Sridevi on TV this Friday....
Srifan_In
on the show called Jeena Isi Ka Naam Hai (Zee TV) this Friday. The
main Guest is Karisma Kapoor...... Is Karisma a great fan of Sri or do
they share a very great friendship.....
All Sri fans dont miss it.... and also Karisma Fans.....:-)
I just cant wait to see it.... I just hope there is no Power Cut at my
home during the show.... 'cos there are lot of Power Cuts happening in
India at the moment.......
Regards,
SriFan_In
Muqudar
here! Now I just need to check out the time...does anyone know when this
episode will be airing here in Southern California?
Srifan_In
Regards,
SriFan_IN
vij...@hotmail.com (Srifan_In) wrote in message news:<bfb09b88.02051...@posting.google.com>...
Muqudar
definitely more youthful than her arch rival Madhuri...
Muqudar
ZeeTV... California time and 8:30PM on ZeeTV New York time.
mamta.dhand
looks great for her age, wheras Madhuri started looking old in HAKHK. It's
a shame really, because Madhuri's look is different. You'll find alot of
actresses who resemble Sri Devi, but not Madhuri Dixit.
"Muqudar" <muq...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20020521225618...@mb-ma.aol.com...
Shishir Yerramilli
> I think is Juhi Chawla roughly same age as Madhuri, if so then Juhi Chawla
> looks great for her age, wheras Madhuri started looking old in HAKHK. It's
> a shame really, because Madhuri's look is different. You'll find alot of
> actresses who resemble Sri Devi, but not Madhuri Dixit.
That is because a lot of actresses want to look like Ms.Sri Devi
Ayyappan Kapoor!Examples:Tabassum Hashmi,Shipa Shetty,Urmila Matondkar
just to name a few.No one wants to look like Madhuri Dixit as she is
just a cosmetic beauty.If luck didnt favor her,she wouldve ended up as
a dancer in a brothel!That is probably the 'different look' you allude
to!
rkus...@rogers.com
> That is because a lot of actresses want to look like Ms.Sri Devi
> Ayyappan Kapoor!Examples:Tabassum Hashmi,Shipa Shetty,Urmila Matondkar
> just to name a few.No one wants to look like Madhuri Dixit as she is
> just a cosmetic beauty.If luck didnt favor her,she wouldve ended up as
> a dancer in a brothel!That is probably the 'different look' you allude
> to!
Shut up Shishir.
If anyone came from a dubious family it is Sridevi. The person who
is known as her father is not her biological father. Her sister
ran away with someone after revolting.
In nutshell, Sridevi comes from a dubious family and she was a slut
while working in south film industry. Sure she looks like one too.
MD comes from a educated middle class family, with her brother
and sister living in US. The chances of her opting out for dancing
in brothel or a slut is much slimmer than Sridevi.
Just look at their marriage:-
One married to an American Doctor and the other as a second
wife of Boney Kapoor. Yuck.
MD may be a plastic beauty, but 1000 times better to look at than
Sridevi. With or without makeup Sridevi is shit to look at,
like almost all Andhra Pradesh actresses.
I wouldn't have posted in such strong words if I didn't notice
your complete contempt for MD. If u don't like her, fine, but
why call her as slut.
Bottomline: Be prepared to get offended if you offend others.
RK-
Girish Bhat
>
> If anyone came from a dubious family it is Sridevi. The person who
> is known as her father is not her biological father. Her sister
> ran away with someone after revolting.
Well, well, well! let it never be said you can't learn anything
new from ramli ;-)
I have never really liked Sridevi but have always felt sorry
for her. I mean imagine, she has been in films from the age
of three! She has never really seen the world at all. Never
known true friendship, always been surrounded by greedy, crass and
"matlabi" people. Never got the chance to grow as a person.
Despite all the glitz and glamour, would any girl
here REALLY like to be in her shoes? I think not. ;-)
Shishir Yerramilli
>
> > That is because a lot of actresses want to look like Ms.Sri Devi
> > Ayyappan Kapoor!Examples:Tabassum Hashmi,Shipa Shetty,Urmila Matondkar
> > just to name a few.No one wants to look like Madhuri Dixit as she is
> > just a cosmetic beauty.If luck didnt favor her,she wouldve ended up as
> > a dancer in a brothel!That is probably the 'different look' you allude
> > to!
>
> Shut up Shishir.
>
> If anyone came from a dubious family it is Sridevi. The person who
> is known as her father is not her biological father. Her sister
> ran away with someone after revolting.
What does her sister have anything to do with her?
> In nutshell, Sridevi comes from a dubious family and she was a slut
> while working in south film industry. Sure she looks like one too.
>
Every young actress has to do 'favors' for the producers/directors
to get a break.Your beloved MD is no exception ,what she did for Feroz
Khan and Mukul Anand is not a state secret!
> MD comes from a educated middle class family, with her brother
> and sister living in US. The chances of her opting out for dancing
> in brothel or a slut is much slimmer than Sridevi.
Since when did education or having ones siblings living in the U.S
constitute high moral character.Is this to imply that all illiterate
agrarian women are whores or sluts!In RK's(whatever the fuck his name
is) eyes wealth=character.
>
> Just look at their marriage:-
> One married to an American Doctor and the other as a second
> wife of Boney Kapoor. Yuck.
Second wife of Boney Kapoor is far from a proper role for SriDevi!But
what of Madhuri Dixit who was bonking Sunjay Dutt like there no
tommorow only to pretend she didnt who he was when he got arrested!Do
you really beleive that she didnt know that the mentally deficient
Dutt hoarding weapons and his plans for revenge on Hindus because his
mother was Muslim!He had called her from jail but she refused to
acknowledge him!Very high moral character indeed!
>
> MD may be a plastic beauty, but 1000 times better to look at than
> Sridevi. With or without makeup Sridevi is shit to look at,
> like almost all Andhra Pradesh actresses.
It doesnt matter where the fuck youre from you bigoted little
shit,if you ever have to throw up just look in the mirror.
>
> I wouldn't have posted in such strong words if I didn't notice
> your complete contempt for MD. If u don't like her, fine, but
> why call her as slut.
>
Because she is one you dumb fuck and she sure as hell looks like
one!
> Bottomline: Be prepared to get offended if you offend others.
>
Ditto
>
> RK-
rkus...@rogers.com
> Go fuck yourself RK!
I don't have to. I have already fucked you.
> > If anyone came from a dubious family it is Sridevi. The person who
> > is known as her father is not her biological father. Her sister
> > ran away with someone after revolting.
>
> What does her sister have anything to do with her?
simple. tells about her family background.
> > In nutshell, Sridevi comes from a dubious family and she was a slut
> > while working in south film industry. Sure she looks like one too.
> >
> Every young actress has to do 'favors' for the producers/directors
> to get a break.Your beloved MD is no exception ,what she did for Feroz
> Khan and Mukul Anand is not a state secret!
Oh yeah. U were witness to all that.
> Since when did education or having ones siblings living in the U.S
> constitute high moral character.Is this to imply that all illiterate
> agrarian women are whores or sluts!In RK's(whatever the fuck his name
> is) eyes wealth=character.
Actually u are right. And this is proved by your sister/mother who
may be sluts. After all living in US or Gulf does not
constitute high moral character.
> Second wife of Boney Kapoor is far from a proper role for SriDevi!But
> what of Madhuri Dixit who was bonking Sunjay Dutt like there no
Getting bonked by Sunjay Dutt is preferrable to getting bonked
by N T Ramarao and Akini Nageshwar Rao. Sridevi must be unique
to get bonked by father and son (Nagaarjun).
> It doesnt matter where the fuck youre from you bigoted little
> shit,if you ever have to throw up just look in the mirror.
He he he. AP dog Yerramilli got irritated. Mission accomplished.
Now go and watch crap AP movies like Jagadala Veeru Atiloka Sundari
and jerk off fantasizing about Sridevi. That's what AP folks are
capable of and that's what they have been doing. Every AP man I
know is crazy about movies and is capable of watching any damn
crap movie.
You may hate MD (bcos she kicked Sridevi's big ass back to Hyderabadu),
but she is any day more ravishing than that shit from AP Sridevi.
RK-
PS: same holds for Rambha and other crap gult actresses.
PPS: I however admit that Sridevi is a very good actress and
IMO a better actress than MD.
PPS2: My last response to this.
Shridhar
> MD comes from a educated middle class family, with her brother
> and sister living in US.
But she is another useless Mumbai product,right?????!!!! :-)
> Just look at their marriage:-
> One married to an American Doctor and the other as a second
> wife of Boney Kapoor. Yuck.
Almost all South Indian hindi film actresses with the exception
of Vyjantimala have shady marraige history. Hema was the second wife
of Dharam, Sridevi 2nd of Boney Kapoor. Rekha really had a turbulent and
short married life. They cant help though it if the marraige is proposed
from the other side!!! So, nothing to get yucked about.
> MD may be a plastic beauty, but 1000 times better to look at than
> Sridevi.
Agreed. Sridevi is not beautiful but thousand times better actress
than Madhuri. Hema and Vyjantimala were the only beautiful South
Indian actresses.
>With or without makeup Sridevi is shit to look at,
> like almost all Andhra Pradesh actresses.
She is half-tamilian though.(not a brahmin the breed you could fanatacise with).
> If u don't like her, fine, but
> why call her as slut.
Is it worse than saying that Shahrukh Khan is a monkey who is
unemployed now and got his butt kicked in his website business.
Practice what you preach.
Shridhar
Shridhar
It was far better than the previous show which had Saurav Ganguly, one
of the worst shows i have ever seen. This idiot has no sense of humor
whatsoever and was generally trying to conceal lot of personal things
about him. Most of his friends were Bongu Babus and everyone from
his relatives to friends had one common thing to say - that Gangu
was a total darpok in the past. Though the so-called jokes of the
Bongs were
totally childish. Atleast, Mumbai side personalities have cosmopolitan
admirers ranging from North to South Indians of all communities who
are a lot more cheerful and enterprising unlike the Bengal tiger who
is totally immersed in his Bengali identity.
Shridhar
rkus...@rogers.com
> Almost all South Indian hindi film actresses with the exception
> of Vyjantimala have shady marraige history. Hema was the second wife
> of Dharam, Sridevi 2nd of Boney Kapoor. Rekha really had a turbulent and
> short married life. They cant help though it if the marraige is proposed
> from the other side!!! So, nothing to get yucked about.
So!!! do u think i will support all these south heroines just
bcos I am also a south indian. All of these marriages is yuck per
me. Madhuri is 1000 times more sensible when it comes to selecting
her hubby.
> Agreed. Sridevi is not beautiful but thousand times better actress
> than Madhuri.
what is this suppose to mean?
> Hema and Vyjantimala were the only beautiful South
> Indian actresses.
and both are iyengars. ho ho ho [ just to irritate u ]
> She is half-tamilian though.(not a brahmin the breed you could fanatacise
with).
bullshit. She is out and out gult, though she is born and brought
up in TN. In case u are not aware apr 20% of TN population
are of AP origin.
> Is it worse than saying that Shahrukh Khan is a monkey who is
> unemployed now and got his butt kicked in his website business.
that was not posted by me. The guy who posted that will join
this thread soon (hint).
How things change. 5 yrs back, Shishir and u were at loggerheads
in that KamalHassan vs ShahRukh Khan thread. Now u have ganged
up together.
