Re: Another Revenge Nomination

[Checkmate, DoW #1]

In article <mribod$8dp$1...@dont-email.me>, noe...@none.not says...


>
> On 8/25/2015 2:07 PM, Peter J Ross wrote:
>
> > [AUK added]
>
> Poetry group snecked.
>
> Yeah, because Burnore never honors 'revenge nominations' <splorf>
>
> Took him four days to tabulate three ballots. You must be very proud of
> your successor.
>
> Why don't you just leave AUK alone and go back to playing your cello and
> writing shitty poetry?
>
> Either that, or come back here and show Gary how it's done properly.

Petey has become another mission poster here, to prop up the now-defunct
Old Guard Regime. He'll tire of it quickly and slink on back to his
poetry group. The ko0k awards are no more, and it's all Perey's fault
for not choosing a better successor.

--
Checkmate, AUK DoW #1
Official AUK Award Giver-Outer
Copyright © 2015
all rights reserved

[Checkmate, DoW #1]

In article <slrnmtpm8v.7s...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
peadar...@gmx.com says...


>
> In alt.usenet.kooks on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 20:13:59 +0000 (UTC), Cujo
> DeSockpuppet wrote:
>
> > Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote in
> > news:slrnmtpflr.7s...@pjr.no-ip.org:
> >
> >> In alt.arts.poetry.comments on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:20:46 -0700,
> >> Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article <slrnmtpb3v.7s...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
> >>> peadar...@gmx.com says...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> In alt.arts.poetry.comments on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:24:01 +0000
> >>>> (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote in
> >>>> > news:slrnmtn6mq.4a...@pjr.no-ip.org:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >> In alt.arts.poetry.comments on Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:15:46 +0000
> >>>> >> (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>> Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote in
> >>>> >>> news:slrnmtn3mr.27...@pjr.no-ip.org:
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>> In alt.arts.poetry.comments on Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:13:47 +0000
> >>>> >>>> (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>>> Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote in
> >>>> >>>>> news:slrnmtmnro.27...@pjr.no-ip.org:
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> [AUK added]
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> In alt.arts.poetry.comments on Mon, 24 Aug 2015 08:30:55
> >>>> >>>>>> -0700 (PDT), Michael Pendragon wrote:
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>> On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 10:57:48 AM UTC-4,
> >>>> >>>>>>> Hieronymous707 wrote:
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> <...>
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>> 2. Dogshit is dogshit; gold is gold; and words are words.
> >>>> >>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>> Correct. And my placing a "Watch your step!" sign over the
> >>>> >>>>>>> dogshit doesn't impart one iota of meaning "to" it.
> >>>> >>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>> It does, however, render potential responses unnecessary,
> >>>> >>>>>>> thus terminating the troll (verb tense).
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> Why are you describing a noun as a "verb tense" (whatever you
> >>>> >>>>>> think that is), Creepster?
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> <...>
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>> 3. Dismissed means dismissed. Posting that you've dismissed
> >>>> >>>>>>>> something unread suggests its importance.
> >>>> >>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>> Not at all. It provides the troll (noun tense) with
> >>>> >>>>>>> evidence that his posts have effectually been killfiled.
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> How does one "effectually killfile" a poster by replying to
> >>>> >>>>>> all his posts, Creepster?
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> But of course you probably meant "effectively", not
> >>>> >>>>>> "effectually", which leads to two further questions.
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> 1. How does one "effectively killfile" a poster by replying
> >>>> >>>>>> to all his posts, Creepster?
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> 2. What is somebody who can't tell the difference between
> >>>> >>>>>> "effectually" and "effectively" doing in a writers'
> >>>> >>>>>> newsgroup, Creepster?
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>> 4. Calling someone a troll is no more euphemistic than
> >>>> >>>>>>>> calling someone a niggler. I self-identify as a niggler.
> >>>> >>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>> In internet parlance, it's much more than that. A "troll"
> >>>> >>>>>>> can destroy a usenet group by driving away potential members
> >>>> >>>>>>> who don't care to sift through 100 posts of childish
> >>>> >>>>>>> name-calling in order to find 1 post discussing a poem.
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> Are you so clueless that you don't know that you're
> >>>> >>>>>> describing yourself as a troll, Creepster? The two most
> >>>> >>>>>> recent poem-drafts posted here (my "Ode" and H H's
> >>>> >>>>>> "Intervention") are already well on the way to attracting
> >>>> >>>>>> "100 posts of childish name-calling" from you and your gang
> >>>> >>>>>> of award-winning kooks.
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>> A "niggler," otoh, is merely a harmless annoyance.
> >>>> >>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>> Not long ago this group was an intellectual wasteland where
> >>>> >>>>>>> every legitimate started by Will, George, and yourself was
> >>>> >>>>>>> immediately trolljacked.
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> The idea that Will Dreckery (KotM), George Dunce (KotM) or
> >>>> >>>>>> the wannabe troll to whom you're replying (Golden Killfile
> >>>> >>>>>> nominee) has ever started a "legitimate [whatever]" is
> >>>> >>>>>> evidence of your cluelessness, your dishonesty, or both.
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>> Today, we've got numerous ongoing threads that (mostly)
> >>>> >>>>>>> remain focused on their topics. That's progress.
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> Anybody who wants a good laugh at the expense of kooks and
> >>>> >>>>>> wannabe trolls who claim to be "poets" needs only to look at
> >>>> >>>>>> the posts that started those "numerous threads". But feel
> >>>> >>>>>> free, O Creepster, to explain what "Definition of Troll",
> >>>> >>>>>> "2015 update on the cats", "Jukebox Saturday Night" and
> >>>> >>>>>> "C.V.B.W.F. Inc. 7th Annual AIDS 5k (Walk or Run) show" have
> >>>> >>>>>> to do with the topic of the poetry newsgroup to which your
> >>>> >>>>>> gang posted them.
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> To summarise:
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> 1. Despite thinking that a noun is the same as a verb, you
> >>>> >>>>>> persist in posting in a writers' newsgroup, only to be
> >>>> >>>>>> ridiculed.
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> 2. Despite thinking that a part of speech is the same as a
> >>>> >>>>>> tense, you persist in posting in a writers' newsgroup, only
> >>>> >>>>>> to be ridiculed.
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> 3. You think that one can "effectually (or effectively)
> >>>> >>>>>> killfile" a poster by replying to all his posts.
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> 4. You have so little idea of what a troll is that you've
> >>>> >>>>>> accidentally described yourself and your kooky net.friends as
> >>>> >>>>>> trolls when trying to insult your betters.
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> 5. Your lits of legitimate thread-starters is really a lits
> >>>> >>>>>> of clueless wannabe trolls.
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> For these reasons I hereby nominate you, "Michael Pendragon"
> >>>> >>>>>> (better and more deservedly known as "Creepy Mike" or "the
> >>>> >>>>>> Creepster"), for Clueless Newbie of the Month (August 2015).
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> Any seconds?
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> Hel, yes. SECONDED with a marachino cherry on top, dammet.
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> <trollsnip>
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> I'd like to thank you for seconding the nomination, but I
> >>>> >>>> haven't read or replied to your post.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> k00ks1gn!
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> <trollsnip>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> What? I didn't read that, so you'd better post it again.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > <piggysnipperdoodle#34553895473>
> >>>> >
> >>>> > You were in my killfile so I couldn't read it from Google.
> >>>>
> >>>> I was expecting you to morph, so I adjusted my killfile, but then
> >>>> you didn't morph, so I had to adjust my killfile again. Please stop
> >>>> trying to evade my killfile!
> >>>
> >>> The Suckpuppet does a pretty good job of staying in mine, Peter.
> >>
> >> *Whooooooooooooooooooooooosh*.
> >>
> >> I don't remember that you were always so stupid. Have you recently
> >> sustained a head injury? If so, I'll use my influence to see if I can
> >> have you pardoned from the large number of Usenet Kook Awards that
> >> you've recently won.
> >
> > I believe there is precedent but it's only happened once.
>
> There are plenty of precedents for pardons. Andy Beckwith (remember
> him?) was pardoned, and then had his pardon rescinded. Mike Cranston
> was pardoned during the No-Wins affair. RLK was pardoned (IIRC) when
> it became clear that we (especially I) had made a mistake.
>
> I can't think of a precedent for a pardon in circumstances like
> Dreckmate's. What precedent are you thinking of?

