Re: Hey Gary

[Aratzio]

On Dec 27, 6:42 pm, Janithor <Janit...@comcast.net> wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> Emmett

Iz U talkin' about "Bugger Boi" Garrry ??
--
The Delimited Ratz

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq�]

"Peter J Ross" <p...@example.invalid> wrote
in message news:slrnke16f...@pjr.no-ip.org...

> If you're the Delimited Ratz, I'm Fred Hall.

Admission of being a gay, Texas hillbilly noted!

--
Sir Gregory

[pandora]

On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:45:55 +0000, Peter J Ross wrote:

> In rec.arts.poems on Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:19:00 -0800 (PST), Aratzio

> If you're the Delimited Ratz, I'm Fred Hall.
>

> Oh wait....

You can't be Fred Hall cause *I* am Fred Hall.

Wait a minute, I'm supposed to be Checkmate.

I'm SO confused.....

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq�]

"Peter J Ross" <p...@example.invalid> wrote in message

news:slrnke1cf...@pjr.no-ip.org...
> In rec.arts.poems on Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:48:44 -0500, Sir Gregory

> How did you uncover my nefarious sockpuppetry, Neal?

With talent on loan from God!

[%]

Sn!pe wrote:

> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>
>>> If you're the Delimited Ratz, I'm Fred Hall.
>>>
>>> Oh wait....
>>
>> You can't be Fred Hall cause *I* am Fred Hall.
>>
>> Wait a minute, I'm supposed to be Checkmate.
>>
>> I'm SO confused.....
>

> Hot damn, pandora, I thought you were /nice./


i tried to warn you see how things get twisted ,
who said pandora is checkmate

[pandora]

On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 21:58:10 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:

> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>

>> > If you're the Delimited Ratz, I'm Fred Hall.
>> >
>> > Oh wait....
>>
>> You can't be Fred Hall cause *I* am Fred Hall.
>>
>> Wait a minute, I'm supposed to be Checkmate.
>>
>> I'm SO confused.....
>

> Hot damn, pandora, I thought you were /nice./

It's just a cover.

[pandora]

On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:28:10 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:

> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>

> [...]

>
>> >> > If you're the Delimited Ratz, I'm Fred Hall.
>> >> >
>> >> > Oh wait....
>> >>
>> >> You can't be Fred Hall cause *I* am Fred Hall.
>> >>
>> >> Wait a minute, I'm supposed to be Checkmate.
>> >>
>> >> I'm SO confused.....
>> >
>> > Hot damn, pandora, I thought you were /nice./
>>
>> It's just a cover.
>

> I guessed that you must be a secret agent. So, are you going to tell us
> what's in the box?

Nevah!

[%]

but you're not posting for attention

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq�]

"pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message
news:xdGdnSbYK8ArenzN...@scnresearch.com...

My dick's in her box!

[Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries]

In article <x6-dnYZvSvq4PH3N...@scnresearch.com>,
pan...@peak.org says...

You think you're confused? Imagine stopping by after an absence of
several months.

I need a new killfile.

[the messenjah]

Where ya been, Rhonda? Prison? Dumbass bitch.

[the messenjah]

You are so fucking clueless, Ross.

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq�]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.2b4cb2e29...@news.individual.net...

>
> You think you're confused? Imagine stopping by after an absence of
> several months.
>
> I need a new killfile.

Negative, but you DO need to realize you've been confused since
the day you were born. Now, go away for several more months, please.

--
Sir Gregory

[%]

hi

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq�]

"%" <per...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:S9OdnXcBFpfa2n7N...@giganews.com...

hi, the Checkmate is going around bragging about how you
give him such excellent head.

[%]

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote:
> "%" <per...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:S9OdnXcBFpfa2n7N...@giganews.com...
>> Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote:
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote in
>>> message news:MPG.2b4cb2e29...@news.individual.net...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> You think you're confused? Imagine stopping by after an absence of
>>>> several months.
>>>>
>>>> I need a new killfile.
>>>
>>> Negative, but you DO need to realize you've been confused since
>>> the day you were born. Now, go away for several more months, please.
>>
>>
>> hi
>
>
> hi, the Checkmate is going around bragging about how you
> give him such excellent head.

am i supposed to care about anything he does

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq�]

"%" <per...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:RcKdneZv7J8n137N...@giganews.com...

There IS one thing you should care about if he does it. That's
if he decides his butt stopped hurting from the severe spanking
he got around here and he comes crawling back. NOBODY
wants that to happen.

