Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

REVIEW: She Male Yum Takes On Black Transsexuals

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Voyager

unread,
Sep 25, 2002, 11:33:53 AM9/25/02
to
She Male Yum Takes On Black Transsexuals

Da Girls: Destiny, Lisa Cage, Ivy, Simone, Chanel
Da Guys: One S.O. of one of the girls and the interviewer

Production Co:. Scarlet-Tower
Release Date: August 2002

Boxcover Eyecandy:
http://jadedvideo.com/yz_result.asp?PRODUCT_ID=69074

Rating: 3.0 out of 4.0, not so much for the quality of the girls but
the presentation of the product. Upgrade the quality of the girls and
production values and this would be a no-brainer.

Summary:
Very similar in nature to Ed Power's Dirty Debutante's series,
however, without the "Mr. Ed" part. She Male Yum's website has one of
the largest stables of she males around.
http://www.shemaleyum.com/shemale/apreview01.html

5 girls, all amerikan black she males. Our cuntry has slipped in the
world, and like so many things, our she males available for smut are
only second in quality at best, to Brazil. While all the girls
displayed a feminine nature, a few were scary when viewed up close.
Ivy (who has been in a Rogue Adventures video),
http://www.shemaleyum.com/shemale/2002/may/ivy.jpg
Chanel and to a lesser extent Simon were the most feminine looking and
acting. Lisa was more full figured and Destiny basically was a thin
male with lipstick on. Also, the blackploitation afro wig Destiny was
wearing creeped me out.

Only Lisa had bolt-ons and she did not go overboard with them. The
other girls had either well formed A or B cups, with hard nipples.
Destiny was without. One of the girls, was able to lactate.

Virtually all of the girls had lower appendages which would put Lex,
goofy Napier and the rest of the male black and white parolees to
shame.

What I liked about the video was the presentation. Yes, the video
quality and sound could have been upgraded to Robert Hill Releasing
quality (a boom mike salesperson, if they called upon the porn
industry would make a killing in sales!).

Each scene started out starkly with the camera focusing on the girl.
She either started out fully dressed, or in tasteful lingerie. Off
camera there was a basic non-goofie-ass-Ed interview where you got
some intel on the girl. Then the girls would go into a rather long
well done preening session 10-20 minutes long, where she might
occasionally talk to the viewer.

In 4 out of the 5 scenes, the last 10-15 minutes of the scene, the
girl would suck the guy, interspersed with more preening, back to
sucking, then the guy would fuck her. The guy being apparently the
cameraman/director. You never see his face and really not much of his
pudgy-lily-white-hairy-body (some things have to stay constant at
least in porn!).

Aside from his initial interviewing questions, you never hear his
voice again, until the bye-bye talkie at the end of the scene. The
guy, takes on average 45 seconds to whack off on the girls (I guess if
we can't see the parolee's face when he cums, it is an axiom in porn,
we need to see the sacred way-too-long parolee manipulating his member
adoration session). Prior to cumming a few of the times the girl was
trying to bring him to completion with her hand or mouth, but in true
porn fashion the guy had to take over. Here is a clue to the
pornmeisters.

... Always, always, let the girls do the heavy lifting.

I believe there was only one facial, most of the time the guy shot on
the girl's chest. The majority of the girls also shot either before or
after the cameraman/director, though some were in the phantom range,
some would put Peter North to shame.

Simone and her S.O. of 1 1/2 years did a no-condom scene. It was very
well done, lots of kissing, fondling, no choke fucking, slapping, or
asking "Whose Your Daddy?" type activity. This guy briefly rimmed her
ass and sucked her for awhile. Aside from this, there was no "gay sex"
among the participants in the video.

Basically, the 5 scenes were long, about 30 minutes each, leading to
about a 2.5 hour video. Well focused upon the girl.
There were lengthy screeners at the beginning of the video for other
offerings...
http://jadedvideo.com/yz_result.asp?PRODUCT_ID=64255
http://jadedvideo.com/yz_result.asp?PRODUCT_ID=61621
---------------------------------------------------------------------
** rec.arts.movies.erotica FAQ at http://www.rame.net/faq **
** internet adult film database at http://www.iafd.com **

ChodeMasterJ

unread,
Sep 26, 2002, 4:45:06 AM9/26/02
to
>She Male Yum Takes On Black Transsexuals
>

man, you need to get the "SheMale Yum Takes on Brazilian girls". review that
and let us know if it's worth buying.

James
------------
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wandacurtis/
"I'd trade it all for just a little peace of mind"
Tool, 'Pushit'

Voyager

unread,
Sep 27, 2002, 12:58:12 AM9/27/02
to
They showed a fairly long screener prior to the main attraction of the
Brazilian girl video. There seemed to have some lookers in it, among
one of them was "Dany". I wonder how they treat the interview session
with the language barrier?


On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 04:45:06 EDT, chodem...@aol.com (ChodeMasterJ)
wrote:

ChodeMasterJ

unread,
Sep 28, 2002, 2:57:26 AM9/28/02
to
>They showed a fairly long screener prior to the main attraction of the
>Brazilian girl video. There seemed to have some lookers in it, among
>one of them was "Dany". I wonder how they treat the interview session
>with the language barrier?
>

I might buy it then....
In Rogue #5, they had subtitles of Patricia Araujo saying "Fuck me. I'm a
whore." Maybe they'll do something like that???

kinda OT, but I was watching this Pride DVD (alot like UFC) and they had people
from all over the world fighting and they had subtitles during their
interviews.

0 new messages