RK-
yeskay
>
> Almost all South Indian hindi film actresses with the exception
> of Vyjantimala have shady marraige history. Hema was the second wife
> of Dharam, Sridevi 2nd of Boney Kapoor.
Dharam was a big actor whereas Boney Kapoor is just another rich man
whose first name could be very apt for a male porn star! I thinks that's
the yuck! part.
> Agreed. Sridevi is not beautiful but thousand times better actress
> than Madhuri.
Yes, agreed.
> Hema and Vyjantimala were the only beautiful South Indian actresses.
Only if you go by the age old Indian concept of beauty.
> Is it worse than saying that Shahrukh Khan is a monkey who is
> unemployed now and got his butt kicked in his website business.
Yes it is. This is just a ridicule while the other is offending.
Balaji A.S. Murthy
>of Vyjantimala have shady marraige history.
Who is Vyjantimala?
- Balaji
Shridhar
> So!!! do u think i will support all these south heroines just
> bcos I am also a south indian. All of these marriages is yuck per
> me. Madhuri is 1000 times more sensible when it comes to selecting
> her hubby.
Why??? Marraige makes sense only if it is an arranged one and is the
first one??? Only in your own conservative and orthodox if not closed
narrow-minded
world. Atleast, Hema's and Sridevi's marraige was because of pure love
betwwn the two sides. If anything, it is Madhuri who is less sensible
as she is married to someone who has not even heard much of her
before. Now she has so much problems trying to be in touch with the
industry because of being located somewhere in the remote world of
California.
>
> > Agreed. Sridevi is not beautiful but thousand times better actress
> > than Madhuri.
>
> what is this suppose to mean?
It is supposed to mean what is just plainly written.
> and both are iyengars. ho ho ho [ just to irritate u ]
I doubt Vyjanti is an Iyengar. Anyway, Iyers are supposed to be more
beautiful than Iyengars(as per lot of people not me). Its just that
many Iyengars join the film industry. Jayaram(palakkad iyer) looks and
acts much better than egoist Kamalahaasan. Anyway, Iyers are atleast
not
classist/casteist in devotion as you Shiva/Dravidian-hating Iyengars
are!!!!
> bullshit. She is out and out gult, though she is born and brought
> up in TN.
Doubt that. She is half Mudaliar.
> > Is it worse than saying that Shahrukh Khan is a monkey who is
> > unemployed now and got his butt kicked in his website business.
>
> that was not posted by me. The guy who posted that will join
> this thread soon (hint).
Don't fuck around,man. I and lot of people here know how you have
insulted superstar Shahrukh Khan before.
> How things change. 5 yrs back, Shishir and u were at loggerheads
> in that KamalHassan vs ShahRukh Khan thread. Now u have ganged
> up together.
Noone is ganging up against anyone, just trying to state facts. Its
just figments of your vivid imagination if not stupid imagination.
Shridhar
>
> RK-
Shridhar
> > Agreed. Sridevi is not beautiful but thousand times better actress
> > than Madhuri.
>
> Yes, agreed.
Do you also agree that Kajol/Madhuri/Kareena etc are much better
actressesthan
south actresses(supposedly)/sirens like Jyotika,Simran,Roja,Meena etc
??
> > Hema and Vyjantimala were the only beautiful South Indian actresses.
>
> Only if you go by the age old Indian concept of beauty.
How else is beauty defined,man? Of course, we are talking about
physical beauty here. Whats worng with that? Many blackish Indian
males clamour for fair-skinned
and beautiful Indian women!!!!
Shridhar
mamta.dhand
> > Agreed. Sridevi is not beautiful but thousand times better actress
> > than Madhuri.
>
that time.
mamta.dhand
> Who is Vyjantimala?
>
> - Balaji
>
from song in Jewel Thief 'Hoto pe aisi baat main dabake chali aayi...'
(please excuse my terrible spelling, I spell Hindi as I hear it)
rkus...@rogers.com
> Why??? Marraige makes sense only if it is an arranged one and is the
> first one??? Only in your own conservative and orthodox if not closed
> narrow-minded
this has nothing to do with arranged vs love marriage.
Hema Malini is Dharam's rakhail (mistress). That she married him
is a hog wash. If Dharam's first wife (who is still married to him)
decides to go to court, both Dharam/Hema would end up in jail.
> world. Atleast, Hema's and Sridevi's marraige was because of pure love
> betwwn the two sides.
Love?? I would say lust?
> > > Agreed. Sridevi is not beautiful but thousand times better actress
> > > than Madhuri.
> >
> > what is this suppose to mean?
>
> It is supposed to mean what is just plainly written.
U are right. I missed the word actress. Sorry.
> I doubt Vyjanti is an Iyengar.
Mysore Iyengar to be precise.
> Anyway, Iyers are supposed to be more
> beautiful than Iyengars(as per lot of people not me). Its just that
> many Iyengars join the film industry. Jayaram(palakkad iyer) looks and
> acts much better than egoist Kamalahaasan. Anyway, Iyers are atleast
> not classist/casteist in devotion as you Shiva/Dravidian-hating Iyengars
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Between u and me, everyone knows who likes Gafoor (Shiva). So there
goes ur theory :-).
> > that was not posted by me. The guy who posted that will join
> > this thread soon (hint).
>
> Don't fuck around,man. I and lot of people here know how you have
> insulted superstar Shahrukh Khan before.
Of course I have insulted SRK, but the one u mentioned, that was
not me.
RK-
Ritu
I somehow do not think Vyjayanthimala (Balaji note I've got the
spelling right this time:-)) was the most beautiful actress of all
times. She was very average looking. She was a good dancer and that
was her USP. Like all dancers her eyes were very expressive but other
wise her expressions could get too animated and artificial at times.
Hema Malini on the other hand was beautiful. She had a a very bright
smile and again was a good dancer. She too could get very animated at
times and her dialogue delivery had a very very strong south hangover
but she had a very pleasing personality.
Between Sridevi and Madhuri I too vouch for Sridevi though Madhuri was
conventionally better looking. Madhuri was a method actress whereas
Sridevi was spontaneous. Madhuri has really not got films to showcase
her talent as such so she captilised on her seductive dances which
basically took her to the top.
btw guys, is it necessary to resort to profanity and gutter level
exchanges to get our points across? Why should it bother us if Sridevi
is Iyer, Iyenger, from AP, MP or Kashmir.. lets discuss her art. Her
personal life is her's and we from outside have no right to comment.
Circumstances mould moralities and it's insensitive for us from our
cocooned existence to pass judgement. It's so easy just for anyone to
trash artistes on these forums. These are the artistes who have proven
themselves and are achievers. Yet, simply because these actresses are
public personalities means anyone can get up and call them sluts?
People who have no claim to fame other than arm-chair rumination on
newsgroups?
Trash their art by all means if you don't like it...but don't indulge
in character assassination. That's in bad taste. And finally, morality
is a personal issue.. what is immoral to you might be a way of life
with another.
Regards,
Ritu
rkus...@rogers.com
> btw guys, is it necessary to resort to profanity and gutter level
> exchanges to get our points across?
And may I ask who started it first by calling Madhuri a slut.
Unless morons like Shishir get back what they deserve they
won't stop. Someone has to do the dirty job of flaming them
and I am more than happy to do that.
Now I hope, after learning his lesson, he would shut up forever.
RK-
Alok
Why don't you flame Habshi, harmony, Jai Maharaj et al?
Killfiling this thread.
-Alok
--
Mathematics is the only science where one never knows what one is
talking about nor whether what is said is true.
-- Russell
yeskay
> Hema Malini on the other hand was beautiful. She had a a very bright
> smile and again was a good dancer. She too could get very animated at
> times and her dialogue delivery had a very very strong south hangover
> but she had a very pleasing personality.
>
But, she was the most wooden actress ever to don the make-up. Ask her
to weep, she makes a lot of sniffing noises, the ones from a running
nose :)
> Between Sridevi and Madhuri I too vouch for Sridevi though Madhuri was
> conventionally better looking. Madhuri was a method actress whereas
> Sridevi was spontaneous. Madhuri has really not got films to showcase
> her talent as such so she captilised on her seductive dances which
> basically took her to the top.
Though Sridevi is a better actress, Madhuri's voice >>>>> Sridevi's.
Those squeaky squeals can get one one's nerves very easily. This is only
her Hindi voice. In south-Indian films, her voice is much better.
rkus...@rogers.com
> Ritu wrote:
> > Hema Malini on the other hand was beautiful. She had a a very bright
> > smile and again was a good dancer. She too could get very animated at
> > times and her dialogue delivery had a very very strong south hangover
> > but she had a very pleasing personality.
> >
>
> But, she was the most wooden actress ever to don the make-up. Ask her
> to weep, she makes a lot of sniffing noises, the ones from a running
> nose :)
HM can't act for nuts. When she talks one gets an impression that
she is gasping for breath (haanfa na).
Though she was very good in Seeta Aur Geeta
and Sholay. Perhaps she can do the role of stupid girl talking
gibberish all the time, which is what she had to do in Seeta-aur-Geeta
and Sholay.
But she is beautiful. Much better than her daughter even at this
age.
RK- [ why star daughters are no match to their mom. Hema, Dimple ..]
Muqudar
that time.>>
I have to agree with this... The first time I saw Sridevi was in Nagina, right
after the bhooli bisri ek kahani song... and when her face is FINALLY revealed,
I thought she was the most beautiful lady ever!
Shishir Yerramilli
> "Shishir Yerramilli" <yshi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > Go fuck yourself RK!
>
> I don't have to. I have already fucked you.
>
> > > If anyone came from a dubious family it is Sridevi. The person who
> > > is known as her father is not her biological father. Her sister
> > > ran away with someone after revolting.
> >
> > What does her sister have anything to do with her?
>
> simple. tells about her family background.
What does your mother and wife eloping with a rickshawwalla have
anything to do with you?Oh never mind....
>
> > > In nutshell, Sridevi comes from a dubious family and she was a slut
> > > while working in south film industry. Sure she looks like one too.
> > >
> > Every young actress has to do 'favors' for the producers/directors
> > to get a break.Your beloved MD is no exception ,what she did for Feroz
> > Khan and Mukul Anand is not a state secret!
>
> Oh yeah. U were witness to all that.
Same way you were witness to SriDevi's alleged misdeeds...
>
> > Since when did education or having ones siblings living in the U.S
> > constitute high moral character.Is this to imply that all illiterate
> > agrarian women are whores or sluts!In RK's(whatever the fuck his name
> > is) eyes wealth=character.
>
> Actually u are right. And this is proved by your sister/mother who
> may be sluts. After all living in US or Gulf does not
> constitute high moral character.
Again do not impose your family history on mine please!A person
who doesnt even post his name even from an anonymous account is in no
position to defame other peoples families!
>
> > Second wife of Boney Kapoor is far from a proper role for SriDevi!But
> > what of Madhuri Dixit who was bonking Sunjay Dutt like there no
>
> Getting bonked by Sunjay Dutt is preferrable to getting bonked
> by N T Ramarao and Akini Nageshwar Rao. Sridevi must be unique
> to get bonked by father and son (Nagaarjun).
Madhuri is also in the unique position of being in orgy with Daud
Ibrahim and Chhota Rajan.I am told that you were the eunuch in the
background holding the fan!Is this why your wife ran away with the
dhoodhwala?
