Review: Serving Up Richard (2012)

Skip to first unread message

Mark Leeper

Sep 5, 2012, 3:38:22 PM9/5/12
(a film review by Mark R. Leeper)

CAPSULE: What begins as a dark comedy becomes a grim
psychological horror film with a battle of wits between
the Hutchins couple who perform ancient Mesoamerican
blood rituals including cannibalism and their captive,
a man of whom they intend to make a meal. From his
cage, a prison cell set up in the Hutchins house,
Richard Reubens plays a cat-and-mouse game. Written
and directed by veteran TV actor Henry Olek, the film
has moments of tension, but moves too slowly in the
middle act. Rating: +1 (-4 to +4) or 6/10

Richard (played by Ross McCall) had thought the dog-eat-dog world
of finance was bad. Now he is in a world of people-eat-people.
Until recently Richard worked for a failing Wall Street firm. He
had kept secret from his fellow workers that the company was going
under and they were all to lose their jobs. The collapse came and
Richard feels guilty. Wanting to distract himself from his guilt
he is getting himself a flashy vintage Ford Mustang. He is going
to answer an ad for the car, and as he later reflects "the smallest
decisions lead to your biggest mistakes." The Mustang is being
sold by Everett Hutchins (Jude Ciccolella) an anthropologist and
expert on pre-Columbian Zapotec culture. The offer is, however, a
trap and a blowgun dart puts Richard in a prison cell built in the
Hutchins house. The Hutchins it seems have revived and perform
Zapotec rituals here in the comfort in what seems like a pleasant
suburban house. Susan Priver, the executive producer of SERVING UP
RICHARD, plays Glory Hutchins, a sort of child-woman trying to be
as pleasant as possible to the man she will be preparing as food.
Richard immediately sees her childish qualities as useful and may
be the key to a possible escape. This possibility becomes even
more promising when Everett goes alone on a six-week trip leaving
Richard in the custody of Glory. But the question is whether Glory
is strong enough to be of any help and at the same time
impressionable enough to be turned to being willing to help

SERVING UP RICHARD is at its best when it seems to have a sense of
humor in the first act. It effects something of the tone of EATING
RAOUL (1982). But there is nobody in this film who can sustain the
gruesome silliness like Paul Bartel and Mary Woronov did in that
film. So there is a bit of fun with the concept, but that dries up
and is replaced by a serious contest of wills between Richard and
the Hutchins. The film is a little slow in the second act then,
waiting for tension to grab the viewer, though little true tension
is generated. The script, written by director Olek from a story by
Jay Longshore, hints at undefined supernatural shamanist powers
from Everett, but the evidence is ambiguous. This film is clearly
shot on a low budget with very little shot outside of the films
main set, apparently a living room cut in half by prison bars.
Almost all could have been filmed in and around a real suburban
home. Beyond that the film has only four characters who interact
and are around for more than a moment. The film could very easily
be adapted into a stage play.

SERVING UP RICHARD is something of a mixed bag of an apparently
whimsical film title and concept, some over-the-top gory images,
and a serious conflict of attitudes and acting. To some extent it
has the feel of an old EC comic like "Tales from the Crypt". A man
does some bad things and then is thrown into a horrific situation
completely unrelated to his crimes, but indicating that the
Universe has a nasty sense of justice. At the same time it is a
film of the present where the crime is topical financial chicanery.
This is not the stuff of a solid, serious film. But SERVING UP
RICHARD has its moments of fun and does keep the viewer guessing
where it will be going. I rate it a +1 on the -4 to +4 scale or

Film Credits: <>

What others are saying:

Mark R. Leeper
Copyright 2012 Mark R. Leeper
Reply all
Reply to author
0 new messages