<
madar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, January 6, 2013 4:01:03 PM UTC-5,
leno...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> On Monday, December 31, 2012 11:34:54 PM UTC-5, RichA wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 30, 10:58 pm,
lenona...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>>
>>
>>>> I seem to remember a critic's writing that the movie was a metaphor
>>>> for the shrinking role of the American male in an increasingly
>>>> mechanised world. Or something like that.
>>
>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>
>>
>>>> Does anyone know who said that?
>>
>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>
>>
>>>> Lenona.
>>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>
>>> It was about a guy who gets irradiated and starts to shrink down. He
>>
>>>
>>
>>> gets to fight with a spider, etc. Metaphors are for critics who need
>>
>>>
>>
>>> to fill column space.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Well, it seems I should have read Richard Matheson's book ("The
>> Shrinking Man") instead. (BTW, I think I first heard of the ideas I
>> mentioned above some years ago.)
>>
>>
>>
>> From 2012:
>>
>>
>>
>>
https://www.worldswithoutend.com/novel_review.asp?ID 26
>>
>>
>>
>> "......Carey is not always particularly sympathetic, although you have
>> to admit he is facing extraordinary challenges. But when he is difficult
>> to his wife, family, media, and the doctors eager to study his
>> condition, he is fighting for his dignity as a human being -- and more
>> specifically as an American male of the 1950's. That last angle must
>> stand out more strongly now that when the book was written, but the
>> scenes where he confronts a drunken pedophile who mistakes him for a
>> young teen, or mindlessly vicious, 1950's-style juvenile delinquents are
>> painful reading. Even more excruciating is Matheson's chronicle of
>> Carey's deteriorating relationship with his wife....."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
http://www.metafilter.com/99211/Writemare-at-20000-feet
>>
>>
>>
>> "I don't remember why I watched Omega Man a few years ago, but it
>> inspired me to read I Am Legend. Which made me realize Matheson existed,
>> so I also read The Incredible Shrinking Man. Wow, what a misogynistic
>> novel that is. It seems to pretty clearly be about the shrinking
>> role/power of men in a world where women are getting the rights they
>> were missing for so long. The protagonist really hates women. (There's
>> also a pretty creepy chapter involving a lost little boy, IIRC, which
>> brings a whole new level into it.)"
>>
>>
>>
>> posted by DU at 7:07 PM on January 4, 2011
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> And Susan Faludi hinted at a metaphor for the "middle-class white
>> American male" in her 1999 tome, "Stiffed."
>>
>>
>>
>> Also see pages 134-135 in the 2005 book "Manhood and American Political
>> Culture in the Cold War."
>>
>> http://books.google.com/books?id=IREMhOPMEtoC&pg=PA135&lpg=PA135&dq=%22incredible+shrinking+man%22+%22american+male%22&source=bl&ots=VBgU51uOjN&sig=5IxBwLwrVkcgIFOB5KrUfWDoY0s&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22incredible%20shrinking%20man%22%20%22american%20male%22&fúlse
>>
>>
>>
>> And from 2010, here's a review of the play "The Return of the Incredible
>> Shrinking Man." (I take it that it premiered near Carmel, CA, but I'm not sure.)
>>
>>
http://www.pcnr.com/news/2010-02-17/The_Arts/Incredible_Shrinking_Man_Premieres_at_Depot_Theatr.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> BTW, I also stumbled on the article below, from March. (I haven't read
>> it yet, so while the general ideas look familiar, I don't know if it's
>> more sympathetic to men or women.) There are more than 100 comments.
>>
>>
>>
>>
http://www.phillymag.com/articles/the-sorry-lives-and-confusing-times-of-today-s-young-men/
>>
>>
>>
>> Excerpt:
>>
>>
>>
>> "....Gender identity, sociologists say, is developed oppositionally. If
>> boys see girls behaving in a certain way working hard and excelling in
>> school they define masculinity in opposite terms: A real man doesn t
>> work hard at school or get good grades. The more that women try to set
>> an example of responsible adult behavior, the more the guys shout along
>> with the band Deer Tick: 'We re full-grown men but we act like kids!'...."
>>
>>
>>
>> I.e., boys supposedly can't stand to compete with girls who actually
>> compete to win in school instead of playing dumb to attract boys, the
>> way they used to. So the boys drop out, more or less.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Lenona.
>
> When I was in 6th Grade, I worked harder at excelling when the girl I
> liked praised me for being so smart. Of course, it would take a few
> years for me to learn that good grades didn't get girls.
Men respond more favorably to recognition of their accomplishments; women
their identities. It's a Mars/Venus thing...and one of the secrets to
unlocking the universe.
--
greg