Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
In article <4b2940a4$0$5355$bbae...@news.suddenlink.net>,
"harmony" <a...@hotmail.com> posted:
> no wonder the chinese are so smart. but what mde them so sneaky and
> ruthless?
> Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
>
> > Ancestors of Chinese came from India: Study
> >
> > By Prashanth G N, TNN
> > The Times of India
> > Saturday, December 12, 2009
> >
> > Bangalore - The ancestors of most Asian populations, including the
> > Chinese and southeast Asians, came from India, a new genetic study
> > across 10 countries has revealed. The study found that humans first
> > migrated to the Indian subcontinent from Africa some 100,000 years
> > ago and then spread to other parts of Asia.
> >
> > "When humans moved out of Africa, there was a migration to India and
> > from India to southeast Asia and then east Asia, and finally to the
> > Americas. So, all Asians have a genetic connection with India,"
> > Mitali Mukerji, a scientist from the Institute of Genomics and
> > Integrative Biology who was in the team, said.
> >
> > The study -- Mapping Human Genetic History in Asia -- was conducted
> > in 10 Asian countries including India. Apart from the Council of
> > Scientific and Industrial Research DG Samir Brahmachari, the Indian
> > study team comprised eight members and some students from IGIB, New
> > Delhi, anthropologist Partha Majumdar and researchers from the Centre
> > for Genomic Applications.
> >
> > The study contradicts earlier findings that humans directly went to
> > East Asia from Africa. The study found remarkable similarities
> > between the Dravidian population of south India and specific
> > populations in Malaysia and Singapore. More interestingly, north
> > Indians and Dravidians, too, were found to be genetically connected --
> > meaning there are similarities in their gene structures.
> >
> > More at:
> >
> >
> http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Ancestors-of-Chinese-came-from-India
> -Study/articleshow/5328596.cms
> >
> > Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> > Om Shanti
> >
> > o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the
> > educational
> > purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may
> > not
> > have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
> > poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
> > fair use of copyrighted works.
> > o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
> > considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,
> > current
> > e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
> > o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others
> > are
> > not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the
> > article.
> >
> > FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
> > which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
> > owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
> > understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
> > democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
> > that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
> > provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
> > Title
> > 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
> > profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
> > included
> > information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
> > subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more
> > information
> > go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
> > If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
> > your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
> > copyright owner.
> >
> > Since newsgroup posts are being removed
> > by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
> > this post may be reposted several times.
>
>