--
Sir Gregory

[%]

not much of what happens here matters to me anymore ,
when the same things get overkilled for a really long time i lose interest

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq�]

"%" <per...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:74qdnSmxv_IS037N...@giganews.com...

Irony meter vaporizes!!!!

[%]

yea ok and you have a great day too

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq�]

"%" <per...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:4radncXWTaOEzX7N...@giganews.com...

You sound depressed... Maybe it's because of that SADS thing.
You know, when the sun doesn't shine for weeks on end (Seattle weather)
and it's raining or snowing all the time and the weather is really, really
cold and you have to stay inside what used to be called 'cabin fever' is
now called Seasonal Affective Disorder Syndrome. The best way to get
over it is high doses of vitamin D and vitamin C since your skin is making
none up there in your horrible climate. Vitamin C assists the vitamin D
to do its thing.

--
Sir Gregory

[%]

since i'm not in seattle its not likely any of that

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq�]

"%" <per...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:EfKdnXwtHebhzn7N...@giganews.com...

Checkmate, if he can be believed, claimed you live in Canada north
of Seattle. That means cold, short days. Even when the sun shines
it's too low on the southern horizon to do you much good. Take my
advice. Supplement with high-dose vitamin D3, two to four thousand
IUs a day and C at the same levels. You'll feel much better after three
or four days. You'll feel stronger, more alert and more alive.

--
Sir Gregory

[pandora]

Heh.

[pandora]

On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 21:17:39 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:

> Gary Burnore <gbur...@panix.com> wrote:
>
>> >> > Hot damn, pandora, I thought you were /nice./
>> >>
>> >> It's just a cover.
>> >

>> > I guessed that you must be a secret agent.
>>

>> Now she'll have to kill you.

>>
>> > So, are you going to tell us what's in the box?
>> >

>> I can't believe you just said that. ;)
>
> It was all the evils of mankind, but it still contains hope.

Indeed.

[%]

well lets look at the things checkmate has said about you ,
if we're going to look at things checkmate said

[Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries]

In article <slrnke6cr...@pjr.no-ip.org>, p...@example.invalid
says...
>
> [AUK restored]
>
> In rec.arts.poems on Tue, 1 Jan 2013 10:19:24 -0800 (PST), the

> messenjah <theguyo...@veryfast.biz> wrote:
>
> > Where ya been, Rhonda? Prison? Dumbass bitch.

Many cancer patients come out the other side with a new and better
outlook on life, Chuck. I'm sorry you missed the epiphany.

> "Women love me." - chuckles the carcinogenic clown

[Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries]

In article <fOGdnVTlUNbH9n7N...@scnresearch.com>,
pan...@peak.org says...

Not "heh" but "who?" As in "who's on first?" Or, "who are these people,
anyway?"

But we can always count on Greg to be his same sorry self, no matter how
much time passes, so all is not lost.

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq·]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote

in message news:MPG.2b4d75371...@news.individual.net...

> In article <fOGdnVTlUNbH9n7N...@scnresearch.com>,
> pan...@peak.org says...
>> On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 08:47:01 -0500, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>> > In article <x6-dnYZvSvq4PH3N...@scnresearch.com>,
>> > pan...@peak.org says...
>> >> On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:45:55 +0000, Peter J Ross wrote:
>> >> > In rec.arts.poems on Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:19:00 -0800 (PST), Aratzio
>> >> > <0rec...@sneakemail.com> wrote:

>> >> >> On Dec 27, 6:42 pm, Janithor <Janit...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >> >>>

>> >> >>> Emmett
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Iz U talkin' about "Bugger Boi" Garrry ?? -- The Delimited Ratz
>> >> >
>> >> > If you're the Delimited Ratz, I'm Fred Hall.
>> >> >
>> >> > Oh wait....
>> >>
>> >> You can't be Fred Hall cause *I* am Fred Hall.
>> >>
>> >> Wait a minute, I'm supposed to be Checkmate.
>> >>
>> >> I'm SO confused.....
>> >
>> > You think you're confused? Imagine stopping by after
>> > an absence of several months.
>> >
>> > I need a new killfile.
>>
>> Heh.
>
> Not "heh" but "who?" As in "who's on first?" Or, "who are these
> people, anyway?"
>
> But we can always count on Greg to be his same sorry self, no
> matter how much time passes, so all is not lost.

If you don't like it then just go away... Even the Emmett obsessed
kook posts are more interesting than your contributions. If you
really are bored and need something to do please email
"pandora" as she's publicly slurping you in another thread.

