Re: NOMINATION: Yads Re: The Doctor The Widow and the Wardrobe : Aslan

[Sergeant Preston]

On Feb 15, 5:22 pm, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
<f...@databasix.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:25:44 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
> Doctor) wrote in <jhhbd7$1g...@gallifrey.nk.ca>:
>
>
>
>
>
> >In article <jhhb5n$1c...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
> >The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> >>In article <e22oj7ho669sp5vvp9mlas3j7so6nnf...@4ax.com>,
> >>Ignis Fatuus  <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote:
> >>>On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:25:22 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
> >>>(The Doctor) wrote:
>
> >>>>In article <9b87d313-db20-4819-9c2b-7cc48fa14...@b9g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>,
> >>>>The Demon of Mockery  <popesna...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>Hail Eris! On Feb 14, 7:19=A0am, The Idiot wrote:
> >>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
> >>>>>> >Hail Eris! On Feb 13, 8:39=3DA0pm, The Idiot wrote:
> >>>>>> >> Peter J Ross wrote:
> >>>>>> >> >In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:38:17 +0000 (UTC), The
> >>>>>> >> >Doctor wrote:
>
> >>>>>> >> >> Wilson is kooky.
>
> >>>>>> >> >I agree.
>
> >>>>>> >> >And if he replied to you as often as you reply to him, he'd deserve a
> >>>>>> >> >share in the awards and offices for which you've been nominated.
>
> >>>>>> >> We should nominate him for an AUK award.
>
> >>>>>> >No, "we" shouldn't, since you won't have any input on it -- not as a
> >>>>>> >nominator, not as a seconder, not as a voter. Not to say he won't get
> >>>>>> >nominated, but you, Yads, are an AUK floor show.
>
> >>>>>> >Snarky
>
> >>>>>> That's why you should be nominated for every award in AUK Frozen Ghost!
>
> >>>>>The post above, and the two before it, should clinch you for the
> >>>>>Bullis, Yads, due to your flagrant liberties with logic, and their
> >>>>>sheer dumbfuckery. However, this one, in particular, seems to me to
> >>>>>deserve special recognition. Hence, due to the complete absence of
> >>>>>meaning in your repeated contention that I deserve to be nominated for
> >>>>>"every" award in AUK -- because you're the floor show?!? WTF??? -- and
> >>>>>also due to your robust and valiant attempt to wrest it from the iron
> >>>>>grip of Scott Abraham in December 2008, I do hereby nominate you,
> >>>>>David Shariff "The Doctor" Yadallee, for the Kook of the Month,
> >>>>>February 2012, and ask for seconds.
>
> >>>>>Snarky
>
> >>>>I will go against IF and say you deserve to be nominated in all categories.
>
> >>>You're not going against Me. I won't let you! I Second your
> >>>nominations!!! Bring them On. Nominate away with Impunity. It is your
> >>>Right as a Citizen of Usenet.
>
> >>Then I nominate Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,
> >>snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,
> >>Mr. SmartyPAnts and PV for all the AUK awards that are
> >>available.
>
> >I forgot that PAndora should also be part of the list.
>
> REJECTED.  Revenge nominations are not accepted.
> --
> Fruity Neighborhood Rump Wrangler

Ur stupid Ferd !!!!
--
Your Pal,
Honest John

[The Doctor]

In article <e6b1a02a-4fdb-4c6d...@1g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>,
Sergeant Preston <Sgt.P...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Feb 15, 5:22=A0pm, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler

><f...@databasix.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:25:44 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
>> Doctor) wrote in <jhhbd7$1g...@gallifrey.nk.ca>:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >In article <jhhb5n$1c...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
>> >The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> >>In article <e22oj7ho669sp5vvp9mlas3j7so6nnf...@4ax.com>,

>> >>Ignis Fatuus =A0<Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote:
>> >>>On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:25:22 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>> >>>(The Doctor) wrote:
>>

>> >>>>In article <9b87d313-db20-4819-9c2b-7cc48fa14...@b9g2000pbo.googlegro=
>ups.com>,
>> >>>>The Demon of Mockery =A0<popesna...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> >>>>>Hail Eris! On Feb 14, 7:19=3DA0am, The Idiot wrote:
>> >>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>> >>>>>> >Hail Eris! On Feb 13, 8:39=3D3DA0pm, The Idiot wrote:
>> >>>>>> >> Peter J Ross wrote:

>> >>>>>> >> >In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:38:17 +0000 (UTC), =

>The
>> >>>>>> >> >Doctor wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>> >> >> Wilson is kooky.
>>
>> >>>>>> >> >I agree.
>>

>> >>>>>> >> >And if he replied to you as often as you reply to him, he'd de=
>serve a
>> >>>>>> >> >share in the awards and offices for which you've been nominate=

>d.
>>
>> >>>>>> >> We should nominate him for an AUK award.
>>

>> >>>>>> >No, "we" shouldn't, since you won't have any input on it -- not a=
>s a
>> >>>>>> >nominator, not as a seconder, not as a voter. Not to say he won't=

> get
>> >>>>>> >nominated, but you, Yads, are an AUK floor show.
>>
>> >>>>>> >Snarky
>>

>> >>>>>> That's why you should be nominated for every award in AUK Frozen G=

>host!
>>
>> >>>>>The post above, and the two before it, should clinch you for the
>> >>>>>Bullis, Yads, due to your flagrant liberties with logic, and their
>> >>>>>sheer dumbfuckery. However, this one, in particular, seems to me to
>> >>>>>deserve special recognition. Hence, due to the complete absence of

>> >>>>>meaning in your repeated contention that I deserve to be nominated f=
>or
>> >>>>>"every" award in AUK -- because you're the floor show?!? WTF??? -- a=
>nd
>> >>>>>also due to your robust and valiant attempt to wrest it from the iro=

>n
>> >>>>>grip of Scott Abraham in December 2008, I do hereby nominate you,
>> >>>>>David Shariff "The Doctor" Yadallee, for the Kook of the Month,
>> >>>>>February 2012, and ask for seconds.
>>
>> >>>>>Snarky
>>

>> >>>>I will go against IF and say you deserve to be nominated in all categ=

>ories.
>>
>> >>>You're not going against Me. I won't let you! I Second your
>> >>>nominations!!! Bring them On. Nominate away with Impunity. It is your
>> >>>Right as a Citizen of Usenet.
>>
>> >>Then I nominate Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,
>> >>snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,
>> >>Mr. SmartyPAnts and PV for all the AUK awards that are
>> >>available.
>>
>> >I forgot that PAndora should also be part of the list.
>>

>> REJECTED. =A0Revenge nominations are not accepted.

>> --
>> Fruity Neighborhood Rump Wrangler
>
>Ur stupid Ferd !!!!
>--
>Your Pal,
>Honest John

stupid and Assinine!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k
Birthdate : 29 Jan 1969 Croydon, Surrey, UK

[pandora]

You two poor sods. I guess I really hurt your feelings, eh?

:-)

[Fred Hall]

On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:39:07 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
Doctor) wrote in <jhjphb$2em$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>:

I see you are familiar with Bankrupt DisHonest John. Good call, Yads

--
"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan

"I'm more of a Usenet force than you'll ever imagine in your wildest dreams." - Nellie Hall

KotAGoR XXXXI
COOSN-075-07-81342
Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1
Old Gringo's Poopy Lits #1
Nellies invalid AUK Sociopath lits #10
@'s Lits of cyberterrorists and cyber bullies #1
eMutT lits o' hate #4
Lits Slut#10
Usenet Ruiner #3
Top Asshole On The Net #2
Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2.
Sweetness Seal Of Approval #2
Hammer of Thor - August 2005
Pierre Salinger HL&S - January 2012
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle,Trainer Rasta Khan March 2006

[%]

did you send emmett his money yet ,
i turned the responsibility over to you because you're so concerned

[The Doctor]

In article <CtudnR9Re4gN8aDS...@scnresearch.com>,

Who sucked on your boobs lately?

[The Doctor]

In article <jhjrhd$6ov$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,

I usually call Snarky and cohorts stupid and assinine.

>--
>"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan
>
>"I'm more of a Usenet force than you'll ever imagine in your wildest dreams." - Nellie Hall
>
>KotAGoR XXXXI
>COOSN-075-07-81342
>Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1
>Old Gringo's Poopy Lits #1
>Nellies invalid AUK Sociopath lits #10
>@'s Lits of cyberterrorists and cyber bullies #1
>eMutT lits o' hate #4
>Lits Slut#10
>Usenet Ruiner #3
>Top Asshole On The Net #2
>Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2.
>Sweetness Seal Of Approval #2
>Hammer of Thor - August 2005
>Pierre Salinger HL&S - January 2012
>Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle,Trainer Rasta Khan March 2006
>

[The Doctor]

In article <8sadnTpiZ9zE6KDS...@giganews.com>,

Maybe Fred Hall, % and or Ignus Fatuus can get together
and nominate and second Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,

snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,

Mr. SmartyPAnts , Pandora and PV for all AUK awards in a batch.

[pandora]

None of your beeswax, boyo. Get your own girl. Oh, I forgot, you can't.

[The Doctor]

In article <CtudnRhRe4gxL6DS...@scnresearch.com>,

I will get my own girl.

[The Demon of Mockery]

Hail Eris! On Feb 16, 2:36 pm, The Idiot wrote:

> % wrote:
> >Fred Hall wrote:

> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:39:07 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
> >>> Sergeant Preston wrote:
> >>>> On Feb 15, 5:22=A0pm, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:25:44 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
> >>>>>>> Ignis Fatuus wrote:

> >>>> Ur stupid Ferd !!!!
> >>>> --
> >>>> Your Pal,
> >>>> Honest John
>
> >>> stupid and Assinine!
>
> >> I see you are familiar with Bankrupt DisHonest John.  Good call, Yads
>
> >did you send emmett his money yet ,
> >i turned the responsibility over to you because you're so concerned
>
> Maybe Fred Hall, % and or Ignus Fatuus can get together
> and nominate and second  Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,
> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,
> Mr. SmartyPAnts , Pandora and PV for all AUK awards in a batch.

Oh, yeah. THAT'll happen. After all, as I've told you before is not
the case, award-winning k00ks (like Squiggles aka %, as you saw in the
"WINNERS!" thread last week) can nominate all the time, right?

Snarky

[Sergeant Preston]

On Feb 16, 4:36 pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> In article <8sadnTpiZ9zE6KDSnZ2dnUVZ_gidn...@giganews.com>,

>
>
>
>
>
> % <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Fred Hall wrote:
> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:39:07 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca

> >> (The Doctor) wrote in <jhjphb$2e...@gallifrey.nk.ca>:
>
> >>> In article
> >>> <e6b1a02a-4fdb-4c6d-af30-65bb0c7c8...@1g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>,

> The doctor

GOOD ONE !!

I see that you ain't lost your WIT !!

Keep-up the just fight for Truth, Justice, and The American Way !!!!
--
Your Friend,
Honest John

[PV]

The Doc feels reading for comprehension slows down his posting, so he just
scans, comments something badly spelled and usually not even relevent and
moves on


--
PV

"This sig left intentionally blank"

[pandora]

Yeah? In what century?

[PV]

In what country?

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.]

"pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message
news:DZOdnZzRuoeUZKDS...@scnresearch.com...

> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:15:41 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <CtudnRhRe4gxL6DS...@scnresearch.com>, pandora
>> <pan...@peak.org> wrote:

[trim]

>>>
>>>None of your beeswax, boyo. Get your own girl. Oh, I forgot, you
>>>can't.
>>
>> I will get my own girl.
>
> Yeah? In what century?

I wish I'd been born back in the caveman days. Knock a sexually desirable
woman on the head with a club, drag her off to the cave by her hair and
have my way with her. That's how things ought to be.