>
> > It doesnt matter where the fuck youre from you bigoted little
> > shit,if you ever have to throw up just look in the mirror.
>
> He he he. AP dog Yerramilli got irritated. Mission accomplished.
Dont flatter yourself RK.Is this same motherfucker Ravi Krishna who
retired from sci as he didnt have the stomach for even usenet
confrontations?!
>
> Now go and watch crap AP movies like Jagadala Veeru Atiloka Sundari
> and jerk off fantasizing about Sridevi. That's what AP folks are
> capable of and that's what they have been doing. Every AP man I
> know is crazy about movies and is capable of watching any damn
> crap movie.
>
Hindi folks like you are only capable of watching recycled crap
movies from Telugu and Tamil.Why dont you meat this AP man face and
face and I'll show what Im fully capable of doing.
> You may hate MD (bcos she kicked Sridevi's big ass back to Hyderabadu),
> but she is any day more ravishing than that shit from AP Sridevi.
>
I dont hate MD you idiot ,it is you who is in love with her whore
like persona.
> RK-
> PS: same holds for Rambha and other crap gult actresses.
Rambha is from TN.Anyway MD deserves comparision with Ramya
Krishna,now she is whore ,you should know as you were the eunuch
guarding the brothel which contained her ,your wife,mother and
sisters.
> PPS: I however admit that Sridevi is a very good actress and
> IMO a better actress than MD.
Oh how kind of you!
> PPS2: My last response to this.
Not mine at any rate you prick.Come back and respond to this like a
man...oops I forgot my bad!
Shishir Yerramilli
I may have called MD a slut but only in retaliation.I did not insult
her family or background.It is that idiot Ravi Krishna who has brought
caste and state into this.Did I say anything about Maharashtra because
MD hails from there?Even if they are sluts,I will say that we are not
in a position to judge them are their circumstances were harsh.
Shishir Yerramilli
> "Ritu" <rc0...@rediffmail.com> wrote :-
>
> > btw guys, is it necessary to resort to profanity and gutter level
> > exchanges to get our points across?
>
> And may I ask who started it first by calling Madhuri a slut.
> Unless morons like Shishir get back what they deserve they
> won't stop. Someone has to do the dirty job of flaming them
> and I am more than happy to do that.
You are only comfortable with dirty jobs!
>
> Now I hope, after learning his lesson, he would shut up forever.
>
Ravi Krishna you disillusioned Tamil Iyengar fuck!It is you who has
to be taught a lesson.I am not going to shut up but it in the past it
seems that someone has shut or should I say blocked you up in a
rather unique way!
> RK-
rkus...@rogers.com
>>I may have called MD a slut but only in retaliation.I did not insult
>>her family or background.
Blatant lie. This is what that moron Shishir Yerramilli wrote
before I entered this thread. Totally unprovoked.
>No one wants to look like Madhuri Dixit as she is
>just a cosmetic beauty.If luck didnt favor her,she wouldve ended up as
>a dancer in a brothel!That is probably the 'different look' you allude
>to!
Dancer in a brothel????
I never called Sridevi a slut. Heck in the
past I have been her supporter in RAMLI. [ check some old
threads around 1997 ].
That moron deserves every abuse and if that means
abusing entire AP, so be it. After all everything
is fair in love and flame war.
RK-
rkus...@rogers.com
>You are only comfortable with dirty jobs!
sorry I don't do Y2K programming like goltis.
Most common Y2K cobol program variable names-
CUSTOMER_NAME_GARU
SSN_GARU
RK-
Gafoor
<rkus...@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:acm1gj$qj3m2$1...@ID-75254.news.dfncis.de...
What is GARU ?
Anant Rege
"Muqudar" <muq...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20020524140807...@mb-fy.aol.com...
You two are too hard on yourselves. Take it easy. Everybody makes such
mistakes while growing up. I knew a person who actually was a Padma Khanna
fan.
Muqudar
mistakes while growing up. >>
It wasn't a mistake =)
Arjun Pandit
>
> Just look at their marriage:-
> One married to an American Doctor and the other as a second
> wife of Boney Kapoor. Yuck.
Prior to that, IIRC, she was secretly married to Mithun da, his third wife.
Arjun Pandit
> Every young actress has to do 'favors' for the producers/directors
> to get a break.Your beloved MD is no exception ,what she did for Feroz
> Khan and Mukul Anand is not a state secret!
if MD did it to FK and MA, then Sridevi did to Jumping Jack, Anil
Kapoor, his brother, Mithun whoever could get her a few films.
Arjun Pandit
> > "Shishir Yerramilli" <yshi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >
> > > Go fuck yourself RK!
> >
> > I don't have to. I have already fucked you.
> >
> Stop having homosexual dreams like your Afghan heroes!
Who do you have as your hero? Chiranjeevi? Its really amazing how
gultis worship this ugly looking character. He got his butt royally
kicked back to andhra land when he tried to enter hindi films.
Arjun Pandit
> Atleast, Hema's and Sridevi's marraige was because of pure love
> betwwn the two sides.
Sridevi had married Mithun Da earlier as his second/third wife out of
pure love. Dont remember when Yogeeta Bali married Mithun. Then she
married Boney as his second wife also out of pure love. What happened
to her pure love for Mithun during the Boney affair?
> If anything, it is Madhuri who is less sensible
> as she is married to someone who has not even heard much of her
> before. Now she has so much problems trying to be in touch with the
> industry because of being located somewhere in the remote world of
> California.
But she is still doing well! Whereas Sridevi is out and probably down
to changing nappies of her 2-3 kids. Devdas if it becomes a hit will
be only because of her and Aishwarya and the apparently excellent
music. We all know what happens to solo superstar starrers not
belonging to the chopra/johar camp otherwise. They sink :-)
> I doubt Vyjanti is an Iyengar.
Pucca iyengar.
> Jayaram(palakkad iyer) looks and
> acts much better than egoist Kamalahaasan. Anyway, Iyers are atleast
> not
> classist/casteist in devotion as you Shiva/Dravidian-hating Iyengars
> are!!!!
I suppose thats because Iyers are lower down the value chain and
consequently closer to Dravidians than Iyengars and you relate to them
better. Remember Iyer you go, Iyengar you become :-). Iyengars are
crystal clear about their superior identity :-). Iyers are the
confused lot, they wanna be like Iyengars, but realise they are not
and consequently they start feeling like Dravidians.
> > that was not posted by me. The guy who posted that will join
> > this thread soon (hint).
>
> Don't fuck around,man. I and lot of people here know how you have
> insulted superstar Shahrukh Khan before.
Yes he did that. I am proof that he insulted the superstar before.
rkus...@rogers.com
Muqudar
belonging to the chopra/johar camp otherwise. They sink :-)>>
And we all know who you were also referring to when you made your remark:
Madhuri =)
Had it not been for Chopra's Dil To Pagal Hai... Madhuri would have absolutely
NO hits since 1997 =) Or more accurately speaking 1995. Her long list of
flops should be proof enough hehe. Oh and wait a minute, you think Devdas will
be a hit because of Madhuri? HA! Gimme what you are smokin' haha. Ever heard
of the producer/director/music/Aishwarya? THEY will be the ONLY reason why
this movie will be a hit. Also, Dil To Pagal Hai was a hit because of Yash
Chopra/music and the excellent career that Karisma and SRK had at that time...
Madhuri was already written off and is about 6 years over her stay in the
industry. Talentless actors/actresses shouldn't be allowed to stay for this
long...
Shridhar
> But she is still doing well! Whereas Sridevi is out and probably down
> to changing nappies of her 2-3 kids. Devdas if it becomes a hit will
> be only because of her and Aishwarya and the apparently excellent
> music. We all know what happens to solo superstar starrers not
> belonging to the chopra/johar camp otherwise. They sink :-)
Yeah, after ruling the industry for 10 years for her acting, not her
vulgar
jhatkas!!! Madhuri couldn't even rule for 5 years. And she never
carried a successful film herself!!!! Devdas is an out and out
Shahrukh film as he
is the central character of the film. Only in your Mumbai-biased
dreamy world is it a Madhuri film(as confessed by herself in the
latest Filmfare issue..go and check it where she talks about her being
a guest role).
>
>
>
> > I doubt Vyjanti is an Iyengar.
>
> Pucca iyengar.
Even Prabhu(looks like a sandas cleaner) deva sundaram is an
iyengar!!! So????
>
>
> > Jayaram(palakkad iyer) looks and
> > acts much better than egoist Kamalahaasan. Anyway, Iyers are atleast
> > not
> > classist/casteist in devotion as you Shiva/Dravidian-hating Iyengars
> > are!!!!
>
> I suppose thats because Iyers are lower down the value chain and
> consequently closer to Dravidians than Iyengars
I have seen both your and RK's photos. Both of you look like pucca
dravidians/australoids. So much for your value chain talk!!!!! Iyers
are great since they don't classify Gods on the basis of caste inspite
of their Aryan heritage unlike you idiots!!! Gosh, this talk is
already getting disgusting. People, forgive me for stooping to the
level of Ravi Iyengar(Arjun Pandit), i couldn't help but give one back
to this idiot for insulting me.
rkus...@rogers.com
> > I suppose thats because Iyers are lower down the value chain and
> > consequently closer to Dravidians than Iyengars
>
> I have seen both your and RK's photos. Both of you look like pucca
> dravidians/australoids. So much for your value chain talk!!!!!
fool who is talking about looks. it is brains :-)
AP is right. Iyers have to up their IQs by at least few 100
points before they reach the same strata like Iyengars.
[ Note: others pls ignore. this is the meant for the consumption
of this fool only ]
Anyhow why are u defending Iyers. None of them consider Palghat
Iyers as one of their own. Tsk Tsk Tsk. Palghat Iyers seem to
be the caste equivalent of hijras, neither tams, nor mallus.
> Iyers
> are great since they don't classify Gods on the basis of caste inspite
> of their Aryan heritage unlike you idiots!!!
this is interesting. will u please explain this in detail. I would
like to know what do you mean by "Iyers don't classify gods on the
basis of caste". I presume u mean that Iyergars do.
>Gosh, this talk is already getting disgusting.
Great!!! U were first to drag caste in this thread and now when ur ass
got kicked, it became disgusting.
At least I flamed Shishir up to the level of state bcos I know
that Gults are very sensitive about Sridevi, Ghantasala and Chandra
Babu Naidu. U had no qualms about dragging Iyers/Iyengars.
RK-
rkus...@rogers.com
> Madhuri couldn't even rule for 5 years.
> And she never carried a successful film herself!!!!
Yup. Beta was a hit bcos of Anuphan Kher/Aruna Irani.
Raja was a hit because of Sanjay Kapoor.
You seem to follow the same rule as you do in cricket. If
Srinath/Mohanty takes wkt, it is bcos of pitch. If Agarkar
takes wkt,it is bcos of true wkt.
BTW Sridevi was #1 bcos of TINA factor. Once Madhuri came,
she was out. Just check her hits after Tezaab. Just one: Chandini.
Rest all were hits as much as Aggy's bowling in test cricket.
Coincidence?? may be.
RK-
Shridhar
> Blatant lie. This is what that moron Shishir Yerramilli wrote
> before I entered this thread. Totally unprovoked.
He atleast abuses stars who are nobody of his, nobody of yours. 1000
times better than you directly abusing the mothers of posters whose
views you can't take at face value.