Perhaps you two can get a room? I'm sure Cujo would appreciate
a break from your usual bedroom routine tedium.

--
Sir Gregory

[pandora]

True enough.

[the messenjah]

Fuck off, Rhonda.

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq·]

"Peter J Ross" <p...@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:slrnkeekj...@pjr.no-ip.org...
> In rec.arts.poems on Fri, 4 Jan 2013 01:22:35 -0800 (PST), the
> messenjah <theguyo...@veryfast.biz> wrote:
>
>> Fuck off, Rhonda.
>
> You could have typed "Fuck off, Kirk" and raised a smile, but of
> course you're as ignorant of Usenet history as of everything else.

Raise a smile? Why, the very mention of Rhonda causes the
majority of us (in AUK) to be laughing our asses off. We luvs
ta gloat about all the money the Good Barrister cost her and
Cujo. In the five-figure range, I hear tell.

It's all the more hilarious due to the fact that she said on more
than one occasion that I, Gregory Hall, was going to be sued
too because she had the misconception that t'was I who posted
the original libel. But, at least she wasn't as dumb as Barbara
Schwarz who actually claimed Gregory Hall was getting sued
just because my nym was mentioned in one of the countersuits -
a countersuit that died on the vine so to speak.

Ah, those were the good ole days.

--
Sir Gregory

[Mandraktophiles]

On 1/4/2013 4:28 PM, Peter J Ross wrote:
> In rec.arts.poems on Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:15:45 -0500, Sir Gregory

> So that's two people so far who are utterly ignorant of Usenet
> history. Who's next?
>

I know more Usenet history than you, yet I am
completely ignorant of your petty anecdotes and
minor incidents. It is called filtering. Not
through a killfile, but through filtering awareness
to remove trivalities from my memory so that I
will not be plagued with infinitesimal details.
In the Usenet history that I study, you are
considered to be a very small insect who covers
very little ground during your unimportant time
in the groups.

Here is Peter J. Ross. If you buy him a beer he
might spin a yarn for you:

http://images.fineartamerica.com/images-stretched-canvas-real/bar-fly-leah-saulnier-the-painting-maniac.jpg

--
This time we will get them all.

[the messenjah]

Pete. You've been spanked, ya clueless piece of shit.

[Mandraktophiles]

On 1/8/2013 12:00 PM, Peter J Ross wrote:
> In rec.arts.poems on Sat, 05 Jan 2013 04:48:25 -0700, Mandraktophiles

> <yawn>
>
> <snip>
>
> That makes three, if sockpuppets count.
>
>
>

plonk.

[Yours Truly,Johnny Dollar]

Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote in

news:slrnkeott...@pjr.no-ip.org:

> In rec.arts.poems on Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:20:43 -0700, Mandraktophiles
> <taki...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
>> plonk.
>
> I remember the days when there were people in alt.flame who didn't run
> away at the first opportunity.

This one is yet another new sock to infest AUK.

When you called a dot f dead you were absolutely correct.


--

You there: Fuck off. And when you get there, fuck off from there, too. Then fuck off some more. Keep
fucking off until you get back here. Then fuck off again.

[Nadegda]

On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 04:09:38 +0000, Peter J Ross wrote:

> The problem with alt.flame was that Ari was so far superior to all his
> antagonists that they all eventually ran away, with the result that he
> had no reason to continue posting.

That seems to be happening here, with the Tetrarchy in the role of Ari.
Most of the old-guard kooks have left, Brain Rot is now taking hiatuses
and barely managing not to piss his pants when he's here and mumbling
tardisms like "FOD" at kensi, and the remaining kooks are simply so
absorbed by their all-consuming Emmett Gulley obsession that they barely
noticed the coup.

<snicker>

[Yours Truly,Johnny Dollar]

Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote in news:slrnkev44...@pjr.no-ip.org:

> In rec.arts.poems on Wed, 9 Jan 2013 04:38:50 +0000 (UTC), Yours

> Truly,Johnny Dollar <ytjo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote in
>> news:slrnkeott...@pjr.no-ip.org:
>>
>>> In rec.arts.poems on Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:20:43 -0700, Mandraktophiles
>>> <taki...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> plonk.
>>>
>>> I remember the days when there were people in alt.flame who didn't run
>>> away at the first opportunity.
>>
>> This one is yet another new sock to infest AUK.
>>
>> When you called a dot f dead you were absolutely correct.
>

> I know very well that Mr Socky isn't an alt.flamer, but it's always
> fun to tempt somebody who says "plonk" to reply again by including a
> deliberate mistake in my answer. My experience of posters like Mr
> Socky is that their plonks are rarely sincere.