--
Sir Gregory

[The Doctor]

In article <b028c72d-7c9e-4b40...@ub4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
The Demon of Mockery <popes...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hail Eris! On Feb 16, 2:36=A0pm, The Idiot wrote:
>> % wrote:
>> >Fred Hall wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:39:07 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
>> >>> Sergeant Preston wrote:

>> >>>> On Feb 15, 5:22=3DA0pm, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler wrote:
>> >>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:25:44 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>>>> Ignis Fatuus wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:25:22 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Feb 14, 7:19=3D3DA0am, The Idiot wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Feb 13, 8:39=3D3D3DA0pm, The Idiot wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter J Ross wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:38:17 +0000

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (UTC), =3D The Doctor wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wilson is kooky.
>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree.
>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if he replied to you as often as you reply to him,

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> he'd de=3D serve a share in the awards and offices for
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which you've been nominate=3D d.

>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We should nominate him for an AUK award.
>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, "we" shouldn't, since you won't have any input on it --

>> >>>>>>>>>>>> not a=3D s a nominator, not as a seconder, not as a voter.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Not to say he won't=3D get nominated, but you, Yads, are an

>> >>>>>>>>>>>> AUK floor show.
>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Snarky
>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> That's why you should be nominated for every award in AUK

>> >>>>>>>>>>> Frozen G=3D host!

>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> The post above, and the two before it, should clinch you for
>> >>>>>>>>>> the Bullis, Yads, due to your flagrant liberties with logic,
>> >>>>>>>>>> and their sheer dumbfuckery. However, this one, in
>> >>>>>>>>>> particular, seems to me to deserve special recognition.
>> >>>>>>>>>> Hence, due to the complete absence of meaning in your

>> >>>>>>>>>> repeated contention that I deserve to be nominated f=3D or

>> >>>>>>>>>> "every" award in AUK -- because you're the floor show?!?

>> >>>>>>>>>> WTF??? -- a=3D nd also due to your robust and valiant attempt
>> >>>>>>>>>> to wrest it from the iro=3D n grip of Scott Abraham in Decembe=

>r
>> >>>>>>>>>> 2008, I do hereby nominate you, David Shariff "The Doctor"
>> >>>>>>>>>> Yadallee, for the Kook of the Month, February 2012, and ask
>> >>>>>>>>>> for seconds.
>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Snarky
>>
>> >>>>>>>>> I will go against IF and say you deserve to be nominated in

>> >>>>>>>>> all categ=3D ories.

>>
>> >>>>>>>> You're not going against Me. I won't let you! I Second your
>> >>>>>>>> nominations!!! Bring them On. Nominate away with Impunity. It
>> >>>>>>>> is your Right as a Citizen of Usenet.
>>
>> >>>>>>> Then I nominate Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,
>> >>>>>>> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,
>> >>>>>>> Mr. SmartyPAnts and PV for all the AUK awards that are
>> >>>>>>> available.
>>
>> >>>>>> I forgot that PAndora should also be part of the list.
>>

>> >>>>> REJECTED. =3DA0Revenge nominations are not accepted.

>>
>> >>>> Ur stupid Ferd !!!!
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Your Pal,
>> >>>> Honest John
>>
>> >>> stupid and Assinine!
>>

>> >> I see you are familiar with Bankrupt DisHonest John. =A0Good call, Yad=

>s
>>
>> >did you send emmett his money yet ,
>> >i turned the responsibility over to you because you're so concerned
>>
>> Maybe Fred Hall, % and or Ignus Fatuus can get together

>> and nominate and second =A0Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,

>> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,
>> Mr. SmartyPAnts , Pandora and PV for all AUK awards in a batch.
>
>Oh, yeah. THAT'll happen. After all, as I've told you before is not
>the case, award-winning k00ks (like Squiggles aka %, as you saw in the
>"WINNERS!" thread last week) can nominate all the time, right?
>
>Snarky

Note the word combination Frozen Ghost.

[The Doctor]

In article <2154b448-3193-4052...@m5g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,
Sergeant Preston <Sgt.P...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Feb 16, 4:36=A0pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> In article <8sadnTpiZ9zE6KDSnZ2dnUVZ_gidn...@giganews.com>,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> % <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >Fred Hall wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:39:07 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>> >> (The Doctor) wrote in <jhjphb$2e...@gallifrey.nk.ca>:
>>
>> >>> In article
>> >>> <e6b1a02a-4fdb-4c6d-af30-65bb0c7c8...@1g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>,

>> >>> Sergeant Preston =A0<Sgt.Pres...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> On Feb 15, 5:22=3DA0pm, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler

>> >>>> <f...@databasix.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:25:44 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>> >>>>> (The Doctor) wrote in <jhhbd7$1g...@gallifrey.nk.ca>:
>>
>> >>>>>> In article <jhhb5n$1c...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
>> >>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> >>>>>>> In article <e22oj7ho669sp5vvp9mlas3j7so6nnf...@4ax.com>,

>> >>>>>>> Ignis Fatuus =3DA0<Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:25:22 +0000 (UTC),
>> >>>>>>>> doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>>>>> In article

>> >>>>>>>>> <9b87d313-db20-4819-9c2b-7cc48fa14...@b9g2000pbo.googlegro=3D
>> >>>>>>>>> ups.com>, The Demon of Mockery =3DA0<popesna...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>>> wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Feb 14, 7:19=3D3DA0am, The Idiot wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Feb 13, 8:39=3D3D3DA0pm, The Idiot wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter J Ross wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:38:17 +0000

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (UTC), =3D The Doctor wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wilson is kooky.
>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree.
>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if he replied to you as often as you reply to him,

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> he'd de=3D serve a share in the awards and offices for
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which you've been nominate=3D d.

>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We should nominate him for an AUK award.
>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, "we" shouldn't, since you won't have any input on it --

>> >>>>>>>>>>>> not a=3D s a nominator, not as a seconder, not as a voter.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Not to say he won't=3D get nominated, but you, Yads, are an

>> >>>>>>>>>>>> AUK floor show.
>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Snarky
>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> That's why you should be nominated for every award in AUK

>> >>>>>>>>>>> Frozen G=3D host!

>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> The post above, and the two before it, should clinch you for
>> >>>>>>>>>> the Bullis, Yads, due to your flagrant liberties with logic,
>> >>>>>>>>>> and their sheer dumbfuckery. However, this one, in
>> >>>>>>>>>> particular, seems to me to deserve special recognition.
>> >>>>>>>>>> Hence, due to the complete absence of meaning in your

>> >>>>>>>>>> repeated contention that I deserve to be nominated f=3D or

>> >>>>>>>>>> "every" award in AUK -- because you're the floor show?!?

>> >>>>>>>>>> WTF??? -- a=3D nd also due to your robust and valiant attempt
>> >>>>>>>>>> to wrest it from the iro=3D n grip of Scott Abraham in Decembe=

>r
>> >>>>>>>>>> 2008, I do hereby nominate you, David Shariff "The Doctor"
>> >>>>>>>>>> Yadallee, for the Kook of the Month, February 2012, and ask
>> >>>>>>>>>> for seconds.
>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Snarky
>>
>> >>>>>>>>> I will go against IF and say you deserve to be nominated in

>> >>>>>>>>> all categ=3D ories.

>>
>> >>>>>>>> You're not going against Me. I won't let you! I Second your
>> >>>>>>>> nominations!!! Bring them On. Nominate away with Impunity. It
>> >>>>>>>> is your Right as a Citizen of Usenet.
>>
>> >>>>>>> Then I nominate Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,
>> >>>>>>> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,
>> >>>>>>> Mr. SmartyPAnts and PV for all the AUK awards that are
>> >>>>>>> available.
>>
>> >>>>>> I forgot that PAndora should also be part of the list.
>>

>> >>>>> REJECTED. =3DA0Revenge nominations are not accepted.

>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Fruity Neighborhood Rump Wrangler
>>
>> >>>> Ur stupid Ferd !!!!
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Your Pal,
>> >>>> Honest John
>>
>> >>> stupid and Assinine!
>>

>> >> I see you are familiar with Bankrupt DisHonest John. =A0Good call, Yad=

>s
>>
>> >did you send emmett his money yet ,
>> >i turned the responsibility over to you because you're so concerned
>>
>> Maybe Fred Hall, % and or Ignus Fatuus can get together

>> and nominate and second =A0Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,

>> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,
>> Mr. SmartyPAnts , Pandora and PV for all AUK awards in a batch.
>>
>> --
>> The doctor
>
>GOOD ONE !!
>
>I see that you ain't lost your WIT !!
>
>Keep-up the just fight for Truth, Justice, and The American Way !!!!
>--
>Your Friend,
>Honest John

Still newed a way to get the above nominated and duly seconded.

[The Doctor]

In article <qxm%q.1011$mT1...@newsfe09.iad>,

That depends who takes up the above nomination.

[The Doctor]

In article <DZOdnZzRuoeUZKDS...@scnresearch.com>,

21st.

[The Doctor]

In article <_is%q.1011$zD5...@newsfe12.iad>,

PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:

Most likely Canada.

[The Doctor]

In article <5dif20....@news.alt.net>,

Care to

nominate Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,
snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,

Mr. SmartyPAnts, PAndora and PV for all the AUK awards that are
available?

[The Demon of Mockery]

Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 7:02 am, The Idiot wrote:
> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

My dear colleague, Mr. Fred Hall, is as likely to nominate me for *a*
Kook Award (never mind multiple ones), as he is to abruptly announce
that he's become a Birther, and wants to see video footage of Obama
being born in Hawaii. As for Ignis, he's welcome to make the attempt,
but the burden of proof, in making nominations, is on the nominator.
Nominations made without proof are generally considered revenge/
flamewar nominations, thus they are ignored. IOW, Yads, I was being
_kind_. Your "Never Would (as it applies to myself, pandora, and PV,
at minimum)," "Never Could," and "Never Should" suggestions are
therefore flushed.

Snarky

[The Doctor]

In article <a3fab7be-f6d7-4332...@vd8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
The Demon of Mockery <popes...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 7:02=A0am, The Idiot wrote:
>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>> >Hail Eris! On Feb 16, 2:360pm, The Idiot wrote:
>> >> % wrote:
>> >> >Fred Hall wrote:
>> >> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:39:07 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
>> >> >>> Sergeant Preston wrote:

>> >> >>>> On Feb 15, 5:22=3D3DA0pm, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler wro=

>te:
>> >> >>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:25:44 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
>> >> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>> Ignis Fatuus wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:25:22 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Feb 14, 7:19=3D3D3DA0am, The Idiot wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Feb 13, 8:39=3D3D3D3DA0pm, The Idiot wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter J Ross wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:38:17 +0000

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (UTC), =3D3D The Doctor wrote:
>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wilson is kooky.
>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree.
>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if he replied to you as often as you reply to him,

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> he'd de=3D3D serve a share in the awards and offices fo=
>r
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which you've been nominate=3D3D d.

>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We should nominate him for an AUK award.
>>

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, "we" shouldn't, since you won't have any input on it =
>--
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> not a=3D3D s a nominator, not as a seconder, not as a vot=
>er.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Not to say he won't=3D3D get nominated, but you, Yads, ar=

>e an
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> AUK floor show.
>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Snarky
>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> That's why you should be nominated for every award in AUK

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Frozen G=3D3D host!
>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> The post above, and the two before it, should clinch you fo=
>r
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> the Bullis, Yads, due to your flagrant liberties with logic=

>,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> and their sheer dumbfuckery. However, this one, in
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> particular, seems to me to deserve special recognition.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hence, due to the complete absence of meaning in your

>> >> >>>>>>>>>> repeated contention that I deserve to be nominated f=3D3D o=

>r
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> "every" award in AUK -- because you're the floor show?!?

>> >> >>>>>>>>>> WTF??? -- a=3D3D nd also due to your robust and valiant att=
>empt
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> to wrest it from the iro=3D3D n grip of Scott Abraham in De=
>cembe=3D

>> >r
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> 2008, I do hereby nominate you, David Shariff "The Doctor"
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Yadallee, for the Kook of the Month, February 2012, and ask
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> for seconds.
>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Snarky
>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> I will go against IF and say you deserve to be nominated in

>> >> >>>>>>>>> all categ=3D3D ories.