> That moron deserves every abuse and if that means
> abusing entire AP, so be it. After all everything
> is fair in love and flame war
Who are you to talk about the so-called yuckiness of a marraige? Heck,
what
is Sridevi/Hema to you??? They or anyone else will do whatever they
want,
do they need your Brahministic culture approval for that??? BTW, how
much
of a Brahmin are you, let me ask?? Do you do daily Sandya vandanams as
prescribed by the Vedas for a Brahmachari??? You are just like so many
other Brahmins who put sacred threads around their bodies for the sake
of it;
they don't respect it or its significance. Maybe i am also like you
but i don't make hedonistic pretentions of being a Brahmin and
insulting the deeds of others!!! BTW, do you know that in ancient
India, people had many wives????!!!!
And as far as Iyengars and film industry go, they can be free to join
the most uncultured way of living in India where they will do
anything for money, be it the most vulgar forms of their own
presentation on screen or some inexplicibles off the screen(some of
wich Shishir pointed out).
First, clean your own backyard, then think about cleaning others'.
Shridhar
Shridhar
> > from song in Jewel Thief 'Hoto pe aisi baat main dabake chali aayi...'
> > (please excuse my terrible spelling, I spell Hindi as I hear it)
>
> I somehow do not think Vyjayanthimala (Balaji note I've got the
> spelling right this time:-)) was the most beautiful actress of all
> times. She was very average looking. She was a good dancer and that
> was her USP. Like all dancers her eyes were very expressive but other
> wise her expressions could get too animated and artificial at times.
You got it right. Dancing was the merit on which Vyjanti ruled the
screen
for some years. In fact, all the South Indian actresses in the Hindi
film industry were excellent dancers with the exception of probably
Rekha who was
okay. These actresses knew how to do some good masala acting(their
expressions/limited-histrionics were enough to give the audience value
for money), were great dancers and could do some good comedy. As a
result, they were part of some successful films and were called
superstars of their generation. But only Rekha among them knew how to
act really serious roles
with flair. She was the only actress out of them in the true sense.
Otherwise, i regard Sharmila Tagore, Nargis, Jaya Bhaduri etc much
better actresses than these South Indian entertainers with the
exception of Rekha.
> Hema Malini on the other hand was beautiful. She had a a very bright
> smile and again was a good dancer. She too could get very animated at
> times and her dialogue delivery had a very very strong south hangover
> but she had a very pleasing personality.
I am amazed that Hema despite having stayed in Delhi before joining
fims had a pathetic accent. Even now she hasn't improved her Hindi
after all these years in Mumbai. What about Sridevi?? Totally madrasi
in her accent even after 20 yrs in the industry??? In that sense, i
admire Rekha who had pure Hindi accent(she worked very hard for this)
in a few years time inspite of having come from the South. It was
almost like she was brought up in the North. Of course,
Meenakshi,Shilpa,Madhu,Aishwarya etc have been brought up in
Delhi/Mumbai respectively, so they know Hindi well.
>
> Between Sridevi and Madhuri I too vouch for Sridevi though Madhuri was
> conventionally better looking. Madhuri was a method actress whereas
> Sridevi was spontaneous. Madhuri has really not got films to showcase
> her talent as such so she captilised on her seductive dances which
> basically took her to the top.
Agreed. BTW, what is unconventiona beauty??? Bipasha basu?? ;-)
>
> btw guys, is it necessary to resort to profanity and gutter level
> exchanges to get our points across? Why should it bother us if Sridevi
> is Iyer, Iyenger, from AP, MP or Kashmir..
See, we are just talking about their origins whats wrong with that????
But
a few idiots of course abuse the entire region/caste out of their
personal hatred. That is wrong. Otherwise, talking about origins is
usually fun!!!
Shridhar
Shridhar
He did Pratibandh in Hindi which was a hit(a good film imo). He also
did
Aaj Ka Goonda Raj(again a hit). He atleast did his dubbing for his
voice in Hindi, not like your iyengar hero Kamalahaasan who made a
mockery of Hindi with his stupid accent in hindi films. Kamalahaasan
was a major flop show in Hindi. He he he, he got his butt kicked in
Canada recently(who asked him to ditch his orthodox name kamalahaasan
and make it sound muslim). Of course, the less talked about Rajnikant
the better(many hindi people call him a joker). Even Venkatesh
delivered a hit in Anari as also Nagarjuna. I am no big fan of them
but just trying to bring some factas to your ignorant hatred-filled
mind.
Shridhar
ps: Can Kamalahaasan iyengar ever do a Mohanlal in kireedam,
Dashradham, Thaalavattam, Bharatam etc or Mamooty in all his
award-winning films leave alone Jairam in his ripping coedies in
Malayalam??? Heck, mahaan actor kamalahaasan had to rig the national
awards to win one. And going by my Tamil friends in Chennai, Jairam
kicked Kamal's ass badly in Thenali.
Shridhar
> Sridevi had married Mithun Da earlier as his second/third wife out of
> pure love.
Were you prying around them then to know about it?? Heck, at that time
you must be in your knickers playing gilli-danda in streets.
> But she is still doing well!
yeah, she is doing well. She goes to Safeway daily and buys groceries
to cook food for Dr.Nene. She vaccum cleans her house daily and waits
for Dr.nene to return home. Her scocial life is meeting a few
colleagues of Dr.Nene. Agreed she is doing very well in the film
industry. Of course, she also delivers mhaan flops in between like Yeh
Raasten hain pyaar ke.
> Whereas Sridevi is out and probably down
> to changing nappies of her 2-3 kids.
She retired from the industry after fully proving herself in acting.
seen Lamhe??Not when her Jhatkas were overtaken by Karisma
Kapoor's!!!!
> Devdas if it becomes a hit will
> be only because of her and Aishwarya and the apparently excellent
> music. We all know what happens to solo superstar starrers not
> belonging to the chopra/johar camp otherwise. They sink :-)
Seen Pardes, Yes Boss, Josh, Baazigar, Karan Arjun, Darr, Raju Ban
Gaya Gentleman etc etc???? BTW, how many hits did Amitabh had in the
70s in films
not directed by Prakash Mehra/Manmohan Desai?????
BTW, why talk about established superstar Shahrukh? Lets talk about
your idol,
tik tik,who was labelled supesrtar by your likes only to get his butt
kicked by SRK in K3G, Mohabattein(v-a-v Mission Kashmir) not to
mention disasters like
Yaadein, AMALL, NTJNH etc etc!!!! Now the industrywallahs are calling
him, guess what, another one-film wonder, HA HA HA!!!! Besides, an
idiot who misled the distributors into shelling millions of rupees in
waste.
Shridhar
rkus...@rogers.com
> He atleast abuses stars who are nobody of his, nobody of yours. 1000
> times better than you directly abusing the mothers of posters whose
> views you can't take at face value.
Ho Ho Ho. And this we have to learn from Shridhar Narayan Iyer, the guy
who has abused every rscer who calls Aggy a crap bowler.
> do they need your Brahministic culture approval for that???
brahministic culture???? what crap is this.
Is being a mistress (which is what Hema Malini is) a non brahmin
culture. Or marrying 2 times like Sridevi approved by non brahmins.
Do u think before writing? Haven't u noticed that I have always
bashed Hema. If I am such a casteist, then I should support her.
for that matter I am a Kamal basher too.
> BTW, how much of a Brahmin are you, let me ask??
anything between 0 and 1.
> Do you do daily Sandya vandanams as
> prescribed by the Vedas for a Brahmachari???
ho ho ho. looks like ur knowledge about vedas is as good as other
knowledge u have displayed so far. Sandya vandanam is for all
(married person); not bachelors (brahmachari) alone.
> You are just like so many
> other Brahmins who put sacred threads around their bodies for the sake
> of it;
oh yeah u know about me better than myself. I don't wear poonal (thread)
and I eat meat too. I am 1% practicising brahmin and I care
a fa*t about caste. However if some moron start bashing brahmins
without any basis, I know how to irritate. That's what USENET is
meant for: Flaming.
> BTW, do you know that in ancient India, people had many wives????!!!!
So!!!!
> And as far as Iyengars and film industry go, they can be free to join
> the most uncultured way of living in India where they will do
> anything for money, be it the most vulgar forms of their own
> presentation on screen or some inexplicibles off the screen(some of
> wich Shishir pointed out).
> First, clean your own backyard, then think about cleaning others'.
is there a translation available for this drivel.
> I am amazed that Hema despite having stayed in Delhi before joining
> fims had a pathetic accent. Even now she hasn't improved her Hindi
> after all these years in Mumbai.
Hema lived in Delhi for about 7-8 yrs and that too her first 7-8 years.
she studied in D.T.E.A Mandir Marg school where she was the classmate
of my aunt's daughter. Her name at that time was Sujata Chakravarathy.
She then moved to Trichi as her father was transfered. And she
lived there till she came to Bombay for films in late 1960s.
So it is not as if she lived in Delhi all her life like me.
However I do agree that her hindi is pathetic. In GharJamai where
she acted as Madhuri's mom she says 45 as paiNtaalis. And Ghar Jamai
is a 1990 movie. Pathetic.
It is not her hindi which I dislike. she is a plain bad actress.
Except for sholay and seeta-aur-geeta I didn't like her acting
in any other movie.
However I was quite impressed by her acting in Hey Ram (tamil version).
>> Sridevi had married Mithun Da earlier as his second/third wife out of
>> pure love.
>Were you prying around them then to know about it?? Heck, at that time
>you must be in your knickers playing gilli-danda in streets.
AP is right. Sridevi was married to Mithun Da around 1987-88. And then
they broke up. It was well reported in all film magazines.
Notice that they never acted together after Guru (1989).
I will leave the rest of flaming business to AP.
RK-
Deb Shanker
eyes, big busts. Have seen a few Hemamalini movies like Dharmatma with Feroz
Khan and also a few Sridebi movies like Judai. They suck bad like the rest.
Thanks bud.
Deb
Muqudar
Apparently you suck the most... can't even spell a name correctly, even when
you have been told the correct spelling... pretty sad if you ask me!
Again, Sridevi. Not Sridebi.
Deb Shanker
Deb
"Muqudar" <muq...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20020526175551...@mb-ma.aol.com...
Srifan_In
> <<When growing up, I always thought Sridevi was the most beautiful actress at
> that time.>>
>
> I have to agree with this... The first time I saw Sridevi was in Nagina, right
> after the bhooli bisri ek kahani song... and when her face is FINALLY revealed,
> I thought she was the most beautiful lady ever!
Even I agree with that....Same thing happened.....I had seen this song
in my neighbour's house when I was a kid....I had seen sri in many
telugu movies by then.... I never knew she was a super star in
Hindi..... I saw soooooo happy to see her in that hindi song.....
Arjun Pandit
>
> > Sridevi had married Mithun Da earlier as his second/third wife out of
> > pure love.
>
> Were you prying around them then to know about it??
Huh? For Anyone who knew how to read english and had access to media,
it was a well known news around 87 ...
> Heck, at that time
> you must be in your knickers playing gilli-danda in streets.
For all we know, you must be still be wearing diapers.
> yeah, she is doing well. She goes to Safeway daily and buys groceries
> to cook food for Dr.Nene. She vaccum cleans her house daily and waits
> for Dr.nene to return home. Her scocial life is meeting a few
> colleagues of Dr.Nene. Agreed she is doing very well in the film
> industry.
And how do you know all this? Now You are prying around in your
diapers is it?
