and deserved to be respected and looked up to, not ridiculed like
> Homer Simpson. Sadly, the world I live in now is much different, and I
> have learned that I am in the minority when it comes to common sense.
Uphill both ways, two movies and popcorn for a nickle, etc. There's
nothing like the rantings of an elderly redneck to remind you of how
uptight and silly American society was. (And still is, apparently.)
Lord Calvert
> > I call it the queering of American men by Obama and Jennings, and it
> > is happening right in front of us. Want to change it? We can, but it
> > will take a concerted effort to replace every politician who votes for
> > the bill, and any who refuses to stand in the way of it getting
> > passed. America is at a crossroads, and we can either fight and take
> > it back, or watch our sons and grandsons become some of the hundreds
> > of thousands who will be inspired to get gender re-assignment
> > procedures at the taxpayers expense because of the gender identity
> > disorder they suffer from, just like the men in the pictures.
>
> Gee, there are around 120,000,000 adult males in this country,
> of which 100-500 a year choose to have sex-change surgery.
>
> Drama queen much?
Not a drama queen. He's just opposed to capitalism. TJ wants big-
government to decide what we can do with our own money, just like it
is in that Republican paradise the Democratic People's Republic of
North Korea.
Scratch a fundie and you'll always find a commie underneath.
Rich Goranson
Amherst, NY, USA
aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1
EAC Department of Paranormal Phycology
"The big thing is to make this country, along with every other country
in the world with a few exceptions, quit discriminating against people
just because they're gay. You don't have to agree with it, but they
have a constitutional right to be gay. And that's what brings me into
it." - Sen. Barry Goldwater (R-AZ)
juanjo
Not to mention how he has conveniently forgotten a lot about the time
period he now idealizes. But often when you get older your memory
starts to go.
juanjo
> No, what I am talking about is what will happen should this bill,
> in whatever form, become the law of the land. After all, I have
> learned through the years that whatever laws get passed by congress
> eventually gets changed by unelected and unaccountable judges.
Apparently this fool flunked his civics course when he was in grade
school and again when he was in high school. If he had paid attention
he would know that the United States Constitution sets up an
independent judiciary which is unelected. The judiciary gets to rule
on the laws passed as being constitutional or not. They also
interpret the laws passed by the legislature. Of course as this fogy
points out if the court does not interpret things they was you like
then they are changing the law but if it goes your way then it is all
copacetic. So for some people, Roe v. Wade - bad court! Bush v Gore
- good court! For others it is the reverse.
>
> It is these many changes in the laws that have made this a much
> different country then the one I was born into. When I was a child,
> abortion was illegal, parents were considered the rulers of their
> homes and their children while the teachers actually taught their
> students to read books about Jack and Jill not Heather has two Mommies
> or Daddies got a friend. Also, Dad was portrayed as a man who worked
> hard and deserved to be respected and looked up to, not ridiculed like
> Homer Simpson. Sadly, the world I live in now is much different, and I
> have learned that I am in the minority when it comes to common sense.
I remember that different world as well. Black people had to drink
from separate water fountains and could not go into the Woolworths and
sit at the lunch counter. Jews were not allowed into "restricted"
businesses. 10 years earlier, we had locked up loyal United States
citizens in concentration camps because they were ethnically suspect.
Qualified people could be denied the right to work at a particular job
because of the gender, their race, their religion or their national
origin. People were restricted to certain neighborhoods when it came
to buying a house to live in. Fathers could and did beat their
children without fear of inference of the courts or police.Husbands
could rape their wives and beat them and no one would say anything
about it. People could be sent to jail or mental institutions because
they loved a person of the same sex. There was no workplace safety
law enforced in the country and companies felt free to discharge all
sorts of dangerous chemicals into lakes and rivers from which other
people drew their drinking water. For most people it was a 46 or 48
hour work week and many people did not have medical or dental
benefits. In many parts of the country there was rampart poverty and
horrible exploitation of the poor. Children as young as 12 might be
forced to work and to drop out of school in order to help support the
family.
People were routinely denied the right to vote or were incarcerated
for long periods of time without the ability to see an attorney. The
police could beat a suspect and no one thought anything about it
especially if the suspect was the wrong color. People were sent to
prison for life or even sentenced to death without having the benefit
of an attorney to represent them at trial.
But if you were a white Anglo-Saxon middle class protestant, it was
most likely a good time to live.
haiku jones
Well, sure...I mean when you say it like THAT...
Superb post. Really. Prolonged, sustained applause.
I've set out a dozen times to write the same kind of
thing, and have never come within a mile of nailing it the
way you did.
Haiku Jones