>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> You're not going against Me. I won't let you! I Second your
>> >> >>>>>>>> nominations!!! Bring them On. Nominate away with Impunity. It
>> >> >>>>>>>> is your Right as a Citizen of Usenet.
>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Then I nominate Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,
>> >> >>>>>>> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,
>> >> >>>>>>> Mr. SmartyPAnts and PV for all the AUK awards that are
>> >> >>>>>>> available.
>>
>> >> >>>>>> I forgot that PAndora should also be part of the list.
>>

>> >> >>>>> REJECTED. =3D3DA0Revenge nominations are not accepted.

>>
>> >> >>>> Ur stupid Ferd !!!!
>> >> >>>> --
>> >> >>>> Your Pal,
>> >> >>>> Honest John
>>
>> >> >>> stupid and Assinine!
>>

>> >> >> I see you are familiar with Bankrupt DisHonest John. =3DA0Good call=
>, Yad=3D

>> >s
>>
>> >> >did you send emmett his money yet ,
>> >> >i turned the responsibility over to you because you're so concerned
>>
>> >> Maybe Fred Hall, % and or Ignus Fatuus can get together

>> >> and nominate and second =3DA0Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,

>> >> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,
>> >> Mr. SmartyPAnts , Pandora and PV for all AUK awards in a batch.
>>
>> >Oh, yeah. THAT'll happen. After all, as I've told you before is not
>> >the case, award-winning k00ks (like Squiggles aka %, as you saw in the
>> >"WINNERS!" thread last week) can nominate all the time, right?
>>
>> >Snarky
>>
>> Note the word combination Frozen Ghost.
>
>My dear colleague, Mr. Fred Hall, is as likely to nominate me for *a*
>Kook Award (never mind multiple ones), as he is to abruptly announce
>that he's become a Birther, and wants to see video footage of Obama
>being born in Hawaii. As for Ignis, he's welcome to make the attempt,
>but the burden of proof, in making nominations, is on the nominator.
>Nominations made without proof are generally considered revenge/
>flamewar nominations, thus they are ignored. IOW, Yads, I was being
>_kind_. Your "Never Would (as it applies to myself, pandora, and PV,
>at minimum)," "Never Could," and "Never Should" suggestions are
>therefore flushed.
>
>Snarky

As I said who is stopping someone else from making such a
batch nomination Troll Frozen Ghost?

[The Demon of Mockery]

On Feb 17, 8:57 am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> In article <a3fab7be-f6d7-4332-94b6-7d926ebb7...@vd8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,

Making one nom, or two, against one poster stick is often hard, like
gluing broken glass back together in the dark, unless said poster
helpfully provides mountains of supporting evidence; making a group
nom stick, against a disparate group of posters, though, is next-to-
impossible, even when they all provide the required evidence, and you
included several posters who've only provided evidence that they
hugely enjoy giving you verbal smackdowns. Until you can prove that
giving you said smackdowns, or at least enjoying the giving of them,
is actively k00ky, not to mention k00k award-worthy, your suggestion
is a kook's pipe dream. Not a unique one, either.

[Sergeant Preston]

On Feb 17, 8:51 am, " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <gregh...@home.fake>
wrote:
> "pandora" <pand...@peak.org> wrote in message

>
> news:DZOdnZzRuoeUZKDS...@scnresearch.com...> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:15:41 +0000, The Doctor wrote:

> >> In article <CtudnRhRe4gxL6DSnZ2dnUVZ_jqdn...@scnresearch.com>, pandora

> >> <pand...@peak.org> wrote:
>
> [trim]
>
>
>
> >>>None of your beeswax, boyo.  Get your own girl.  Oh, I forgot, you
> >>>can't.
>
> >> I will get my own girl.
>
> > Yeah?  In what century?
>
> I wish I'd been born back in the caveman days. Knock a sexually desirable
> woman on the head with a club, drag her off to the cave by her hair and
> have my way with her. That's how things ought to be.
>
> --
> Sir Gregory

Hell....it's the same now-a-days....just substitute hard liquer fer
the club !!

[The Demon of Mockery]

On Feb 17, 10:20 am, Sergeant Preston wrote:
> On Feb 17, 8:51 am, "  Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." wrote:
> > "pandora" wrote...

> > > On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:15:41 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
> > >> pandora wrote:
>
> > [trim]
>
> > >>>None of your beeswax, boyo.  Get your own girl.  Oh, I forgot, you
> > >>>can't.
>
> > >> I will get my own girl.
>
> > > Yeah?  In what century?
>
> > I wish I'd been born back in the caveman days. Knock a sexually desirable
> > woman on the head with a club, drag her off to the cave by her hair and
> > have my way with her. That's how things ought to be.
>
> > --
> > Sir Gregory
>
> Hell....it's the same now-a-days....just substitute hard liquer fer
> the club !!

Like your new friends, Yads? It's like the old days with Cuddles &
DBurns...Only, these guys are in the Galactic Killfile (GaK), forever
to be deprived of further attention from the FNVW (except when he's
bored), or, more importantly, future monthly ballots. Annual ballots
are another matter, since any past KOTM can win KOTY, regardless of
hir GaK status.

Snarky

[The Doctor]

In article <5f769e5b-1167-4564...@tj4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
The Demon of Mockery <popes...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Feb 17, 8:57=A0am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> In article <a3fab7be-f6d7-4332-94b6-7d926ebb7...@vd8g2000pbc.googlegroups=
>.com>,
>> The Demon of Mockery =A0<popesna...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 7:02=3DA0am, The Idiot wrote:
>> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>> >> >Hail Eris! On Feb 16, 2:360pm, The Idiot wrote:
>> >> >> % wrote:
>> >> >> >Fred Hall wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:39:07 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
>> >> >> >>> Sergeant Preston wrote:

>> >> >> >>>> On Feb 15, 5:22=3D3D3DA0pm, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangle=
>r wro=3D

>> >te:
>> >> >> >>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:25:44 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Ignis Fatuus wrote:

>> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:25:22 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote=

>:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Feb 14, 7:19=3D3D3D3DA0am, The Idiot wrote=

>:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Feb 13, 8:39=3D3D3D3D3DA0pm, The Idiot w=

>rote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter J Ross wrote:

>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:38:17 +00=
>00

>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (UTC), =3D3D3D The Doctor wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wilson is kooky.
>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree.
>>

>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if he replied to you as often as you reply to hi=
>m,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> he'd de=3D3D3D serve a share in the awards and offic=
>es fo=3D
>> >r
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which you've been nominate=3D3D3D d.

>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We should nominate him for an AUK award.
>>

>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, "we" shouldn't, since you won't have any input on =
>it =3D
>> >--
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> not a=3D3D3D s a nominator, not as a seconder, not as =
>a vot=3D
>> >er.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Not to say he won't=3D3D3D get nominated, but you, Yad=
>s, ar=3D

>> >e an
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> AUK floor show.
>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Snarky
>>

>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> That's why you should be nominated for every award in A=
>UK
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Frozen G=3D3D3D host!
>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> The post above, and the two before it, should clinch you=
> fo=3D
>> >r
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> the Bullis, Yads, due to your flagrant liberties with lo=
>gic=3D

>> >,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> and their sheer dumbfuckery. However, this one, in
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> particular, seems to me to deserve special recognition.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hence, due to the complete absence of meaning in your

>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> repeated contention that I deserve to be nominated f=3D3=
>D3D o=3D

>> >r
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> "every" award in AUK -- because you're the floor show?!?

>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> WTF??? -- a=3D3D3D nd also due to your robust and valian=
>t att=3D
>> >empt
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> to wrest it from the iro=3D3D3D n grip of Scott Abraham =
>in De=3D
>> >cembe=3D3D
>> >> >r
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> 2008, I do hereby nominate you, David Shariff "The Docto=
>r"
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Yadallee, for the Kook of the Month, February 2012, and =
>ask
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> for seconds.
>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Snarky
>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I will go against IF and say you deserve to be nominated =
>in
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> all categ=3D3D3D ories.
>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> You're not going against Me. I won't let you! I Second you=
>r
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> nominations!!! Bring them On. Nominate away with Impunity.=

> It
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> is your Right as a Citizen of Usenet.
>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Then I nominate Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,

>> >> >> >>>>>>> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shado=

>w,
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Mr. SmartyPAnts and PV for all the AUK awards that are
>> >> >> >>>>>>> available.
>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> I forgot that PAndora should also be part of the list.
>>

>> >> >> >>>>> REJECTED. =3D3D3DA0Revenge nominations are not accepted.

>>
>> >> >> >>>> Ur stupid Ferd !!!!
>> >> >> >>>> --
>> >> >> >>>> Your Pal,
>> >> >> >>>> Honest John
>>
>> >> >> >>> stupid and Assinine!
>>

>> >> >> >> I see you are familiar with Bankrupt DisHonest John. =3D3DA0Good=
> call=3D
>> >, Yad=3D3D

>> >> >s
>>
>> >> >> >did you send emmett his money yet ,

>> >> >> >i turned the responsibility over to you because you're so concerne=

>d
>>
>> >> >> Maybe Fred Hall, % and or Ignus Fatuus can get together

>> >> >> and nominate and second =3D3DA0Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Br=

>ead,
>> >> >> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,
>> >> >> Mr. SmartyPAnts , Pandora and PV for all AUK awards in a batch.
>>
>> >> >Oh, yeah. THAT'll happen. After all, as I've told you before is not

>> >> >the case, award-winning k00ks (like Squiggles aka %, as you saw in th=

Does not answer the question.

[The Doctor]

In article <f1ba71e4-5f41-49d7...@f2g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
Sergeant Preston <Sgt.P...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Feb 17, 8:51=A0am, " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <gregh...@home.fake>

>wrote:
>> "pandora" <pand...@peak.org> wrote in message
>>

>> news:DZOdnZzRuoeUZKDS...@scnresearch.com...> On Fri, 17 Feb =

>2012 03:15:41 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>> >> In article <CtudnRhRe4gxL6DSnZ2dnUVZ_jqdn...@scnresearch.com>, pandora
>> >> <pand...@peak.org> wrote:
>>
>> [trim]
>>
>>
>>

>> >>>None of your beeswax, boyo. =A0Get your own girl. =A0Oh, I forgot, you

>> >>>can't.
>>
>> >> I will get my own girl.
>>

>> > Yeah? =A0In what century?

>>
>> I wish I'd been born back in the caveman days. Knock a sexually desirable
>> woman on the head with a club, drag her off to the cave by her hair and
>> have my way with her. That's how things ought to be.
>>
>> --
>> Sir Gregory
>
>Hell....it's the same now-a-days....just substitute hard liquer fer
>the club !!
>--
>Your Friend,
>Honest John

You have to fight back massively!

[The Doctor]

In article <f97eede7-156c-4481...@9g2000pbd.googlegroups.com>,

The Demon of Mockery <popes...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Feb 17, 10:20=A0am, Sergeant Preston wrote:

>> On Feb 17, 8:51=A0am, " =A0Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." wrote:
>> > "pandora" wrote...
>> > > On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:15:41 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>> > >> pandora wrote:
>>
>> > [trim]
>>

>> > >>>None of your beeswax, boyo. =A0Get your own girl. =A0Oh, I forgot, y=

>ou
>> > >>>can't.
>>
>> > >> I will get my own girl.
>>

>> > > Yeah? =A0In what century?
>>
>> > I wish I'd been born back in the caveman days. Knock a sexually desirab=

>le
>> > woman on the head with a club, drag her off to the cave by her hair and
>> > have my way with her. That's how things ought to be.
>>
>> > --
>> > Sir Gregory
>>
>> Hell....it's the same now-a-days....just substitute hard liquer fer
>> the club !!
>
>Like your new friends, Yads? It's like the old days with Cuddles &
>DBurns...Only, these guys are in the Galactic Killfile (GaK), forever
>to be deprived of further attention from the FNVW (except when he's
>bored), or, more importantly, future monthly ballots. Annual ballots
>are another matter, since any past KOTM can win KOTY, regardless of
>hir GaK status.
>
>Snarky

SFlames Flames again.