>
> The problem with alt.flame was that Ari was so far superior to all his
> antagonists that they all eventually ran away, with the result that he
> had no reason to continue posting.
>

> Well, that's probably not what really happened, but it's how I like to
> remember it.

It's better than most versions of a dor f history that I've heard.

[kensi]

On 10/01/2013 11:42 PM, Peter J Ross wrote:
> In rec.arts.poems on Fri, 11 Jan 2013 04:30:12 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda

> How many AUK awards have you won so far, s<FOOM!>

She's won a Hammer of Thor and a couple of Woodhouses as trainer of a
ko0k or two. That answer your question?

[%]

Bit Rot wrote:
> news from Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com>:

>> In rec.arts.poems on Fri, 11 Jan 2013 04:30:12 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>

>> How many AUK awards have you won so far, sockboi?
>>
>> Just curious.
>
>
> Derbyshire and socks [kensi/negegda/seamus/andrewwhatshisfuck/tom
> swift/1000s more] has every AUK award possible. We had no idea what a
> motherlode of lunatic we had on the hook until the koOk totally
> kooked out over 2012.
>
> A good deal of it my doing.
> [preens cerubic locks]


a post with the word gay in it and here you are , hi checkmate

[Nadegda]

On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 05:05:27 +0000, Bit <bit...@aukhistory.org> Rot wrote:

> news from Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com>:
>>In rec.arts.poems on Fri, 11 Jan 2013 04:30:12 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>><nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>

>>How many AUK awards have you won so far, sockboi?
>>
>>Just curious.
>
> Derbyshire and socks [kensi/negegda/seamus/andrewwhatshisfuck/tom
> swift/1000s more] has every AUK award possible. We had no idea what a
> motherlode of lunatic we had on the hook until the koOk totally kooked
> out over 2012.

Nice fanfic. Too bad the object of your adoration doesn't actually exist
and kensi and I had never even heard of your Derbyshire until this summer.

> A good deal of it my doing.
> [preens cerubic locks]

<bangs head against wall>

I'm going to have to open a ticket with customer service to complain
about the substandard kooks we're receiving these days.

I mean, really! Can't we get a kook or two sent down here that can, at
the *very* least, successfully avoid making any serious spelling mistakes
*in the middle of their kooky narcissistic self-back-patting babble*
about *how great they think they are*??? Yeesh!

Although at this point I'd probably settle for one that could flame
halfway-creatively. Endless repetitions of "you stupid cunt", or "you're
Derbyshire!!!", or "socky" and variants, or any other single thing is
just lame. I *know* there are nutters out there that can do better than
that. But none of them are here!

[kensi]

On 11/01/2013 12:29 AM, Nadegda wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 05:05:27 +0000, Bit <bit...@aukhistory.org> Rot wrote:
>> A good deal of it my doing.
>> [preens cerubic locks]
>
> <bangs head against wall>
>
> I'm going to have to open a ticket with customer service to complain
> about the substandard kooks we're receiving these days.
>
> I mean, really! Can't we get a kook or two sent down here that can, at
> the *very* least, successfully avoid making any serious spelling mistakes
> *in the middle of their kooky narcissistic self-back-patting babble*
> about *how great they think they are*??? Yeesh!

*LOL*

And SPNAK! on Bit Rot.

> Although at this point I'd probably settle for one that could flame
> halfway-creatively. Endless repetitions of "you stupid cunt", or "you're
> Derbyshire!!!", or "socky" and variants, or any other single thing is
> just lame. I *know* there are nutters out there that can do better than
> that. But none of them are here!

"ALIEN"/"hay"/"VISITOR" is back and bubbling away again, as of ten
minutes ago. Does one that doesn't flame at all count as an improvement
over one that flames repetitiously and uncreatively?

--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"A clue, a clue. My kingdom for a clue!!!!" ~Gweggles,
in an uncommon moment of self-awareness.

[Andrew Wilson]

On Jan 11, 5:29 am, Nadegda <nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 05:05:27 +0000, Bit <bit...@aukhistory.org> Rot wrote:

> > news from Peter J Ross  <peadar.ru...@gmx.com>:

> >>In rec.arts.poems on Fri, 11 Jan 2013 04:30:12 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda

I blame the economy. The fries at my local burger joint are shittier
than they were a few years ago, too.