John Malkovich in DANGEROUS LIAISONS
Malkovich & his co-star, Glenn Close, were the two ugliest romantic
leads around that year.
These two don't hold a candle with Jack Palance.
Wull
I never thought Humphrey Bogart was very handsome.
Nor Fred MacMurray, James Stewart and Nicholas Cage.
I'm sure we'll come up with more.
Tom
James Stewart isn't a bad looking guy, but the string bean arms and
legs along with the bad whig he wore never helped.
> James Stewart isn't a bad looking guy, but the string bean arms and
> legs along with the bad whig he wore never helped.
(He wore 18th-cty. reform politicians on his head?) ;)
Derek Janssen
eja...@verizon.net
Apart from Cary Grant very few of my favorite leading men could be
regarded as handsome.
British actress Diana Dors talked about working with Victor Mature -
she said he was the handsomest man she had ever seen but she found
rather unattractive - as do most women apparently.
Dave in Toronto
>Walter Matthau?
Russell Crowe has a lot of people fooled. He looks like a plumber.
stockard channing, roseanne barr, karl malden and liam neeson
Coburn? Seriously? Charles Coburn, maybe. But James? In his prime, he
had a face I'd have traded for. He probably wouldn't have agreed to it,
though.
Jim Beaver
>I never thought Humphrey Bogart was very handsome.
If Ingrid Bergman looked at you with love in her eyes, you too could
have had a career in romantic roles.
Probably the classic Lee Marvin-James Coburn mixup.
Eye of the beholder and all that but I thought James Coburn to be one of
the ugliest men on Earth, esp. those big buck teeth of his. Ugh!
Plus he was a lousy actor.
You can't get much uglier than Edward G. Robinson.
http://www.radioarchives.org/pictures/Edward%20G%20Robinson.jpg
He had some sympathetic starring roles in some movies, most notably "Dr.
Ehrlich's Magic Bullet."
--
Steven L.
Email: sdli...@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
In his early years, Aldo Ray looked ruggedly handsome.
But as he aged and gained weight, he looked uglier and uglier.
http://www.filmdope.com/Gallery/ActorsR/14346-7709.gif
I am sure the guy got more pussy than Frank Sinatra.
Well, not literally--that is just an old cliche. But he laid more wood than
the combined experience of the top 25 male posters in here, on that I would
bet.
(Do we even have 25 posters of either sex any more?)
Really?
I thought he was fantastic in several roles, maybe most notably in A Fistful
of Dynamite/Duck, You Sucker.
Bruce Willis in you-name-it.
I hasten to point out this is not a judgment on his acting, just on his eye
appeal.
Victor Mature wasn't handsome. I always thought he looked like a
caricature.
Mono-brow must be "in".
I've never met anyone who considered Also to be a "leading man".
>You can't get much uglier than Edward G. Robinson.
>
>http://www.radioarchives.org/pictures/Edward%20G%20Robinson.jpg
>
>He had some sympathetic starring roles in some movies, most notably "Dr.
>Ehrlich's Magic Bullet."
Bette Davis, after having to kiss him in a movie, referred to him as
Liver Lips.
What do you consider his prime? Charade? Flint?
--
Uncle Jack: "Will, you're invisible!"
Will: "Invisible? I can't be! I can touch myself!"
--actual dialog from third season LAND OF THE LOST
>>>Over the years some real plug uglies have been featured as leading men.
>>>The two ugliest I can think of are James Coburn and Charles Bronson.
>>>Any other nominations?
>>Coburn? Seriously? Charles Coburn, maybe. But James? In his prime, he
>>had a face I'd have traded for. He probably wouldn't have agreed to it,
>>though.
>What do you consider his prime? Charade? Flint?
The President's Analyst!
I think that says more about the pan you're sporting than it does about
Coburn.
John Belushi
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082200/
Tom
Chris Farley
John Candy
On the other side of the coin, some talent scout spotted one Robert
Moseley in 1944 and got him a 5-minute part in a film called Since You
Went Away. His appearance in the movie brought a deluge of letters
asking about this handsome newcomer .. though by now he was called Guy
Madison. He then became a leading man in Till the End of Time but it
was soon evident that he couldn't act for toffee. So I guess the
leading men uglies have the edge when it comes to the acting talent
stakes.
Possibly. Mine has been a handicap in everything but love and an acting
career. But let me rephrase: I have looked at Coburn's face in his prime
and thought, "That would be a great face to have." Not Guy Madison, by any
means. But handsome and damned charismatic. He didn't play Flint because
no one could stand to look at him.
Jim Beaver
>Possibly. Mine has been a handicap in everything but love and an acting
>career. But let me rephrase: I have looked at Coburn's face in his prime
>and thought, "That would be a great face to have." Not Guy Madison, by any
>means. But handsome and damned charismatic. He didn't play Flint because
>no one could stand to look at him.
I think for acting, a face with character gives one more jobs. There
are lots of interchangeable actors of both genders who can look
pretty.
Of course "pretty" is in the eye of the beholder. Our tastes vary.
In comedy, leading men can vary even more - one could cast a Don
Knotts as the guy who gets the gal.
--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."
- James Madison
Hey, The Incredible Mr. Limpet--of course she was a fish, but still.
(Hey... BobF's, like, calling you ugly, man. Can't you manage to
sound a little more tremulous?) Science says that classical beauty
adheres strictly to the median appearance of the group, i.e., worship
of the bland. James Coburn's looks, otoh, successfully integrates
interesting departures from that norm. It's what we call
'character' (...and each imagine that we, too, have).
--
- - - - - - - -
YOUR taste at work...
http://www.moviepig.com
Belushi? Belushi could charm the pants off The Pope.
Most ugly leading men have been in comedies and looked like Woody
Allen or Rodney Dangerfield.
I didn't say he wasn't charming... just not handsome. Hey, I loved the
guy.
Tom
But he wasn't ugly either.
--
Chris Mack *quote under construction*
'Invid Fan'
This girl would take Beloosh over Brad Pitt or George Clooney any day!
Pretty has got nothing much to do with sexy.
But we aren't talking about sexy... we are talking about ugly leading
men. I'm glad you find Belushi sexy. As I said before, I loved the
guy.
I have no doubt Humphrey Bogart was sexy. He was also ugly.
Tom
Tom
But he's not REALLY UGLY - come on, he's not even fairly ugly! Now
I'll accept that he's not classically handsome in the boring Hollywood
pretty boy sense (yawning just thinking about it) - but REALLY UGLY -
puke-inducing, it-burns-my-eyes-to-look-at-him, he-makes-me-question-
what-was-God-thinking REALLY UGLY??? I can think of a helluva lot
more actors with faces only mothers could love, but karma forbids me
to name them here, except to say that there were a lot of films made
in the eighties where supermodel-types somehow fell for short-arsed
men who had faces like smacked arses... yeah, as if, in your dreams,
love... We can agree to disagree on this particular issue, but
secretly because I'm a woman, I know I'm right...
> I can think of a helluva lot
>more actors with faces only mothers could love, but karma forbids me
>to name them here, except to say that there were a lot of films made
>in the eighties where supermodel-types somehow fell for short-arsed
>men who had faces like smacked arses... yeah, as if, in your dreams,
>love... We can agree to disagree on this particular issue, but
>secretly because I'm a woman, I know I'm right...
And because you're a woman, your vote surely counts more than mine in
this issue. (Although I tend to agree with you)
Uncle! ;-)
As a well-trained husband, I know when I should just agree and shut
up... lol!
I'll close by repeating three of the most important words in a
successful marriage:
"You're right, dear."
Tom