[The Doctor]

In article <Xns9FFC70D...@208.90.168.18>, shiny <a@b.ç> wrote:
>doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) sez 17 Feb 2012:

>
>> In article <5dif20....@news.alt.net>,
>> Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greg...@home.fake> wrote:
>>>"pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message
>>>news:DZOdnZzRuoeUZKDS...@scnresearch.com...
>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:15:41 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <CtudnRhRe4gxL6DS...@scnresearch.com>,
>>>>> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>>[trim]
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>None of your beeswax, boyo. Get your own girl. Oh, I forgot, you
>>>>>>can't.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will get my own girl.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah? In what century?
>>>
>>>
>>>I wish I'd been born back in the caveman days. Knock a sexually
>>>desirable woman on the head with a club, drag her off to the cave by
>>>her hair and have my way with her. That's how things ought to be.
>>>
>>>--
>>>Sir Gregory
>>>
>>
>> Care to
>>
>> nominate Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,
>> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,
>> Mr. SmartyPAnts, PAndora and PV for all the AUK awards that are
>> available?
>>
>

>why?
>

Because that whole lot is inane.

>--
>@}`-,-- *with bells & motley and a tinfoil tiara*

[The Demon of Mockery]

Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 10:55 am, The Idiot wrote:
> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

> >On Feb 17, 8:57am, The Doctor wrote:
> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

Try to read for context, Yads. "What's stopping them?" Clue-
possession, not that you'd know anything about that.

Snarky

[pandora]

On what planet?

[The Demon of Mockery]

Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 11:05 am, shiny wrote:
> The Doctor sez 17 Feb 2012:

> > Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> >>"pandora" wrote...

> >>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:15:41 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
> >>>> pandora wrote:
> >>[trim]
>
> >>>>>None of your beeswax, boyo.  Get your own girl.  Oh, I forgot, you
> >>>>>can't.
>
> >>>> I will get my own girl.
>
> >>> Yeah?  In what century?
>
> >>I wish I'd been born back in the caveman days. Knock a sexually
> >>desirable woman on the head with a club, drag her off to the cave by
> >>her hair and have my way with her. That's how things ought to be.
>

> > Care to
>
> >  nominate Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,
> >  snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,
> >  Mr. SmartyPAnts, PAndora and PV for all the AUK awards that are
> >  available?
>

> why?

His butt hurts? Like, rilly bad.

Snarky

[The Doctor]

>i lurves snarky, and like pandora quite a bit. i assume yer experience is
>different.

>
>--
>@}`-,-- *with bells & motley and a tinfoil tiara*
>
>

You van be added next time.

[The Doctor]

In article <61de914f-7cac-4be2...@i10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
The Demon of Mockery <popes...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 10:55=A0am, The Idiot wrote:
>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>> >On Feb 17, 8:57am, The Doctor wrote:
>> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>> >> >Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 7:02am, The Idiot wrote:
>> >> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>> >> >> >Hail Eris! On Feb 16, 2:360pm, The Idiot wrote:
>> >> >> >> % wrote:
>> >> >> >> >Fred Hall wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:39:07 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>> Sergeant Preston wrote:

>> >> >> >> >>>> On Feb 15, 5:22=3D3D3D3DA0pm, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wr=
>angle=3D
>> >r wro=3D3D
>> >> >te:
>> >> >> >> >>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:25:44 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote=

>:
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Ignis Fatuus wrote:

>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:25:22 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wr=
>ote=3D

>> >:
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Feb 14, 7:19=3D3D3D3D3DA0am, The Idiot =
>wrote=3D

>> >:
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Feb 13, 8:39=3D3D3D3D3D3DA0pm, The Id=
>iot w=3D

>> >rote:
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter J Ross wrote:

>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:38:17 =
>+00=3D
>> >00

>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (UTC), =3D3D3D3D The Doctor wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wilson is kooky.
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree.
>>

>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if he replied to you as often as you reply to=
> hi=3D
>> >m,
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> he'd de=3D3D3D3D serve a share in the awards and =
>offic=3D
>> >es fo=3D3D
>> >> >r
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which you've been nominate=3D3D3D3D d.

>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We should nominate him for an AUK award.
>>

>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, "we" shouldn't, since you won't have any input =
>on =3D
>> >it =3D3D
>> >> >--
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> not a=3D3D3D3D s a nominator, not as a seconder, no=
>t as =3D
>> >a vot=3D3D
>> >> >er.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Not to say he won't=3D3D3D3D get nominated, but you=
>, Yad=3D
>> >s, ar=3D3D

>> >> >e an
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> AUK floor show.
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Snarky
>>

>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> That's why you should be nominated for every award i=
>n A=3D
>> >UK
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Frozen G=3D3D3D3D host!
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> The post above, and the two before it, should clinch =
>you=3D
>> > fo=3D3D
>> >> >r
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> the Bullis, Yads, due to your flagrant liberties with=
> lo=3D
>> >gic=3D3D

>> >> >,
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> and their sheer dumbfuckery. However, this one, in

>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> particular, seems to me to deserve special recognitio=

>n.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hence, due to the complete absence of meaning in your
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> repeated contention that I deserve to be nominated f=

>=3D3D3=3D
>> >D3D o=3D3D
>> >> >r
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> "every" award in AUK -- because you're the floor show=
>?!?
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> WTF??? -- a=3D3D3D3D nd also due to your robust and v=
>alian=3D
>> >t att=3D3D
>> >> >empt
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> to wrest it from the iro=3D3D3D3D n grip of Scott Abr=
>aham =3D
>> >in De=3D3D
>> >> >cembe=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >r
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> 2008, I do hereby nominate you, David Shariff "The Do=
>cto=3D
>> >r"
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Yadallee, for the Kook of the Month, February 2012, a=
>nd =3D
>> >ask
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> for seconds.
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Snarky
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I will go against IF and say you deserve to be nominat=
>ed =3D
>> >in
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> all categ=3D3D3D3D ories.
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> You're not going against Me. I won't let you! I Second =
>you=3D
>> >r
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> nominations!!! Bring them On. Nominate away with Impuni=
>ty.=3D

>> > It
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> is your Right as a Citizen of Usenet.
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Then I nominate Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,

>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Sh=
>ado=3D

>> >w,
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Mr. SmartyPAnts and PV for all the AUK awards that are
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> available.
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> I forgot that PAndora should also be part of the list.
>>

>> >> >> >> >>>>> REJECTED. =3D3D3D3DA0Revenge nominations are not accepted.

>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> Ur stupid Ferd !!!!
>> >> >> >> >>>> --
>> >> >> >> >>>> Your Pal,
>> >> >> >> >>>> Honest John
>>
>> >> >> >> >>> stupid and Assinine!
>>

>> >> >> >> >> I see you are familiar with Bankrupt DisHonest John. =3D3D3DA=
>0Good=3D
>> > call=3D3D
>> >> >, Yad=3D3D3D

>> >> >> >s
>>
>> >> >> >> >did you send emmett his money yet ,

>> >> >> >> >i turned the responsibility over to you because you're so conce=
>rne=3D

>> >d
>>
>> >> >> >> Maybe Fred Hall, % and or Ignus Fatuus can get together

>> >> >> >> and nominate and second =3D3D3DA0Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf =
>of Br=3D

>> >ead,
>> >> >> >> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,
>> >> >> >> Mr. SmartyPAnts , Pandora and PV for all AUK awards in a batch.
>>

>> >> >> >Oh, yeah. THAT'll happen. After all, as I've told you before is no=
>t
>> >> >> >the case, award-winning k00ks (like Squiggles aka %, as you saw in=
> th=3D

All you need is a mover and a seconder.

[The Doctor]

In article <ksidnSTblJftMKPS...@scnresearch.com>,

Earth.

[Fred Hall]

On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:49:32 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
Doctor) wrote in <jhmb0c$etj$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>:

Nominations and seconds by known net.kooks are rarely accepted.
Nominations that don't include a justification are never accepted.

--
"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan

"I'm more of a Usenet force than you'll ever imagine in your wildest dreams." - Nellie Hall

KotAGoR XXXXI
COOSN-075-07-81342
Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1
Old Gringo's Poopy Lits #1
Nellies invalid AUK Sociopath lits #10
@'s Lits of cyberterrorists and cyber bullies #1
eMutT lits o' hate #4
Lits Slut#10
Usenet Ruiner #3
Top Asshole On The Net #2
Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2.
Sweetness Seal Of Approval #2
Hammer of Thor - August 2005
Pierre Salinger HL&S - January 2012
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle,Trainer Rasta Khan March 2006

[The Doctor]

In article <jhmagu$qln$4...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,

Who said I would either nominate or second?

>--
>"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan
>
>"I'm more of a Usenet force than you'll ever imagine in your wildest dreams." - Nellie Hall
>
>KotAGoR XXXXI
>COOSN-075-07-81342
>Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1
>Old Gringo's Poopy Lits #1
>Nellies invalid AUK Sociopath lits #10
>@'s Lits of cyberterrorists and cyber bullies #1
>eMutT lits o' hate #4
>Lits Slut#10
>Usenet Ruiner #3
>Top Asshole On The Net #2
>Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2.
>Sweetness Seal Of Approval #2
>Hammer of Thor - August 2005
>Pierre Salinger HL&S - January 2012
>Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle,Trainer Rasta Khan March 2006
>

[The Demon of Mockery]

Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 11:49 am, The Idiot wrote:
> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

> >Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 10:55am, The Idiot wrote:
> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
> >> >On Feb 17, 8:57am, The Doctor wrote:
> >> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
> >> >> >Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 7:02am, The Idiot wrote:
> >> >> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
> >> >> >> >Hail Eris! On Feb 16, 2:360pm, The Idiot wrote:

<snip>

And if they have a clue, they won't so much as consider nominating a
bunch of posters for a bunch of awards, all at once, since one non-
k00k in the group makes a seconder unlikely, as it is difficult to get
votes for non-k0oks, on an AUK ballot, except for the Hammer of Thor,
the Salinger, or the Woodhouse.

Snarky

[Fred Hall]

On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:58:40 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
Doctor) wrote in <jhmbhg$f9o$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>:

Your pitiful begging for others to DYDW is noted and giggled at, Yads

[%]

hi i like dicks i'm fred the immigrant criminal hall

[The Demon of Mockery]

Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 11:58 am, The Idiot wrote:
> Fred Hall wrote:

> >On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:49:32 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
> >>The Demon of Mockery wrote:
> >>>Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 10:55=A0am, The Idiot wrote:
> >>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
> >>>> >On Feb 17, 8:57am, The Doctor wrote:
> >>>> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
> >>>> >> >Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 7:02am, The Idiot wrote:
> >>>> >> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
> >>>> >> >> >Hail Eris! On Feb 16, 2:360pm, The Idiot wrote:
> >>>> >> >> >> % wrote:
> >>>> >> >> >> >Fred Hall wrote:
> >>>> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:39:07 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
> >>>> >> >> >> >>> Sergeant Preston wrote:
> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> On Feb 15, 5:22=3D3D3D3DA0pm, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wr=
> >>>angle=3D
> >>>> >r wro=3D3D
> >>>> >> >te:
> >>>> >> >> >> >>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:25:44 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote=
> >>>:
> >>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:

<snip>

Whether you do it or not, a justification is _mandatory_. You don't
even have one -- all you've got is a sore bottom.

Snarky

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.]

"shiny" <a@b.ç> wrote in message
news:Xns9FFC70F...@208.90.168.18...
>" Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greg...@home.fake> sez 17 Feb 2012:

>
>> "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message
>> news:DZOdnZzRuoeUZKDS...@scnresearch.com...

>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:15:41 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <CtudnRhRe4gxL6DS...@scnresearch.com>,
>>>> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:

>> [trim]

>>
>>>>>
>>>>>None of your beeswax, boyo. Get your own girl. Oh, I forgot, you
>>>>>can't.
>>>>
>>>> I will get my own girl.
>>>
>>> Yeah? In what century?
>>
>>

>> I wish I'd been born back in the caveman days. Knock a sexually
>> desirable woman on the head with a club, drag her off to the cave by
>> her hair and have my way with her. That's how things ought to be.
>>
>

> that's a step up for you, nellie.


Are you suggesting I'm ghey? Perish the thought. I just act like it
sometimes so I can keep Checkmate aka Sabian on the hook. He's a back door
bandit.

