On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 2:13:23 PM UTC-4, SLGreg wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:59:42 -0700 (PDT),
cri...@windstream.net wrote:
> >I haven't seen the 1997 version, but would think
> >the 1962 Kubrick/Mason/Sellers version that I've seen
> >several times would be hard to beat.
>
> Try it, and with an open mind. If you admire Nabokov's beautiful 1955
> novel, it's worth the time to see Lyne's version.
>
> I enjoyed both, but felt the dysfunction, pain and tragedy more
> understood and palpable in Lyne's more dramatic version, which
> followed the source material more faithfully, IMO. Kubrick's played
> up more to the black comedy angle, which didn't work for me,
> personally. I detested Sellers as Quilty; however, I much preferred
> Shelley Winters over Melanie Griffith as the lumbering cow, though.
>
> That being said, we've debated and contrasted these two versions here
> before and I've lost. I expect that to be the case should it happen
> again. Carry on ;-)
I've queued the 1997 version on Netflix, and should
see it this weekend. I don't think I'm the one who
argued with you before, but we can take it up again
in a few days.