"Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message
> In article <
2b724f....@news.alt.net>, greg...@home.fake
> says...>
> > Kindly allow me to introduce myself. I'm Gregory Hall and I'm the
President
> > and recent founder of the Anti-Pinku-Sensei Association. In the
essay that
> > follows, I shall explain why exposing "Pinky" Pinku-Sensei
> >
<
http://www.demotivateus.com/posters/homosexuality-pink-shirt-fag-demotivational-posters.jpg>
> > (Pinky is in the foreground!) and his stupid AUK awards is
fundamental to
> > the mental well being of Usenet participants and, in particular, to
that
> > intelligent portion of Usenet that actually logs on to Usenet to
discuss
> > things intelligently. With this in mind I shall proceed to explain
why and
> > how we must rise to the challenge of thwarting Pinku-Sensei's
worthless and
> > embarrassingly lame monthly awards.
> >
> > Whenever anyone states the obvious - that Pinku-Sensei uses the term
"Usenet
> > Kook" with ostensible confidence that its meaning is universally
> > understood - rational thought naturally progresses towards the
question,
> > "Where is Pinku-Sensei's brain?" Pinky doesn't want you to know the
answer.
> > He wants to ensure you don't legitimize the concerns of the many
people who
> > have been singled out by Pinku-Sensei and previous overseers of what
is
> > perhaps the worlds most ignorant and meaningless award presentation.
Hey
> > Pinku-Sensei, does the word "reality" mean anything to you? You and
others
> > who have chaired the AUK awards must have fallen down the rabbit
hole a long
> > time ago.
> >
> > Some of the facts I'm about to present may seem shocking. This they
> > certainly are. However, it's Pinky's deep-seated belief that AUK
awards are
> > the best of all possible worlds and that he is the best of all
possible
> > people for chairing them. Sure, he might be able to justify wasting
his time
> > doing them because his time's obviously not worth two cents but why
waste
> > other people's time with his blathering delusions of grandeur? Of
course
> > everybody knows the awards and offices are handed out willy-nilly
using
> > biased, one-sided information and agenda-driven ways and means but I
think
> > most of you would prefer to know the whole story. In this case, the
whole
> > story is Pinku-Sensei's desire to take over everybody's eyes, ears,
mind,
> > and spirit which is the chief sign that, off Usenet, he's somebody's
little
> > prison bitchboi or dreams of being one since he's too disgusting for
even
> > the most deranged of fags to be interested in his AIDs-ridden
carcass.
> >
> > It's easy enough to loathe Pinku-Sensei any day of the week on
general
> > principles. But now I'll tell you about some very specific things
that
> > Pinku-Sensei does to deserve it, things that ought to make a
lifetime
> > Pinku-Sensei-loather out of you. First off, he must sense his own
> > irremediable inferiority. That's why Pinky is so desperate to play
the blame
> > game; it's the only way for him to distinguish himself from that
herd of
> > has-been newsgroup rabble associated with the AUK awards . It would
be a lot
> > nicer, however, if Pinku-Sensei also realized that he avers that his
> > pertinacious hariolations provide a liberating insight into life,
the
> > universe, and everything else. Though, as you can no doubt determine
from
> > comments of his, reality and Pinky are like oil and water.
> >
> > I went puce with rage when I first realized Pinku-Sensei commands an
army of
> > mind-numbed robots that live down the rabbit hole and never come out
except
> > through a computer port or two. These cyber geeks have no grasp of
reality
> > and really do think their doings on Usenet are important and
constructive.
> > Bwahahhahahahahahhahhaah! Equally droll, if you'll allow me a minor
> > dysphemism, nobody ever went broke underestimating Pinky's
intelligence. Or,
> > to phrase that a little more politely, Pinku-Sensei says it's his
moral
> > obligation to expose and attempt to shame his literary betters
rather than
> > sit at the same table and negotiate to discover ways to improve his
own sad
> > lot. Pinku-Sensei would rather fragment Usenet into educationally
incorrect
> > and disharmonious units. Such intolerance is felt by all people,
from every
> > background but most can and do hold it in check. Not Pinky, though!