--
Sir Gregory

[Stephen Wilson]

"pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message

news:ksidnSTblJftMKPS...@scnresearch.com...

>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who sucked on your boobs lately?
>>>>>
>>>>> None of your beeswax, boyo. Get your own girl. Oh, I forgot, you
>>>>> can't.
>>>>
>>>> I will get my own girl.
>>>
>>> Yeah? In what century?
>>
>> In what country?
>
> On what planet?

Yads thinks that heaven is another planet. Perhaps he thinks that he'll get
his girl when he goes to heaven...

[pandora]

Yeah, aren't they just TOO cute for words? Of course, they're right up
Yads' alley since all three have the exact same attitude toward women
(knock em out, cart em off, have their way with them). Women aren't
people, according to them, they're just pieces of meat to satisfy their
cravings.

[Fred Hall]

On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:25:51 -0700, "%" <per...@gmail.com> wrote in
<NsednbOsGehjKKPS...@giganews.com>:

>hi i like dicks

I'm sure your chick with a dick is aware of that fact

[Fred Hall]

On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:27:20 -0000, "Stephen Wilson"
<stephen.wils...@ntlworld.com> wrote in
<yHy%q.62773$kH7....@newsfe12.ams2>:

Sounds like Yads attends the same church as Obves

[%]

Fred Hall wrote:
>
>> hi i like dicks
>

[Charlotte L. Blackmer]

In article <jhk0e9$a9j$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:

>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:39:07 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>>> (The Doctor) wrote in <jhjphb$2em$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>:

>>>
>>>>> On Feb 15, 5:22=A0pm, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>>>> <f...@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:25:44 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>>>>>> (The Doctor) wrote in <jhhbd7$1g...@gallifrey.nk.ca>:
>>>>>>> In article <jhhb5n$1c...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
>>>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:

(I tried to edit/clean attribs here)

>>>>>>>> Then I nominate Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,

>>>>>>>> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,

>>>>>>>> Mr. SmartyPAnts and PV for all the AUK awards that are
>>>>>>>> available.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I forgot that PAndora should also be part of the list.
>>>>>>

>>>>>> REJECTED. =A0Revenge nominations are not accepted.
>>>>>> --

>Maybe Fred Hall, % and or Ignus Fatuus can get together

>and nominate and second Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,

>snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,
>Mr. SmartyPAnts , Pandora and PV for all AUK awards in a batch.

PleaCe add me to your LITS.

OKTHXBYE

Charlotte
--
Hammer of Thor, December 2007
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls (Emerita), soc.singles
--

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.]

"shiny" <a@b.ç> wrote in message

news:Xns9FFC9FD...@208.90.168.18...
>" Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greg...@home.fake> erudited on 17 Feb 2012:

[trim]

>> Are you suggesting I'm ghey? Perish the thought. I just act like it
>> sometimes so I can keep Checkmate aka Sabian on the hook. He's a back
>> door bandit.
>>
>

> don't matter which door he likes, as long as it's on a gurl.

I guess that leaves you out. LOL!

> and i was suggesting that cavemen had a more civi<<<<<SMACK>>>>>

Liar!

[pandora]

On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:50:13 +0000, The Doctor wrote:

> In article <ksidnSTblJftMKPS...@scnresearch.com>, pandora
> <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:08:10 -0700, PV wrote:
>>
>>> pandora wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:15:41 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <CtudnRhRe4gxL6DS...@scnresearch.com>,
>>>>> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:34:38 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <CtudnR9Re4gN8aDS...@scnresearch.com>,
>>>>>>> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:39:07 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article

>>>>>>>>> <e6b1a02a-4fdb-4c6d-
af30-65b...@1g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>,

Extremely doubtful.

[pandora]

Perhaps that's the case. Although he seems to think he can get a girl on
Planet Earth. I sincerely doubt that will ever happen.

[Fred Hall]

On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 21:23:19 +0000 (UTC), Peter J Ross
<p...@example.invalid> wrote in <slrnjjtha...@pjr.no-ip.org>:

>In rec.arts.poems on Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:51:24 -0600, Fred Hall

>In another post, Yads has justified the nomination by explaining that
>all of the above are inane.
>
>That's good enough justification for me, so I've made a nomination of
>all of the above for all of the awards, which I trust will appear on
>the ballot if seconded.

An unusual nomination, but then again these are unusual times. I'll
second.

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.]

"shiny" <a@b.ç> wrote in message

news:Xns9FFCA96...@208.90.168.18...
>" Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greg...@home.fake> sez 17 Feb 2012:

> are you a multiple personality disorder?
>
> not that it matters, as i'm not gonna fuck any of yer personalities.


Seems to me everything you touch is fucked. Bwahahhahahahahah.

--
Sir Gregory

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.]

"Peter J Ross" <p...@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:slrnjjtmf...@pjr.no-ip.org...
> In alt.usenet.kooks on Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:35:21 -0600, Fred Hall
> <fkh...@databasix.com> wrote:

[trim]

>> An unusual nomination, but then again these are unusual times. I'll
>> second.
>

> Thanks. I'll help with any extra paperwork.

Yah, I bet you're an expert at rolling nice firm joints. . .

[Ignis Fatuus]

I've noted on previous occasions that your greatest weakness is an
unpleasant tendency towards Premature Gloating. On this occasion
you've surpassed yourself with a long delayed resurgence that's been
devoted almost entirely to a pusillanimous, self-righteous, and almost
incoherent bickering session with a single individual that you've
persistently castigated for being incapable of reasoned discussion.

In Honour Of This Significant Self-Administered Abandonment Of
Prestige (duly recorded and available for scrutiny), I Hereby Award
You the Papier Mache Whip for Flogging A Dead Horse (awarded in
recognition of a lifetime devoted to the pursuit of lost causes). This
award entitles you to undertake the office of PumiceStoneDildo in
recognition of your effectiveness as a Universal Exfoliant.

[Ignis Fatuus]

As a former Baker I'm a dab hand at jointing nice firm rolls.

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.]

"Ignis Fatuus" <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote in message
news:2entj750cfkcjtgtr...@4ax.com..

>
> I've noted on previous occasions that your greatest weakness is an
> unpleasant tendency towards Premature Gloating. On this occasion
> you've surpassed yourself with a long delayed resurgence that's been
> devoted almost entirely to a pusillanimous, self-righteous, and almost
> incoherent bickering session with a single individual that you've
> persistently castigated for being incapable of reasoned discussion.
>
> In Honour Of This Significant Self-Administered Abandonment Of
> Prestige (duly recorded and available for scrutiny), I Hereby Award
> You the Papier Mache Whip for Flogging A Dead Horse (awarded in
> recognition of a lifetime devoted to the pursuit of lost causes). This
> award entitles you to undertake the office of PumiceStoneDildo in
> recognition of your effectiveness as a Universal Exfoliant.

Wow! I'm impressed. This guy puts Tavek to shame.

[The Doctor]

In article <bb5869c6-16a8-42da...@vd8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,

The Demon of Mockery <popes...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 11:49=A0am, The Idiot wrote:
>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>> >Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 10:55am, The Idiot wrote:
>> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>> >> >On Feb 17, 8:57am, The Doctor wrote:
>> >> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>> >> >> >Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 7:02am, The Idiot wrote:
>> >> >> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>> >> >> >> >Hail Eris! On Feb 16, 2:360pm, The Idiot wrote:

><snip>

>> >> >> >> >> Maybe Fred Hall, % and or Ignus Fatuus can get together

>> >> >> >> >> and nominate and second =3D3D3D3DA0Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a =
>Loaf =3D
>> >of Br=3D3D

>> >> >ead,
>> >> >> >> >> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,

>> >> >> >> >> Mr. SmartyPAnts , Pandora and PV for all AUK awards in a batc=
>h.
>>
>> >> >> >> >Oh, yeah. THAT'll happen. After all, as I've told you before is=
> no=3D
>> >t
>> >> >> >> >the case, award-winning k00ks (like Squiggles aka %, as you saw=
> in=3D
>> > th=3D3D

>> >> >e
>> >> >> >> >"WINNERS!" thread last week) can nominate all the time, right?
>>
>> >> >> >> >Snarky
>>
>> >> >> >> Note the word combination Frozen Ghost.
>>

>> >> >> >My dear colleague, Mr. Fred Hall, is as likely to nominate me for =
>*a*
>> >> >> >Kook Award (never mind multiple ones), as he is to abruptly announ=
>ce
>> >> >> >that he's become a Birther, and wants to see video footage of Obam=
>a
>> >> >> >being born in Hawaii. As for Ignis, he's welcome to make the attem=
>pt,
>> >> >> >but the burden of proof, in making nominations, is on the nominato=

>r.
>> >> >> >Nominations made without proof are generally considered revenge/

>> >> >> >flamewar nominations, thus they are ignored. IOW, Yads, I was bein=
>g
>> >> >> >_kind_. Your "Never Would (as it applies to myself, pandora, and P=

>V,
>> >> >> >at minimum)," "Never Could," and "Never Should" suggestions are
>> >> >> >therefore flushed.
>>
>> >> >> >Snarky
>>
>> >> >> As I said who is stopping someone else from making such a
>> >> >> batch nomination Troll Frozen Ghost?
>>
>> >> >Making one nom, or two, against one poster stick is often hard, like
>> >> >gluing broken glass back together in the dark, unless said poster
>> >> >helpfully provides mountains of supporting evidence; making a group
>> >> >nom stick, against a disparate group of posters, though, is next-to-
>> >> >impossible, even when they all provide the required evidence, and you
>> >> >included several posters who've only provided evidence that they
>> >> >hugely enjoy giving you verbal smackdowns. Until you can prove that
>> >> >giving you said smackdowns, or at least enjoying the giving of them,
>> >> >is actively k00ky, not to mention k00k award-worthy, your suggestion
>> >> >is a kook's pipe dream. Not a unique one, either.
>>
>> >> Does not answer the question.
>>
>> >Try to read for context, Yads. "What's stopping them?" Clue-
>> >possession, not that you'd know anything about that.
>>
>> >Snarky
>>
>> All you need is a mover and a seconder.
>

>And if they have a clue, they won't so much as consider nominating a
>bunch of posters for a bunch of awards, all at once, since one non-
>k00k in the group makes a seconder unlikely, as it is difficult to get
>votes for non-k0oks, on an AUK ballot, except for the Hammer of Thor,
>the Salinger, or the Woodhouse.
>
>Snarky

You are giving them clues.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k
Birthdate : 29 Jan 1969 Croydon, Surrey, UK

[The Doctor]

In article <jhmba5$13k$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
Fred Hall <fkh...@databasix.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:58:40 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
>Doctor) wrote in <jhmbhg$f9o$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>:
>
>>In article <jhmagu$qln$4...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,

>>Fred Hall <fkh...@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:49:32 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
>>>Doctor) wrote in <jhmb0c$etj$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>:
>>>

>>>>In article <61de914f-7cac-4be2...@i10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,

>>>>The Demon of Mockery <popes...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>>Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 10:55=A0am, The Idiot wrote:
>>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>>>>>> >On Feb 17, 8:57am, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>>>>>> >> >Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 7:02am, The Idiot wrote:
>>>>>> >> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>>>>>> >> >> >Hail Eris! On Feb 16, 2:360pm, The Idiot wrote:

>>>>>> >> >> >> % wrote:
>>>>>> >> >> >> >Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>>> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:39:07 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> >> >> >> >>> Sergeant Preston wrote:
>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> On Feb 15, 5:22=3D3D3D3DA0pm, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wr=
>>>>>angle=3D
>>>>>> >r wro=3D3D
>>>>>> >> >te:
>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:25:44 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote=
>>>>>:
>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:

>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Ignis Fatuus wrote:
>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:25:22 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wr=
>>>>>ote=3D
>>>>>> >:

>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Feb 14, 7:19=3D3D3D3D3DA0am, The Idiot =
>>>>>wrote=3D
>>>>>> >:

>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Then I nominate Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,
>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Sh=
>>>>>ado=3D
>>>>>> >w,
>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Mr. SmartyPAnts and PV for all the AUK awards that are
>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> available.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> I forgot that PAndora should also be part of the list.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> REJECTED. =3D3D3D3DA0Revenge nominations are not accepted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> Ur stupid Ferd !!!!
>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> --
>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> Your Pal,
>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> Honest John
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> >> >> >>> stupid and Assinine!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> >> >> >> I see you are familiar with Bankrupt DisHonest John. =3D3D3DA=
>>>>>0Good=3D
>>>>>> > call=3D3D
>>>>>> >> >, Yad=3D3D3D
>>>>>> >> >> >s
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> >> >> >did you send emmett his money yet ,
>>>>>> >> >> >> >i turned the responsibility over to you because you're so conce=
>>>>>rne=3D
>>>>>> >d
>>>>>>

>>>>>> >> >> >> Maybe Fred Hall, % and or Ignus Fatuus can get together

>>>>>> >> >> >> and nominate and second =3D3D3DA0Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf =
>>>>>of Br=3D

>>>>>> >ead,
>>>>>> >> >> >> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,

>>>>>> >> >> >> Mr. SmartyPAnts , Pandora and PV for all AUK awards in a batch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> >> >Oh, yeah. THAT'll happen. After all, as I've told you before is no=
>>>>>t
>>>>>> >> >> >the case, award-winning k00ks (like Squiggles aka %, as you saw in=
>>>>> th=3D

>>>>>> >e
>>>>>> >> >> >"WINNERS!" thread last week) can nominate all the time, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> >> >Snarky
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> >> Note the word combination Frozen Ghost.
>>>>>>

>>>>>> >> >My dear colleague, Mr. Fred Hall, is as likely to nominate me for *a*
>>>>>> >> >Kook Award (never mind multiple ones), as he is to abruptly announce
>>>>>> >> >that he's become a Birther, and wants to see video footage of Obama
>>>>>> >> >being born in Hawaii. As for Ignis, he's welcome to make the attempt,
>>>>>> >> >but the burden of proof, in making nominations, is on the nominator.

>>>>>> >> >Nominations made without proof are generally considered revenge/

>>>>>> >> >flamewar nominations, thus they are ignored. IOW, Yads, I was being
>>>>>> >> >_kind_. Your "Never Would (as it applies to myself, pandora, and PV,

>>>>>> >> >at minimum)," "Never Could," and "Never Should" suggestions are
>>>>>> >> >therefore flushed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> >Snarky
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> As I said who is stopping someone else from making such a
>>>>>> >> batch nomination Troll Frozen Ghost?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >Making one nom, or two, against one poster stick is often hard, like
>>>>>> >gluing broken glass back together in the dark, unless said poster
>>>>>> >helpfully provides mountains of supporting evidence; making a group
>>>>>> >nom stick, against a disparate group of posters, though, is next-to-
>>>>>> >impossible, even when they all provide the required evidence, and you
>>>>>> >included several posters who've only provided evidence that they
>>>>>> >hugely enjoy giving you verbal smackdowns. Until you can prove that
>>>>>> >giving you said smackdowns, or at least enjoying the giving of them,
>>>>>> >is actively k00ky, not to mention k00k award-worthy, your suggestion
>>>>>> >is a kook's pipe dream. Not a unique one, either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does not answer the question.
>>>>>
>>>>>Try to read for context, Yads. "What's stopping them?" Clue-
>>>>>possession, not that you'd know anything about that.
>>>>>
>>>>>Snarky
>>>>
>>>>All you need is a mover and a seconder.
>>>

>>>Nominations and seconds by known net.kooks are rarely accepted.
>>>Nominations that don't include a justification are never accepted.
>>>
>>
>>Who said I would either nominate or second?
>

>Your pitiful begging for others to DYDW is noted and giggled at, Yads

>
>
>>
>>>--
>>>"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan
>>>
>>>"I'm more of a Usenet force than you'll ever imagine in your wildest dreams." - Nellie Hall
>>>
>>>KotAGoR XXXXI
>>>COOSN-075-07-81342
>>>Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1
>>>Old Gringo's Poopy Lits #1
>>>Nellies invalid AUK Sociopath lits #10
>>>@'s Lits of cyberterrorists and cyber bullies #1
>>>eMutT lits o' hate #4
>>>Lits Slut#10
>>>Usenet Ruiner #3
>>>Top Asshole On The Net #2
>>>Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2.
>>>Sweetness Seal Of Approval #2
>>>Hammer of Thor - August 2005
>>>Pierre Salinger HL&S - January 2012
>>>Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle,Trainer Rasta Khan March 2006
>>>

You must be a born pessimist.

[The Doctor]

In article <NsednbOsGehjKKPS...@giganews.com>,

>hi i like dicks i'm fred the immigrant criminal hall

Sounds like something Frozen Ghost would say.

[The Doctor]

In article <81f9c20a-a83b-4795...@z7g2000pbr.googlegroups.com>,

The Demon of Mockery <popes...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 11:58=A0am, The Idiot wrote:
>> Fred Hall wrote:

>> >On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:49:32 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
>> >>The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>> >>>Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 10:55=3DA0am, The Idiot wrote:
>> >>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>> >>>> >On Feb 17, 8:57am, The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>> >>>> >> >Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 7:02am, The Idiot wrote:
>> >>>> >> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>> >>>> >> >> >Hail Eris! On Feb 16, 2:360pm, The Idiot wrote:
>> >>>> >> >> >> % wrote:
>> >>>> >> >> >> >Fred Hall wrote:

>> >>>> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:39:07 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wro=
>te:
>> >>>> >> >> >> >>> Sergeant Preston wrote:
>> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> On Feb 15, 5:22=3D3D3D3D3DA0pm, Friendly Neighborhood =
>Vote Wr=3D
>> >>>angle=3D3D
>> >>>> >r wro=3D3D3D
>> >>>> >> >te:
>> >>>> >> >> >> >>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:25:44 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor =
>wrote=3D
>> >>>:
>> >>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
><snip>
>> >>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Then I nominate Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of B=
>read,
>> >>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divi=
>ne Sh=3D
>> >>>ado=3D3D
>> >>>> >w,
>> >>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Mr. SmartyPAnts and PV for all the AUK awards that =
>are
>> >>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> available.
>>
>> >>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> I forgot that PAndora should also be part of the lis=
>t.
>>
>> >>>> >> >> >> >>>>> REJECTED. =3D3D3D3D3DA0Revenge nominations are not ac=

>cepted.
>>
>> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> Ur stupid Ferd !!!!
>> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> --
>> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> Your Pal,
>> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> Honest John
>>
>> >>>> >> >> >> >>> stupid and Assinine!
>>

>> >>>> >> >> >> >> I see you are familiar with Bankrupt DisHonest John. =3D=
>3D3D3DA=3D
>> >>>0Good=3D3D
>> >>>> > call=3D3D3D
>> >>>> >> >, Yad=3D3D3D3D

>> >>>> >> >> >s
>>
>> >>>> >> >> >> >did you send emmett his money yet ,

>> >>>> >> >> >> >i turned the responsibility over to you because you're so =
>conce=3D
>> >>>rne=3D3D

>> >>>> >d
>>
>> >>>> >> >> >> Maybe Fred Hall, % and or Ignus Fatuus can get together

>> >>>> >> >> >> and nominate and second =3D3D3D3DA0Snarky, Stephen Wilson, =
>a Loaf =3D
>> >>>of Br=3D3D
>> >>>> >ead,
>> >>>> >> >> >> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shado=
>w,
>> >>>> >> >> >> Mr. SmartyPAnts , Pandora and PV for all AUK awards in a ba=
>tch.
>>
>> >>>> >> >> >Oh, yeah. THAT'll happen. After all, as I've told you before =
>is no=3D
>> >>>t
>> >>>> >> >> >the case, award-winning k00ks (like Squiggles aka %, as you s=
>aw in=3D
>> >>> th=3D3D
>> >>>> >e
>> >>>> >> >> >"WINNERS!" thread last week) can nominate all the time, right=

>?
>>
>> >>>> >> >> >Snarky
>>
>> >>>> >> >> Note the word combination Frozen Ghost.
>>

>> >>>> >> >My dear colleague, Mr. Fred Hall, is as likely to nominate me fo=
>r *a*
>> >>>> >> >Kook Award (never mind multiple ones), as he is to abruptly anno=
>unce
>> >>>> >> >that he's become a Birther, and wants to see video footage of Ob=
>ama
>> >>>> >> >being born in Hawaii. As for Ignis, he's welcome to make the att=
>empt,
>> >>>> >> >but the burden of proof, in making nominations, is on the nomina=

>tor.
>> >>>> >> >Nominations made without proof are generally considered revenge/

>> >>>> >> >flamewar nominations, thus they are ignored. IOW, Yads, I was be=
>ing
>> >>>> >> >_kind_. Your "Never Would (as it applies to myself, pandora, and=

> PV,
>> >>>> >> >at minimum)," "Never Could," and "Never Should" suggestions are
>> >>>> >> >therefore flushed.
>>
>> >>>> >> >Snarky
>>
>> >>>> >> As I said who is stopping someone else from making such a
>> >>>> >> batch nomination Troll Frozen Ghost?
>>

>> >>>> >Making one nom, or two, against one poster stick is often hard, lik=

>e
>> >>>> >gluing broken glass back together in the dark, unless said poster
>> >>>> >helpfully provides mountains of supporting evidence; making a group

>> >>>> >nom stick, against a disparate group of posters, though, is next-to=
>-
>> >>>> >impossible, even when they all provide the required evidence, and y=

>ou
>> >>>> >included several posters who've only provided evidence that they
>> >>>> >hugely enjoy giving you verbal smackdowns. Until you can prove that

>> >>>> >giving you said smackdowns, or at least enjoying the giving of them=
>,
>> >>>> >is actively k00ky, not to mention k00k award-worthy, your suggestio=

>n
>> >>>> >is a kook's pipe dream. Not a unique one, either.
>>
>> >>>> Does not answer the question.
>>
>> >>>Try to read for context, Yads. "What's stopping them?" Clue-
>> >>>possession, not that you'd know anything about that.
>>
>> >>>Snarky
>>
>> >>All you need is a mover and a seconder.
>>

>> >Nominations and seconds by known net.kooks are rarely accepted.
>> >Nominations that don't include a justification are never accepted.
>>
>> Who said I would either nominate or second?
>

>Whether you do it or not, a justification is _mandatory_. You don't
>even have one -- all you've got is a sore bottom.
>
>Snarky

Justification? all your posts combined in all the groups you post
IS your justification.

[The Doctor]

In article <yHy%q.62773$kH7....@newsfe12.ams2>,

Stephen Wilson <stephen.wils...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>"pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message
>news:ksidnSTblJftMKPS...@scnresearch.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who sucked on your boobs lately?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> None of your beeswax, boyo. Get your own girl. Oh, I forgot, you
>>>>>> can't.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will get my own girl.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah? In what century?
>>>
>>> In what country?
>>
>> On what planet?
>
>Yads thinks that heaven is another planet. Perhaps he thinks that he'll get
>his girl when he goes to heaven...
>
>

We know you are from Hell SW.

[The Doctor]

In article <ksidnSfblJc4J6PS...@scnresearch.com>,
pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:45:37 -0800, The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>
>> On Feb 17, 10:20 am, Sergeant Preston wrote:
>>> On Feb 17, 8:51 am, "  Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." wrote:
>>> > "pandora" wrote...

>>> > > On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:15:41 +0000, The Doctor wrote:

>>> > >> pandora wrote:
>>>
>>> > [trim]

>>>
>>> > >>>None of your beeswax, boyo.  Get your own girl.  Oh, I forgot, you
>>> > >>>can't.
>>>
>>> > >> I will get my own girl.
>>>
>>> > > Yeah?  In what century?
>>>

>>> > I wish I'd been born back in the caveman days. Knock a sexually
>>> > desirable woman on the head with a club, drag her off to the cave by
>>> > her hair and have my way with her. That's how things ought to be.
>>>
>>> > --
>>> > Sir Gregory
>>>
>>> Hell....it's the same now-a-days....just substitute hard liquer fer the
>>> club !!
>>
>> Like your new friends, Yads? It's like the old days with Cuddles &
>> DBurns...Only, these guys are in the Galactic Killfile (GaK), forever to
>> be deprived of further attention from the FNVW (except when he's bored),
>> or, more importantly, future monthly ballots. Annual ballots are another
>> matter, since any past KOTM can win KOTY, regardless of hir GaK status.
>>
>> Snarky
>
>Yeah, aren't they just TOO cute for words? Of course, they're right up
>Yads' alley since all three have the exact same attitude toward women
>(knock em out, cart em off, have their way with them). Women aren't
>people, according to them, they're just pieces of meat to satisfy their
>cravings.