> Of course, she also delivers mhaan flops in between like Yeh
> Raasten hain pyaar ke.
Yep. But less Mahaan flops compared to Shahrukh's home productions
PDDHH and Asoka. Did you know Asoka is to debut as serial in some tv
channel? The TV channel must have realised that no one can stand 3 odd
hours of crap at a stretch and made the wise decision of splitting it
into 3-4 pieces. HEHEHEHEHEHE.
>
> > Whereas Sridevi is out and probably down
> > to changing nappies of her 2-3 kids.
>
> She retired from the industry after fully proving herself in acting.
> seen Lamhe??Not when her Jhatkas were overtaken by Karisma
> Kapoor's!!!!
HO HO HO. How many hits in %age did Sridebi have once Tezaab was out
as RK asked? Madhuri rightly kicked Sridebi's big butt big time after
Tezaab. Anyway Lamhe was a mahaan flop, in your own words.
> Seen Pardes,
Mahima was the hero. HEHEHEHE. SRK played second fiddle to a debutant
heroine. HO HO HO.
> Yes Boss, Baazigar, Darr, Karan Arjun, Raju Ban
> Gaya Gentleman etc etc????
Yep. Also seen Duplicate, One two ka four, Guddu, Ram Jaane, Asoka,
PBDHH, Koyla, Oh Darling, Baadshah etc etc. Bottom line SRK has more
super duper flops than hits you have listed. BTW Darr is Chopra camp.
So one hit knocked off.
> Josh
Flop
> BTW, how many hits did Amitabh had in the
> 70s in films
> not directed by Prakash Mehra/Manmohan Desai?????
I am not a AB fan, Gafoor/RK can help. But I can list off the top of
my head Sholay, Deewar (Chopra, not Mehra/Desai), Natwarlal, Don,
Trishul, Kaala Patthar, Majboor, Chupke Chupke, Abhimaan, Namak Haram,
Anand, Khuddar etc etc. Impressive, once RK/Gafoor contribute the list
is bound to grow. Apart from stray films like Ganga ki Saugandh and
Great Gambler, AB had a very good record during his time.
Your SRK's record is PATHETIC in comparison.
>
> BTW, why talk about established superstar Shahrukh? Lets talk about
> your idol,
> tik tik,who was labelled supesrtar by your likes only to get his butt
> kicked by SRK in K3G, Mohabattein(v-a-v Mission Kashmir) not to
> mention disasters like
> Yaadein, AMALL, NTJNH etc etc!!!!
All said and done, SRK must be the only superstar in this world, who
consistently gives FLOPS. Super Duper Flops. Please refer the list
above compared to the hit list you have given. HEHEHEHEHE.
Arjun Pandit
> Yeah, after ruling the industry for 10 years for her acting, not her
> vulgar
> jhatkas!!!
Bollywood movie watchers go to watch an actress's acting? Wow thats a
new one for me. Anyway Sridebi has very few movies (or practically
none is it if you leave out Sadma etc) like Tabu's (taking a more
recent actress) Chandni Bar to demonstrate her acting or where people
went to see the movie for her acting.
> Madhuri couldn't even rule for 5 years. And she never
> carried a successful film herself!!!!
RK has more than answered this ... Beta/Raja were all one woman shows.
> Devdas is an out and out
> Shahrukh film as he
> is the central character of the film.
Pity really. After Saigal/Dilip Kumar, we have SRK essaying Devdas.
> Only in your Mumbai-biased
> dreamy world is it a Madhuri film(as confessed by herself in the
> latest Filmfare issue..go and check it where she talks about her being
> a guest role).
Sorry, I dont care. Such movies are not for me. I cant releate to
losers like Devdas who give up on their life for some babe ...
especially when he is portrayed by another loser.
Ritu
> fims had a pathetic accent. Even now she hasn't improved her Hindi
> after all these years in Mumbai. What about Sridevi?? Totally madrasi
> in her accent even after 20 yrs in the industry??? In that sense, i
> admire Rekha who had pure Hindi accent(she worked very hard for this)
> in a few years time inspite of having come from the South. It was
> almost like she was brought up in the North. Of course,
> Meenakshi,Shilpa,Madhu,Aishwarya etc have been brought up in
> Delhi/Mumbai respectively, so they know Hindi well.
Yeskay Wrote :
>
> But, she was the most wooden actress ever to don the make-up. Ask her
> to weep, she makes a lot of sniffing noises, the ones from a running
> nose :)
>
Well I can't really dispute your opinions here. Hema Malini's dialogue
delivery did leave a lot to be desired. Her funny 'ha.n' after very
line was quite distracting but she had expressive eyes. She could
emote very well through her expressions. I somehow always liked her.
As I said she had a pleasing personality and her work with directors
like Gulzar was pretty good. Ofcourse she does not come in the class
of Jaya Bhaduri etc. Hema Malini IMO was the perfect star material..
very pleasing personality, passable acting skills and lots of good
films to credit...The Gulzar films she did sort of elevated her
status.
Incidentally, talking about her weeping skills. I remember reading an
interview of Vijay Anand. In 'Tere Mere Sapne' he wanted to show her
character break down and cry. But he somehow did not trust her to do
the job right. Finally, he improvised her scene so that she had to
hide her head in the refrigerator and cry :-).. The scene was very
effective. Infact Vijay Anand used the same 'refrigerator treatment'
with his brother also. Since Dev Anand was equally bad at crying he
always used to make him cover his face with his hand and cry!!
> > Between Sridevi and Madhuri I too vouch for Sridevi though Madhuri was
> > conventionally better looking. Madhuri was a method actress whereas
> > Sridevi was spontaneous. Madhuri has really not got films to showcase
> > her talent as such so she captilised on her seductive dances which
> > basically took her to the top.
>
> Agreed. BTW, what is unconventiona beauty??? Bipasha basu?? ;-)
Yeah! I'm sure you guys really like her :-)
> >
> > btw guys, is it necessary to resort to profanity and gutter level
> > exchanges to get our points across? Why should it bother us if Sridevi
> > is Iyer, Iyenger, from AP, MP or Kashmir..
>
> See, we are just talking about their origins whats wrong with that????
> But
> a few idiots of course abuse the entire region/caste out of their
> personal hatred. That is wrong. Otherwise, talking about origins is
> usually fun!!!
Yes, as long as you are making light-hearted remarks about
idiosyncrasies of people of a particular region it's fun.... but
trashing people using their origins as a base to my mind is a dark
ages mentality. And usage of profanity at most time reflects poorly on
the person using it rather than the person who is the target for
it.... let's try and keep the newsgroup a decent place.
Regards,
Ritu
rkus...@rogers.com
>rkus...@rogers.com> wrote :-
>>"Shridhar" wrote in message
> > Iyers
> > are great since they don't classify Gods on the basis of caste inspite
> > of their Aryan heritage unlike you idiots!!!
>
> this is interesting. will u please explain this in detail. I would
> like to know what do you mean by "Iyers don't classify gods on the
> basis of caste". I presume u mean that Iyergars do.
Shridhar,
A reminder. Pls explain what you have written above, else it will
be concluded that once again u wrote without thinking.
If this is OT, u know where to email me.
RK-
Muqudar
And Arjunpandit... are you a mahaan fool? HEHEHE
Again, it's Sridevi....
Alok
<snip>
>
> Incidentally, talking about her weeping skills. I remember reading an
> interview of Vijay Anand. In 'Tere Mere Sapne' he wanted to show her
> character break down and cry. But he somehow did not trust her to do
> the job right. Finally, he improvised her scene so that she had to
> hide her head in the refrigerator and cry :-).. The scene was very
> effective. Infact Vijay Anand used the same 'refrigerator treatment'
> with his brother also. Since Dev Anand was equally bad at crying he
> always used to make him cover his face with his hand and cry!!
What is this? *Dev Anand* of all people, wasn't perfect? <grin>
<snip>
> >
> > Agreed. BTW, what is unconventiona beauty??? Bipasha basu?? ;-)
>
> Yeah! I'm sure you guys really like her :-)
Not all of "us guys"
-Alok
Shridhar
> Bollywood movie watchers go to watch an actress's acting?
Oh yeha, then how come 80% movies flop. Maybe you are one ofthe only
few
idiotic Bowllywood watchers who goes for jhatkas and not to see a good
movie with good performances. No wonder Madhuri is your favourite
actress and useless
wooden actor hrithik is your favourite ator.
> RK has more than answered this ... Beta/Raja were all one woman shows.
Raja???!!! HA HA HA, you people are so hypocritical. Do you call a
shit movie like Raja one of the achievements of Madhuri???? You can do
better than that
by citing better examples like Mrityudand!!!! Anyway, Raja/Beta etc
are remakes of Tamil fims. Can they even compare with original
performances like Chandini
or Lamhe????
> Sorry, I dont care. Such movies are not for me.
Then don't care to even comment about the movie or its stars. If you
don't like a character, shut your trap and let others talk about
it!!!!
Shridhar
Shridhar
> Huh? For Anyone who knew how to read english and had access to media,
> it was a well known news around 87 ...
So, everything written in gossipy film magazines is true??? They are
published only to fool ignorant idiots like you.
> For all we know, you must be still be wearing diapers.
And you pried on me somewhere to reach that conclusion????? Arjun
Pandit 007 !!!!
> And how do you know all this?
She herself confessed in an interview of hers in TV. Unlike your
remote
cave in Peoria, i have access to all indian television channels.
> Now You are prying around in your
> diapers is it?
Oh, you dream of me being in diapers????? Arjun Pervert 007 !!!
> HO HO HO. How many hits in %age did Sridebi have once Tezaab was out
So a good performance depends on whether the movie is a hit, huh???
Enuf said. Amazed by your knowledge about films or the lack of it!!!
Going by your views,i think you must be one of those front-benchers
giving taalis and whistles in some shoddy theatre in Mumbai whenever a
heroine strips on screen !!!!!
Shridhar
rkus...@rogers.com
> > HO HO HO. How many hits in %age did Sridebi have once Tezaab was out
>
> So a good performance depends on whether the movie is a hit, huh???
Ho Ho Ho.
When it comes to SRK, u are first to count his hits
ignoring his pathetic acting.
When it comes to Sridevi, hits/flops do not matter.
> Raja???!!! HA HA HA, you people are so hypocritical. Do you call a
> shit movie like Raja one of the achievements of Madhuri???? You can do
> better than that
> by citing better examples like Mrityudand!!!! Anyway, Raja/Beta etc
> are remakes of Tamil fims. Can they even compare with original
> performances like Chandini
> or Lamhe????
fool we are not talking about good/shit movie. Raja/Beta were hits
bcos of madhuri and only madhuri. if u have a probem accepting that,
GFY.
RK-
Ritu
> rc0...@rediffmail.com (Ritu) wrote in message news:<8777cccd.02052...@posting.google.com>...
>
> <snip>
> >
> > Incidentally, talking about her weeping skills. I remember reading an
> > interview of Vijay Anand. In 'Tere Mere Sapne' he wanted to show her
> > character break down and cry. But he somehow did not trust her to do
> > the job right. Finally, he improvised her scene so that she had to
> > hide her head in the refrigerator and cry :-).. The scene was very
> > effective. Infact Vijay Anand used the same 'refrigerator treatment'
> > with his brother also. Since Dev Anand was equally bad at crying he
> > always used to make him cover his face with his hand and cry!!