It's really cute the way you try to sound like you, or your silly
awards, really matter to anyone. You're done, Peter... accept it and go
back to writing shitty poetry.

[Checkmate, DoW #1]

In article <mrqeg2$qkt$1...@reader1.panix.com>, gbur...@panix.com says...

>
> In alt.usenet.kooks Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic...@the.edge> wrote:
> > In article <slrnmtpm8v.7s...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
> > peadar...@gmx.com says...
> >
> >
> >>
> >> In alt.usenet.kooks on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 20:13:59 +0000 (UTC), Cujo
> >> DeSockpuppet wrote:
> >>
> >> > Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote in
> >> > news:slrnmtpflr.7s...@pjr.no-ip.org:
> >> >
> >> >> In alt.arts.poetry.comments on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:20:46 -0700,
> >> >> Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> In article <slrnmtpb3v.7s...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
> >> >>> peadar...@gmx.com says...
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> In alt.arts.poetry.comments on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:24:01 +0000
> >> >>>> (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
> >> >>>>

> s>> >>>> > Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote in

> You poor thing. It mattered until you went batshit. It matters to you more
> now.

It's mattered less and less every month. It mattered a lot more after I
criticized you for the way you were running them, and you went batshit.
Now they don't matter anymore, because they're gone. The 3 or 4 of you
still left can keep pretending there are ko0k awards, but your numbers
are directly proportional to their relevancy. The rest of us will laugh
out loud and mock you.

[%]

i won't