Ladies are people. You Pandie we are no certain about you humanity.

[The Doctor]

In article <jhmdfa$5je$3...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
Fred Hall <fkh...@databasix.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:25:51 -0700, "%" <per...@gmail.com> wrote in
><NsednbOsGehjKKPS...@giganews.com>:
>
>>hi i like dicks
>
>I'm sure your chick with a dick is aware of that fact
>

LOL!

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjjtfa...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>In alt.usenet.kooks on Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:24:24 +0000 (UTC), The
>Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>> In article <Xns9FFC70D...@208.90.168.18>, shiny <a@b.ç> wrote:
>>>doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) sez 17 Feb 2012:
>>>
>>>> In article <5dif20....@news.alt.net>,

>>>> Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greg...@home.fake> wrote:
>>>>>"pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message

>>>>>news:DZOdnZzRuoeUZKDS...@scnresearch.com...

>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:15:41 +0000, The Doctor wrote:

>>>>>>> In article <CtudnRhRe4gxL6DS...@scnresearch.com>,

>>>>>>> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>>>>[trim]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>None of your beeswax, boyo. Get your own girl. Oh, I forgot, you
>>>>>>>>can't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will get my own girl.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah? In what century?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I wish I'd been born back in the caveman days. Knock a sexually
>>>>>desirable woman on the head with a club, drag her off to the cave by
>>>>>her hair and have my way with her. That's how things ought to be.
>>>>>
>>>>>--
>>>>>Sir Gregory
>>>>>
>>>>

>>>> Care to
>>>>
>>>> nominate Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,
>>>> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,
>>>> Mr. SmartyPAnts, PAndora and PV for all the AUK awards that are
>>>> available?
>>>>
>>>
>>>why?
>>
>> Because that whole lot is inane.
>
>Yes, you're quite right.
>
>For being an inane whole lot, I hereby nominate Snarky, Stephen
>Wilson, a Loaf of Bread, snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor,
>His Divine Shadow, Mr. SmartyPAnts, PAndora and PV for all the AUK
>awards that are available.
>
>Seconds?
>
>--
>PJR :-)
>μέτρα φυλάσσεσθαι: καιρὸς δ' ἐπὶ πᾶσιν ἄριστος. (Hesiod)

You rock Peter.

[The Doctor]

In article <jhmdj4$5je$4...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
Fred Hall <fkh...@databasix.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:27:20 -0000, "Stephen Wilson"
><stephen.wils...@ntlworld.com> wrote in
><yHy%q.62773$kH7....@newsfe12.ams2>:

>
>>
>>"pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message

>>news:ksidnSTblJftMKPS...@scnresearch.com...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who sucked on your boobs lately?
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> None of your beeswax, boyo. Get your own girl. Oh, I forgot, you
>>>>>>> can't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will get my own girl.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah? In what century?
>>>>

>>>> In what country?
>>>
>>> On what planet?
>>
>>Yads thinks that heaven is another planet. Perhaps he thinks that he'll get
>>his girl when he goes to heaven...
>>
>

>Sounds like Yads attends the same church as Obves

0/10.

>--
>"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan
>
>"I'm more of a Usenet force than you'll ever imagine in your wildest dreams." - Nellie Hall
>
>KotAGoR XXXXI
>COOSN-075-07-81342
>Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1
>Old Gringo's Poopy Lits #1
>Nellies invalid AUK Sociopath lits #10
>@'s Lits of cyberterrorists and cyber bullies #1
>eMutT lits o' hate #4
>Lits Slut#10
>Usenet Ruiner #3
>Top Asshole On The Net #2
>Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2.
>Sweetness Seal Of Approval #2
>Hammer of Thor - August 2005
>Pierre Salinger HL&S - January 2012
>Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle,Trainer Rasta Khan March 2006
>

[The Doctor]

In article <ksidnSDblJeBXKPS...@scnresearch.com>,

That is where you come from.

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjjtha...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.poems on Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:51:24 -0600, Fred Hall

><fkh...@databasix.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:49:32 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
>> Doctor) wrote in <jhmb0c$etj$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>:
>>
>>>In article <61de914f-7cac-4be2...@i10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
>>>The Demon of Mockery <popes...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 10:55=A0am, The Idiot wrote:
>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>>>>> >On Feb 17, 8:57am, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>>>>> >> >Hail Eris! On Feb 17, 7:02am, The Idiot wrote:
>>>>> >> >> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>>>>> >> >> >Hail Eris! On Feb 16, 2:360pm, The Idiot wrote:
>>>>> >> >> >> % wrote:

>>>>> >> >> >> >Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:39:07 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> >> >> >> >>> Sergeant Preston wrote:
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> On Feb 15, 5:22=3D3D3D3DA0pm, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wr=
>>>>angle=3D
>>>>> >r wro=3D3D
>>>>> >> >te:
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:25:44 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote=
>>>>:
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Ignis Fatuus wrote:
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:25:22 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wr=
>>>>ote=3D

>>>>> >:
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Feb 14, 7:19=3D3D3D3D3DA0am, The Idiot =
>>>>wrote=3D

>>>>> >:
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Feb 13, 8:39=3D3D3D3D3D3DA0pm, The Id=
>>>>iot w=3D
>>>>> >rote:

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter J Ross wrote:
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:38:17 =
>>>>+00=3D
>>>>> >00

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (UTC), =3D3D3D3D The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wilson is kooky.
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree.
>>>>>

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if he replied to you as often as you reply to=
>>>> hi=3D
>>>>> >m,
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> he'd de=3D3D3D3D serve a share in the awards and =
>>>>offic=3D
>>>>> >es fo=3D3D
>>>>> >> >r

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which you've been nominate=3D3D3D3D d.

>>>>>
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We should nominate him for an AUK award.
>>>>>

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, "we" shouldn't, since you won't have any input =
>>>>on =3D
>>>>> >it =3D3D
>>>>> >> >--
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> not a=3D3D3D3D s a nominator, not as a seconder, no=
>>>>t as =3D
>>>>> >a vot=3D3D
>>>>> >> >er.
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Not to say he won't=3D3D3D3D get nominated, but you=
>>>>, Yad=3D
>>>>> >s, ar=3D3D

>>>>> >> >e an
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> AUK floor show.
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Snarky
>>>>>

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> That's why you should be nominated for every award i=
>>>>n A=3D
>>>>> >UK

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Frozen G=3D3D3D3D host!
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> The post above, and the two before it, should clinch =
>>>>you=3D
>>>>> > fo=3D3D
>>>>> >> >r
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> the Bullis, Yads, due to your flagrant liberties with=
>>>> lo=3D
>>>>> >gic=3D3D

>>>>> >> >,
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> and their sheer dumbfuckery. However, this one, in

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> particular, seems to me to deserve special recognitio=

>>>>n.
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hence, due to the complete absence of meaning in your
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> repeated contention that I deserve to be nominated f=

>>>>=3D3D3=3D
>>>>> >D3D o=3D3D
>>>>> >> >r

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> "every" award in AUK -- because you're the floor show=
>>>>?!?
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> WTF??? -- a=3D3D3D3D nd also due to your robust and v=
>>>>alian=3D
>>>>> >t att=3D3D
>>>>> >> >empt
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> to wrest it from the iro=3D3D3D3D n grip of Scott Abr=
>>>>aham =3D
>>>>> >in De=3D3D
>>>>> >> >cembe=3D3D3D
>>>>> >> >> >r

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> 2008, I do hereby nominate you, David Shariff "The Do=
>>>>cto=3D
>>>>> >r"
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Yadallee, for the Kook of the Month, February 2012, a=
>>>>nd =3D
>>>>> >ask
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> for seconds.
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Snarky
>>>>>

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I will go against IF and say you deserve to be nominat=
>>>>ed =3D
>>>>> >in

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> all categ=3D3D3D3D ories.
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> You're not going against Me. I won't let you! I Second =
>>>>you=3D
>>>>> >r
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> nominations!!! Bring them On. Nominate away with Impuni=
>>>>ty.=3D

>>>>> > It
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> is your Right as a Citizen of Usenet.
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Then I nominate Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Sh=
>>>>ado=3D

>>>>> >w,
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Mr. SmartyPAnts and PV for all the AUK awards that are
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> available.
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> I forgot that PAndora should also be part of the list.
>>>>>

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> REJECTED. =3D3D3D3DA0Revenge nominations are not accepted.
>>>>>

>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> Ur stupid Ferd !!!!
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> --
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> Your Pal,
>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> Honest John
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >> >> >>> stupid and Assinine!
>>>>>

>>>>> >> >> >> >> I see you are familiar with Bankrupt DisHonest John. =3D3D3DA=
>>>>0Good=3D
>>>>> > call=3D3D
>>>>> >> >, Yad=3D3D3D

>>>>> >> >> >s
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >> >> >did you send emmett his money yet ,

>>>>> >> >> >> >i turned the responsibility over to you because you're so conce=
>>>>rne=3D

>>>>> >d
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >> >> Maybe Fred Hall, % and or Ignus Fatuus can get together

>>>>> >> >> >> and nominate and second =3D3D3DA0Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf =
>>>>of Br=3D
>>>>> >ead,

>>>>> >> >> >> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,

>>>>> >> >> >> Mr. SmartyPAnts , Pandora and PV for all AUK awards in a batch.
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >> >Oh, yeah. THAT'll happen. After all, as I've told you before is no=
>>>>t
>>>>> >> >> >the case, award-winning k00ks (like Squiggles aka %, as you saw in=
>>>> th=3D
>>>>> >e
>>>>> >> >> >"WINNERS!" thread last week) can nominate all the time, right?

>>>>>
>>>>> >> >> >Snarky
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >> Note the word combination Frozen Ghost.
>>>>>

>>>>> >> >My dear colleague, Mr. Fred Hall, is as likely to nominate me for *a*
>>>>> >> >Kook Award (never mind multiple ones), as he is to abruptly announce
>>>>> >> >that he's become a Birther, and wants to see video footage of Obama
>>>>> >> >being born in Hawaii. As for Ignis, he's welcome to make the attempt,
>>>>> >> >but the burden of proof, in making nominations, is on the nominator.

>>>>> >> >Nominations made without proof are generally considered revenge/

>>>>> >> >flamewar nominations, thus they are ignored. IOW, Yads, I was being
>>>>> >> >_kind_. Your "Never Would (as it applies to myself, pandora, and PV,

>>>>> >> >at minimum)," "Never Could," and "Never Should" suggestions are
>>>>> >> >therefore flushed.
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >Snarky
>>>>>
>>>>> >> As I said who is stopping someone else from making such a
>>>>> >> batch nomination Troll Frozen Ghost?
>>>>>

>>>>> >Making one nom, or two, against one poster stick is often hard, like

>>>>> >gluing broken glass back together in the dark, unless said poster
>>>>> >helpfully provides mountains of supporting evidence; making a group

>>>>> >nom stick, against a disparate group of posters, though, is next-to-
>>>>> >impossible, even when they all provide the required evidence, and you

>>>>> >included several posters who've only provided evidence that they
>>>>> >hugely enjoy giving you verbal smackdowns. Until you can prove that

>>>>> >giving you said smackdowns, or at least enjoying the giving of them,
>>>>> >is actively k00ky, not to mention k00k award-worthy, your suggestion

>>>>> >is a kook's pipe dream. Not a unique one, either.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does not answer the question.
>>>>
>>>>Try to read for context, Yads. "What's stopping them?" Clue-
>>>>possession, not that you'd know anything about that.
>>>>
>>>>Snarky
>>>
>>>All you need is a mover and a seconder.
>>
>> Nominations and seconds by known net.kooks are rarely accepted.
>> Nominations that don't include a justification are never accepted.
>

>In another post, Yads has justified the nomination by explaining that
>all of the above are inane.
>
>That's good enough justification for me, so I've made a nomination of
>all of the above for all of the awards, which I trust will appear on
>the ballot if seconded.
>

>--
>PJR :-)
>μέτρα φυλάσσεσθαι: καιρὸς δ' ἐπὶ πᾶσιν ἄριστος. (Hesiod)

Maybe IF and/or SP will second.