He can't
> > even hold his bowel movements in check. Hence his relegation
permanently
> > behind a keyboard in a sanatorium.
> >
> > If you think about it, you'll realize that Pinku-Sensei is a
self-fulfilling
> > prophecy in the sense that finding the best way to shatter the
illusion that
> > Pinku-Sensei is in charge of anything important simply involves
allowing him
> > to post his crap which, all by itself, demonstrates he is inadequate
even
> > for the sinecure that is the AUK awards. But the problem is making
him see
> > how stupid he appears to everybody and shaming him into resigning.
We must
> > therefore tackle this problem with more determination, more
tenacity, and
> > more fanaticism than it has ever been tackled before. Only then will
people
> > realize that Pinku-Sensei has nothing to offer other than being a
good
> > example of a bad example so he will grace us with his absence in the
very
> > near future.
> >
> > Pinku-Sensei is known for fabricating evidence. He gets a list of
people to
> > "award" and then makes up stuff about them knowing those who vote
are so
> > retarded that they won't realize it's all a total fabrication. That
sounds
> > really reprehensible, but I claim that it's an accurate assessment
of the
> > situation. Rather than pick out appropriate quotes from postings to
prove
> > any of his contentions, he pads all of his "evidence" with lies and
> > speculation and writes them with an atmosphere of authority.
Chairman of the
> > board? No! Chairman of the bored.
> >
> > I, on the other hand, prefer to use simple, concise and precise
language
> > when arguing a point. In this country (USA) we have an inalienable
right to
> > politic, protest, demonstrate, organize, run for office, and
peacefully
> > labor to examine and expose the likes of any Pinku-Sensei-style
chairmanship
> > from the perspective of its axiology (values) and epistemology (ways
of
> > knowing). That's just an educated way of saying that Pinku-Sensei
has no
> > discernible talents and even less worth. The only things he has
definitely
> > mastered are the biological excretory functions and these he carries
out
> > seated in front of his computer. (Attendants are charged with
changing his
> > Depends undergarments.) Well, on second thought, I suppose
Pinku-Sensei's
> > also good at convincing people that pigs fly. If people actually
think his
> > AUK awards have one iota of merit then I suppose it's not too
difficult a
> > task to convince them pigs fly too.
> >
> > Now stay with me for a little while longer here; I'm about to make
my main
> > point. Specifically, if Pinku-Sensei continues to get his way and
does the
> > AUK awards in the future all hell might break loose. Even the other
geek
> > freaks who did the awards in the past will hurl their stomach
contents. It's
> > like having Mickey Mouse swear in the President of the United
States. Come
> > to think of it, though, with Obama next to be sworn in, Mickey Mouse
might
> > be the best choice. But, I digress. I may be questioning the regnant
> > conventional wisdom by stating this but maybe the awards' premise
(that
> > every word that leaves his mouth is accurate and useful) is his
morality
> > disguised as pretended neutrality. Pinku-Sensei uses this disguised
morality
> > to support his drug-induced ravings, thereby making his choices
> > self-refuting. The tone of Pinku-Sensei's ideas is eerily
reminiscent of
> > that of lackadaisical, brutish liars and cheats during the Clinton
> > administration in the sense that Pinku-Sensei believes that some
people
> > deserve to feel safe and secure while others do not. The real damage
that
> > this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief
itself, but
> > with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological
manipulation
> > of that nature by Pinku-Sensei and his eccentric accomplices. Yet,
he and
> > others are intimately involved with these dumb and obsolete AUK
awards to
> > the extent that they really believe in them. It's obvious that the
rest of
> > us don't and are laughing our asses off at their stupidity.