>
> What is this? *Dev Anand* of all people, wasn't perfect? <grin>
:-D That was my attempt at objectivity...but since you pointed out...
I revert. Dev Anand **was** perfect!!!
> > >
> > > Agreed. BTW, what is unconventiona beauty??? Bipasha basu?? ;-)
> >
> > Yeah! I'm sure you guys really like her :-)
>
> Not all of "us guys"
There is still hope in this world!
Cheers
Ritu
Arjun Pandit
> > Huh? For Anyone who knew how to read english and had access to media,
> > it was a well known news around 87 ...
>
> So, everything written in gossipy film magazines is true??? They are
> published only to fool ignorant idiots like you.
Huh? Just a few threads back you were quoting Filmfare as if its some
bible. I have outgrown these mags (gossipy ones) but looks like as you
are growing older, you are becoming an ignorant idiot (quoting and
reading these gossipy mags arent you). could be due to a lot of free
time these days.
>
> > For all we know, you must be still be wearing diapers.
>
> And you pried on me somewhere to reach that conclusion????? Arjun
> Pandit 007 !!!!
If you think i pried on you then i must be right! Shridhar still moves
around in diapers.
>
> She herself confessed in an interview of hers in TV. Unlike your
> remote
> cave in Peoria, i have access to all indian television channels.
Even if I had access to all indian tv channels, I wouldnt have the
time like you to watch all this crap.
>
> Oh, you dream of me being in diapers????? Arjun Pervert 007 !!!
Boss, tera neeche wala aukat sabko malum hai. Even a pervert wont be
aroused.
>
> > HO HO HO. How many hits in %age did Sridebi have once Tezaab was out
>
> So a good performance depends on whether the movie is a hit, huh???
Werent you gloating about Yeh Raaste hai pyaar ke being a flop a few
threads back? So for you its all flop/hit, but others can talk
flop/hit.
> Going by your views,i think you must be one of those front-benchers
> giving taalis and whistles in some shoddy theatre in Mumbai whenever a
> heroine strips on screen !!!!!
Why should i fly down from my cave in peoria to mumbai to watch movies
in a mumbai theatre? I can rent a movie or watch a firang movie for
the stripping bit. You sure seem to be one confused soul in need of
dire help.
Shishir Yerramilli
>
> Yeah! I'm sure you guys really like her :-)
OK Ritu,you have been on my case thru out this entire thread but
this is the last straw!What is wrong with Bipasha Basu?
>
> > >
> > > btw guys, is it necessary to resort to profanity and gutter level
> > > exchanges to get our points across? Why should it bother us if Sridevi
> > > is Iyer, Iyenger, from AP, MP or Kashmir..
> >
> > See, we are just talking about their origins whats wrong with that????
> > But
> > a few idiots of course abuse the entire region/caste out of their
> > personal hatred. That is wrong. Otherwise, talking about origins is
> > usually fun!!!
>
> Yes, as long as you are making light-hearted remarks about
> idiosyncrasies of people of a particular region it's fun....
No,its not.Its fun if youre not from that region.Such remarks are
rarely light hearted .Is it fun if the remarks are based on
idiosyncracies which are further based on generalizations like,
Maharastrians lack enterprise,Andhrites are rude,Tamils are
oppurtunistic,Punjabis are materialistic,Kashmiris are cowardly etc.
> trashing people using their origins as a base to my mind is a dark
> ages mentality.
Only if you beleive that family and community and their influence on
an individual are outmoded dark age concepts.
>And usage of profanity at most time reflects poorly on
> the person using it rather than the person who is the target for
> it.... let's try and keep the newsgroup a decent place.
Gandhi said that an eye for an eye would make the entire world
blind.Well that perverted old geezer was shot dead.Its Lex Talionis
for me all the way,if Ravi Krishna or an other moron insults my family
I will cut him or her down to size.
>
> Regards,
> Ritu
rkus...@rogers.com
"Shishir Yerramilli" <yshi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>OK Ritu,you have been on my case thru out this entire thread but
>this is the last straw!What is wrong with Bipasha Basu?
Nothing wrong. In fact, compared to actressed from AP, who
get passed on to hindi films as beauties from down south,
Bipasah is damn good.
> if Ravi Krishna or an other moron insults my family
> I will cut him or her down to size.
yo idiot, that's what I did when u insulted Madhuri
and judging by the way u ran off from this thread
with ur tail between ur legs, I would consider
my job well done.
RK-
Ritu
> >
> > Yeah! I'm sure you guys really like her :-)
>
> OK Ritu,you have been on my case thru out this entire thread but
> this is the last straw!What is wrong with Bipasha Basu?
What is right with her?? :-)
> >
> > > >
> > > > btw guys, is it necessary to resort to profanity and gutter level
> > > > exchanges to get our points across? Why should it bother us if Sridevi
> > > > is Iyer, Iyenger, from AP, MP or Kashmir..
> > >
> > > See, we are just talking about their origins whats wrong with that????
> > > But
> > > a few idiots of course abuse the entire region/caste out of their
> > > personal hatred. That is wrong. Otherwise, talking about origins is
> > > usually fun!!!
> >
> > Yes, as long as you are making light-hearted remarks about
> > idiosyncrasies of people of a particular region it's fun....
>
> No,its not.Its fun if youre not from that region.Such remarks are
> rarely light hearted .Is it fun if the remarks are based on
> idiosyncracies which are further based on generalizations like,
> Maharastrians lack enterprise,Andhrites are rude,Tamils are
> oppurtunistic,Punjabis are materialistic,Kashmiris are cowardly etc.
Well, we do it all the time and the leg pulling is light-hearted.
Gujjus are Kanjoos, Panjus are loud... I know innumerable sardars who
crack sardar jokes themselves. I think over-sensitivity on these
issues is the bane of our existence.
> > trashing people using their origins as a base to my mind is a dark
> > ages mentality.
>
> Only if you beleive that family and community and their influence on
> an individual are outmoded dark age concepts.
They aren't, but intolerance towards people who are different is..My
statement was not that identification with roots is a dark ages
concept. My statement is that trashing people using their region,
religion, caste etc. is. Two different things absolutely.
>
> >And usage of profanity at most time reflects poorly on
> > the person using it rather than the person who is the target for
> > it.... let's try and keep the newsgroup a decent place.
>
> Gandhi said that an eye for an eye would make the entire world
> blind.Well that perverted old geezer was shot dead.Its Lex Talionis
> for me all the way,if Ravi Krishna or an other moron insults my family
> I will cut him or her down to size.
Yeah you insult his family in return. And then? He insults your family
a little more and you get back and in the process everyone else gets a
ringside view of the tamasha. Cool!. .who is the loser?
Regards,
Ritu
P.S Shishir, I don't know why you say I've been on your case on this
thread. I don't even remember who said what. I was simply reacting to
the profanity in the whole exchange.
yeskay
Ritu wrote:
>
> P.S Shishir, I don't know why you say I've been on your case on this
> thread. I don't even remember who said what. I was simply reacting to
> the profanity in the whole exchange.
As one who is just a passerby (viewing the Tamasha during boring
afternoons) it all started when Shishir called Madhuri a dancer in a
brothel and things got ugly when RK retaliated calling Sridevi the
same from an AP perspective which ticked Shishir off. Unlike Ritu, I
don't mind reading stuff like this.
rkus...@rogers.com
> As one who is just a passerby (viewing the Tamasha during boring
> afternoons) it all started when Shishir called Madhuri a dancer in a
> brothel and things got ugly when RK retaliated calling Sridevi the
> same from an AP perspective which ticked Shishir off. Unlike Ritu, I
> don't mind reading stuff like this.
thanks yeskay.
shishir started it and IMO deserved the abuse I gave him.
Like most APites I know, he seem to dislike MD just bcos she
dethroned Sridevi in HFM. As long as he kept his dislike
to a reasonable extent I didn't mind. Like this what he wrote:-
"
However how you seen Madhuri without make up?I
have had the misfortune in Dubai once.She can definitely pass of as an
Amma!Heck this was back in '92(Beta time!).
"
I was itching to get into a flame war by writing something unpalatable
about Sridevi, but I decided to let it go. After all it wasn't offending.
But calling her a slut was too much.
RK-
Shishir Yerramilli
lame comeback of yours was that Chiranjeevi couldnt make it in Hindi
films!I couldnt care less!
> RK-
rkus...@rogers.com
> No idiot.It is you who has refused to respond to my posts.The only
> lame comeback of yours was that Chiranjeevi couldnt make it in Hindi
> films!I couldnt care less!
Besides being a moron, r u blind also.
I didn't make any post on Chiranjeevi. That was Arjun Pandit.
Can't u see the header of that post.
RK-
Alok
> ganda...@rediffmail.com (Alok) wrote in message news:<65f93bfb.02052...@posting.google.com>...
> > What is this? *Dev Anand* of all people, wasn't perfect? <grin>
>
> :-D That was my attempt at objectivity...but since you pointed out...
> I revert. Dev Anand **was** perfect!!!
I see that your emphasis is on the word "was" and not "perfect"! :-)
BTW, does that mean that all the reviews that you posted here weren't objective? :-)
-Alok
Muqudar
<<I was itching to get into a flame war by writing something unpalatable
about Sridevi, but I decided to let it go. After all it wasn't offending.
But calling her a slut was too much.
>>
Too much kaise yaar? Kya Madhuri tumhari chachi hai??
Shishir Yerramilli
> "Shishir Yerramilli" <yshi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > No idiot.It is you who has refused to respond to my posts.The only
> > lame comeback of yours was that Chiranjeevi couldnt make it in Hindi
> > films!I couldnt care less!
>
> Besides being a moron, r u blind also.
Oops my oversight!
>
> I didn't make any post on Chiranjeevi. That was Arjun Pandit.
Oh well!I have to flame him also!
Shishir Yerramilli
> yshi...@hotmail.com (Shishir Yerramilli) wrote in message news:<370a0b0.02052...@posting.google.com>...
> > >
> > > I don't have to. I have already fucked you.
> > >
> > Stop having homosexual dreams like your Afghan heroes!
>
> Who do you have as your hero? Chiranjeevi? Its really amazing how
> gultis worship this ugly looking character. He got his butt royally
> kicked back to andhra land when he tried to enter hindi films.
Arjun Pandit,some of us have real heroes(read non film or athletic)
unlike you or that clown Ravi Krishna.I couldnt care less about
Chiranjeevi or escapades in Bollywood but for the record what did end
his career was that retard Mahesh Bhatt!About his being ugly there a
lot more objectionable looking people in the Hindi film industry
passing off as leading stars.Apparently for caste and complexion
obsessed Arjun Pandit ,Rishi Kapoor is the epitome of beauty!
Shishir Yerramilli
> > yshi...@hotmail.com (Shishir Yerramilli) wrote in message news:<370a0b0.02052...@posting.google.com>...
> > > <rkus...@rogers.com> wrote in message news:<acjdkh$q4r17$1...@ID-75254.news.dfncis.de>...
> > > > "Shishir Yerramilli" <yshi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > >
> > > > > Go fuck yourself RK!
> > > >
> > > > I don't have to. I have already fucked you.
> > > >
> > > Stop having homosexual dreams like your Afghan heroes!
> >
> > Who do you have as your hero? Chiranjeevi? Its really amazing how
> > gultis worship this ugly looking character. He got his butt royally
> > kicked back to andhra land when he tried to enter hindi films.