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjjthe...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.poems on Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:50:13 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor

><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>> In article <ksidnSTblJftMKPS...@scnresearch.com>,
>> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>>On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:08:10 -0700, PV wrote:
>>>
>>>> pandora wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:15:41 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <CtudnRhRe4gxL6DS...@scnresearch.com>, pandora
>>>>>> <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:34:38 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <CtudnR9Re4gN8aDS...@scnresearch.com>,

>>>>>>>> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:39:07 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In article

>>>>>>>>>> <e6b1a02a-4fdb-4c6d...@1g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>,

>>>>>>>>>> Sergeant Preston <Sgt.P...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 15, 5:22=A0pm, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler

>>>>>>>>>>> <f...@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:25:44 +0000 (UTC),

>>>>>>>>>>>> doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in

>>>>>>>>>>>> <jhhbd7$1g...@gallifrey.nk.ca>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <jhhb5n$1c...@gallifrey.nk.ca>, The Doctor
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <e22oj7ho669sp5vvp9mlas3j7so6nnf...@4ax.com>, Ignis

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fatuus =A0<Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:25:22 +0000 (UTC),

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <9b87d313-db20-4819-9c2b-7cc48fa14...@b9g2000pbo.googlegro=

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ups.com>, The Demon of Mockery =A0<popesna...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Feb 14, 7:19=3DA0am, The Idiot wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Feb 13, 8:39=3D3DA0pm, The Idiot wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter J Ross wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:38:17 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (UTC), =

>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wilson is kooky.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if he replied to you as often as you reply to him,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he'd de=

>>>>>>>>>>> serve a

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> share in the awards and offices for which you've been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nominate=

>>>>>>>>>>> d.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should nominate him for an AUK award.
>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, "we" shouldn't, since you won't have any input on it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- not a=

>>>>>>>>>>> s a

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nominator, not as a seconder, not as a voter. Not to say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he won't=
>>>>>>>>>>> get

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nominated, but you, Yads, are an AUK floor show.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snarky
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's why you should be nominated for every award in AUK
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Frozen G=
>>>>>>>>>>> host!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The post above, and the two before it, should clinch you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the Bullis, Yads, due to your flagrant liberties with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> logic, and their sheer dumbfuckery. However, this one, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particular, seems to me to deserve special recognition.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hence, due to the complete absence of meaning in your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeated contention that I deserve to be nominated f=

>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "every" award in AUK -- because you're the floor show?!?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WTF??? -- a=
>>>>>>>>>>> nd

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also due to your robust and valiant attempt to wrest it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the iro=
>>>>>>>>>>> n

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grip of Scott Abraham in December 2008, I do hereby
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nominate you, David Shariff "The Doctor" Yadallee, for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kook of the Month, February 2012, and ask for seconds.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snarky
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will go against IF and say you deserve to be nominated in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all categ=
>>>>>>>>>>> ories.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not going against Me. I won't let you! I Second your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nominations!!! Bring them On. Nominate away with Impunity. It

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is your Right as a Citizen of Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then I nominate Snarky, Stephen Wilson, a Loaf of Bread,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowman, Robert Weldon, William Grosvenor, His Divine Shadow,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mr. SmartyPAnts and PV for all the AUK awards that are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I forgot that PAndora should also be part of the list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> REJECTED. =A0Revenge nominations are not accepted. -- Fruity
>>>>>>>>>>>> Neighborhood Rump Wrangler
>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Ur stupid Ferd !!!!
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Your Pal,
>>>>>>>>>>> Honest John
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> stupid and Assinine!
>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You two poor sods. I guess I really hurt your feelings, eh?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who sucked on your boobs lately?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> None of your beeswax, boyo. Get your own girl. Oh, I forgot, you
>>>>>>> can't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will get my own girl.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah? In what century?
>>>>
>>>> In what country?
>>>
>>>On what planet?
>>
>> Earth.
>

>In what alternative reality?
>

Same one we broadcast from.

>--
>PJR :-)
>μέτρα φυλάσσεσθαι: καιρὸς δ' ἐπὶ πᾶσιν ἄριστος. (Hesiod)

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjjthk...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.poems on Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:27:20 -0000, Stephen Wilson

><stephen.wils...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>> "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message
>> news:ksidnSTblJftMKPS...@scnresearch.com...
>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Who sucked on your boobs lately?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> None of your beeswax, boyo. Get your own girl. Oh, I forgot, you
>>>>>>> can't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will get my own girl.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah? In what century?
>>>>
>>>> In what country?
>>>
>>> On what planet?
>>

>> Yads thinks that heaven is another planet. Perhaps he thinks that he'll get
>> his girl when he goes to heaven...
>

>Evidently, Yads's Heaven is the planet of the Drahvins.

>
>--
>PJR :-)
>μέτρα φυλάσσεσθαι: καιρὸς δ' ἐπὶ πᾶσιν ἄριστος. (Hesiod)

For those who do not know Drahvins, check Doctor Who.

[The Doctor]

In article <jhmgjr$8na$8...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,

Game on!

[The Doctor]

In article <2entj750cfkcjtgtr...@4ax.com>,

Good one IF!

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjjtvk...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.poems on Sat, 18 Feb 2012 01:15:50 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor

>Would you rather they appeared on the ballot paper collectively or
>individually?
>
>Maybe it would be best for the nominated candidates to compete against
>each other. There are a lot of candidates, and they're nominated for a
>lot of awards, so perhaps there ought to be a preliminary elimination
>ballot. What do you think? Obviously, there are apprixamotely six
>candidates for apprexomitaly thirty awards, but we can't have 6 × 30
>nominees on the ballot, can we? Maybe we ought to have a preliminary
>elimination round.

>
>--
>PJR :-)
>μέτρα φυλάσσεσθαι: καιρὸς δ' ἐπὶ πᾶσιν ἄριστος. (Hesiod)

Collectively thank you.

[John Fleming]

[Default] On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:51:53 -0600, while chained to a desk
in the scriptorium pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> $On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:15:41 +0000, The Doctor wrote:

> $> I will get my own girl.
> $
> $Yeah? In what century?

The odds are against him.

If he wants a virgin, well, in modern North American you are talking
about girls around the age of puberty.

A lot of unattached women in their 30s and early 40s (the doctor's
probably hunting ground) are separated or divorced or (occasionally)
widowed. If they've been in a prior relationship, they likely aren't
virgins. And if they are virgins, well, odds are they aren't a good
catch for some reason or another.

Throw in the fact that, unless there are really, really good reasons
for the arrangement to exist, most girls in North America prefer men
who aren't still living with their parents unless said boy is still a
teenager.
--


John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada


Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O

[pandora]

Well, "WE" are quite certain about yours; you have none.

[pandora]

Yes, I'm from the planet Earth. What does that have to do with you
getting a girl? I'm sure not interested in you and I expect that no
other girl is either.

[PV]

His only bet at this point I think is mail-order. China or Russia, both are
full of desperate women who wish to start a new life in a new country and
are willing to pay the price to do it.

Mind you being with the Doc full time, being hoisted and groped whenever he
is in the mood might be too steep of a price.

--
PV

"This sig left intentionally blank"

[PV]

Peter J Ross wrote:
> In rec.arts.poems on Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:33:07 -0700, John Fleming

> <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>
>> [Default] On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:51:53 -0600, while chained to a desk
>> in the scriptorium pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>> $On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:15:41 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> $> I will get my own girl.
>>> $
>>> $Yeah? In what century?
>>
>> The odds are against him.
>>
>> If he wants a virgin, well, in modern North American you are talking
>> about girls around the age of puberty.
>>
>> A lot of unattached women in their 30s and early 40s (the doctor's
>> probably hunting ground) are separated or divorced or (occasionally)
>> widowed. If they've been in a prior relationship, they likely aren't
>> virgins. And if they are virgins, well, odds are they aren't a good
>> catch for some reason or another.
>>
>> Throw in the fact that, unless there are really, really good reasons
>> for the arrangement to exist, most girls in North America prefer men
>> who aren't still living with their parents unless said boy is still a
>> teenager.
>

> You're rather creepy, aren't you?

>
> "girls around the age of puberty"
>

> When I was a reader of RADw, I killfiled you and the indescribably
> tedious edm.* groups you crossposted from, but I've resumed my
> kookological studies, and I think you might be fun to apply electric
> shocks to.
>
> Tell me, why do you crosspost every moronic little thought that
> passes across your tiny brain into rec.arts.drwho?
>
> (That question applies to the rest of you Edmonton kooks too, btw.)

Because the Doc starts the cross-post and then add follow-up groups to catch
the unwary person who responds to his and cross-posts even farther including
AUK and the Flonk

And the fact the Doc starts it explains the "moronic little thought"
description

Thanks for asking

[%]

yea but you're 80 years old

[pandora]

Well, you just never know just how desperate someone might be.

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjju26...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.poems on Sat, 18 Feb 2012 01:37:45 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor

>You're welcome.
>
>The FNVW seconded the FNVWE's nomination, so it's completely official
>now. All those people will be candidates for all those awards on the
>ballot paper, and you'll have the satisfaction of knowing that nobody
>can ever again try to make you the victim of a blatant troll with
>impunity, no matter how obviously the troll is directed at you.
>
>Btw, I apologise for the typos in "apprixamotely" and "apprexomitaly"
>in the most recent post to which you replied. Anybody less clueful
>than you might have guessed - mistakenly, of course - that I'd
>perpetrated the mistakes on purpose, but they were just mistakes.
>
>Back on topic:
>Anneke Wills, Jean Marsh, Carole Ann Ford:
>Shag, marry or kill?
>
>

Marry and s*g

>
>--
>PJR :-)
>μέτρα φυλάσσεσθαι: καιρὸς δ' ἐπὶ πᾶσιν ἄριστος. (Hesiod)

[The Doctor]

In article <HcidnT8ClI28jaLS...@scnresearch.com>,

Failure on deflection Pandie.

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjju43...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.poems on Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:33:07 -0700, John Fleming
><nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>

>> [Default] On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:51:53 -0600, while chained to a desk
>> in the scriptorium pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>> $On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:15:41 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> $> I will get my own girl.
>>> $
>>> $Yeah? In what century?
>>
>> The odds are against him.
>>
>> If he wants a virgin, well, in modern North American you are talking
>> about girls around the age of puberty.
>>
>> A lot of unattached women in their 30s and early 40s (the doctor's
>> probably hunting ground) are separated or divorced or (occasionally)
>> widowed. If they've been in a prior relationship, they likely aren't
>> virgins. And if they are virgins, well, odds are they aren't a good
>> catch for some reason or another.
>>
>> Throw in the fact that, unless there are really, really good reasons
>> for the arrangement to exist, most girls in North America prefer men
>> who aren't still living with their parents unless said boy is still a
>> teenager.
>

>You're rather creepy, aren't you?
>
>"girls around the age of puberty"
>
>When I was a reader of RADw, I killfiled you and the indescribably
>tedious edm.* groups you crossposted from, but I've resumed my
>kookological studies, and I think you might be fun to apply electric
>shocks to.
>
>Tell me, why do you crosspost every moronic little thought that
>passes across your tiny brain into rec.arts.drwho?
>
>(That question applies to the rest of you Edmonton kooks too, btw.)
>

Would you like to add to add John to that collective kook ballot?

I will not object.

>--
>PJR :-)
>μέτρα φυλάσσεσθαι: καιρὸς δ' ἐπὶ πᾶσιν ἄριστος. (Hesiod)