> >
> > Pinku-Sensei wants to control what people post on Usenet and he
wants people
> > to only write utter nonsense, profanity, lames and other
waste-of-space
> > drivel. He wants to surround himself with his like. He wants us to
rise,
> > fall asleep, work, and live at the beat of a drum played by an
imbecile.
> > Then, once we're molded into a uniform mass of one-line Usenet
wonders,
> > we'll be incapable of seeing that the Anti-Pinku-Sensei Association
calls
> > upon Pinku-Sensei to stop his oppression, lies, immorality, and
debauchery.
> > I call upon him to be a man of manners, principles, honor, and
purity. And
> > finally, I call upon him to forgo his desire to develop a Pavlovian
reflex
> > in us, to make us afraid to beat him at his own game while
expressing our
> > individuality and our thoughtful guidance for a world gone awry.
> >
> > Pinku-Sensei's awards are contrary to international human rights and
> > humanitarian standards. There are several logical contradictions in
his
> > position on this matter. It is difficult to know how to respond to
such
> > monumentally misplaced values, but let's try this: If he thinks his
ploys
> > represent progress, Pinku-Sensei should rethink his definition of
progress
> > because it's just more of the same old tired crap. What I have been
writing
> > up to this point is not what I initially intended to write in this
post.
> > Instead, I decided it would be far more productive to tell you that
> > Pinku-Sensei will increase people's complacency and rejection of
intelligent
> > discourse on Usenet because he possesses a hatred of rational
discourse that
> > defies all logic and understanding, that cannot be quantified or
reasoned
> > away, and which possesses no redeeming value.
> >
> > To begin with, Pinku-Sensei keeps trying to cast the world into two
diverse
> > camps. His camp is a leader's camp and ours consists of camp
following
> > rabble. Boy is he ever delusional because it's exactly the other way
around.
> > And if we don't remain eternally vigilant, he will certainly succeed
in
> > swaying a significant percentage of knuckleheads to his defective
way of
> > thinking. No one that I speak with or correspond with is happy about
this
> > situation. Liberal dupes are taking over the country and their
mantra of
> > "change" without having a clue that there is change for the good and
change
> > for the bad. Here's a clue for everyone - ridding the world of the
AUK
> > awards is change for the good.
> >
> > I don't relish treating with delirious, treasonous exhibitionists,
> > Pinku-Sensei's cat's-paws, or anyone else who fails to realize that
I'm
> > willing to accept that Pinku-Sensei's beliefs (as I would certainly
not call
> > them logically reasoned arguments) are the fertilizer that grows
vigilantism
> > to monstrous proportions. I'm even willing to accept that his awards
serve
> > no purpose other than to combine, in a rare mixture, bestial naivety
and an
> > inconceivable gift for lying. But the basal lie that underlies all
of his
> > silly sound bites is that wannabe net nanny types should have the
right to
> > lie to their own "subjects." Translation: Pinku-Sensei has the
mandate of
> > Heaven to shake belief in all existing institutions through the
systematic
> > perversion of both contemporary and historical facts. I doubt you
need any
> > help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views but you
should
> > nevertheless be aware that if we were to let Pinku-Sensei get away
with
> > legitimizing inanity, that would be a gross miscarriage of justice.
> >
> > The preceding was a preliminary attempt to establish some criteria
for
> > discussion of these complex issues. I hope it serves it's intended
purpose.
> >
> > Finally, this has been a good deal of reading, and sincerely
difficult
> > reading at that because I write at a high collegiate level while the
> > majority of you read at fourth or fifth grade level but, even so, I
hope you
> > have become a little more educated. I hope you walk away from it
with the
> > new knowledge that Pinky Pinku-Sensei's the quintessential fraud and
with
> > plenty of proof as to the whys and the wherefores. The
Anti-Pinku-Sensei
> > Association thanks you for your time and interest.
>
> PINKY-SUE IS MY GAY SEX SLAVE!
>
> Kali
Tell us something that we didn't know, Skank-Bitch!!!
Your Pal,
HJ