>
> did
> Aaj Ka Goonda Raj(again a hit). He atleast did his dubbing for his
> voice in Hindi, not like your iyengar hero Kamalahaasan who made a
> mockery of Hindi with his stupid accent in hindi films. Kamalahaasan
> was a major flop show in Hindi. He he he, he got his butt kicked in
> Canada recently(who asked him to ditch his orthodox name kamalahaasan
> and make it sound muslim). Of course, the less talked about Rajnikant
> the better(many hindi people call him a joker). Even Venkatesh
> delivered a hit in Anari as also Nagarjuna. I am no big fan of them
> but just trying to bring some factas to your ignorant hatred-filled
> mind.
>
>
> Shridhar
>
Dear Shridhar,
Thank you very much for your support.
> ps: Can Kamalahaasan iyengar ever do a Mohanlal in kireedam,
> Dashradham, Thaalavattam, Bharatam etc or Mamooty in all his
> award-winning films leave alone Jairam in his ripping coedies in
> Malayalam??? Heck, mahaan actor kamalahaasan had to rig the national
> awards to win one. And going by my Tamil friends in Chennai, Jairam
> kicked Kamal's ass badly in Thenali.
Arjun Pandit
> arjunpa...@indya.com (Arjun Pandit) wrote in message news:<246f4bf5.02052...@posting.google.com>...
> > yshi...@hotmail.com (Shishir Yerramilli) wrote in message news:<370a0b0.02052...@posting.google.com>...
> > > <rkus...@rogers.com> wrote in message news:<acjdkh$q4r17$1...@ID-75254.news.dfncis.de>...
> > > > "Shishir Yerramilli" <yshi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > >
> > > > > Go fuck yourself RK!
> > > >
> > > > I don't have to. I have already fucked you.
> > > >
> > > Stop having homosexual dreams like your Afghan heroes!
> >
> > Who do you have as your hero? Chiranjeevi? Its really amazing how
> > gultis worship this ugly looking character. He got his butt royally
> > kicked back to andhra land when he tried to enter hindi films.
>
> He did Pratibandh in Hindi which was a hit(a good film imo). He also
> did
> Aaj Ka Goonda Raj(again a hit).
Can you tell me why after 2 hits followed by a flop in Gentleman,
Chiranjeevi was never considered again? Really bad actors (around mid
90s) like Sunil Shetty survived innumerable flops and continue to get
offers. Bottom line, his ass was kicked so hard back to AP Land that
he could never come back.
> He atleast did his dubbing for his
> voice in Hindi, not like your iyengar hero Kamalahaasan who made a
> mockery of Hindi with his stupid accent in hindi films.
Who cares? You are making it appear as if I am some big fan of Kamal,
my views on him are well documented on RAMLI.
> Kamalahaasan
> was a major flop show in Hindi. He he he,
ho ho ho
> he got his butt kicked in
> Canada recently(who asked him to ditch his orthodox name kamalahaasan
> and make it sound muslim).
yeah, good. i enjoyed his butt getting kicked.
> Of course, the less talked about Rajnikant
> the better(many hindi people call him a joker).
you have lost it man.
> Shridhar
>
> ps: Can Kamalahaasan iyengar ever do a Mohanlal in kireedam,
> Dashradham, Thaalavattam, Bharatam etc or Mamooty in all his
> award-winning films
Ho ho ho
> Heck, mahaan actor kamalahaasan had to rig the national
> awards to win one.
yeah.
> And going by my Tamil friends in Chennai, Jairam
> kicked Kamal's ass badly in Thenali.
who cares.
Arjun Pandit
> arjunpa...@indya.com (Arjun Pandit) wrote in message news:<246f4bf5.02052...@posting.google.com>...
> > yshi...@hotmail.com (Shishir Yerramilli) wrote in message news:<370a0b0.02052...@posting.google.com>...
> > > <rkus...@rogers.com> wrote in message news:<acjdkh$q4r17$1...@ID-75254.news.dfncis.de>...
> > > > "Shishir Yerramilli" <yshi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > >
> > > > > Go fuck yourself RK!
> > > >
> > > > I don't have to. I have already fucked you.
> > > >
> > > Stop having homosexual dreams like your Afghan heroes!
> >
> > Who do you have as your hero? Chiranjeevi? Its really amazing how
> > gultis worship this ugly looking character. He got his butt royally
> > kicked back to andhra land when he tried to enter hindi films.
>
> Arjun Pandit,some of us have real heroes(read non film or athletic)
> unlike you or that clown Ravi Krishna.I couldnt care less about
> Chiranjeevi or escapades in Bollywood but for the record what did end
> his career was that retard Mahesh Bhatt!
A lot of other actors like Aamir, Shahrukh, have acted with that
"retard" and survived. Whether he is a retard or not, his movies are
definetely much more watchable compared to the gulti masala movies
full of crappy songs featuring fat women such as rambha and crappy
humor and crappy storylines which usually involve two biwis.
> passing off as leading stars.Apparently for caste and complexion
> obsessed Arjun Pandit ,Rishi Kapoor is the epitome of beauty!
Yawn.
rkus...@rogers.com
"Arjun Pandit" <arjunpa...@indya.com> wrote in message
> > He did Pratibandh in Hindi which was a hit(a good film imo). He also
> > did
> > Aaj Ka Goonda Raj(again a hit).
AP,
Aaj Ka Goonda Raj is a hit by only Shridhar standards. The same standards
in which Josh is considered a hit.
Pratibandh was a decent hit though.
Except for Pratibandh, Chiranjeevi has nothing else to show in Hindi movies.
He was rightly kicked back to AP.
RK-
Shishir Yerramilli
> > > Who do you have as your hero? Chiranjeevi? Its really amazing how
> > > gultis worship this ugly looking character. He got his butt royally
> > > kicked back to andhra land when he tried to enter hindi films.
> >
> > Arjun Pandit,some of us have real heroes(read non film or athletic)
> > unlike you or that clown Ravi Krishna.I couldnt care less about
> > Chiranjeevi or escapades in Bollywood but for the record what did end
> > his career was that retard Mahesh Bhatt!
>
> A lot of other actors like Aamir, Shahrukh, have acted with that
> "retard" and survived. Whether he is a retard or not, his movies are
> definetely much more watchable compared to the gulti masala movies
> full of crappy songs featuring fat women such as rambha and crappy
> humor and crappy storylines which usually involve two biwis.
Aamir and Shah Rukh were much established in the industry that
Chiranjeevi.No one denied that!However his direction for Gentlemen was
so inept that it was considered a fiasco!BTW a lot of these movies
with crappy songs with fat women have been whole heartedly plagiarised
in Hindi movies proving to be big hits!
>
> > passing off as leading stars.Apparently for caste and complexion
> > obsessed Arjun Pandit ,Rishi Kapoor is the epitome of beauty!
>
> Yawn.
I presume you meant to say 'Yum'!
Shishir Yerramilli
> yshi...@hotmail.com (Shishir Yerramilli) wrote in message news:<370a0b0.02052...@posting.google.com>...
>
> > to get a break.Your beloved MD is no exception ,what she did for Feroz
> > Khan and Mukul Anand is not a state secret!
>
> if MD did it to FK and MA, then Sridevi did to Jumping Jack, Anil
> Kapoor, his brother, Mithun whoever could get her a few films.
Of course FK and MA are just to name a few!There were also Indra
Kumar,Sooraj Barjatya(Yes Mr.Squeaky Clean himself).Also in Dubai she
paid a few nightly visits to a certain Mr.Dawood Ibrahim!
Shishir Yerramilli
>
> > vulgar
> > jhatkas!!!
>
> Bollywood movie watchers go to watch an actress's acting? Wow thats a
> new one for me. Anyway Sridebi has very few movies (or practically
> none is it if you leave out Sadma etc) like Tabu's (taking a more
> recent actress) Chandni Bar to demonstrate her acting or where people
> went to see the movie for her acting.
>
>
>
> > Madhuri couldn't even rule for 5 years. And she never
> > carried a successful film herself!!!!
> RK has more than answered this ... Beta/Raja were all one woman shows.
>
>
> > Devdas is an out and out
> > Shahrukh film as he
> > is the central character of the film.
>
> Pity really. After Saigal/Dilip Kumar, we have SRK essaying Devdas.
>
> > Only in your Mumbai-biased
> > dreamy world is it a Madhuri film(as confessed by herself in the
> > latest Filmfare issue..go and check it where she talks about her being
> > a guest role).
>
> Sorry, I dont care. Such movies are not for me. I cant releate to
> losers like Devdas who give up on their life for some babe ...
> especially when he is portrayed by another loser.
Shishir Yerramilli
> "yeskay" <new_...@NPSPAMyahoo.com> wrote
> > As one who is just a passerby (viewing the Tamasha during boring
> > afternoons) it all started when Shishir called Madhuri a dancer in a
> > brothel and things got ugly when RK retaliated calling Sridevi the
> > same from an AP perspective which ticked Shishir off. Unlike Ritu, I
> > don't mind reading stuff like this.
>
> thanks yeskay.
>
> shishir started it and IMO deserved the abuse I gave him.
>
> Like most APites I know, he seem to dislike MD just bcos she
> dethroned Sridevi in HFM. As long as he kept his dislike
> to a reasonable extent I didn't mind. Like this what he wrote:-
>
actresses are not from AP!Furthermore I am also a Brahmin!I dont like
MD because she is not a particularly good actress and she is actually
at best average looking as you have shown by digging up the post I
made below(as Selvan I think).
> "
> However how you seen Madhuri without make up?I
> have had the misfortune in Dubai once.She can definitely pass of as an
> Amma!Heck this was back in '92(Beta time!).
> "
>
> I was itching to get into a flame war by writing something unpalatable
> about Sridevi, but I decided to let it go. After all it wasn't offending.
> But calling her a slut was too much.
While we are in the business of digging up the past,here is an
instance of how a leapord changes its spots.Here is Ravi Krishna from
1996 where he is all praise for Telugu and hate for Tamil(which I
think he still indulges in!).Also he uses Sridevi to prove his point!
From: Ravi Krishna (rkri...@informix.com)
Subject: Re: South Indian Cultural Associations.....
Newsgroups: soc.culture.tamil
View: Complete Thread (17 articles) | Original Format
Date: 1996/04/16
Subbu Sundar wrote:
: What is painfull to me is to see most of these B's keep on putting
TAMIL
: down.
There is nothing great in tamil to be proud of. Just because it is
your
mother tongue will not make it a great language.
Anyonw who knows other languages , particularly the sweet sounding one
like Urdu, Telegu and Bengali will admit that tamil is indeed a harsh
sounding language. Who care for it's literature ( and other crap) if
it even
does not sound nice to ears. It is so harsh sounding. Once Sridevi
said in
an interview that in spite of living in Madras she hates tamil because
it is
so harsh sounding. Telegu is indeed a sweet language.
: This is what sickening. No respect for TAMIL. No support for TAMIL
cause.
There is no need to show repsect to tamil.
: B's would praise Malayalam, Telugu Kannada purely for its Sanskrit
: content.
What's wrong in praising other language if it is better then your own
mother
tongue.
: I do not think these people know any of thse language well enough to
: comment.
This statement fits you better because you THINK that tamil is a great
language. Please learn other languages , you will understand why I
say tamil
is harsh.
: The fact that TAMIL is an independent language really bothers B's.
They
: tried to TWIST fact tried and tried for a long TIME. Thank GOD truth
: succeded.
OH yeah, blatant lies has been passed on to generations as truth. Who
says
that tamil was taught by god. I think god will have much better taste
then
to promote tamil.
: It could be true that TELUGU is more suited for kirthanas. So what
let it
: be.
Nothing. It is just a simple fact that telegu is a better language.
: This attitude is what bothering me.
Fuck you.
: This is what I call an enemy within.
I would prefer an intelligent enemy to a idiot friend.
Imagine listening to Suprabath, kirthanas in tamil. YUK.
>
> RK-
rkus...@rogers.com
"Shishir Yerramilli" <yshi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> While we are in the business of digging up the past,here is an
> instance of how a leapord changes its spots.
Just like u r now licking the butt of Shridhar with whom u
have nasty flame wars in the past.
>Dear Shridhar,
>Thank you very much for your support.
Yup the same Shridhar of ASU who has written tons of crap against
AP and their movies back in 1996/97 and which irritated u big time
at that time.
rk-
Shishir Yerramilli
> yshi...@hotmail.com (Shishir Yerramilli) wrote in message news:<370a0b0.02052...@posting.google.com>...
> > > Agreed. BTW, what is unconventiona beauty??? Bipasha basu?? ;-)
> > >
> > > Yeah! I'm sure you guys really like her :-)
> >
> > OK Ritu,you have been on my case thru out this entire thread but
> > this is the last straw!What is wrong with Bipasha Basu?
>
> What is right with her?? :-)
>
> > >
> > No,its not.Its fun if youre not from that region.Such remarks are
> > rarely light hearted .Is it fun if the remarks are based on
> > idiosyncracies which are further based on generalizations like,
> > Maharastrians lack enterprise,Andhrites are rude,Tamils are
> > oppurtunistic,Punjabis are materialistic,Kashmiris are cowardly etc.
>
> Well, we do it all the time and the leg pulling is light-hearted.
> Gujjus are Kanjoos, Panjus are loud... I know innumerable sardars who
> crack sardar jokes themselves. I think over-sensitivity on these
> issues is the bane of our existence.
That may be so!But refusing to acknowledge that people are over
sensitive makes it worse!I personally can appreciate any jokes about
my community eg satire or even stereotypes if they are done with sole
purpose of humor or even as a way examining the community.But I was
surprised that when the film Ashoka was released ,it was protested in
Orissa(the Kalinga that Ashoka ravaged was mostly presesnt day Orissa
and Northern AP) ,though by no means a very significant one,there are
some people who want to rekindle over 2100 year old rivalries most
people dont even know existed!My point is that there are always people
looking for something to hate!
>
> > > trashing people using their origins as a base to my mind is a dark
> > > ages mentality.
> >
> > Only if you beleive that family and community and their influence on
> > an individual are outmoded dark age concepts.
>
> They aren't, but intolerance towards people who are different is..My
> statement was not that identification with roots is a dark ages
> concept. My statement is that trashing people using their region,
> religion, caste etc. is. Two different things absolutely.
>
These things you mention are all building blocks of nations and
societies,in a multicultural society like India,I do understand that
criticism of a person based on this criteria is inevitable.I do not
condone it but I dont think it is a 'dark ages' concept.
>
> >
> > >And usage of profanity at most time reflects poorly on
> > > the person using it rather than the person who is the target for
> > > it.... let's try and keep the newsgroup a decent place.
> >
> > Gandhi said that an eye for an eye would make the entire world
> > blind.Well that perverted old geezer was shot dead.Its Lex Talionis
> > for me all the way,if Ravi Krishna or an other moron insults my family
> > I will cut him or her down to size.
>
> Yeah you insult his family in return. And then? He insults your family
> a little more and you get back and in the process everyone else gets a
> ringside view of the tamasha. Cool!. .who is the loser?
I beleive that person who enjoys the tamasha degrades himself as
much!I dont care what people really think when I am dishing out
justice!
>
> Regards,
> Ritu
>
> P.S Shishir, I don't know why you say I've been on your case on this
> thread. I don't even remember who said what. I was simply reacting to
> the profanity in the whole exchange.
All right!I retract that allegation!
rkus...@rogers.com
> While we are in the business of digging up the past,here is an
> instance of how a leapord changes its spots.Here is Ravi Krishna from
> 1996 where he is all praise for Telugu and hate for Tamil(which I
> think he still indulges in!).Also he uses Sridevi to prove his point!
U can be from AP but your favourite actresses are not be from AP,
which u proudly claim.
I can be a tamil but I can not like non tamil languages in music or
poetry. what logic is this.
And how am I defending Sridevi in this case. I just quoted her,
which I agree to large extent.
RK-
rkus...@rogers.com
"Shishir Yerramilli" <yshi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> Of course FK and MA are just to name a few!There were also Indra
> Kumar,Sooraj Barjatya(Yes Mr.Squeaky Clean himself).Also in Dubai she
> paid a few nightly visits to a certain Mr.Dawood Ibrahim!
just like Sridevi started her sex life with regular 'servicing'
from Bharataraja, KB Balachandran and god knows how many
reddys and raos of AP.
So what is ur point.
If you want us to believe that Sridevi was a paragon of virtue and
Madhuri a slut, then please go and tell a gult. He will be the only
person to believe it.
RK-
rkus...@rogers.com
> However his direction for Gentlemen was
> so inept that it was considered a fiasco!
I have seen both tamil version and hindi version
of Gentlemen and there was no difference. The only difference
was the tamil version appealed to the masses bcos of the
topic (capitation fee college). In the hindi belt
such topic is not sensitive and it hardly appeals to them.
Notice that India and Hindustani were both hits in tamil and hindi
version, bcos the topic (corruption) appeals to all indians.
> BTW a lot of these movies
> with crappy songs with fat women have been whole heartedly plagiarised
> in Hindi movies proving to be big hits!
Absolutely. And do u know the reason. Bcos gult film makers have
spoiled the taste of hindi movie goers. this as told by your new
best friend shridhar in 1997.
RK-
Shishir Yerramilli
Yes so what! I have also defended you against Shridhar once when he
flamed you.You send me an email thanking me for it!I have enough class
not to view that as butt licking!
>
> rk-
Shishir Yerramilli
> "Shishir Yerramilli" <yshi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > While we are in the business of digging up the past,here is an
> > instance of how a leapord changes its spots.Here is Ravi Krishna from
> > 1996 where he is all praise for Telugu and hate for Tamil(which I
> > think he still indulges in!).Also he uses Sridevi to prove his point!
>
> U can be from AP but your favourite actresses are not be from AP,
> which u proudly claim.
It is neither pride nor shame,its just the way it is!
> I can be a tamil but I can not like non tamil languages in music or
> poetry. what logic is this.
Hmm.You dont like the people but apparently love the language and
quote an actress you abhor to express your affection for the
language.Great logic indeed!
Shishir Yerramilli
> "Shishir Yerramilli" <yshi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message >
>
> > However his direction for Gentlemen was
> > so inept that it was considered a fiasco!
>
> I have seen both tamil version and hindi version
> of Gentlemen and there was no difference.
No there was.Mahesh Bhatt inspite of almost scene to scene copying
,the direction was rambling and inept.I like some Mahesh Bhatt movies
but definitely not the high budget ones.Now Shankar is not a genius
but he is far superior to Mahesh Bhatt!
The only difference
> was the tamil version appealed to the masses bcos of the
> topic (capitation fee college). In the hindi belt
> such topic is not sensitive and it hardly appeals to them.
>
> Notice that India and Hindustani were both hits in tamil and hindi
> version, bcos the topic (corruption) appeals to all indians.
>
> > BTW a lot of these movies
> > with crappy songs with fat women have been whole heartedly plagiarised
> > in Hindi movies proving to be big hits!
>
> Absolutely. And do u know the reason. Bcos gult film makers have
> spoiled the taste of hindi movie goers. this as told by your new
> best friend shridhar in 1997.
>
Are Hindi film goers a bunch of brain dead sheep that they can
'spoiled' by these foreign tastes!In that case blame K.Vishwanath and
Ram Gopal Varma and now Mani Shankar for wrecking the tastes of the
Hindi audience!
> RK-
rkus...@rogers.com
>Hmm.You dont like the people but apparently love the language and
>quote an actress you abhor to express your affection for the
>language.Great logic indeed!
I know tons of indians who hate muslims (and I really mean hate)
but love Urdu for its poetry and ghazal, specially punjabis.
So u can shove ur logic up <you-know-where>.
And BTW I don't hate APite. I don't go after them unprovoked.
Why should I hate them. What have they done to me.
I don't post in their newsgroup. And I know
certain indians who keep posting in soc.culture.israel or jew.
Ah, must be out of love :-)
But yes, some flaming is necessary to keep some morons in check.
I care a f**t if u consider me anti gult or whatever.
RK-
rkus...@rogers.com
>I have enough class not to view that as butt licking!
u mean the same class where u call Madhuri a slut purely bcos of dislike.
I need to refer to dictionary to know the meaning of class.
RK-
Shridhar
> Can you tell me why after 2 hits followed by a flop in Gentleman,
> Chiranjeevi was never considered again?
Because he decided to stick to Telugu films. Which is better
considering he has a good market there and there is no guarantee of
the way he will be treated in the Hindi film industry.
> Really bad actors (around mid
> 90s) like Sunil Shetty survived innumerable flops
He acted very well in Mohra, Dhadkan, Jungle, Hera pheri etc and has
acted better than Akshay Kumar in all their films together . Of
course, idiots like this can't comprehend this because you are
ignorant enough to idolise media-created one-hit superstars
like chikna roshan.
> Who cares? You are making it appear as if I am some big fan of Kamal,
iyengar..value chain..ha ha ha.
> Ho ho ho
Consult a doc if you have got cough!!!
> who cares.
iyengar..valuie chain..ha ha ha.
Shridhar
Shishir Yerramilli
> "Shishir Yerramilli" <yshi...@hotmail.com> wrote
>
> >Hmm.You dont like the people but apparently love the language and
> >quote an actress you abhor to express your affection for the
> >language.Great logic indeed!
>
> I know tons of indians who hate muslims (and I really mean hate)
> but love Urdu for its poetry and ghazal, specially punjabis.
> So u can shove ur logic up <you-know-where>.
stuffed inside you anyway!
>
> And BTW I don't hate APite. I don't go after them unprovoked.
> Why should I hate them. What have they done to me.
>
> I don't post in their newsgroup. And I know
> certain indians who keep posting in soc.culture.israel or jew.
> Ah, must be out of love :-)
Love,interest,support and so on...
>
> But yes, some flaming is necessary to keep some morons in check.
> I care a f**t if u consider me anti gult or whatever.
Now I dont think your opinions carry any gravity anyway so I dont
really care!
>
> RK-
Shishir Yerramilli
> "Shishir Yerramilli" <yshi...@hotmail.com> wrote:-
>
> >I have enough class not to view that as butt licking!
>
> u mean the same class where u call Madhuri a slut purely bcos of dislike.
Again I didnt call her a slut initially!
>
> I need to refer to dictionary to know the meaning of class.
I have no trouble beleiving this!
>
> RK-
Muqudar
Sridevi has the looks, can act and dance well.
Madhuri... can dance.>>
THANK YOU. The discussion stops here.